Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Radiol ; 96(1143): 20220413, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment outcomes in patients from a low-middle income country (LMIC) with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT/S). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 254 patients (median follow-up: 53 months) met our inclusion criteria. Out-of-field nodal regions were determined by reviewing individual radiotherapy plans. Cox regression modelling was performed to analyze overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), while pathological complete response (pCR) prediction utilized Poisson regression. RESULTS: The median OS was 71.4 months (interquartile range: 19.6-∞), RFS did not reach the median and pCR rate was 46%. On multivariable Cox regression, BMI [0.93 (0.89-0.98); 0.94 (0.89-0.99)] and absence of out-of-field node with extranodal extension (ENE)[0.22 (0.09-0.53); 0.30 (0.12-0.75)] influenced OS and RFS, respectively. Age [1.03 (1.01-1.06)], nodal stage [cN2-3 vs cN0: 2.67 (1.08-6.57)] and adventitial involvement [2.54 (1.36-4.72)] also influenced OS, while involved margins [3.12 (1.24-7.81)] influenced RFS. On multivariable Poisson regression, non-CROSS-chemotherapy regimens [0.65 (0.44-0.95)] and residual primary disease on pre-surgical imaging [0.73 (0.57-0.93)] were significantly associated with pCR. The most frequently involved in-field and out-of-field nodal regions were the periesophageal and perigastric (greater and lesser curvature) regions, respectively. CONCLUSION: NACRT/S is feasible and effective in patients from LMIC. Out-of-field ENE merits further investigation as a prognostic factor since it significantly influenced both OS and RFS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The results of clinical trials are replicable in LMICs. Out-of-field ENE is an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Combined Modality Therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging
2.
BJR Open ; 2(1): 20200007, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330831

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study compares planning techniques stratified by consensus delineation guidelines in patients undergoing whole-breast radiotherapy based on an objective plan quality assessment scale. METHODS: 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer were randomly selected, and target delineation for intact breast was performed using Tangent (RTOG 0413), ESTRO, and RTOG guidelines. Consensus Plan Quality Metric (PQM) scoring was defined and communicated to the physicist before commencing treatment planning. Field-in-field IMRT (FiF), inverse IMRT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created for each delineation. Statistical analyses utilised a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, after applying a Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Total PQM score of plans for Tangent and ESTRO were comparable for FiF and IMRT techniques (FiF vs IMRT for Tangent, p = 0.637; FiF vs IMRT for ESTRO, p = 0.304), and were also significantly higher compared to VMAT. Total PQM score of plans for RTOG revealed that IMRT planning achieved a significantly higher score compared to both FiF and VMAT (IMRT vs FiF, p < 0.001; IMRT vs VMAT, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Total PQM scores were equivalent for FiF and IMRT for both Tangent and ESTRO delineations, whereas IMRT was best suited for RTOG delineation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: FiF and IMRT planning techniques are best suited for ESTRO or Tangent delineations. IMRT also yields better results with RTOG delineation.

3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32826266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the survival of patients with malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERF) and perform a comparative effectiveness analysis of ERF-directed interventions. METHODS: Fifty-five patients met our inclusion criteria, and data on ERF-directed interventions (stent placement, surgical repair and best supportive care) and their outcomes, along with clinical and treatment details, were recorded. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and survival after developing ERF (F-OS). RESULTS: The median OS and F-OS for the entire cohort was 299 days (SE=23.2) and 123 days (SE=11.63), respectively. On univariable analysis, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (I-III vs IV) influenced both OS (403 vs 171 days; p=0.006) and F-OS (129 vs 67 days; p=0.034). Proximal location of ERF influenced OS favourably (494 vs 285 days; p=0.021), whereas patients developing ERF late in their disease course experienced inferior F-OS (96 vs 232 days; p=0.03). On multivariable analysis, the AJCC stage (IV vs I-III, HR=3.03 (1.41-6.50)), time to developing ERF from diagnosis (greater than vs within 3 months, HR=5.82 (1.84-18.36)) and location of ERF (distal vs proximal, HR=2.47 (1.14-5.34)) had a significant impact on F-OS. The comparative efficacy (OS and F-OS) of best supportive care was statistically equivalent to any intervention irrespective of AJCC stage and success/failure of initial or subsequent intervention(s). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with ERF is dismal, and our analysis suggests that best supportive care results in equivalent OS and F-OS when compared with any intervention.

4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(3)2019 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30902839

ABSTRACT

A middle-aged man presented with progressively worsening breathlessness and non-productive cough for the last 3 months. On examination, his breathing was stridulous and air entry was decreased bilaterally. He underwent emergency fibre-optic bronchoscopy, which revealed a tracheal growth causing luminal narrowing, and after tumour debulking, he improved symptomatically. Histopathological evaluation of the specimen revealed an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea, and systemic evaluation revealed metastatic dissemination. Systemic molecular-targeted therapy was initiated (gefitinib and later imatinib mesylate) and continued for 5 years, in view of stable disease on periodic follow-up. He subsequently presented with breathlessness again, which was managed with an emergency tracheostomy. In view of stable systemic disease and local progression only, he received definitive radiotherapy with image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy, which resulted in a complete radiological response. The patient has been disease-free for the last 9 months.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Tracheal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...