Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 29(1): 31-39, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29098347

ABSTRACT

We conducted a meta-analysis of prospective studies to assess the association between BMI and incident vertebral fracture. We found that as body mass index (BMI) increases, the risk of vertebral fracture decreases in men, but not in women, suggesting possible gender differences in the relationship of BMI with risk of vertebral fracture. INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that the relationship between BMI and fracture risk may be site-specific. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies to investigate the association between BMI and risk of incident vertebral fracture. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles published from inception through February 15, 2017. Extracted relative risks (RR) from the prospective studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Six studies were included, with a total of 105,129 participants followed for 3 to 19 years. The pooled RR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for vertebral fracture per each standard deviation increase in BMI was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.80-1.10) with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 88.0%, p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis by gender, we found a significant inverse association between BMI and risk of vertebral fracture in men (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73-0.98, n = 25,617 participants) but not in women (RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.81-1.20, n = 79,512 participants). Across studies of women not adjusting for bone mineral density (BMD), there was no significant association between BMI and risk of vertebral fracture (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.80-1.04, p = 0.18, n = 72,755 participants). However, BMI was associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture in studies of women that adjusted for BMD (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17-1.40, p < 0.001, n = 6757 participants). Substantial heterogeneity was found among studies of women (I 2 = 90.1%, p < 0.001), which was partly explained by the adjustment for BMD (adjusted R 2 = 61%). We found no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our findings suggest that there might be gender differences in the relationship of BMI with risk of vertebral fracture. Further research is needed, including the assessment of other measures of adiposity, such as visceral adiposity, on the risk of vertebral fracture.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology , Spinal Fractures/physiopathology , Bone Density/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Publication Bias , Risk Assessment/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 25(8): 2047-56, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24803331

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Some recent reports suggest that calcium supplement use may increase risk of cardiovascular disease. In a prospective cohort study of 74,245 women in the Nurses' Health Study with 24 years of follow-up, we found no independent associations between supplemental calcium intake and risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. INTRODUCTION: Some recent reports suggest that calcium supplements may increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The objective was to examine the independent associations between calcium supplement use and risk of CVD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of supplemental calcium use and incident CVD in 74,245 women in the Nurses' Health Study (1984-2008) free of CVD and cancer at baseline. Calcium supplement intake was assessed every 4 years. Outcomes were incident CHD (nonfatal or fatal MI) and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), confirmed by medical record review. RESULTS: During 24 years of follow-up, 4,565 cardiovascular events occurred (2,709 CHD and 1,856 strokes). At baseline, women who took calcium supplements had higher levels of physical activity, smoked less, and had lower trans fat intake compared with those who did not take calcium supplements. After multivariable adjustment for age, body mass index, dietary calcium, vitamin D intake, and other CVD risk factors, the relative risk of CVD for women taking >1,000 mg/day of calcium supplements compared with none was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 to 0.92; p for trend <0.001). For women taking >1,000 mg/day of calcium supplements compared with none, the multivariable-adjusted relative risk for CHD was 0.71 (0.61 to 0.83; p for trend < 0.001) and for stroke was 1.03 (0.87 to 1.21; p for trend = 0.61). The relative risks were similar in analyses limited to non-smokers, women without hypertension, and women who had regular physical exams. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the hypothesis that calcium supplement intake increases CVD risk in women.


Subject(s)
Calcium/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Adult , Body Mass Index , Calcium/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/chemically induced , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke/chemically induced , Stroke/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(6): 1727-36, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21932115

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Many determinants of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are unknown. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), numerous factors not classically associated with calcium-phosphorus homeostasis, such as uric acid and smoking, are independently associated with PTH in adults without chronic kidney disease. Associations between serum phosphorus and PTH may vary by race. INTRODUCTION: Although PTH may be an important biomarker for osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, many determinants of PTH are unknown. We investigated associations between demographic, dietary, and serum factors and PTH level. METHODS: We studied 4,026 white, 1,792 black, and 1,834 Mexican-American adult participants without chronic kidney disease from the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 NHANES. RESULTS: The mean serum PTH level was 38.3 pg/ml for whites, 42.6 pg/ml for blacks, and 41.3 pg/ml for Mexican-Americans. After adjusting for diet, body mass index, serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, creatinine, and other factors, smokers compared to non-smokers had lower PTH, ranging from -4.2 pg/ml (95% confidence interval (CI) -7.3 to -1.1) in Mexican-Americans to -6.1 pg/ml (95% CI -8.7 to -3.5) in blacks. After multivariate adjustment, PTH was higher in females compared to males, ranging from 1.1 pg/ml (95% CI -1.2 to 3.4) in Mexican-Americans to 4.5 pg/ml (95% CI 1.9 to 7.0) in blacks, and in older (>60 years) compared to younger participants (<30 years), ranging from 3.7 pg/ml (95% CI 1.3 to 6.1) in Mexican-Americans to 8.0 pg/ml (95% CI 5.4 to 10.7) in blacks. Higher uric acid was associated with higher PTH. In whites only, lower serum phosphorus and lower serum retinol were associated with higher PTH. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous factors not classically associated with calcium-phosphorus homeostasis are independently associated with PTH and should be considered in future studies of PTH and chronic disease. Additional research is needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying identified associations with PTH and to explore possible racial differences in phosphorus handling.


Subject(s)
Nutrition Surveys , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Adult , Age Factors , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Demography , Diet , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Mexican Americans/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Uric Acid/blood , Vitamin A/blood , White People/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL