Inequities in adolescent sleep health in Aotearoa New Zealand: Cross-sectional survey findings.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate ethnic inequities in, and social determinants of, adolescent sleep health in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: Analysis of self-report data from a cross-sectional survey of secondary school students (12- to 18-year-olds). Analyses included weighted prevalence estimates of good and poor sleep health stratified by ethnicity, and multivariable logistic regression models concurrently adjusted for ethnicity, school year, gender, rurality, neighborhood deprivation, school decile, housing deprivation, sleeping elsewhere due to lack of adequate housing, unsafe environment, and racism. RESULTS: Inequities in social determinants of health were evident for Maori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand; n = 1528) and minoritized (Pacific n = 1204; Asian n = 1927; Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African [MELAA] n = 210; and 'Other' ethnicity n = 225) adolescents. A greater proportion of Maori, Pacific, Asian, MELAA, and 'Other' adolescents had short sleep, compared to European (n = 3070). Maori, Pacific, Asian, and MELAA adolescents were more likely to report late bedtimes (after midnight), and Maori, Pacific, and 'Other' adolescents were more likely to report early waketimes (5 AM-6 AM or earlier), on school days. Rurality, neighborhood deprivation, school-level deprivation, housing deprivation, sleeping elsewhere due to inadequate housing, unsafe environments, and racism partially, but not fully, explained associations between ethnicity and short sleep, late bedtimes, and early waketimes. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic inequities exist in adolescent sleep health in Aotearoa New Zealand. Socio-political actions are needed to address racism and colonialism as root causes of ethnic inequities in adolescent sleep, to ensure all young people are afforded the basic human right of good sleep health and associated mental and physical well-being.

Examining the impact of COVID-19 on Maori:non-Maori health inequities in Aotearoa, New Zealand: an observational study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had both direct and indirect impacts on the health of populations worldwide. While racial/ethnic health inequities in COVID-19 infection are now well known (and ongoing), knowledge about the impact of COVID-19 pandemic management on non-COVID-19-related outcomes for Indigenous peoples is less well understood. This article presents the study protocol for the Health Research Council of New Zealand funded project 'Ma te Mohio ka Marama: Impact of COVID-19 on Maori:non-Maori inequities'. The study aims to explore changes in access to healthcare, quality of healthcare and health outcomes for Maori, the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) and non-Maori during the COVID-19 outbreak period across NZ. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This observational study is framed within a Kaupapa Maori research positioning that includes Kaupapa Maori epidemiology. National datasets will be used to report on access to healthcare, quality of healthcare and health outcomes between Maori and non-Maori during the COVID-19 pandemic in NZ. Study periods are defined as (a) prepandemic period (2015-2019), (b) first pandemic year without COVID-19 vaccines (2020) and (c) pandemic period with COVID-19 vaccines (2021 onwards). Regional and national differences between Maori and non-Maori will be explored in two phases focused on identified health priority areas for NZ including (1) mortality, cancer, long-term conditions, first 1000 days, mental health and (2) rheumatic fever. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical approval from the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC AH26253). An advisory group will work with the project team to disseminate the findings of this project via project-specific meetings, peer-reviewed publications and a project-specific website. The overall intention of the project is to highlight areas requiring health policy and practice interventions to address Indigenous inequities in health resulting from COVID-19 pandemic management (both historical and in the future).

Do I care for you more when you really need help? An experimental test of the effect of clinical urgency on compassion in health care.

OBJECTIVES: To experimentally investigate whether more urgent patient presentations elicit greater compassion from health care professionals than less urgent, facilitating future research and thinking to address systemic barriers to compassion in health care. DESIGN: This is a pre-registered online study with an experimental, within-subjects repeated-measure study design. Two clinical vignettes that systematically varied the urgency of patient presentation were utilized. Both vignettes depicted a patient with difficult behaviours typically associated with lower compassion. METHODS: Health care professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health practitioners) recruited from all 20 District Health Boards across Aotearoa/New Zealand completed two vignettes in a counterbalanced order. Paired-sample t-tests were used to test the effect of the presentation urgency on indices of compassion. RESULTS: A total of 939 participants completed the vignettes (20% doctors, 47%, nurses and 33% allied health professionals). As expected, participants reported greater care and motivation to help the more urgent patient. However, the more urgent patient was also perceived as less difficult, and exploratory analyses showed that perceived patient difficulty was associated with lower caring and motivation to help, particularly in the less urgent patient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first work to experimentally test the relationship between the urgency of patient presentation and compassion in health care. Although the association between urgency and difficulty is complex, our findings are consonant with evolutionary views in which urgent distress elicits greater compassion. A system-wide orientation towards efficiency and urgency may exacerbate this 'bias' which must be addressed to ensure more equitable compassion in health care.

Sleep inequities and associations between poor sleep and mental health for school-aged children: findings from the New Zealand Health Survey.

In Aotearoa/New Zealand, ethnic inequities in sleep health exist for young children and adults and are largely explained by inequities in socioeconomic deprivation. Poor sleep is related to poor mental health for these age groups but whether sleep inequities and associations with mental health exist for school-aged children is unclear. We aimed to (1) determine the prevalence of poor sleep health including sleep problems by ethnicity, (2) examine social determinants of health associated with poor sleep, and (3) investigate relationships between poor sleep and mental health for 5-14-year-olds using cross-sectional New Zealand Health Survey data (n = 8895). Analyses included weighted prevalence estimates and multivariable logistic regression. Short sleep was more prevalent for Indigenous Maori (17.6%), Pacific (24.5%), and Asian (18.4%) children, and snoring/noisy breathing during sleep was more prevalent for Maori (29.4%) and Pacific (28.0%) children, compared to European/Other (short sleep 10.2%, snoring/noisy breathing 17.6%). Ethnicity and neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation were independently associated with short sleep and snoring/noisy breathing during sleep. Short sleep was associated with increased odds of anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and activity-limiting emotional and psychological conditions after adjusting for ethnicity, deprivation, age, and gender. In addition, long sleep was independently associated with increased odds of depression. These findings demonstrate that for school-aged children ethnic inequities in sleep exist, socioeconomic deprivation is associated with poor sleep, and poor sleep is associated with poor mental health. Sociopolitical action is imperative to tackle social inequities to support sleep equity and mental health across the lifecourse.

Inequities in colonoscopy access: a retrospective audit of accepted referrals in Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau.

AIM: Maori are more likely to have colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed in the emergency setting.[[1]] CRC patients diagnosed in the emergency setting have a higher stage, increased surgical complications and worse survival than those diagnosed elsewhere.[[2]] Access to colonoscopy is crucial to diagnosing CRC prior to an emergency presentation. This study aims to assess inequities in access to symptomatic and surveillance colonoscopies. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all accepted referrals for symptomatic and surveillance colonoscopies made in Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau in 2018 (n=7,184) with analysis by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 751 Maori patients, 33.4% were removed off the waiting list and therefore did not have their colonoscopy performed, compared to 24.1% of the 4,047 NZ European patients. Maori patients were significantly more likely to be removed off the waiting list than NZ European patients with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-2.02). Pasifika patients were significantly more likely to be removed off the waiting list than NZ European patients with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.30 (95% CI 1.92-2.75). CONCLUSIONS: Maori have significantly less access to colonoscopies than NZ Europeans. We suggest improvements to referral systems locally and nationally to facilitate equitable access.

Caregiver experiences of racism and child mental health outcomes: cross-sectional analysis from Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIMS: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of vicarious racism experienced by children (0-14 years) in Aotearoa New Zealand and investigate the association between vicarious racism and diagnosed child mental health conditions. METHODS: Adult and child 2016/2017 New Zealand Health Survey data were merged to create child-caregiver dyads. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between the caregiver experiences of racism (exposure) and diagnosed child mental health conditions (outcome), adjusting for confounders and exploring potential pathway variables. RESULTS: Looking at 2,989 dyads, the prevalence of "any" vicarious racism was higher for Maori (28.1%; 95% CI 24.2-31.9), Pacific (23.2%; 95% CI 17.9-28.5) and Asian (29%; 95% CI 23.6-34.5) children compared to European/Other children (12.5%; 95% CI 10.2-14.8). A statistically significant association was identified between >2 reports of vicarious racism and the outcome (OR= 2.53, 95% 1.18-5.43). Adding caregiver psychological distress reduced this association (OR= 1.92, 95% 0.91-4.08). CONCLUSIONS: Children in Maori, Pacific and Asian ethnicity groupings experience higher exposure to vicarious racism than those in the European/Other grouping. Multiple experiences of vicarious racism are associated with increased odds of diagnosed child mental health conditions in a dose-response distribution.

Using Days Alive and Out of Hospital to measure inequities and possible pathways for them after cardiovascular surgery in Aotearoa New Zealand: study protocol for a secondary data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), socioeconomic status and being of Maori ethnicity are often associated with poorer health outcomes, including after surgery. Inequities can be partially explained by differences in health status and health system biases are hypothesised as important factors for remaining inequities. Previous work identified inequities between Maori and non-Maori following cardiovascular surgery, some of which have been identified in studies between 1990 and 2012. Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) is an emerging surgical outcome metric. DAOH is a composite measure of outcomes, which may reflect patient experience and longer periods of DAOH may also reflect extended interactions with the health system. Recently, a 1.1-day difference in DAOH was observed between Maori and non-Maori at a hospital in NZ across a range of operations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a secondary data analysis using data from the National Minimum Data Set, maintained by the Ministry of Health. We will report unadjusted and risk-adjusted DAOH values between Maori and non-Maori using direct risk standardisation. We will risk adjust first for age and sex, then for each of deprivation (NZDep18), levels of morbidity (M3 score) and rurality. We will report DAOH values across three time periods, 30, 90 and 365 days and across nine deciles of the DAOH distribution (0.1-0.9 inclusive). We will interpret all results from a Kaupapa Maori research positioning, acknowledging that Maori health outcomes are directly tied to the unequal distribution of the social determinants of health. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for this study was given by the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee. Outputs from this study are likely to interest a range of audiences. We plan to disseminate our findings through academic channels, presentations to interested groups including Maori-specific hui (meetings), social media and lay press.

Working in value-discrepant environments inhibits clinicians' ability to provide compassion and reduces well-being: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The practice of compassion in healthcare leads to better patient and clinician outcomes. However, compassion in healthcare is increasingly lacking, and the rates of professional burnout are high. Most research to date has focused on individual-level predictors of compassion and burnout. Little is known regarding how organizational factors might impact clinicians' ability to express compassion and well-being. The main study objective was to describe the association between personal and organizational value discrepancies and compassion ability, burnout, job satisfaction, absenteeism and consideration of early retirement among healthcare professionals. METHODS: More than 1000 practising healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals) were recruited in Aotearoa/New Zealand. The study was conducted via an online cross-sectional survey and was preregistered on AsPredicted (75407). The main outcome measures were compassionate ability and competence, burnout, job satisfaction and measures of absenteeism and consideration of early retirement. RESULTS: Perceived discrepancies between personal and organizational values predicted lower compassion ability (B = -0.006, 95% CI [-0.01, -0.00], p < 0.001 and f 2  = 0.05) but not competence (p = 0.24), lower job satisfaction (B = -0.20, 95% CI [-0.23, -0.17], p < 0.001 and f 2  = 0.14), higher burnout (B = 0.02, 95% CI [0.01, 0.03], p < 0.001 and f 2  = 0.06), absenteeism (B = 0.004, 95% CI [0.00, 0.01], p = 0.01 and f 2  = 0.01) and greater consideration of early retirement (B = 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.03], p = 0.04 and f 2  = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Working in value-discrepant environments predicts a range of poorer outcomes among healthcare professionals, including hindering the ability to be compassionate. Scalable organizational and systems-level interventions that address operational processes and practices that lead to the experience of value discrepancies are recommended to improve clinician performance and well-being outcomes.

Ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of traumatic rotator cuff injuries in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Traumatic rotator cuff injuries can be a leading cause of prolonged shoulder pain and disability and contribute to significant morbidity and health care costs. Previous studies have shown evidence of sociodemographic disparities with these injuries. The purpose of this nationwide study was to better understand these disparities based on ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status, in order to inform future health care strategies. METHODS: Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) is a no-fault comprehensive compensation scheme encompassing all of Aotearoa/New Zealand (population in 2018, 4.7 million). Using the ACC database, traumatic rotator cuff injuries were identified between January 2010 and December 2018. Injuries were categorized by sex, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic deprivation index of the claimant. RESULTS: During the 9-year study period, there were 351,554 claims accepted for traumatic rotator cuff injury, which totaled more than NZ$960 million. The greatest proportion of costs was spent on vocational support (49.8%), then surgery (26.3%), rehabilitation (13.1%), radiology (8.1%), general practitioner (1.6%), and "Other" (1.1%). Asian, Maori (indigenous New Zealanders), and Pacific peoples were under-represented in the age-standardized proportion of total claims and had lower rates of surgery than Europeans. Maori had higher proportion of costs spent on vocational support and lower proportions spent on radiology, rehabilitation, and surgery than Europeans. Males had higher number and costs of claims and were more likely to have surgery than females. There were considerably fewer claims from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This large nationwide study demonstrates the important and growing economic burden of rotator cuff injuries. Indirect costs, such as vocational supports, are a major contributor to the cost, suggesting improving treatment and rehabilitation protocols would have the greatest economic impact. This study has also identified sociodemographic disparities that need to be addressed in order to achieve equity in health outcomes.

We still don't count: the under-counting and under-representation of Maori in health and disability sector data.

AIM: To examine ethnicity data quality; in particular, the representation and potential under-counting of Maori in health and disability sector data, as well as implications for inequities. METHODS: Maori and non-Maori ethnicity data are analysed at: 1) a population aggregate level across multiple 2018 datasets (Estimated Resident Population, Census Usually Resident Population, Health Service User (HSU) population and Primary Health Organisation (PHO) enrolments); and 2) an individual level for those linked in PHO and 2018 Census datasets. Ethnicity is drawn from the National Health Index (NHI) in health datasets and variations by age and gender are explored. RESULTS: Aggregate analyses show that Maori are considerably under-represented in HSU and PHO data. In linked analysis Maori were under-counted on the NHI by 16%. Under-representation in data and under-counting occur across both genders but are more pronounced for Maori men with variations by age. CONCLUSION: High quality ethnicity data are fundamental for understanding and monitoring Maori health and health inequities as well as in the provision of targeted services and interventions that are responsive to Maori aspirations and needs. The continued under-counting of Maori in health and disability sector data is a breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and must be addressed with urgency.

Analysis of deprivation distribution in New Zealand by ethnicity, 1991-2013.

AIMS: To compare the distribution of Maori and New Zealand (NZ) European populations in Aotearoa New Zealand by neighbourhood deprivation, for the five censuses between 1991 and 2013, and to identify changes in the distribution pattern over time. METHODS: Geographical meshblock data from the 1991-2013 New Zealand censuses, by NZDep Index deprivation score, and by prioritised ethnic group population, were combined to analyse ethnic population counts by deprivation decile and deprivation score. Trends over time were analysed. RESULTS: Maori were over-represented in the more deprived NZDep deciles and under-represented in the least deprived deciles for all census periods. The NZ European population were over-represented in the least deprived deciles, and under-represented in the more deprived deciles. In each census, over 40% of the Maori population have been living in the two most deprived deciles, compared to less than 15% for NZ European. CONCLUSION: The patterns of inequity in socio-economic deprivation between Maori and NZ Europeans have remained virtually unchanged since 1991, despite various Government commitments to reduce inequity. Socio-economic deprivation for Maori is a key determinant of health inequity, and bolder Government measures prioritised for Maori are needed to change this socio-economic gradient if health equity goals are to be met.

Estimating the economic costs of Indigenous health inequities in New Zealand: a retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant international interest in the economic impacts of health inequities, few studies have quantified the costs associated with unfair and preventable ethnic/racial health inequities. This Indigenous-led study is the first to investigate health inequities between Maori and non-Maori adults in New Zealand (NZ) and estimate the economic costs associated with these differences. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. Quantitative epidemiological methods and 'cost-of-illness' (COI) methodology were employed, within a Kaupapa Maori theoretical framework. SETTING: Data for 2003-2014 were obtained from national data collections held by NZ government agencies, including hospitalisations, mortality, outpatient and primary care consultations, laboratory and pharmaceutical usage and accident claims. PARTICIPANTS: All adults in NZ aged 15 years and above who had engagement with the health system between 2003 and 2014 (deidentified). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of 'potentially avoidable' hospitalisations and mortality as well as 'excess or underutilisation' of healthcare were calculated, as the difference between actual rates for Maori and the rate expected if Maori had the same rates as non-Maori. These differences were then quantified using COI methodology to estimate the financial cost of ethnic inequities. RESULTS: In this conservative estimate, health inequities between Maori and non-Maori adults cost NZ$863.3 million per year. Direct costs of NZ$39.9 million per year included costs from ambulatory sensitive hospitalisations and outpatient care, with cost savings from underutilisation of primary care. Indirect costs of NZ$823.4 million per year came from years of life lost and lost wages. CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous adult health inequities in NZ create significant direct and indirect costs. The 'cost of doing nothing' is predominantly borne by Indigenous communities and society. The net cost of adult health inequities to the government conceals substantial savings to the government from underutilisation of primary care and accident/injury care.

Sociodemographic differences in 24-hour time-use behaviours in New Zealand children.

BACKGROUND: The time that children spend in physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep each day (i.e., 24-h time-use behaviours), is related to physical and mental health outcomes. Currently, there is no comprehensive evidence on New Zealand school-aged children's 24-h time-use behaviours, adherence to the New Zealand 24-h Movement Guidelines, and how these vary among different sociodemographic groups. METHODS: This study utilises data from the 8-year wave of the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study. Using two Axivity AX3 accelerometers, children's 24-h time-use behaviours were described from two perspectives: activity intensity and activity type. Compositional data analysis techniques were used to explore the differences in 24-h time-use compositions across various sociodemographic groups. RESULTS: Children spent on average, 31.1%, 22.3%, 6.8%, and 39.8% of their time in sedentary, light physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and sleep, respectively. However, the daily distribution of time in different activity types was 33.2% sitting, 10.8% standing, 7.3% walking, 0.4% running, and 48.2% lying. Both the activity intensity and activity type compositions varied across groups of child ethnicity, gender, and household income or deprivation. The proportion of children meeting each of the guidelines was 90% for physical activity, 62.5% for sleep, 16% for screen time, and 10.6% for the combined guidelines. Both gender and residence location (i.e., urban vs. rural) were associated with meeting the physical activity guideline, whereas child ethnicity, mother's education and residence location were associated with meeting the screen time guideline. Child ethnicity and mother's education were also significantly associated with the adherence to the combined 24-h Movement Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided comprehensive evidence on how New Zealand children engage in 24-h time-use behaviours, adherence to the New Zealand 24-h Movement Guidelines, and how these behaviours differ across key sociodemographic groups. These findings should be considered in designing future interventions for promoting healthy time-use patterns in New Zealand children.

Co-design for indigenous and other children and young people from priority social groups: A systematic review.

Background: Co-design has increasingly been posited as a useful approach for Indigenous peoples and other social groups that experience inequities. However, the relatively rapid rise in co-design rhetoric has not necessarily been accompanied by increased understanding of whether co-design works for these social groups, and how equity is addressed. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify the current state of co-design as theory and praxis within the context of health and/or disability related interventions or services, with a specific focus on equity considerations for Indigenous and other children and young people from priority social groups. Six electronic databases were searched systematically to identify peer-reviewed papers and grey literature (dissertation and theses) published between January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020, and a hand-search of reference lists for selected full texts was undertaken. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Although all studies used the term 'co-design', only three provided a definition of what they meant by use of the term. Nine studies described one or more theory-based frameworks and a total of 26 methods, techniques and tools were reported, with only one study describing a formal evaluation. The key mechanism by which equity was addressed appeared to be the inclusion of participants from a social group experiencing inequities within an area of interest. Conclusion: A dearth of information limits the extent to which the literature can be definitive as to whether co-design works for Indigenous and other children and young people from priority social groups, or whether co-design reduces health inequities. It is critical for quality reporting to occur regarding co-design definitions, theory, and praxis. There is an urgent requirement for evaluation research that focuses on co-design impacts and assesses the contribution of co-design to achieving equity. We also recommend culturally safe ethical processes be implemented whenever undertaking co-design.

Examining emergency department inequities in Aotearoa New Zealand: Findings from a national retrospective observational study examining Indigenous emergency care outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence that EDs may not operate equitably for all patients, with Indigenous and minoritised ethnicity patients experiencing longer wait times for assessment, differential pain management and less evaluation and treatment of acute conditions. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used a Kaupapa Maori framework to investigate ED admissions into 18/20 District Health Boards in Aotearoa New Zealand (2006-2012). Key pre-admission variable was ethnicity (Maori:non-Maori), and outcome variables included: ED self-discharge; ED arrival to assessment time; hospital re-admission within 72 h; ED re-presentation within 72 h; ED length of stay; ward length of stay; access block and mortality (in ED or within 10 days of ED departure). Generalised linear regression models controlled for year of presentation, sex, age, deprivation, triage category and comorbidity. RESULTS: Despite some ED process measures favouring Maori, for example arrival to assessment time (mean difference -2.14 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.42 to -1.86) and access block (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.87-0.91), others showed no difference, for example self-discharge (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-1.00). Despite this, Maori mortality (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.50-1.71) and ED re-presentation (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.12) were higher than non-Maori. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive investigation of acute outcomes by ethnicity to date in New Zealand. We found ED mortality inequities that are unlikely to be explained by ED process measures or comorbidities. Our findings reinforce the need to investigate health professional bias and institutional racism within an acute care context.

The economic cost of Indigenous child health inequities in Aotearoa New Zealand-an updated analysis for 2003-2014.

AIMS: This study estimates of the cost of Indigenous child health inequities in New Zealand. METHODS: Standard quantitative epidemiological and cost of illness methodologies were used within a Kaupapa Maori framework. Data for 2003-2014 on children under 15 years were obtained from government datasets. Rates of potentially avoidable hospitalisations and mortality, as well as excess or under-utilisation were calculated. Publicly funded health sector costs, costs to families and costs of premature mortality were used to estimate the costs (or savings) of inequities. RESULTS: Maori children had lower utilisation rates than non-Maori for primary healthcare, outpatient care, medicines, laboratory investigations and care after an accident/injury. Maori children had greater rates of avoidable hospitalisation (RR=1.36, 95% CI 1.35-1.37) and death (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.84-2.13). Inequalities between Maori and non-Maori children cost in excess of $170 million NZD each year. This includes an annual net savings for the government health sector of $4 million NZD, with an annual cost to society of around $175 million NZD. CONCLUSIONS: The under-serving of Maori children in the health sector saves the government health system money, yet imposes a huge cost on Maori families and society. In addition to avoiding considerable human suffering, reducing child health inequities would result in significant economic benefits.

Barriers and facilitators for Maori in accessing hospital services in Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIM: This paper reports the findings of a literature review to answer the research question, "What are the barriers and facilitators of access to hospital services for Maori?" METHOD: MEDLINE (Ovid) and PsycINFO were searched using keywords to identify relevant literature published between 2000 and 2020. The data analysis was informed by a Kaupapa Maori positioning and the CONSIDER statement on reporting of health research involving Indigenous peoples. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. We identified five themes that captured the barriers for Maori accessing hospital services (practical barriers, poor communication, hostile healthcare environment, primary care barriers and racism) and five facilitatory themes were identified (practical facilitators, whakawhanaungatanga, whanau, manaakitanga and cultural safety). CONCLUSION: This article confirms existing knowledge about practical barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for Maori and contributes to an emerging body of evidence about the impact of racism and culturally unsafe services in preventing Maori from accessing healthcare services. The facilitators identified provide a potential roadmap for the redesign of services so they are accessible and effective for Maori. Improving services in this way would support district health boards, the Ministry of Health and professional organisations to comply with their commitments to providing culturally safe services and health professionals.

Bowel cancer screening age range for Maori: what is all the fuss about?

The current New Zealand Bowel Screening Programme (BSP) is inequitable. At present, just over half of bowel cancers in Maori present before the age of 60 years (58% in females and 52% in males), whereas just under a third of bowel cancers in non-Maori are diagnosed before the same age (27% in females and 29% in males). The argument for extending the bowel screening age range down to 50 years for Maori is extremely simple-in comparison to non-Maori, a greater percentage of bowel cancers in Maori occur before the age of 60 years (when screening starts). Commencing the BSP at 50 years of age for Maori with high coverage will help fix this inequity. In this paper we review the current epidemiology of colorectal cancer with respect to the age range extension for Maori.

Multiple dimensions of sleep are consistently associated with chronically elevated depressive symptoms from late pregnancy to 3 years postnatal in Indigenous and non-Indigenous New Zealand women.

INTRODUCTION: Poor sleep and depressive symptoms are common throughout the perinatal period, but little is known about the extended time course of depression and the sleep dimensions associated with these trajectories. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated different depression trajectories in New Zealand Maori and non-Maori women from late pregnancy to 3 years postnatal. Relationships between multiple dimensions of sleep and these depression trajectories were also investigated. METHODS: Data from 856 women (30.6% Maori and 69.4% non-Maori) from the longitudinal Moe Kura cohort study were used. Depressive symptoms and multiple dimensions of sleep (quality, duration, latency, continuity and daytime sleepiness) were collected at 36 weeks' gestation, 12 weeks postnatal and 3 years postnatal. Trajectory analysis was completed using latent class analysis. RESULTS: Latent class analysis revealed two distinct groups of depressive symptom trajectories: 'chronic high' and 'stable mild' for both Maori and non-Maori women. Maori women in both trajectories were more likely than non-Maori women to have clinically significant depressive symptoms at every time point. Poorer sleep quality, latency, continuity and greater daytime sleepiness were consistently associated with the chronic high depressive symptom trajectory at all three time points, after controlling for sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of Maori and non-Maori women experience chronically high depressive symptoms during the perinatal period and the following years. Across this extended time frame, Maori women have a higher probability of experiencing clinically significant depressive symptoms compared to non-Maori women. These persistent patterns of depressive symptoms occur concurrently with multiple dimensions of poor sleep. Given the well-described impact of maternal depression on the mother, child, family and community, this highlights the importance of healthcare professionals asking about mothers' sleep quality, continuity, latency and daytime sleepiness as potential indicators of long-term mood outcomes.