Practical Prediction of New Baseline Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is generally preferred for localized renal masses due to strong functional outcomes. Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after PN may facilitate preoperative counseling because NBGFR may affect long-term survival, particularly for patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease. Methods for predicting parenchymal volume preservation, and by extension NBGFR, have been proposed, including those based on contact surface area (CSA) or direct measurement of tissue likely to be excised/devascularized during PN. We previously reported that presuming 89% of global GFR preservation (the median value saved from previous, independent analyses) is as accurate as the more subjective/labor-intensive CSA and direct measurement approaches. More recently, several promising complex/multivariable predictive algorithms have been published, which typically include tumor, patient, and surgical factors. In this study, we compare our conceptually simple approach (NBGFRPost-PN = 0.90 × GFRPre-PN) with these sophisticated algorithms, presuming that an even 90% of the global GFR is saved with each PN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 631 patients with bilateral kidneys who underwent PN at Cleveland Clinic (2012-2014) for localized renal masses with available preoperative/postoperative GFR were analyzed. NBGFR was defined as the final GFR 3-12 months post-PN. Predictive accuracies were assessed from correlation coefficients (r) and mean squared errors (MSE). RESULTS: Our conceptually simple approach based on uniform 90% functional preservation had equivalent r values when compared with complex, multivariable models, and had the lowest degree of error when predicting NBGFR post-PN. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple formula performs equally well as complex algorithms when predicting NBGFR after PN. Strong anchoring by preoperative GFR and minimal functional loss (≈ 10%) with the typical PN likely account for these observations. This formula is practical and can facilitate counseling about expected postoperative functional outcomes after PN.

Point of care parenchymal volume analyses to estimate split renal function and predict functional outcomes after radical nephrectomy.

Accurate prediction of new baseline GFR (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) can inform clinical management and patient counseling whenever RN is a strong consideration. Preoperative global GFR, split renal function (SRF), and renal functional compensation (RFC) are fundamentally important for the accurate prediction of NBGFR post-RN. While SRF has traditionally been obtained from nuclear renal scans (NRS), differential parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) via software analysis may be more accurate. A simplified approach to estimate parenchymal volumes and SRF based on length/width/height measurements (LWH) has also been proposed. We compare the accuracies of these three methods for determining SRF, and, by extension, predicting NBGFR after RN. All 235 renal cancer patients managed with RN (2006-2021) with available preoperative CT/MRI and NRS, and relevant functional data were analyzed. PVA was performed on CT/MRI using semi-automated software, and LWH measurements were obtained from CT/MRI images. RFC was presumed to be 25%, and thus: Predicted NBGFR = 1.25 × Global GFRPre-RN × SRFContralateral. Predictive accuracies were assessed by mean squared error (MSE) and correlation coefficients (r). The r values for the LWH/NRS/software-derived PVA approaches were 0.72/0.71/0.86, respectively (p < 0.05). The PVA-based approach also had the most favorable MSE, which were 120/126/65, respectively (p < 0.05). Our data show that software-derived PVA provides more accurate and precise SRF estimations and predictions of NBGFR post-RN than NRS/LWH methods. Furthermore, the LWH approach is equivalent to NRS, precluding the need for NRS in most patients.

Optimizing prediction of new-baseline glomerular filtration rate after radical nephrectomy: are algorithms really necessary?

INTRODUCTION: Radical nephrectomy (RN) is an important consideration for the management of localized renal-cell-carcinoma (RCC) whenever the tumor appears aggressive, although reduced renal function is a concern. Split-renal-function (SRF) in the contralateral kidney and postoperative renal functional compensation (RFC) are fundamentally important for the accurate prediction of new baseline GFR (NBGFR) post-RN. SRF can be estimated either from nuclear renal scans (NRS) or from preoperative imaging using parenchymal-volume-analysis (PVA). We compare two SRF-based models for predicting NBGFR after RN with a subjective prediction of NBGFR by an experienced urologic-oncologist. METHODS: 187 RCC patients managed with RN (2006-16) were included based on the availability of preoperative CT/MRI and NRS, and preoperative/postoperative eGFR. NBGFR was defined as the final GFR 3-12 months post-RN. For the SRF-based approaches, SRF was derived from either NRS or PVA, and RFC was estimated at 25% based on previous independent analyses. Thus, the formula (Global GFRPre-RN × SRFcontralateral) × 1.25 was used to predict NBGFR after RN. For subjective-assessment, a blinded, independent urologic oncologist provided NBGFR predictions based on preoperative eGFR, CT/MRI, and clinical/tumor characteristics. Predictive accuracies were assessed by correlation coefficients (r). RESULTS: The r values for subjective-assessment, NRS/SRF-based, and PVA/SRF-based approaches were 0.72/0.72/0.85, respectively (p < 0.05). The PVA/SRF-based model also demonstrated significant improvement across other performance parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The PVA/SRF-based model more accurately predicts NBGFR post-RN than NRS/SRF-based and Subjective Estimation. PVA software (Fujifilm-medical-systems) is readily available and affordable and provides accurate SRF estimations from routine preoperative imaging. This novel approach may inform clinical management regarding RN/PN for complex RCC cases.

Predicting GFR after radical nephrectomy: the importance of split renal function.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a conceptually simple model to predict new-baseline-glomerular-filtration-rate (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) based on split-renal-function (SRF) and renal-functional-compensation (RFC), and to compare its predictive accuracy against a validated non-SRF-based model. RN should only be considered when the tumor has increased oncologic potential and/or when there is concern about perioperative morbidity with PN due to increased tumor complexity. In these circumstances, accurate prediction of NBGFR after RN can be important, with a threshold NBGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73m2 correlating with improved overall survival. METHODS: 236 RCC patients who underwent RN (2010-2012) with preoperative imaging (CT/MRI) and relevant functional data were included. NBGFR was defined as GFR 3-12 months post-RN. SRF was determined using semi-automated software that provides differential parenchymal-volume-analysis (PVA) from preoperative imaging. Our SRF-based model was: Predicted NBGFR = 1.24 (× Global GFRPre-RN) (× SRFContralateral), with 1.24 representing the mean RFC estimate from independent analyses. A non-SRF-based model was also assessed: Predicted NBGFR = 17 + preoperative GFR (× 0.65)-age (× 0.25) + 3 (if tumor > 7 cm)-2 (if diabetes). Alignment between predicted/observed NBGFR was assessed by comparing correlation coefficients and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analyses. RESULTS: The correlation-coefficients (r) were 0.87/0.72 for SRF-based/non-SRF-based models, respectively (p = 0.005). For prediction of NBGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73m2, the SRF-based/non-SRF-based models provided AUC of 0.94/0.87, respectively (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Previous non-SRF-based models to predict NBGFR post-RN are complex and omit two important parameters: SRF and RFC. Our proposed model prioritizes these parameters and provides a conceptually simple, accurate, and clinically implementable approach to predict NBGFR post-RN. SRF can be easily obtained using PVA software that is affordable, readily available (FUJIFILM-Medical-Systems), and more accurate than nuclear-renal-scans. The SRF-based model demonstrates greater predictive-accuracy than a non-SRF-based model, including the clinically-important predictive-threshold of NBGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73m2.

Radiosensitization in prostate cancer: mechanisms and targets.

Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in American men over the age of 45 years and is the third most common cause of cancer related deaths in American men. In 2012 it is estimated that 241,740 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer and 28,170 men will succumb to prostate cancer. Currently, radiation therapy is one of the most common definitive treatment options for localized prostate cancer. However, significant number of patients undergoing radiation therapy will develop locally persistent/recurrent tumours. The varying response rates to radiation may be due to 1) tumor microenvironment, 2) tumor stage/grade, 3) modality used to deliver radiation, and 4) dose of radiation. Higher doses of radiation has not always proved to be effective and have been associated with increased morbidity. Compounds designed to enhance the killing effects of radiation, radiosensitizers, have been extensively investigated over the past decade. The development of radiosensitizing agents could improve survival, improve quality of life and reduce costs, thus benefiting both patients and healthcare systems. Herin, we shall review the role and mechanisms of various agents that can sensitize tumours, specifically prostate cancer.