Proportion and predictors of FVC decline in patients with interstitial lung disease.

RATIONALE: The proportion of patients who develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), along with risk factors for progression remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with an increased risk of developing PPF among patients at a referral center. METHODS: We identified patients with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) seen within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. Utilizing a retrospective observational approach we estimated the risk of developing progression by diagnosis group and identified key clinical predictors using the FVC component of both the original progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (PFILD) and the proposed PPF (ATS) criteria. RESULTS: We identified 5934 patients with a diagnosis of ILD. The cumulative incidence of progression over the 24 months was similar when assessed with the PFILD and PPF criteria (33.1 % and 37.9 % respectively). Of those who met the ATS criteria, 9.5 % did not meet the PFILD criteria. Conversely, 4.3 % of patients who met PFILD thresholds did not achieve the 5 % absolute FVC decline criteria. Significant differences in the rate of progression were seen based on underlying diagnosis. Steroid therapy (HR 1.46, CI 1.31-1.62) was associated with an increased risk of progressive fibrosis by both PFILD and PPF criteria. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the definition used, the cumulative incidence of progressive disease is high in patients with ILD in the 24 months following diagnosis. Some differences are seen in the risk of progression when assessed by PFILD and PPF criteria. Further work is needed to identify modifiable risk factors for the development of progressive fibrosis.

Prospective cohort of cryobiopsy in interstitial lung diseases: a single center experience.

RATIONALE: Transbronchial cryobiopsy has been increasingly used to diagnose interstitial lung diseases. However, there is uncertainty regarding its accuracy and risks, mainly due to a paucity of prospective or randomized trials comparing cryobiopsy to surgical biopsy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and complications of cryobiopsy in patients selected by multidisciplinary discussion. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort from 2017 to 2019. We included consecutive patients with suspected interstitial lung diseases being considered for lung biopsy presented at our multidisciplinary meeting. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 112 patients, we recommended no biopsy in 31, transbronchial forceps biopsy in 16, cryobiopsy in 54 and surgical biopsy in 11. By the end of the study, 34 patients had had cryobiopsy and 24 patients, surgical biopsy. Overall pathologic and multidisciplinary diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy was 47.1% and 61.8%, respectively. The yield increased over time for both pathologic (year 1: 28.6%, year 2: 54.5%, year 3: 66.7%, p = 0.161) and multidisciplinary (year 1: 50%, year 2: 63.6%, year 3: 77.8%, p = 0.412) diagnosis. Overall rate of grade 4 bleeding after cryobiopsy was 11.8%. Cryobiopsy required less chest tube placement (11.8% vs 100%, p < 0.001) and less hospitalizations compared to surgical biopsy (26.5% vs 95.7%, p < 0.001), but hospitalized patients had a longer median hospital stay (2 days vs 1 day, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy increased over time but the overall grade 4 bleeding rate was 11.8%.

Use of leflunomide in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Prednisone has been shown to reverse lung function declines in hypersensitivity pneumonitis patients without established fibrosis. Second line immunosuppressants like azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil have a steroid sparing effect and improve DLCO. There is no published literature on the use of leflunomide in such patients. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with leflunomide for treatment of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in 40 patients. We stratified patients according to the presence or absence of significant (> 20%) fibrosis. We studied the effect of leflunomide on FVC and DLCO trajectory and reported the changes at 12 months. RESULTS: Treatment with leflunomide tended to improve the estimated FVC slope from 0.18 ± 1.90% (SEM) of predicted per year to 4.62 ± 1.65% of predicted (NS, p = 0.118). It significantly improved the FVC at 12 months of treatment by 4.4% of predicted (p = 0.02). DLCO continued to increase at 1.45 ± 1.44% (SEM) of predicted per year. Non-fibrotic cHP patients had the largest gain in pulmonary function. Their FVC increased by 8.3% (p = 0.001) and DLCO by 4.8% (p = 0.011). Patients with fibrotic cHP did not improve. Leflunomide treatment was associated with significant gastrointestinal and other adverse effects leading 40% of patients to discontinue therapy. It had a significant steroid sparing effect with half the patients weaned off prednisone entirely. CONCLUSIONS: Leflunomide appears to be a fairly well tolerated steroid sparing immunosuppressant that improves pulmonary function in cHP patients. It is most effective in patients without significant fibrosis.

Performance of diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have cardiac sarcoidosis: Is it time to regroup?

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is challenging. Because of the current limitations of endomyocardial biopsy as a reference standard, physicians rely on advanced cardiac imaging, multidisciplinary evaluation, and diagnostic criteria to diagnose CS. AIMS: To compare the 3 main available diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have CS. METHODS: We prospectively included patients clinically judged to have CS by a multidisciplinary sarcoidosis team from November 2016 to October 2017. We included only incident cases (diagnosis of CS within 1 year of inclusion). We applied retrospectively the following diagnostic criteria: the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases (WASOG), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) 2016 criteria. RESULTS: We identified 69 patients. Diagnostic criteria classified patients as follows: WASOG as highly probable (1.4%), probable (52.2%), possible (0%), some criteria (40.6%), and no criteria (5.8%); HRS as histological diagnosis (1.4%), probable (52.2%), some criteria (40.6%), and no criteria (5.8%); JCS as histological diagnosis (1.4%), clinical diagnosis (58%), some criteria (39.1%), and no criteria (1.4%). Concordance was high between WASOG and HRS (κ = 1) but low between JCS and the others (κ = 0.326). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients clinically judged to have CS are unable to be classified according to the 3 main diagnostic criteria. There is low concordance between JCS criteria and the other 2 criteria (WASOG and HRS).

Knowing when to use steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics for the treatment of sarcoidosis.

Introduction: Care of patients with sarcoidosis requires familiarity with its natural history as well as of various immunosuppressants employed in its treatment. We would like to share our approach to management based on our experience and understanding of the relevant literature.Areas covered: Asymptomatic patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis ought to be managed conservatively. Systemic sarcoidosis with burdensome symptoms usually responds to corticosteroids, but one needs to consider the risk of long-term steroid toxicity as well as relapse. Rapidly tapering steroids can decrease cumulative exposure without compromising efficacy. Steroid-sparing anti-sarcoidosis (SSAS) agents take longer to act and are associated with unique but mostly reversible toxicities. Used judiciously and with careful monitoring, they effectively suppress granulomatous inflammation. Patients intolerant of or failing to improve with a particular drug can be switched to another, and occasionally combination therapy with two SSAS agents might prove effective. A small proportion of patients are refractory, but often achieve control and sometimes remission with stepping up to biologic therapy.Expert opinion: Adopting a strategy of early SSAS therapy ought to effectively control sarcoidosis and avoid harm from prolonged corticosteroid dosing.