Physical therapy intervention versus corticosteroid injection for lateral elbow tendinopathy. Does slow and steady win the race? - A systematic review.

Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy is one of the most common chronic and degenerative diseases which significantly affects quality of life and the activities of daily living of a person. The following is a systematic review reporting a comparison between physical therapy intervention and corticosteroid injection for the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Method: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched using headings related to treatment options for Lateral elbow tendinopathy. The following keywords were used: lateral epicondylitis, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injection. Result: We descriptively analyzed and reviewed a total of 12 studies including a total of 1253 patients for lateral elbow tendinopathy. The physical therapy intervention included interventions like electrotherapy, manual therapy, and exercise. The studies included had an overall low to unknown risk of bias. Conclusion: Our review suggests corticosteroid injection provides beneficial short-term effects and physical therapy interventions provide intermediate to long-term effects, less additional treatment and low recurrence rate in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Although high-quality randomized control trials are required in order to have a better understanding of both intervention types.

Bio-evaluation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles loaded with radiolabelled rifampicin.

AIMS: The poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) nanoparticles of tubercular drugs have been demonstrated to have a sustained release profile over 7 days. There is no information on the location or mode of release of these nanoparticles in living systems. Therefore, we have planned the study to explore the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of PLGA rifampicin nanoparticles in healthy human volunteers. We aim to study the distribution pattern of PLGA-loaded nano-formulation of radiolabelled rifampicin in humans. METHODS: Rifampicin was labelled with 99m Tc by indirect method and nanoparticles were prepared by a single emulsion evaporation method. To investigate the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles, a single dose of 450 mg of rifampicin was administered orally to healthy human volunteers divided into two different groups. RESULTS: Following a single oral dosage of the rifampicin nanoformulation, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were significantly different between the nanoparticle and conventional groups: area under the concentration-time curve (AUC = 113.8 vs. 58.6; P < .001), mean residence time (MRT = 16.2 vs. 5.8; P < .01) and elimination rate constant (Ke = 0.04 vs. 0.10; P < .05). Also, Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) images revealed biodistribution of nanoparticles in the distal portions of the intestine, which is consistent with our dosimetry analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Significant difference in PK parameters and biodistribution of nanoparticles in spleen and lymph nodes with maximum deposition were observed in the large intestine. The nanoparticle distribution pattern may be advantageous for the treatment of intestinal or lymph node tuberculosis (TB) and has the potential to result in a lower dose of rifampicin nanoformulation for the treatment of pulmonary TB.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Orthopaedic Implant Removal: What Does the Evidence Say?

Orthopaedic implant removal is considered a sterile procedure, but the current literature suggests it is associated with around a 20% Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rate. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis is still ambiguous and contentious. Taking into consideration this issue we conducted a meta-analysis for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic implant removal surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether or not antibiotic prophylaxis benefits orthopaedic implant removal surgeries. METHODS: Electronic and printed sources were searched up to February 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using antibiotic prophylaxis and a control group. Data from eligible studies were pooled for the following outcomes: overall, superficial, and deep surgical site infection (SSI). Pooled odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Mantel Haenszel fixed-effect model preferentially. RESULTS: Two studies, including 766 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was not statistically significant between the studies. There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall SSI in cefazolin and normal saline (NS) groups (Pooled OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.53- 1.17). In subgroup analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis showed statistically significant improvement for deep SSI (Pooled OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70). CONCLUSION: Overall incidence of SSI is not reduced after the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis one hour before removal of orthopaedic implants.

Comparison of 4D computed tomography and F-18 fluorocholine PET for localisation of parathyroid lesions in primary hyperparathyroidism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is the standard of care for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Four dimensional computed tomography(4DCT) and F-18 Fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FCH PET/CT) localize adenomas accurately to perform MIP. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and metanalysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 4DCT and FCH PET/CT scan for quadrant wise localisation in PHPT patients and to do head-to-head comparison between these two modalities. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENT : After searching through PubMed and EMBASE databases, 46 studies (using histology as a gold standard) of 4DCT and FCH PET/CT were included. RESULTS: Total number of patients included were 1651 and 952 for 4DCT scan (studies n = 26) and FCH PET/CT scan (studies n = 24) respectively. In per patient analysis, FCH PET/CT and 4DCT had pooled sensitivities of 92% (88-94) and 85% (73-92) respectively and in per lesion analysis, 90% (86-93) and 79% (71-84), respectively. In the subgroup with negative conventional imaging/persistent PHPT, FCH PET/CT had comparable sensitivity to 4DCT (84% [74-90] vs. 72% [46-88]). As per patient wise analysis, FCH PET/CT had better detection rates than 4DCT ([92.4 vs. 76.85], odds ratio -3.89 [1.6-9.36] p = .0024) in the subpopulation where both FCH PET/CT and 4DCT were reported. CONCLUSION: Both 4DCT and FCH PET/CT scan performed well in newly diagnosed patients, patients with persistent disease and in those with inconclusive conventional imaging results. FCH PET/CT scan had a higher pooled sensitivity than 4DCT in detecting patients with PHPT in head to head comparison.

Single ascending dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of econazole in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Econazole has been found efficacious as antitubercular in in vitro and in vivo animal studies. However, limited information is available for its safety and pharmacokinetics in humans. In our present study we have conducted single ascending dose, safety, and pharmacokinetic evaluation in healthy human volunteers with the purpose of enabling translation for tuberculosis. METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center, ascending-dose, placebo-controlled, double blind design. Three ascending dose were chosen (250 , 500 , and 1000 mg) to be administered as a single oral dose. The volunteers were screened for potential eligibility. Participants were randomized to receive either Econazole or Placebo in a 6:2 design. Safety assessments and pharmacokinetic evaluations were carried out for each cohort. RESULTS: Econazole was found to be safe at all dose levels. No serious or severe adverse events occurred during the study. The AUC (0-∞) showed a response relationship with a value of 49 ± 3.47 h* µg/ml, 17. 86 ± 8.40 hr* µg/ml, 35.54 ± 13.94 hr* µg/ml for 250 mg, 500 mg, and 1000 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of our study, a dose of 500 mg Econazole, once a day orally was considered as appropriate for further evaluation.

Shortage of essential antimicrobials: a major challenge to global health security.

The lack of access to safe and effective antimicrobials for human populations is a threat to global health security and a contributor to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The increasingly common shortages of antimicrobials are an additional threat to the emergence of AMR. While the threat of such drug shortages is most acutely experienced in low-income and middle-income settings, their consequences impact the quality and effectiveness of antimicrobials worldwide. Furthermore, there is a need for robustly conducted studies examining the impact of these increasingly prevalent shortages on patient outcomes and on the emergence and spread of AMR. In this review, we have mapped common drivers for antimicrobial shortages and propose strategies for rethinking the regulation, supply and pricing of antimicrobials to secure their sustainable access across diverse healthcare systems and to help minimise the unintended consequences of weak and ineffective supply chains. Greater government involvement in antimicrobial manufacture and supply is essential to ensure no one is left behind. Dedicated demand systems need to be developed for antimicrobials which take into consideration evolving AMR patterns, burden of diseases, pandemic events and supply and demand issues and facilitate implementation of strategies to address them. Interventions, ranging from advocacy and forecasting to public-private collaborations, new economic models and international consortia working across countries and supply chains, will help assure access to safe and effective antimicrobials to all populations around the globe and ensure that shortages no longer contribute to AMR.

Host Cell and SARS-CoV-2-Associated Molecular Structures and Factors as Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is caused by an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus, referred to as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which belongs to the realm Riboviria, order Nidovirales, family Coronaviridae, genus Betacoronavirus and the species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus. This viral disease is characterized by a myriad of varying symptoms, such as pyrexia, cough, hemoptysis, dyspnoea, diarrhea, muscle soreness, dysosmia, lymphopenia and dysgeusia amongst others. The virus mainly infects humans, various other mammals, avian species and some other companion livestock. SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry is primarily accomplished by molecular interaction between the virus's spike (S) protein and the host cell surface receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), although other host cell-associated receptors/factors, such as neuropilin 1 (NRP-1) and neuropilin 2 (NRP-2), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), as well as proteases such as TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine protease 2) and furin, might also play a crucial role in infection, tropism, pathogenesis and clinical outcome. Furthermore, several structural and non-structural proteins of the virus themselves are very critical in determining the clinical outcome following infection. Considering such critical role(s) of the abovementioned host cell receptors, associated proteases/factors and virus structural/non-structural proteins (NSPs), it may be quite prudent to therapeutically target them through a multipronged clinical regimen to combat the disease.

Assessment of Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy in Resource-Constrained Settings: Development and Piloting of a Novel Tool-AmRAT.

Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing is considered to be the leading cause of high burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in resource-constrained lower- and middle-income countries. Under its global action plan, the World Health Organization has envisaged tackling the AMR threat through promotion of rational antibiotic use among prescribers. Given the lack of consensus definitions and other associated challenges, we sought to devise and validate an Antimicrobial Rationality Assessment Tool-AmRAT-for standardizing the assessment of appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing. A consensus algorithm was developed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of intensivists, internal medicine practitioners, clinical pharmacologists, and infectious disease experts. The tool was piloted by 10 raters belonging to three groups of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) personnel: Master of Pharmacology (M.Sc.) (n = 3, group A), Doctor of Medicine (MD) residents (n = 3, group B), and DM residents in clinical pharmacology (n = 4, group C) using retrospective patient data from 30 audit and feedback forms collected as part of an existing AMS program. Percentage agreement and the kappa (κ) coefficients were used to measure inter-rater agreements amongst themselves and with expert opinion. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were analyzed comparing their assessments against the gold standard. For the overall assessment of rationality, the mean percent agreement with experts was 76.7% for group A, 68.9% for group B, and 77.5% for group C. The kappa values indicated moderate agreement for all raters in group A (κ 0.47-0.57), and fair to moderate in group B (κ 0.22-0.46) as well as group C (κ 0.37-0.60). Sensitivity and specificity for the same were 80% and 68.6%, respectively. Though evaluated by raters with diverse educational background and variable AMS experience in this pilot study, our tool demonstrated high percent agreement and good sensitivity and specificity, assuring confidence in its utility for assessing appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions in resource-constrained healthcare environments.

System for administering and monitoring hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for COVID-19 in accordance with a national advisory: preliminary experience of a tertiary care institute in India.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was one of the earliest drugs to be recommended for tackling the COVID-19 threat leading to its widespread usage. We provide preliminary findings of the system, established in a tertiary care academic center for the administration of HCQ prophylaxis to healthcare workers (HCW) based on Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) advisory. METHODS: A dedicated clinical pharmacology and internal medicine team screened for contraindications, administered informed consent, maintained compliance and monitored for adverse events. RESULTS: Among the 194 HCWs screened for ruling out contraindications for prophylaxis, 9 were excluded and 185 were initiated on HCQ. A total of 55 adverse events were seen in 38 (20.5%) HCWs out of which 70.9%, 29.1% were mild and moderate & none were severe. Before the completion of therapy, a total of 23 participants discontinued. Change in QTc interval on day 2 was 5 (IQR: -3.75, 11) ms and the end of week 1 was 15 ms (IQR: 2, 18). Out of the 5 HCW who turned positive for COVID-19, 2 were on HCQ. CONCLUSION: HCQ prophylaxis was found to be safe and well tolerated in HCW when administered after appropriate screening and with monitoring for adverse events.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of clastogenicity of second-line antitubercular drug loaded PLGA nanoparticles.

Sustained release nanoformulations of second line antitubercular drugs levofloxacin and ethionamide had shown promise in pharmacokinetics and acute and sub-acute toxicity studies. The present study evaluated the clastogenicity potential of the nanoformulations of these antitubercular agents. Clastogenicity was evaluated by (a) in vitro micronucleus assay (b) in vivo micronucleus assay in Swiss albino mice and (c) sister chromatid exchange (SCE) in CHO cell lines. Ethionamide and levofloxacin loaded nanoparticles were 312 ± 64 nm and 245 ± 24 nm in size respectively and drug encapsulation was 35.2 ± 3.1% w/w and 45.6 ± 9.4% w/w, respectively. The frequency of MN-NCE/1000 NCE and MN-PCE/1000 PCE were significantly reduced in mice treated with ethionamide nanoparticle (3.5 ± 0.9, 13.8 ± 16.68) and levofloxacin nanoparticles (5.6 ± 2.7, 16.7 ± 12.7) compared to the mice treated with free ethionamide (11.5 ± 4.1, p = 0.23 and 45.19 ± 19.21, p = 0.38) and free levofloxacin (14.7 ± 1.88, p < 0.0001 and 54.6 ± 18.1, p = 0.0017), respectively. For in vitro, micronucleus assay frequencies of micronuclei per thousand bi-nucleated cells (MN-BN/1000 BN) was 188.3 ± 20.20 and 148 ± 20.42 for ethionamide and levofloxacin nanoparticles as compared to 232.6 ± 16.04 (p = 0.52) and 175 ± 5.56 (p = 0.45) for free ethionamide and levofloxacin, respectively. The average number of SCE per cell for nanoformulation of ethionamide were not different from that of free drug (4.9 ± 0.51 vs 4.1 ± 0.55, p = 0.86). The SCE per cells were not significant difference for nanoformulation of levofloxacin (2.33 ± 1.36 vs 5.46 ± 0.25, p = 0.88). In vitro and in vivo assays have shown relatively less clastogenic potential of equivalent dose of ethionamide nanoparticles as compared to the conventional formulation.

A meta-analysis to assess usefulness of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic usage for decision making.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Development of antibacterial resistance and its association with antibiotic overuse makes it necessary to identify a specific and sensitive biomarker for the diagnosis of bacterial infection and guiding antibiotic therapy. Procalcitonin (PCT), as a sepsis biomarker, may play a role in guiding antibiotics treatment in hospital settings. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the utility of PCT on various outcomes of interest in inpatients. METHODS: Different databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing PCT-guided therapy with standard therapy in admitted patients with bacterial infections. Twenty six articles were found suitable for full text search and of these, 16 studies were considered finally for data extraction. RESULTS: There were no significant differences found in total mortality [pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.22, P=0.63], 28-day mortality (pooled OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80-1.19, P=0.79), need of Intensive Care Unit admission (OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.09, P=0.16) and duration of stay in hospital (pooled mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.50-0.49, P=0.98) between treatment and control groups. PCT-guided treatment significantly decreased the duration of antibiotic treatment (pooled mean difference -2.79, 95% CI -3.52--2.06, P<0.00001). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: PCT-guided therapy significantly decreased antibiotics exposure and thus treatment cost. However, the hard endpoints did not demonstrate any significant benefits, possibly due to low power to detect differences and/or the presence of comorbidities.