ABSTRACT
The impact of residual symptoms following recovery from immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) on activities of daily living during remission is not routinely discussed or evaluated by hematologists. This study used qualitative methodology to understand 3 issues from the patient's perspective: the most important symptoms during remission, the impact of these symptoms on their daily activities, and the effectiveness of communication with hematologists. Oklahoma and Ohio patients participated in either focus groups or individual interviews. Eligibility included age ≥18 years, ADAMTS13 deficiency (<10% activity) at diagnosis or relapse, and in clinical remission (≥1 year from episode). A nonprobabilistic purposive sampling approach was used. The most important symptoms were defined as symptoms mentioned across all 7 focus groups. The interviews supplemented focus group data. The analysis focused on describing the impact of symptoms and barriers to communicating with hematologists. A total of 44 patients participated (focus groups, N = 25; interviews, N = 19). The most important symptoms affecting the patients' daily activities were cognitive issues, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. These symptoms affected patients' ability to return to their previous level of functioning and created difficulties in relationships. A key communication barrier with their hematologists was forgetting to mention these symptoms. Although hematologists pronounce patients as recovered, iTTP remains a life-changing event. Patients often did not return to their previous functioning; relationships and careers were affected. However, patients may forget to discuss these concerns with their hematologist. To improve remission care, hematologists should incorporate patient-reported outcome measures evaluating these symptoms in remission visits.
Subject(s)
Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic , Thrombosis , Humans , Adolescent , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/diagnosis , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Focus GroupsABSTRACT
Choosing Wisely is a medical stewardship and quality-improvement initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with leading medical societies in the United States. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) has been an active participant in the Choosing Wisely project. In 2019, ASH and the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO) formed a joint task force to solicit, evaluate, and select items for a pediatric-focused Choosing Wisely list. By using an iterative process and an evidence-based method, the ASH-ASPHO Task Force identified 5 hematologic tests and treatments that health care providers and patients should question because they are not supported by evidence, and/or they involve risks of medical and financial costs with low likelihood of benefit. The ASH-ASPHO Choosing Wisely recommendations are as follows: (1) avoid routine preoperative hemostatic testing in an otherwise healthy child with no previous personal or family history of bleeding, (2) avoid platelet transfusion in asymptomatic children with a platelet count >10 × 103/µL unless an invasive procedure is planned, (3) avoid thrombophilia testing in children with venous access-associated thrombosis and no positive family history, (4) avoid packed red blood cells transfusion for asymptomatic children with iron deficiency anemia and no active bleeding, and (5) avoid routine administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for prophylaxis of children with asymptomatic autoimmune neutropenia and no history of recurrent or severe infections. We recommend that health care providers carefully consider the anticipated risks and benefits of these identified tests and treatments before performing them.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Tests , Societies, Medical , Child , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Hematologic Tests/methods , Hemostasis , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Describe anxiety and depressive symptoms in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures and evaluate potential correlations with disease manifestations. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of children with JIA and a parent proxy who completed PROMIS measures on depression, anxiety, stress, and pain. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) measured mobility, and the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10) measured disease activity. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients completed the study. Demographic median values included age (14 yrs), disease duration (4.73 yrs), CHAQ score (0), total active joint count (0), and cJADAS10 (2). Using cJADAS10, 57 patients (70%) had inactive or low disease activity. Mean PROMIS t-scores for depressive and anxiety symptoms were lower in children with JIA compared to the reference population (P < 0.0001). Nineteen patients (23%) had moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Age and CHAQ score (mobility) correlated with depressive symptoms (r = 0.36, P =0.0008 and r = 0.32, P = 0.0029, respectively) but not anxiety. Depressive and anxiety symptoms correlated with pain (r = 0.64 and r = 0.47, respectively, P < 0.0001) and stress (r = 0.79 and r = 0.75, respectively, P < 0.0001) but not with sex, JIA subtype, disease duration, or disease activity. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-quarter of children with JIA reported moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression. These symptoms are associated with pain and stress, but they are not associated with other disease manifestations. Understanding how mental health symptoms and JIA affect each other is necessary in order to improve patient outcomes and provide well-rounded care.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile , Adolescent , Anxiety , Arthritis, Juvenile/complications , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/etiology , Humans , Pain/etiology , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Patient reported outcome measures, such as the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) may be utilized to understand experiences of patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of PROMIS domains to detect changes in pain, physical functioning, and asthma impact over time for children experiencing asthma exacerbation. METHODS: Our prospective cohort study included children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for asthma exacerbation. Children completed PROMIS surveys in the ED, 7-10 days, and 1-3 months post-discharge. We used linear mixed models adjusted for age, gender, acute care utilization, and child global health to determine changes in PROMIS T-scores. We used self-reported child health response (Much better now versus a little better now or worse) at discharge as an anchor to determine if change in PROMIS scores corresponded with changes in health. A change was statistically significant if the 95% CI did not include 0. RESULTS: Our study included 63 children who presented to the ED for acute asthma exacerbation. We identified that children improved significantly in all domains over time. There was improvement over time following discharge from ED for all pain and physical functioning domains, and asthma impact. Using the clinical anchor, those with considerable improvement in asthma symptoms had improved T scores from 4-17. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS domains of pain, physical functioning, depression, fatigue, peer relationships, and asthma impact are responsive to changes in health states over time. These domains may be used to measure clinically significant change in children experiencing asthma exacerbation.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Aftercare , Asthma/diagnosis , Child , Humans , Pain , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a life-limiting inherited hemoglobinopathy that results in significant complications and affects quality of life. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative intervention for SCD; however, guidelines are needed to inform how to apply HSCT in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and health professionals in their decisions about HSCT for SCD. METHODS: The multidisciplinary guideline panel formed by ASH included 2 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Mayo Evidence-Based Practice Research Program supported the guideline development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (through 2019). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 8 recommendations to help patients and providers assess how individuals with SCD should consider the timing and type of HSCT. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence review yielded no randomized controlled clinical trials for HSCT in SCD; therefore, all recommendations are based on very low certainty in the evidence. Key recommendations include considering HSCT for those with neurologic injury or recurrent acute chest syndrome at an early age and to improve nonmyeloablative regimens. Future research should include the development of a robust SCD registry to serve as a comparator for HSCT studies.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Hematology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Stem Cell Transplantation , United StatesABSTRACT
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at high risk of developing serious infections, therefore, understanding the impact that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection has on this population is important. We sought to identify factors associated with hospitalization and serious COVID-19 illness in children and adults with SCD.We established the international SECURE-SCD Registry to collect data on patients with SCD and COVID-19 illness. We used multivariable logistic models to estimate the independent effects of age, sex, genotype, hydroxyurea, and SCD-related and -nonrelated comorbidities on hospitalization, serious COVID-19 illness, and pain as a presenting symptom during COVID-19 illness. As of 23 March 2021, 750 COVID-19 illness cases in patients with SCD were reported to the registry. We identified history of pain (relative risk [RR], 2.15; P < .0001) and SCD heart/lung comorbidities (RR, 1.61; P = .0001) as risk factors for hospitalization in children. History of pain (RR, 1.78; P = .002) was also a risk factor for hospitalization in adults. Children with history of pain (RR, 3.09; P = .009), SCD heart/lung comorbidities (RR, 1.76; P = .03), and SCD renal comorbidities (RR, 3.67; P < .0001) and adults with history of pain (RR 1.94, P = .02) were at higher risk of developing serious COVID-19 illness. History of pain and SCD renal comorbidities also increased risk of pain during COVID-19 in children; history of pain, SCD heart/lung comorbidities, and female sex increased risk of pain during COVID-19 in adults. Hydroxyurea showed no effect on hospitalization and COVID-19 severity, but it lowered the risk of presenting with pain in adults during COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , COVID-19 , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Child , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Choosing Wisely is a medical stewardship and quality-improvement initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with leading medical societies in the United States. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) has been an active participant in the Choosing Wisely project. In 2019, ASH and the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO) formed a joint task force to solicit, evaluate, and select items for a pediatric-focused Choosing Wisely list. By using an iterative process and an evidence-based method, the ASH-ASPHO Task Force identified 5 hematologic tests and treatments that health care providers and patients should question because they are not supported by evidence, and/or they involve risks of medical and financial costs with low likelihood of benefit. The ASH-ASPHO Choosing Wisely recommendations are as follows: (1) avoid routine preoperative hemostatic testing in an otherwise healthy child with no previous personal or family history of bleeding, (2) avoid platelet transfusion in asymptomatic children with a platelet count 10 × 103 /µL unless an invasive procedure is planned, (3) avoid thrombophilia testing in children with venous access-associated thrombosis and no positive family history, (4) avoid packed red blood cells transfusion for asymptomatic children with iron deficiency anemia and no active bleeding, and (5) avoid routine administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for prophylaxis of children with asymptomatic autoimmune neutropenia and no history of recurrent or severe infections. We recommend that health care providers carefully consider the anticipated risks and benefits of these identified tests and treatments before performing them.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Tests , Child , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Hemostasis , Humans , Iron Deficiencies , Societies, Medical , United StatesABSTRACT
In the United States, COVID-19 has disproportionately affected Black persons. Sickle cell disease (SCD) and sickle cell trait (SCT) are genetic conditions that occur predominantly among Black individuals. It is unknown if individuals with SCD/SCT are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 illness compared with Black individuals who do not have SCD/SCT. The objective of our study was to compare COVID-19 outcomes, including the disease manifestations, hospitalization, and death, among individuals with SCD/SCT vs Black individuals who do not have SCD/SCT. We leveraged electronic health record data from a multisite research network to identify Black patients with COVID-19 who have SCD/SCT and those who do not have SCD/SCT. During the study period of 20 January 2020 to 20 September 2020, there were 312 patients with COVID-19 and SCD and 449 patients with COVID-19 and SCT. There were 45 517 Black persons who were diagnosed with COVID-19 but who did not have SCD/SCT. After 1:1 propensity score matching (based on age, sex, and other preexisting comorbidities), patients with COVID-19 and SCD remained at a higher risk of hospitalization (relative risk [RR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.7) and development of pneumonia (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4) and pain (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.5-4.8) compared with Black persons without SCD/SCT. The case fatality rates for those with SCD compared with Black persons without SCD/SCT were not significantly different. There also were no significant differences in COVID-19 outcomes between individuals with SCT and Black persons without SCD/SCT within the matched cohorts.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sickle Cell Trait , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sickle Cell Trait/complications , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) includes numerous domains to assess functioning among the pediatric population. These domains, however, have not been evaluated for use in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this study was to determine the measurement properties of PROMIS domains (pain behavior, pain quality, physical stress experience, physical activity, strength impact, and profile-25) in children with T1D. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of children with T1Drecruited from tertiary care facilities. To determine construct validity, we compared PROMIS T-scores between known-groups based on (a) glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) and (b) self-reported general health, using t test or analysis of variance. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha and item response theory reliability. We also determined agreement between parent-proxy and child self-report PROMIS scores. RESULTS: Our study included 192 children, mean age 12.7 (SD = 2.9) years, eligible to self-report PROMIS surveys. There were significant differences in physical stress experience and pain intensity between children with HbA1c < 10% and those with HbA1c ≥ 10%. There also were significant differences in T-scores for all domains except physical function mobility and strength impact among children with poor/fair, good, very good/excellent general health. All valid domains had reliability >0.70. More than 40% of child-parent pairs were in agreement, with intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) ranging between 0.41 and 0.63 for all domains, except pain behavior (%agreement = 23%; ICC = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the PROMIS domains tested are valid, reliable, and able to differentiate children with T1D who report different general health states. There is moderate agreement between child-parent pairs for all domains except pain behavior.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Health Status , Information Systems , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Exercise , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength , Reproducibility of Results , Self ReportABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patient reported outcome measures, such as the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) may be used to assess patient functioning for asthma and aid in understanding the impact of asthma exacerbation. These domains may be utilized as endpoints in clinical trials and to guide clinical care. The purpose of this study was to determine psychometric properties of the new PROMIS measures for children with asthma, at baseline and with exacerbation. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of children with acute asthma exacerbation or at baseline health. Psychometric properties of validity (using known groups and correlation) and reliability (using Cronbach's alpha and IRT) for the new PROMIS measures were determined. RESULTS: Our study included 220 subjects, 102 were enrolled during an acute exacerbated state. Cronbach's alpha and IRT reliability was greater or equal to 0.75. Our subjects experiencing an acute exacerbated state reported worse T-scores for pain related domains: pain behavior 45.7 vs 53.5 (p < 0.001), pain quality sensory 44.4 vs 48.5 (p < 0.005), pain quality affective 42.5 vs 51.3 (p < 0.001), and physical stress experience 60.5 vs 65.4 (p < 0.001); and asthma impact 47.9 vs 61.0 (p < 0.001), than subjects at baseline. Child and parent-proxy agreement ranged from 35% to 56%. CONCLUSIONS: The new Pediatric PROMIS domains are valid and reliable for use in children with asthma, for both child-reported and parent-proxy reported outcomes. It was determined that children with acute asthma exacerbation have worse patient reported outcomes (PROs) for the new pain related domains and asthma impact.
Subject(s)
Asthma/physiopathology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Psychometrics/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Parents/psychology , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although annual transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening is recommended for children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), compliance is low and variable. Our objective was to utilize an electronic health record (EHR)-based registry to improve TCD adherence among children with SCA, 2-16 years of age, at our institution. METHODS: We developed an in-EPIC real time registry for children with sickle cell disease in year 2016. Since end of year 2016, we have been extracting data quarterly to examine TCD rates and share the list of children who have not received a TCD screen in the past 18 months with the clinical team. The registry also includes a TCD risk score to enhance point of care. We also added Child Life support to increase TCD compliance among children <7 years. Control charts are used to examine TCD rates. RESULTS: At baseline, prior to and start of quarterly data audit and feedback, 63% of children received the recommended annual TCD screen. TCD rates steadily increased to 80% by the third quarter of 2017. We observed a dip in TCD rates, driven by failure of screening young children. Since the initiation of Child Life support for children <7 years, we have sustained TCD screen rates >70%. Overall, our data meet criteria for special cause variation, indicating improvement in TCD rates since 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Regular tracking and identification of patients overdue for a TCD screen using an EHR-based registry resulted in sustained improvement in TCD screening rates. Involvement of Child Life support further improved TCD rates.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnostic imaging , Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnosis , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Registries/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) in pain conditions other than sickle cell disease (SCD); this relationship in SCD is unknown. We investigated this relationship and hypothesized neuropathic pain is associated with poor HRQL in adolescents with SCD. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with SCD ages 13-18 years during baseline health. Primary outcome was HRQL, assessed by the PedsQL SCD Module (child self-report, parent proxy report). PedsQL is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better HRQL. Neuropathic pain was assessed using the painDETECT questionnaire (scored 0-38); higher scores indicated greater likelihood of neuropathic pain. All completed both PedsQL SCD Module and painDETECT questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used and associations between painDETECT and PedsQL Total Score, Pain Impact, Pain and Hurt, and Pain Management and Control Scores were determined via Pearson correlation. Significance was P < .05. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 15 (14-16.5) years, 75% were female, and 83% were on hydroxyurea. Higher painDETECT scores were significantly associated with lower PedsQL SCD Module child self-report Pain and Hurt Scores (r = -0.68, P = .01). Higher painDETECT scores were also significantly associated with lower PedsQL parent proxy-report Total Scores (r = -0.64, P = .03) and Pain and Hurt Scores (r = -0.67, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that adolescents with SCD and neuropathic pain have poor HRQL even in their baseline state of health. Prospective, larger studies are needed to confirm this preliminary finding and explore a multimodal approach for pain assessment in SCD.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Neuralgia/etiology , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Neuralgia/pathology , Neuralgia/psychology , Pain Measurement , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prognosis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate the serial mediating effects of perceived cognitive functioning, patient health communication, and disease-specific worry in the relationship between pain and overall generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) from the patient perspective. METHODS: The pain, cognitive functioning, communication and worry scales from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Sickle Cell Disease Module and the PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales were completed in a multisite national study by 233 youth with SCD of ages 5-18. Hierarchical multiple regression and serial multiple mediator model analyses were conducted to test the mediating effects of perceived cognitive functioning, health communication, and disease-specific worry as intervening variables in the association between the pain predictor variable and overall generic HRQOL. RESULTS: Pain predictive effects on overall generic HRQOL were serially mediated by cognitive functioning, health communication, and disease-specific worry. In predictive analytics models utilizing hierarchical multiple regression analyses with age and gender demographic covariates, pain, cognitive functioning, health communication, and worry accounted for 65% of the variance in patient-reported overall generic HRQOL (P < .001), representing a large effect size. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived cognitive functioning, patient health communication, and disease-specific worry explain in part the mechanism of pain predictive effects on overall generic HRQOL in youth with SCD. Identifying SCD-specific pain, perceived cognitive functioning, health communication, and disease-specific worry as predictor variables of overall generic HRQOL from the patient perspective may inform clinical interventions and future patient-centered clinical research.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anxiety/physiopathology , Cognition , Health Communication , Pain/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Pain/etiology , Pain/psychology , PrognosisABSTRACT
Sickle cell disease (SCD) disproportionately affects Black or African American persons in the United States and can cause multisystem organ damage and reduced lifespan. Among 178 persons with SCD in the United States who were reported to an SCD-coronavirus disease case registry, 122 (69%) were hospitalized and 13 (7%) died.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Acuity , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Registries , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
We developed a risk score to predict event-free survival (EFS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. The study population (n = 1425) was randomly split into training (n = 1070) and validation (n = 355) cohorts. Risk factors were identified and validated via Cox regression models. Two risk factors of 9 evaluated were predictive for EFS: age at transplantation and donor type. On the basis of the training cohort, patients age 12 years or younger with an HLA-matched sibling donor were at the lowest risk with a 3-year EFS of 92% (score, 0). Patients age 13 years or older with an HLA-matched sibling donor or age 12 years or younger with an HLA-matched unrelated donor were at intermediate risk (3-year EFS, 87%; score, 1). All other groups, including patients of any age with a haploidentical relative or HLA-mismatched unrelated donor and patients age 13 years or older with an HLA-matched unrelated donor were high risk (3-year EFS, 57%; score, 2 or 3). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. This simple risk score may guide patients with sickle cell disease and hematologists who are considering allogeneic transplantation as a curative treatment relative to other available contemporary treatments.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/mortality , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/genetics , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Homologous/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) includes multiple domains that measure pain and physical functioning which are valid and reliable for use in children with sickle cell disease. The responsiveness of these measures to detect changes in health status over time among children with sickle cell disease is unknown. PROCEDURE: We conducted a prospective cohort study of children presenting to emergency department (ED) with vaso-occlusive crises. Children completed PROMIS surveys in the ED and at two follow-up time points (7-10 days and 1-3 months) after their acute care visit. Linear mixed models were used to determine if there were significant changes in PROMIS T scores over time. We used a patient's global assessment of change in pain question to anchor the changes in PROMIS scores (mean and 95% confidence interval). A change was considered statistically significant if the 95% CI did not include 0. RESULTS: We found that patients improved significantly in all domains 1 to 3 months after discharge from an acute care visit for pain. In addition, the pain and physical stress experience domains were responsive to change 7 to 10 days after discharge. Using the anchor of change in pain, for children who had considerable improvement in pain, there were significant changes in PROMIS T scores ranging from 6 to 15. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant PROMIS domains detect changes in children experiencing acute vaso-occlusive crises. These domains can be used in research and clinic settings to measure clinically relevant change in children with sickle cell disease.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/physiopathology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Pain/physiopathology , Adolescent , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Donors other than matched siblings and low-intensity conditioning regimens are increasingly used in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the relative risk of donor type and conditioning regimen intensity on the transplantation outcomes of in patients with sickle cell disease. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from 90 US centres reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Eligible patients were younger than 50 years, had genetically confirmed sickle cell disease (Hb SS) or sickle beta thalassemia (Hb Sß), and underwent allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 28, 2017. We considered transplants from donor-recipient pairs matched at the allele-level (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1), including HLA-matched sibling donors, haploidentical related donors, matched unrelated donors, or mismatched unrelated donors. The main outcome was event-free survival. The effect of donor type, conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative, non-myeloablative, and reduced-intensity regimens), age (≤12 or 13-49 years), sex, performance score, comorbidity index, recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus, graft type (bone marrow, peripheral blood, or umbilical cord blood), and transplantation period (2008-12 and 2013-17) on outcomes was studied using Cox regression models. FINDINGS: Of 996 patients with sickle cell disease and who underwent transplantation in 2008-17, 910 (91%) were included (558 [61%] patients had HLA-matched sibling donors, 137 [15%] haploidentical related donors, 111 [12%] matched unrelated donors, and 104 [11%] mismatched unrelated donors). The median follow-up was 36 months (IQR 18-60) after transplantation from HLA-matched siblings, 25 months (12-48) after transplantation from haploidentical related donors, 37 months (23-60) after transplantation from HLA-matched unrelated donors, and 47 months (24-72) after transplantation from mismatched unrelated donors. Event-free survival was worse in recipients aged 13 years or older than in those younger than 13 years (hazard ratio 1·74, 95% CI 1·24-2·45; p=0·0014) and in those who received a transplant from haploidentical related donors (5·30, 3·17-8·86; p<0·0001), matched unrelated donors (3·71, 2·39-5·75; p<0·0001), and mismatched unrelated donors (4·34, 2·58-7·32; p<0·0001) than in patients who received a transplant from matched siblings. There was no significant difference in event-free survival between recipients of transplants from non-sibling donors: haploidentical related donors (1·43, 0·81-2·50; p=0·21) or mismatched unrelated donors (1·17, 0·67-2·05; p=0·58) versus HLA-matched unrelated donors, or mismatched unrelated donors versus haploidentical related donors (1·22, 0·65-2·27; p=0·98). Event-free survival was also worse in patients conditioned with reduced-intensity regimens (1·97, 1·15-3·36; p=0·013) than in those conditioned with non-myeloablative regimens, but did not differ between those who received myeloablative compared with non-myeloablative regimens (1·57, 0·95-2·61; p=0·079). Interpretation Our data suggest that event-free survival is improved in patients with sickle cell disease who receive an allogenic transplantation at age 12 years or younger and those with an HLA-matched sibling donor. For patients without a matched sibling available for transplantation, our data do not favour one alternative donor type over another in this setting. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and US Health Services Research Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Fetal Blood/transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/mortality , Anemia, Sickle Cell/pathology , Blood Donors , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Child , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous , Young AdultABSTRACT
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and pain behavior domains are valid and reliable for children with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, clinical interpretation of the scores is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical meaning of PROMIS pain scores for children with SCD. We used 2 approaches to determine clinical meaning: dichotomization of item responses and T-score ranges. T-score ranges determined thresholds for no/mild, moderate, and severe pain. We compared the proportion of patients who needed pain medications among pain severity groups using χ2/Fisher's exact tests. The study included 117 children (mean age, 11.5 years [standard deviation, 2.9 years]). Using the dichotomization approach, 43 children had pain interference T-scores ≤48 reflecting minimal pain, and 30 children had T-scores >60 reflecting substantial pain. For pain behavior, 34 children had T-scores ≤41 reflecting minimal problems, and 23 patients had T-scores >57 reflecting substantial problems with pain. Using T-score ranges, clinical thresholds of no/mild and severe pain interference were determined as ≤48.3 and >63.6, respectively. The thresholds for no/mild and severe pain behavior were ≤41.3 and >57.3, respectively. Overall, the proportion of patients who took pain medications was significantly different among those with no/mild, moderate, and severe pain as identified by pain interference (P = .002) and pain behavior domains (P = .0113). We identified T-scores for PROMIS pain domains that facilitate clinical interpretation and provide necessary information for PROMIS users in a clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Child , Child Behavior , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine parent preferences for discharge with home oxygen in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study of parents of infants born at <32 weeks' gestation with established bronchopulmonary dysplasia and approaching neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge. Parents were presented a hypothetical scenario of an infant who failed weaning to room air and 2 options: discharge with home oxygen or try longer to wean oxygen. The initial scenario risks reflected a 1.5-week difference in NICU length of stay and no differences in other outcomes. Length of stay and readmission outcomes were increased or decreased until the parent switched preference. Three months after discharge, parents were asked to reconsider their preference. Differences were analyzed by χ2 or Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Of 125 parents, 50% preferred home oxygen. For parents preferring home oxygen, the most important reason was comfort at home (79%). Forty percent switched preference when the length of stay difference decreased by 1 week; 35% switched when readmission increased by 5%. For parents preferring to stay in NICU, the most important reason was fear of taking care of the child at home (73%). Thirty-two percent switched preference when the length of stay difference increased by 1 week; 31% switched when readmission decreased by 5%. One hundred ten parents completed the 3-month follow-up; 80 were discharged with home oxygen. Seventy-eight percent would prefer home oxygen (97% who initially preferred home oxygen and 60% who initially preferred to stay in the NICU). CONCLUSIONS: Parents weigh differences in NICU length of stay and readmission risk similarly. After discharge, most prefer earlier discharge with home oxygen. Earlier education to increase comfort with home technology may facilitate NICU discharge planning.
Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/therapy , Home Care Services , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Parents/psychology , Patient Preference , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Length of Stay , Male , Patient Discharge , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine how infant illness and parent demographics are associated with parent health-related quality of life (HRQL) during and 3 months after hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We hypothesized that parents of extremely preterm infants would report lower NICU HRQL than other parents, and that all parents would report improved HRQL after discharge. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study of parent-infant dyads admitted to a level IV NICU for ≥14 days from 2016 to 2017 measured parent HRQL before and 3 months after discharge using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Family Impact Module. Multivariable regression was used to identify risk factors associated with HRQL differences during hospitalization and after discharge. RESULTS: Of the 194 dyads, 167 (86%) completed the study (24% extremely preterm; 53% moderate to late preterm; 22% term). During the NICU hospitalization, parents of extremely preterm infants reported lower adjusted HRQL (-7 points; P = .013) than other parents. After discharge, parents of extremely preterm infants reported higher HRQL compared with their NICU score (+10 points; P = .001). Tracheostomy (-13; P = .006), home oxygen (-6; P = .022), and readmission (-5; P = .037) were associated with lower parent HRQL 3 months after discharge, adjusted for NICU HRQL score. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of extremely preterm infants experienced a greater negative impact on HRQL during the NICU hospitalization and more improvement after discharge than parents of other infants hospitalized in the NICU. Complex home care was associated with lower parent HRQL after discharge. The potential benefit of home discharge should be balanced against the potential negative impact of complex home care.