Five-year cardiovascular event risk in early rheumatoid arthritis patients who received treat-to-target management: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored whether the excess cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) risk in RA could be ameliorated by suppression of inflammation using a treat-to-target (T2T) approach. We compared the CV event (CVE) incidence among ERA patients managed by a T2T strategy with a CV risk factor-matched non-RA population and a historical RA cohort (HRA). METHODS: This was an observational study using the city-wide hospital data and the ERA registry. ERA patients received T2T management while HRA patients received routine care. Each ERA/HRA patient was matched to three non-RA controls according to age, gender and CV risk factors. Patients on antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents, with pre-existing CVD, chronic kidney disease or other autoimmune diseases were excluded. All subjects were followed for up to 5 years. The primary end point was the first occurrence of a CVE. RESULTS: The incidence of CVE in the ERA cohort (n = 261) and ERA controls were similar with a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI 0.15, 1.79). In contrast, the incidence of CVE in the HRA cohort (n = 268) was significantly higher than that of the HRA controls with a hazard ratio of 1.9 (95% CI 1.16, 3.13). The incidence of CVE in the ERA cohort was significantly lower than that of the HRA cohort and the difference became insignificant after adjusting for inflammation, the use of methotrexate and traditional CV risk factors. CONCLUSION: ERA patients managed by a T2T strategy did not develop excess CVE compared with CV risk factor-matched controls over 5 years.

Rituximab for refractory rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease related to anti-MDA5 antibody-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis.

To report our experience in using rituximab (RTX) for treating refractory rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) complicating anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody (anti-MDA5 Ab)-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM). Medical records of four ADM patients with refractory RP-ILD treated with RTX therapy were reviewed retrospectively. All four patients were tested positive for anti-MDA5 Ab and failed to respond to high-dose systemic steroid and other intensive immunosuppressive therapies. Respiratory symptoms, lung function tests, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest were compared before and after the first course of RTX. After RTX treatment, all four patients had improvement in the respiratory symptoms in terms of New York Heart Association classification. Two patients successfully had their supplementary oxygen therapy weaned off. The lung function tests were significantly better in all patients. The HRCT showed improvement in three patients while the other one remained static. The recalcitrant vasculitic rashes associated with the anti-MDA5 Ab were also better in all patients. The average daily prednisolone dose dropped from 20 to 6.25 mg post-treatment. None of the patients died throughout the follow-up period which ranged from 6 months to 2 years. However, two patients developed chest infection and one wound infection within 6 months after the RTX infusion. Our results suggest that RTX may be a useful therapy for anti-MDA5 Ab-positive ADM associated with RP-ILD. However, infection is the major risk.