Morbidity and mortality analysis in general surgery operations. Is there any room for improvement?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to examine the performance of surgeries, by evaluating the results. The evaluation of the results, with particular attention to complications, is the corner stone to identify the causes leading to correction of any predisposing factors and reducing risks, to improve quality of care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 952 consecutive patients who had elective or emergency surgery from November 1, 2018, to October 31, 2019. We classified surgical intervention according to their complexity. The Clavien Dindo classification was used to categorize the complications. We performed a stepwise multivariate logistic-regression analysis, with the presence of postoperative complications as dependent variable and age, gender, BMI, ASA, type of surgery procedures, complexity of surgery, operative time as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 952 surgical procedures were included in this study. Abdominal procedures were the most frequent type of surgery performed (52.1%). Postoperative complications occurred in 120 surgical procedures (12.6%), these are related to the increase of the ASA score and the longer average operative time, with an increase of developing complication of 5% for each additional 10 minutes of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Many factors influence postoperative morbidity and mortality. Particular attention was due to complication's evaluation, about all in abdominal surgery and high complexity procedures. We argue that key factors which influence the favorable surgical outcome are compliance with standardized safety procedures, volume of activity of the structure, presence of interdisciplinary care groups, and ability of health professionals in recognizing and promptly treating complications.

Effect of delaying surgery by more than 10 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a single institution experience.

The optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer is still controversial. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing time interval between the end of CRT and surgery on pathological outcomes. This is a retrospective analysis on 114 patients treated with long-course neoadjuvant RT with or without chemotherapy between January 2005 and September 2020. 43 patients underwent surgery within 10 weeks from the end of CRT (1st group), whereas 71 patients underwent total mesorectal excision with a time interval equal or greater than 10 weeks (2nd group). Primary endpoint was pCR (pathological complete response). Secondary endpoints were near pCR (ypT0-1 N0), tumor downstaging (ypT less than cT), nodal downstaging (ypN less than cN), and overall response comparing clinical with pathological TN stage. Overall, the pCR rate was 8.8%, whereas we observed no significantly difference in primary endpoint between the two groups. Considering near pCR, a trend toward significant difference in favor of 2nd group was seen (p = 0.072). Tumor and nodal downstaging rates were 39.5%, 41.9%, 59.2%, and 56.3% in the 1st and 2nd group, respectively, with a statistically significant difference for T category (p = 0.042). Overall response rates (TN stage) showed a trend toward significant difference in favor of patients of the ≥ 10 week group (p = 0.059). Our study suggests that a prolonged time interval between the end of CRT and surgery (≥ 10 weeks) increases pathological response rates.

Prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label trial, designed to evaluate the best timing of closure of the temporary ileostomy (early versus late) in patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and with indication for adjuvant chemotherapy: the STOMAD (STOMa closure before or after ADjuvant therapy) randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Temporary ileostomy is a valuable aid in reducing the severity of complications related to rectal cancer surgery. However, it is still unclear what is the best timing of its closure in relation to the feasibility of an adjuvant treatment, especially considering patient-reported outcomes and health system costs. The aim of the study is to compare the results of an early versus late closure strategy in patients with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for rectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective multicentre randomised trial, sponsored by Rete Oncologica Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta (Oncology Network of Piedmont and Aosta Valley-Italy). Patients undergone to rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy, aged >18 years, without evidence of anastomotic leak and with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy will be enrolled in 28 Network centres. An early closure strategy (between 30 and 40 days from rectal surgery) will be compared with a late one (after the end of adjuvant therapy). Primary endpoint will be the compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy with and without ileostomy. Complications associated with stoma closure as well as quality of life, costs and oncological outcomes will be assessed as secondary endpoints. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial will engage the Network professional teams in a common effort to improve the treatment of rectal cancer by ensuring the best results in relation to the most correct use of resources. It will take into consideration both the patients' point of view (patient-reported outcome) and the health system perspective (costs analysis). The study has been approved by the Ethical Review Board of Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital in Turin (Italy). The results of the study will be disseminated by the Network website, medical conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04372992.

Post-thyroidectomy chronic asthenia: self-deception or disease?

There is clinical evidence that post-total thyroidectomy (TT) patients can present persistent asthenia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of asthenia symptoms in such patients, assess whether a chronic asthenia syndrome could be caused by TT or become evident after it. An observational study was carried out comparing two groups of 100 patients each, all with homogeneous characteristics. Group A was treated with total lobectomy (TL), Group B with TT. All patients presented normal thyroid hormone levels. The patients were interviewed in order to identify the ones affected by post-operative asthenia persisting for at least six months, with reduced ability to perform physical and mental work, not showing improvement with rest. The severity of the symptoms has been measured by means of the brief fatigue inventory (BFI). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate statistically significative differences between groups and prognostic factors in TT group. The incidence of post-operative asthenia was 0 % after TL and 25 % after TT, with the operation being the only significant variable. Asthenia is well known as symptom of post-thyroidectomy, but it has not been adequately investigated as consequence of surgery. We demonstrated that the complete removal of the thyroid gland could determine chronic post-thyroidectomy asthenia, although with intensity limited to low/moderate. Post-thyroidectomy asthenia is a relevant sequela interfering with quality of life of at least 25 % of patients operated, suggesting the need to identify its real causes and limit the indication to TT only when strictly required.