Rural emergency care facilities may be adapting to their context: A population-level study of resources and workforce.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a structured understanding of rural hospital-based emergency care facility workforce and resources. DESIGN: The resources of regional training hubs were used to survey eligible emergency care facilities in their surrounding region. SETTING: Rural emergency care facilities manage more than one third of Australia's emergency presentations. These emergency care facilities include emergency departments and less-resourced facilities in smaller towns. PARTICIPANTS: Hospital facilities located outside metropolitan areas that report emergency presentations to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. INTERVENTIONS: A survey tool was sent by email. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of human, diagnostic and other resources as reported on a questionnaire. RESULTS: A completed questionnaire was received from 195 emergency care facilities. Over 60% of Small hospitals had on-call doctors only. General practitioners/generalists and nurses with extended emergency skills were found in all hospital types. Emergency physicians were present across all remoteness areas, but more commonly seen in larger facilities. All Major/Large facilities and most Medium facilities reported having onsite pathology and radiology. Point of care testing and clinician radiography were more commonly reported in smaller facilities. Among Small hospitals, Very Remote hospitals were more likely than Inner Regional hospitals to have an onsite doctor in the emergency care facility and/or a high dependency unit. CONCLUSION: Smaller and more remote facilities appear to adapt by using different workforce structures and bedside investigations.

The clinical and functional outcomes of a large naturalistic cohort of young people accessing national early psychosis services.

AIMS: Services for individuals with a first episode of psychosis or at ultra-high risk of psychosis have become a treatment model of choice in mental health care. The longitudinal changes in clinical and functional outcomes as a result of real-world treatment remain under-reported. METHODS: We analysed data from first episode of psychosis and ultra-high risk services delivered across Australian primary youth mental health care services known as headspace between 19 June 2017 and 30 September 2019. Outcome measures were completed and entered into a minimum dataset every 90 days a participant was receiving treatment and included psychiatric symptomatology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and psychological distress, K10) and psychosocial functioning (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale and My Life Tracker). Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate changes in outcome over time. RESULTS: Outcome data from a total of 1252 young people were evaluated (643 first episode of psychosis, 609 ultra-high risk). Of those who entered ultra-high risk services, 11.8% transitioned to first episode of psychosis services. Overall, substantial improvement in clinical (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, K10) and functional (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, My Life Tracker) outcomes were seen across groups and outcomes. Ultra-high risk patients showed a greater reduction in distress symptoms, while first episode of psychosis patients experienced a greater reduction in positive psychosis symptoms. Although clinical outcomes showed a plateau effect after approximately 3 months of care, improvement in functional outcomes (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, My Life Tracker) continued later in treatment. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of real-time, real-world and low-cost administrative data to rigorously evaluate symptomatic and functional outcomes in early psychosis treatment settings. Findings that functional outcomes improve past the remittance of clinical outcomes also support the functional recovery focus of early psychosis services and remaining high levels of distress suggest the need for ultra-high risk services to extend beyond 6 months of care.

New Fellows Early Career Survey 2014-2017: Shift of trends in emergency medicine workforce.

OBJECTIVE: Within the complex and dynamic emergency medicine workforce setting, the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) New Fellows (FACEMs) Early Career Survey was established in 2014 to capture information on the work profiles, future career plans and challenges experienced among new FACEMs. METHODS: The voluntary online survey is distributed twice yearly to new FACEMs who gained their Fellowship the preceding 6-12 months. Eligible new FACEMs were contacted by email and invited to participate. RESULTS: A representative sample of 348 (53%) of 660 eligible new FACEMs responded to the survey from 2014 to 2017. New Fellows in the 2017 cohort were less likely to have secured a specialist position at attainment of Fellowship or 6-12 months later. Compared with new FACEMs in earlier cohorts, they were significantly more likely to be working in regional areas, across multiple workplaces and in more than one area of clinical/professional practice. The proportion of new FACEMs working part-time or in casual positions (42%) remained reasonably consistent across the 4 years. Finding a specialist position and securing a permanent position were among the main challenges experienced by new FACEMs after attaining their Fellowship. CONCLUSION: A shift in the employment profile of early career Fellows was observed between 2014 and 2017, with the potential push factor of limited specialist positions in metropolitan areas now starting to result in an increase in new FACEMs choosing to work in regional and rural areas and in the number working across multiple workplaces.