"Follicular HCG endometrium priming for IVF patients experiencing resisting thin endometrium. A proof of concept study".

PURPOSE: A thin endometrium is one of the most difficult problems encountered in assisted reproduction every day practice. Whether a daily dose of 150 IU HCG for 7 days concomitant with estrogen administration in estrogen replacement cycles can increase the endometrial thickness and improve pregnancy outcome, was the objective of the current study. METHODS: Seventeen infertile patients with successive implantation failures and resisting thin endometrium, being recipients of fresh donor or frozen embryos were recruited. This was a prospective cohort, proof of concept study, NCT01768247. On day-8 or 9 of the estrogen administration, and continuing 8 mg estrogen per day, subcutaneous injections of 150 IU HCG were initiated daily for 7 days. After a week on HCG priming, (day-14 or 15) endometrial thickness was controlled with ultrasound, and progesterone was initiated. RESULTS: Mean endometrial thickness was increased from 5.2 mm to 6 mm (p = 0.008). 35.3 % of the patients had more than 20 % improvement of their endometrial thickness after HCG priming. 17 % achieved an endometrial thickness more than 7 mm, and 29.4 % did not improve their thickness at all. Interestingly, from the later two became pregnant. Overall, 41 % of them (7/17) finally delivered. CONCLUSIONS: One hundred fifty IU HCG endometrial priming for 7 days in the proliferative phase of estrogen substituted cycles for frozen embryos is highly promising, as not only the thickness of the endometrium improves but also eventually the receptivity appears normalized.

GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients.

STUDY QUESTION: Does a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger followed by a bolus of 1.500 IU hCG in a group of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) reduce the OHSS incidence compared with hCG trigger? SUMMARY ANSWER: A GnRHa trigger followed by early luteal hCG support with one bolus of 1.500 IU hCG appears to reduce OHSS in patients at risk of OHSS; however, in a low-risk group a second bolus of 1.500 IU hCG induced two cases of late onset OHSS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A GnRHa trigger is an alternative to hCG in GnRH antagonist co-treated cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Two RCTs were performed in four Danish IVF units. A total of 446 patients were assessed for eligibility and 390 patients were enrolled in the study from January 2009 until December 2011. The primary outcome of the study was OHSS incidence in the group at risk of OHSS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients received a fixed dose of recombinant human FSH for the first 4 days. On the day of triggering, patients were assessed for their risk of OHSS based on the total number of follicles ≥11 mm diameter, and were classified as being at risk of OHSS when the total number of follicles ≥11 mm was between 15 and 25 and at low risk of OHSS when the total number of follicles ≥11 mm was ≤14. Two separate randomization lists were used for each of the OHSS risk groups. Women at risk of OHSS were allocated (RCT 1) to either: Group A (n = 60), ovulation triggering with a bolus of 0.5 mg buserelin (GnRHa) s.c. followed by a single bolus of 1.500 IU hCG s.c. after the oocyte retrieval-or: Group B (n = 58): 5.000 IU hCG. Similarly, women at low risk of OHSS were allocated (RCT 2) to receive either: Group C (n = 125), a bolus of 0.5 mg buserelin s.c., followed by a bolus of 1.500 IU hCG s.c. after oocyte retrieval and a second bolus of 1.500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval +5-or: Group D (n = 141), 5.000 IU hCG. Groups C and D were included in order to obtain preliminary data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In women at risk of OHSS (RCT 1) (15-25 follicles) no OHSS case was seen in Group A (GnRHa trigger and one bolus of 1.500 IU hCG), whereas two cases of moderate late-onset OHSS occurred in group B (3.4%), (P = 0.24). In contrast, in women at a low risk of OHSS (RCT 2) (≤14 follicles) two cases of late-onset OHSS occurred in Group C (GnRHa trigger and two boluses of 1.500 IU hCG), whereas no OHSS case was encountered in Group D (P = 0.22). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the first RCT was powered to include 168 patients at risk of OHSS (15-25 follicles ≥11 mm) randomized to either GnRHa trigger or hCG trigger, the trial was prematurely discontinued when a total of 118 patients at risk of OHSS were randomized. In addition the second RCT in the OHSS low-risk group was designed as a feasibility study to assess the incidence of OHSS after GnRHa trigger and dual hCG administration versus 5.000 IU hCG. No power calculation was performed for this trial. In addition, there was a lack of blinding in the RCTs. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although a non-significant result, one bolus of 1.500 IU hCG after GnRHa trigger tended to reduce the OHSS rate in patients with 15-25 follicles ≥11 mm as well as secure the ongoing pregnancy rate. In contrast, in patients at low risk of OHSS the administration of two boluses of 1.500 IU hCG after GnRHa trigger should be avoided as it may induce OHSS.

Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in premenopausal and post-menopausal women. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effect of misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy for cervical dilatation, no solid conclusion has been reached. We therefore set out to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the ISI Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify RCTs comparing misoprostol versus placebo or control prior to hysteroscopy. No restrictions on language or time were applied. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all dichotomous outcomes, whereas mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerSimonian-Laird model according to the heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of the initial 141 potentially relevant articles that were retrieved, 21 RCTs involving 1786 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed according to menopausal status and according to whether diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy was performed. Premenopausal women treated with misoprostol had a significantly lower risk for further cervical dilatation in the diagnostic setting [RR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.34-0.92)] and a significantly lower risk for cervical laceration in the operative setting [RR (95% CI): 0.22 (0.09-0.54)], compared with placebo. In contrast, post-menopausal patients did not experience any clear benefit from misoprostol compared with placebo regarding the need for further cervical dilatation [RR (95% CI): 0.99 (0.76-1.30)] and the cervical laceration rate [RR (95% CI): 1.15 (0.40-3.29)]. In addition, the mean cervical width prior to hysteroscopy was significantly higher in premenopausal women treated with misoprostol compared with placebo [MD (95% CI): 2.47 mm (1.81-3.13)] but did not differ among post-menopausal patients [MD (95% CI): 0.39 mm (-0.42 to 1.21)]. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy appears to facilitate an easier and uncomplicated procedure only in premenopausal women.

GnRH-agonist versus GnRH-antagonist IVF cycles: is the reproductive outcome affected by the incidence of progesterone elevation on the day of HCG triggering? A randomized prospective study.

BACKGROUND: In view of the current debate concerning possible differences in efficacy between the two GnRH analogues used in IVF stimulated cycles, the current study aimed to explore whether progesterone control in the late follicular phase differs when GnRH antagonist is used as compared with GnRH agonist, and if so, to what extent the progesterone rise affects the probability of pregnancy. METHODS: Overall 190 patients were randomized: 94 in the GnRH-agonist group and 96 in the GnRH-antagonist group. The GnRH-agonist long protocol started on Day 21 of the preceding cycle with intranasal buserelin (600 mg per day). The GnRH-antagonist protocol started on Day 6 of the stimulation with ganirelix or cetrorelix (each 0.25 mg). All blood samples were analysed with the Elecsys analyzer. An intention-to-treat analysis was applied. RESULTS: A progesterone rise >1.5 ng/ml was noticed in 23.0% of the antagonist group, comparable with 24.1% incidence within the agonist group. Per patient randomized, delivery rates were also comparable: 28.1% in the antagonist group and 24.5% in the agonist group (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.63-2.31, P= 0.56). However, there was a reduction in delivery rates when progesterone exceeded the threshold of 1.5 ng/ml, both in the agonist group (9.5 versus 31.8%, P= 0.03) and in the antagonist group (14.3 versus 34.3%, P= 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of a progesterone rise was similar between the two analogues, our findings reconfirm previous observations that insufficient progesterone control (>1.5 ng/ml) on the day of ovulation triggering is related to poor delivery rates in both protocols. The current study has shown that the reproductive outcomes with the two GnRH analogues are comparable. Possible modes of action to circumvent late follicular progesterone rise should be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01191710.

The relationship of premature progesterone rise with serum estradiol levels and number of follicles in GnRH antagonist/recombinant FSH-stimulated cycles.

OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the relationship between premature progesterone (P) rise and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels and the number of follicles in GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH stimulated cycles. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and seven patients treated by IVF/ICSI at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine of the Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University were included in this observational study. They received 200 IU/day rec-FSH from day 2 of the cycle and daily GnRH antagonist starting on day 6 of stimulation. The criteria for hCG administration included the presence of ≥3 follicles of ≥17 mm diameter. Serum P, E(2) and LH were determined on the day of hCG administration. The outcome measure was to identify a threshold of E(2) and number of follicles on the day of hCG administration which would define a progesterone rise on the day of hCG administration (cut-off value of 1.5 ng/ml). RESULT(S): Patients with a P >1.5 ng/ml had significantly higher concentrations of E(2) and increased number of follicles on the day of hCG administration compared to those with P ≤1.5 ng/ml. However, patients with a P >1.5 ng/ml the day of hCG showed lower pregnancy rates than those with P <1.5 ng/ml (17.8 vs. 32.7%, respectively; p<0.05). A ROC curve was employed in order to estimate a cut-off for E(2) on day of hCG >1790.5 pg/ml and more than 9.5 follicles of ≥11 mm in diameter for progesterone rise over 1.5 ng/ml. CONCLUSION(S): A significant impact is shown on progesterone rise by E(2) and number of follicles on the day of hCG administration in GnRH antagonist/rec-FSH-stimulated cycles. With this knowledge, an upcoming progesterone rise during follicular phase can be anticipated and prevented.

The luteal phase after GnRH-agonist triggering of ovulation: present and future perspectives.

In stimulated IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles, the luteal phase is disrupted, necessitating luteal-phase supplementation. The most plausible reason behind this is the ovarian multifollicular development obtained after ovarian stimulation, resulting in supraphysiological steroid concentrations and consecutive inhibition of LH secretion by the pituitary via negative feedback at the level of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. With the introduction of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-(GnRH) antagonist, an alternative to human chorionic gonadotrophin triggering of final oocyte maturation is the use of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) which reduces or even prevents ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Interestingly, the current regimens of luteal support after HCG triggering are not sufficient to secure the early implanting embryo after GnRHa triggering. This review discusses the luteal-phase insufficiency seen after GnRHa triggering and the various trials that have been performed to assess the most optimal luteal support in relation to GnRHa triggering. Although more research is needed, GnRHa triggering is now an alternative to HCG triggering, combining a significant reduction in OHSS with high ongoing pregnancy rates.

Should Cochrane reviews be performed during the development of new concepts?

Cochrane reviews are internationally recognized as the highest standard in evidence-based health care. A Cochrane analysis conducts systematic reviews of primary research in human health care, and the analysis includes a comprehensive search of all potentially relevant studies and the use of explicit, reproducible criteria in the selection of studies for review. Thus, Cochrane reviews, undoubtedly provide many useful clinical guidelines. In this opinion paper, however, it is questioned at what level of clinical development of a new strategy a Cochrane review should be conducted in order not to draw premature conclusions that may not be sustained later on. Previous examples of this are debated together with the most recent Cochrane review regarding GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation, in which debatable conclusions are drawn from early studies, when the concept was still under development. We question the current policy of meta-analysis and recommend that in the future, the meta-analysts should await the results of a sufficient number of well-performed studies with an established new regime before an analysis is performed in order to avoid too early and possibly biased conclusions.

GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice?

BACKGROUND: GnRH agonist (GnRHa) triggering has been shown to significantly reduce the occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) compared with hCG triggering; however, initially a poor reproductive outcome was reported after GnRHa triggering, due to an apparently uncorrectable luteal phase deficiency. Therefore, the challenge has been to rescue the luteal phase. Studies now report a luteal phase rescue, with a reproductive outcome comparable to that seen after hCG triggering. METHODS: This narrative review is based on expert presentations and subsequent group discussions supplemented with publications from literature searches and the authors' knowledge. Moreover, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and analysed either in fresh IVF cycles with embryo transfer (ET), oocyte donation cycles or cycles without ET; risk differences were calculated regarding pregnancy rate and OHSS rate. RESULTS: In fresh IVF cycles with ET (9 RCTs) no OHSS was reported after GnRHa triggering [0% incidence in the GnRHa group: risk difference 5% (with 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.02)]. Importantly, the delivery rate improved significantly after modified luteal support [6% risk difference in favour of the HCG group (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.2)] when compared with initial studies with conventional luteal support [18% risk difference (95% CI: -0.36 to 0.01)]. In oocyte donation cycles (4 RCTs) the OHSS incidence is 0% [10% risk difference (95% CI: 0.02-0.40)]. CONCLUSIONS: GnRHa triggering is a valid alternative to hCG triggering, resulting in an elimination of OHSS. After modified luteal support there is now a non-significant difference of 6% in delivery rate in favour of hCG triggering.

Does cessation of progesterone supplementation during early pregnancy in patients treated with recFSH/GnRH antagonist affect ongoing pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether the cessation of progesterone (P) supplementation during early pregnancy after GnRH antagonist cycles is not inferior to its continuation in terms of pregnancy rates beyond 12 weeks of gestation METHODS: There were 200 patients, with a positive ß-hCG test (followed by a doubling in ß-hCG levels 48 h later) after a fixed recombinant FSH (recFSH)/GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI and a Day-3 fresh embryo transfer (ET), participated in this randomized controlled study. All patients received luteal support, with 200 mg vaginal P being administered three times daily for 14 days, beginning on the day of ET until the second ß-hCG test, 16 days post-ET. In the control group (n = 100) the administration of P was continued until 7 weeks of gestation. In the study group (n = 100), vaginal P was discontinued on the 16th day post-ET RESULTS: The ongoing pregnancy rate beyond 12 weeks, the primary outcome measure, did not differ between the study and control groups (82 versus 73%, P = 0.175; difference 9%, 95% CI: -2.6 to 20.3). There were also no significant differences observed between the study and control group in terms of abortion before or after 7 weeks of gestation [(9 versus 12%, P = 0.645) and (8 versus 10%, P = 0.806), respectively]. The same was true for bleeding episodes (14 versus 19%, P = 0.446). CONCLUSIONS: After recFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles, the withdrawal of P supplementation in early pregnancy, with normally increasing ß-hCG levels on the 16th day post-ET, had no significant clinical impact in terms of ongoing pregnancy rates beyond 12 weeks.

Endometrial advancement after triggering with recombinant or urinary HCG: a randomized controlled pilot study.

More than 3 days' luteal endometrial advancement in IVF has been related with no pregnancies. This study assessed the effect of recombinant and urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (recHCG and uHCG) when administered for final oocyte maturation on the advancement of endometrial histology. Thirty patients were randomized to receive either 250 microg recHCG or 10,000 IU uHCG in an antagonist/recombinant FSH protocol. Endometrial biopsy was performed on the day of oocyte retrieval. All specimens were evaluated according to Noyes' criteria by one pathologist blinded to the allocation treatment groups. Single blastocyst transfer was performed. Overall, 13 patients in recHCG group and 14 patients in uHCG group underwent endometrial biopsy. The mean days of histological endometrial advancement were comparable between the two groups: 2.03 versus 2.17days, respectively. Nevertheless more patients (69%, 9/13) had less than 3 days' advanced endometrium in the recHCG arm as compared with 43% (6/14) patients in the uHCG group (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.4-16.3). The delivery rate per patient was higher, although not significantly, in the recHCG group (38.5% versus 28.6%). Both recHCG and uHCG preparations induce advancement of endometrial maturation. Whether a subtle difference in endometrial maturation affects the reproductive outcome remains to be proven.

GnRHa to trigger final oocyte maturation: a time to reconsider.

Recently GnRH antagonist protocols for the prevention of a premature LH surge were introduced, allowing final oocyte maturation to be triggered with a single bolus of a GnRH agonist (GnRHa). GnRHa is as effective as hCG for the induction of ovulation, and apart from the LH surge a FSH surge is also induced. Until recently, prospective randomized studies reported a poor clinical outcome when GnRHa was used to trigger final oocyte maturation in IVF/ICSI antagonist protocols, presumably due to a luteal phase deficiency, despite standard luteal phase supplementation with progesterone and estradiol. As GnRHa triggering of final oocyte maturation could possess advantages over hCG triggering in terms of a reduced if not eliminated risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the retrieval of more mature oocytes, the challenge has been to rescue the luteal phase. In the literature now several studies report a luteal phase rescue with a reproductive outcome comparable to that of hCG induced final oocyte maturation. Although more research is needed, GnRHa triggering is now a valid alternative with potential benefits.

Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether the probability of pregnancy is increased by adding estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support in patients treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: A literature search covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, meeting proceedings and reference lists of published articles was performed to identify relevant RCTs. Data were extracted for meta-analysis yielding pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses by including studies with pseudo-randomization or unclear method of randomization were also performed (n=1141 patients in total). RESULTS: Four RCTs (n=587 patients) were eligible for inclusion. No statistically significant differences were present between patients who received a combination of progesterone and estrogen for luteal support when compared with those who received only progesterone, in terms of positive hCG rate (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.19), clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.78-1.13) and live birth rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77-1.21) per woman randomized. These results did not materially differ in the sensitivity analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available evidence suggests that the addition of estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support does not increase the probability of pregnancy in IVF. However, there is an obvious need for further RCTs that will assess, with more confidence, the effect of estrogen addition to progesterone during the luteal phase on the probability of pregnancy.

Among patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for in vitro fertilization, is the addition of recombinant LH associated with the probability of live birth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether the addition of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) increases live birth rate, among patients treated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) answering the research question that contained sufficient information to allow ascertainment of whether randomization was true and whether equality was present between the groups compared, regarding baseline demographic characteristics, gonadotrophin stimulation protocol, number of embryos transferred and luteal phase support administered. A literature search identified seven RCTs (701 patients) that provided the information of interest, among which five reported agonist and two antagonist cycles. The reported outcome measure, clinical pregnancy, was converted to live birth using published data in one study. No significant difference in the probability of live birth was present with or without rLH addition to FSH (odds ratio [OR]: 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.31; P = 0.65). This finding remained stable in subgroup analyses that ordered the studies by dose of rLH added, the type of analogue used to inhibit premature LH surge, the time rLH was added during the follicular phase, the age of patients analysed, the presence of allocation concealment and by the way the information on live birth was retrieved. In conclusion, the available evidence does not support the hypothesis that the addition of recombinant LH increases the live birth rate in patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for IVF.

Triggering of final oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin. Live birth after frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycles after GnRH-agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in the collecting cycle with GnRH-antagonist. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, multicentric clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary university-affiliated IVF centers. PATIENT(S): Patients under observation previously had been recruited into two concurrently performed, independent, randomized controlled trials (comparing hCG with GnRH-agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocols in normal responder patients) encompassing a total of 228 participants. Surplus embryos or oocytes at the pronuclear stage were cryopreserved in 53 patients after hCG administration and 32 patients after GnRH-agonist administration on the basis of patient choice, pronuclear/embryo availability, and local laws. INTERVENTION(S): Transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate. RESULT(S): Thirty-one and 23 patients after administration of hCG and GnRH-agonist, respectively, started a frozen-embryo replacement cycle by September 2005, with 25 and 16 patients eventually undergoing at least one frozen-thawed ET. Live birth rate per ET was 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-36.7) and 30.0% (95% CI, 14.5-51.9) after hCG and GnRH-agonist triggering, respectively. Cumulative live birth rate per patient starting a frozen-embryo replacement cycle was 16.1% (95% CI, 7.1-32.6) and 26.1% (95% CI, 12.5-46.5) for hCG and GnRH-agonist, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The likelihood of live birth in frozen-embryo replacement cycles after GnRH-agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation does not appear to be impaired.

Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate.

BACKGROUND: The Belgian legislation imposes single embryo transfer (SET) on women of <36 years in their first treatment cycle to avoid multiple pregnancies. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of this legislation on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for inherited diseases in young women undergoing SET. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PGD cycles for monogenic disorders and translocations in women <36 years on their first treatment cycle. Two groups of patients were defined according to the implementation of the Belgian legislation: (i) double embryo transfer (DET), January 2001-June 2003 (ii) SET, July 2003-June 2005. The primary and secondary outcome measures were delivery per embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rates, respectively. A subgroup analysis for monogenic disorders and translocations was performed. RESULTS: 62 cycles were included in the DET group and 73 cycles in the SET group. The mean age, number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, number of fertilized oocytes, number of biopsied and cryopreserved embryos were comparable between both groups. There was no significant difference in the delivery rates between the DET and the SET groups (33.9% versus 27.4%, respectively). Multiple pregnancies were avoided when SET was performed. When monogenic disorders and chromosomal translocations were separately evaluated, no significant difference in the delivery rate after SET was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a SET policy in young women undergoing PGD for monogenic disorders and translocations enables a significant reduction of multiple pregnancies without significantly affecting the delivery rate.

Effect of oral administration of dydrogestrone versus vaginal administration of natural micronized progesterone on the secretory transformation of endometrium and luteal endocrine profile in patients with premature ovarian failure: a proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the endometrial histology and endocrine profiles on day 21 of an artificial cycle in patients with premature ovarian failure (POF) treated with oral dydrogesterone (DG) or vaginal micronized progesterone. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective pilot study at an academic reproductive medicine unit. Six POF patients were included in the study. After estrogen endometrial priming, patients were randomized to receive DG or progesterone in two subsequent cycles. The main outcome measure was the endometrial histology and the endocrine profiles on day 21 of the cycle. RESULTS: Development of endometrial glands corresponded to an early secretory phase in five out of six cases supplemented with DG (out-phase). In contrast, five out of six cases treated with micronized progesterone showed an endometrium corresponding to a mid-luteal phase (in-phase) (P = 0.021 versus DG). There was a significant difference in the mean progesterone value [8.6 versus 0.3 microg l(-1) (P = 0.013)], the mean LH value [12.9 versus 22.5 IU l(-1) (P = 0.049)] and the mean FSH value [13.0 versus 23.9 IU l(-1) (P = 0.047)] between the progesterone and DG group, respectively, on day 21 of the cycle. CONCLUSIONS: After estrogen endometrial priming in POF patients, exogenous vaginal micronized progesterone is more effective than oral DG in creating an 'in-phase' secretory endometrium and induces significantly higher progesterone and lower LH and FSH serum concentrations on day 21 of the cycle.

Does PGD for aneuploidy screening change the selection of embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men?

BACKGROUND: An increased incidence of aneuploid embryos has been recently described from azoospermic men. The aim of this study was to assess if embryo selection on day 5, based on morphological criteria, would be different from the selection based on PGD for aneuploidy screening (AS) in couples undergoing ICSI for male azoospermia. METHODS: Sixty-two cycles of testicular sperm extraction (TESE)-ICSI with PGD-AS were included in the analysis. Two embryologists, blinded to the PGD-AS results, retrospectively reviewed the available embryology data from day 5 embryos and selected one, two or three embryos to be transferred. These results were compared with the selected embryos based on PGD-AS. RESULTS: A total of 39 cycles from non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and 23 cycles from obstructive azoospermia (OA) were retrospectively analysed. If single embryo transfer (SET) had been performed, in 64.8% of the NOA cycles and 54.5% of the OA cycles, no difference in embryo choice would have occurred compared to PGD-AS and in 10.8 and 36.6% of the cycles, respectively, an aneuploid embryo would have been chosen. If double ET (DET) had been performed, in 72.9% of the NOA cycles and 86.5% of the OA cycles, no difference in embryo choice would have occurred compared to PGD-AS and in 2.7 and 4.5% of the cycles, respectively, an aneuploid embryo would have been chosen. If triple ET (TET) had been performed, the outcome would have been the same as for DET. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that under the terms of an SET policy, the performance of PGD-AS in azoospermia would result in a higher chance of success, as the possibility of selecting a euploid embryo is enhanced.

Early pregnancy loss is significantly higher after day 3 single embryo transfer than after day 5 single blastocyst transfer in GnRH antagonist stimulated IVF cycles.

The current study aimed to investigate whether single day-3 embryo transfer (SET) results in higher early pregnancy loss (EPL) than single blastocyst transfer (SBET). A total of 896 patients underwent 1103 IVF cycles with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. In 603 cycles (D3 group) a single embryo on day 3 of the embryo culture was transferred, whereas in the remaining 500 cycles a single blastocyst was transferred on day 5 (D5 group). Multifollicular ovarian stimulation was performed with a GnRH antagonist protocol starting on day 6. SET resulted in 209 pregnancies (34.7%), compared with 221 pregnancies (44.2%) for SBET. Early pregnancy loss rate was significantly higher with SET compared with SBET (26.8% versus 17.2%, P = 0.017) and ongoing implantation rate was also significantly higher with day 5 compared with day-3 embryo transfer (OR:1.68, 95% confidence interval:1.31-2.18). Sub-optimal embryo selection for transfer on day 3, in addition to asynchronization between altered endometrium and early exposure of cleavage-stage embryos, might explain the above difference. Nevertheless, the higher implantation potential of the blastocyst questions the rationale behind performing single embryo transfer on day 3 of embryo culture in women under 36 years old.