ABSTRACT
AIM: The ipsilateral external carotid artery (ECA) can potentially provide an important collateral pathway for cerebral blood flow in the presence of occlusion or severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), recovering up to 15% of the middle cerebral arterial flow. The aim of the study is to elucidate the role of ECA in cerebral flow of patients with total ICA occlusion. METHODS: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 139 patients with total ICA occlusions. The patients were divided to symptomatic and asymptomatic and were categorized in four subgroups according to the stenosis rates: A) ipsilateral ECA<70% and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis <70%; B) ipsilateral ECA stenosis <70% and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis ≥70%; C) ipsilateral ECA stenosis ≥70% and contralateral ICA stenosis <70%; D) ipsilateral ECA stenosis ≥70% and contralateral ICA stenosis ≥75%. RESULTS: Fifty eight (41.7%) patients were asymptomatic. The highest rate (48.2%) of asymptomatic patients was in Group A. Among patients with strokes, the highest rate belonged in groups C and D (44.4% and 50% respectively) where ipsilateral ECA stenosis was ≥70% irrespectively of the contralateral ICA patency. Ipsilateral external carotid artery stenosis ≥70% proved to be and independent risk factor for symptom presentation (P=0.013). CONCLUSION: The study reveals the significant role of ECA patency in cerebral flow in patients with ICA occlusion.
Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, External/physiopathology , Carotid Artery, Internal/physiopathology , Carotid Stenosis/physiopathology , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Collateral Circulation , Middle Cerebral Artery/physiopathology , Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Asymptomatic Diseases , Carotid Artery, External/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/complications , Carotid Stenosis/diagnosis , Cerebral Angiography , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Greece , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/etiology , Ischemic Attack, Transient/physiopathology , Logistic Models , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Male , Middle Cerebral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Regional Blood Flow , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/physiopathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, Doppler, DuplexABSTRACT
During the last 50 years vascular surgery has met an enormous evolution, paving the way for the development of modern vascular and endovascular surgery. Although, vascular surgery (VS) has emerged from general (GS) and cardiothoracic surgery (CTS), the need for specialized training has been recognized and gradually practice patterns are shifting towards vascular independence, but yet not in all countries. In these countries VS training is either permitted only after prerequisite GS certification, or as a non accredited surgical specialty, VS might be included in GS or CTS training and certification. Such a policy raises two main issues: the efficiency of vascular training within the GS or CTS curricula and the performance of vascular interventions by general or cardiothoracic surgeons. Meanwhile, the explosion of endovascular procedures has brought new disciplines into play, each one wanting to maintain its stake in the future. Interventional radiologists and a significant number of cardiologists become increasingly involved in the treatment of vascular diseases. The question of which specialist among those qualified should carry out medical treatment, open, and endovascular procedures is still suspended. Under this prism, vascular training issues arise as an important component of the future of vascular surgeons.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Endovascular Procedures/education , Interdisciplinary Communication , Internship and Residency , Vascular Surgical Procedures/education , Certification , Clinical Competence , Cooperative Behavior , Curriculum , Humans , Models, Educational , Patient Care TeamABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the best type of arteriovenous (AV) fistula to be formed in secondary and tertiary access procedures when primary fistulas have failed. This meta-analysis aimed to compare transposed brachial-basilic AV fistulas (BBAVFs) with upper limb AV prosthetic grafts. METHODS: A literature search of the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both BBAVFs with upper limb AV prosthetic grafts. Meta-analysis techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two groups regarding primary and secondary 1-year failure rates. RESULTS: Eleven relevant studies, involving 1509 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated in the final analysis; however, only one was randomised controlled trial. The pooled odds' ratio (OR) estimate for the primary and secondary failure rates at 1 year was 0.67 (CI 0.41-1.09) and 0.88 (CI 0.69-1.12), respectively, showing no difference in the outcome between the two groups. The re-intervention rate was higher for prosthetic grafts (0.54 per BBAVF versus 1.32 per graft). In a small subgroup of two studies comparing BBAVFs with forearm grafts the pooled estimate for 1-year primary failure rate was in favour of the BBAVF group (OR 0.3, CI 0.15-0.58, p=0.0004) suggesting that forearm grafts were inferior having a 3-fold risk of failure at 1 year. CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the use of BBAVF early in difficult access cases prior to the use of prosthetic grafts. However, the latter conclusion is debatable due to heterogeneity, small size and non-randomised design of the included studies.
