ABSTRACT
The regimen of 5-azacytidine for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has remained unchanged since its first approval. Although several modifications have since been made and delays and dose reductions are common especially during the first treatment cycles, there are minimal data on the prognostic effect of these modifications. In this study, based on data from 897 patients with MDS treated with 5-azacytidine recorded in a national registry, the effect of treatment delays and dose reductions on response, transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia, and survival (after 5-azacytidine initiation, OST ) were analysed. Delays during the first two cycles were noted in 150 patients (16·7%) and were found to adversely affect OST independently of the International Prognostic Scoring System score [hazard ratio (HR), 1·368; P = 0·033] or pre-existing neutropenia (HR, 1·42; P = 0·015). In patients achieving a response, delays before response achievement were correlated with its type (complete remission, 2·8 days/cycle; partial remission, 3·3 days/cycle; haematologic improvement, 5·6 days/cycle; P = 0·041), while delays after response achievement did not have any effect on retention of response or survival. Dose reductions were found to have no prognostic impact. Based on our results, treatment delays especially during the first cycles should be avoided, even in neutropenic patients. This strict strategy may be loosened after achieving a favourable response.
Subject(s)
Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Drug Tapering , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Registries , Time-to-Treatment , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hypomethylating agents have altered the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) so that long-term survival is now a feasible treatment goal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from patients with MDS treated with 5-azacytidine recorded in the Hellenic 5-azacytidine registry. We divided patients, on the basis of their survival after 5-azacytidine initiation (OST), in groups of long-term survivors (Q3 and P90 group with OST above the third quartile and the 90th percentile of the whole group, respectively) and short-term survivors comprising the remaining patients, and compared the characteristics between the groups. The study included 626 patients, 157 in the Q3 group and 63 in the P90 group. RESULTS: Categorization per the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), revised IPSS (IPSS-R), and World Health Organization-based prognostic scoring system (WPSS) was found to predict long-term survival, while multivariate analysis revealed that response to 5-azacytidine was the strongest predictor of long-term survival. Nevertheless, patients with hematologic improvement (HI) and stable disease (SD) were equally distributed in the groups of short- and long-term survival. CONCLUSION: SD should not be considered a poor treatment response and should not be grouped with failure, while HI offers similar prognosis to SD and thus should not be grouped with complete and partial remission. Patients with SD should continue treatment with 5-azacytidine.
