ABSTRACT
Reports in the veterinary literature support three-view abdominal radiographs as a standard of practice for evaluating dogs with suspected gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. The usefulness of three-view abdominal studies has not been evaluated in cats. Images from a prospective crossover group study with 20 healthy cats, and those from a retrospective cohort study of 110 cats, were reviewed and the location and degree of gas was assessed in the gastric outflow tract. Comparisons of the frequency of luminal gas were made between the views and between cats with GI disease versus cats without and between cats having sedation versus those without. Chi-Square analysis was performed with P < .05 being considered significant. No significant difference was found in the location and degree of luminal gas in left versus right lateral views in all cats regardless of the order in which the views were obtained or in cats with GI disease versus cats without. Cats with gastric dilation had a higher overall frequency of gas; those with dilation with homogeneous material were higher than those with dilation with heterogeneous material. A higher frequency of gas was found in sedated cats than nonsedated, but further study is needed to determine the underlying cause. Based on these findings, a three-view abdominal study for cats as a standard of practice may not be necessary, but obtaining the additional lateral view when gastric dilation is present might allow better visualization of the pyloric antrum and duodenum.
Subject(s)
Cat Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Duodenal Ulcer/veterinary , Gases , Stomach Ulcer/veterinary , Animals , Cats , Cross-Over Studies , Duodenal Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Duodenum/diagnostic imaging , Female , Male , Patient Positioning , Prospective Studies , Pyloric Antrum/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Abdominal/veterinary , Stomach Ulcer/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
A 6-year-old neutered male, Golden retriever presented with regurgitation and excitement-induced coughing. Two years prior, extra-thoracic tracheal collapse was diagnosed and extra-luminal tracheal ring prostheses were placed. Radiographs at presentation showed mineralized and undulant cervical tracheal cartilages. A dorsally broad-based soft tissue opacity bulged into the caudal cervical tracheal lumen. Esophageal dysmotility and barium accumulation were identified at this level on contrast esophography. Computed tomography showed migration of a prosthetic tracheal ring, resulting in perforation of the esophagus. Hair, foreign material, and dynamic tracheal narrowing were identified on esophagoscopy and tracheoscopy, respectively. Esophagostomy and foreign body removal were performed.
Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Perforation/veterinary , Prosthesis Failure , Radiography/veterinary , Animals , Dog Diseases/etiology , Dogs , Esophageal Perforation/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophagoscopy/veterinary , Male , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/veterinaryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Degenerative joint disease (DJD) is highly prevalent in cats, and pain contributes to morbidity. In humans, alterations of cytokine concentrations have been associated with joint deterioration and pain. Similar changes have not been investigated in cats. Cytokine concentrations can be measured using multiplex technology with small samples of serum or plasma, however, serum and plasma are not interchangeable for most bioassays. Correlations for cytokine concentrations between serum and plasma have not been evaluated in cats. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the levels of detection and agreement between serum and plasma samples in cats. ANIMALS: Paired serum and plasma samples obtained from 38 cats. METHODS: Blood was collected into anti-coagulant free and EDTA Vacutainer® tubes, serum or plasma extracted, and samples frozen at -80°C until testing. Duplicate samples were tested using a 19-plex feline cytokine/chemokine magnetic bead panel. RESULTS: Agreement between serum and plasma for many analytes was high, however correlation coefficients ranged from -0.01 to 0.97. Results from >50% of samples were below the lower limit of quantification for both serum and plasma for nine analytes, and for an additional three analytes for plasma only. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: While serum and plasma agreement was generally good, detection was improved using serum samples.