S100A8 alarmin supports IL-6 and metalloproteinase-9 production by fibroblasts in the synovial microenvironment of peripheral spondyloarthritis.

Introduction: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a common autoinflammatory disease. S100A8/ S100A9 alarmin is strongly expressed in the synovial sublining layers of psoriatic arthritis. S100A8/ S100A9 is the most abundant protein in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid (SF) and has a key role in promoting IL-6 expression in fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS). The molecular mechanisms and the role of S100-alarmins in the synovial microenvironment of SpA have never been demonstrated. Methods and Results: Here, we confirm the effect of the synovial microenvironment of peripheral SpA on interleukin-6 (IL-6) and metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 production by FLS. MMP-9 expression and activity were detected, which were reduced in the presence of anti-IL-6R. Analyzing cell signaling mechanisms, we found that stimulation with IL-6 co-triggered MMP-9 and IL-10 secretion. MMP-9 secretion depended on JNK and p38 MAPKs, whereas IL-10 secretion was dependent on the JAK pathway as a potential feedback mechanism controlling IL-6-induced MMP-9 expression. Using a proteomic approach, we identified S100A8 in the peripheral SpA SF. This presence was confirmed by immunoblotting. S100A8 increased the IL-6 secretion via ERK and p38 MAPK pathways. Furthermore, anti-S100A8/A9 reduced both IL-6 and MMP-9 production induced by SpA SF in FLS. Discussion: Our data reveal a marked relationship between S100A8 alarmin with IL-6 and MMP-9 secretion by FLS in the real synovial microenvironment of peripheral SpA. These results identify a mechanism linking S100A8 to the pathogenesis of peripheral SpA.

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Etanercept (Enerceptan) Versus Its Original Form in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Noninferiority Study.

BACKGROUND: Enerceptan (EtaBS) has been developed as a proposed biosimilar of etanercept. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study conducted in Argentina included adults with active, moderate, and severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate. Subjects were randomly assigned to 32 weeks treatment with EtaBS (n = 99) or etanercept (n = 51) at a weekly 50-mg dose administered subcutaneously. Patients were categorized according to prior use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and concomitant use of steroids. The primary efficacy endpoint was ACR20 response rate at week 32. Safety, immunogenicity, and steady-state concentration of both drugs were evaluated. The noninferiority margin for ACR20 was estimated at 12%. RESULTS: In the per-protocol population, 85 subjects (92.4%) treated with EtaBS and 44 subjects (93.6%) treated with etanercept achieved ACR20 (difference, -1.2%; 95% confidence interval, -10.1% to 7.6%). Frequent adverse drug reactions occurred in 34.3% and 38% of subjects treated with EtaBS and etanercept, respectively. The most common reaction was upper respiratory tract infection. Six and 3 serious adverse events occurred in 4 and 3 subjects treated with EtaBS and etanercept, respectively. Injection site reactions occurred in 67.7% and 66.0% of subjects treated with EtaBS and etanercept, respectively. Two subjects treated with EtaBS and 1 subject treated with etanercept developed antibodies by week 32. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy outcomes for EtaBS were noninferior to original etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate. Safety and immunogenicity results were comparable between the two. This study is a major step toward improving access to biologics in Latin America.