miR-196b-5p and miR-107 Expression Differentiates Ocular Sebaceous Carcinoma from Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Conjunctiva.

An Ocular Sebaceous Carcinoma (OSC) is a rare malignant tumor for which initial clinical and pathological diagnosis is often incorrect. OSCs can mimic Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Conjunctiva (SCCC). The aim of this study was to find microRNA biomarkers to distinguish OSCs and SCCCs from normal tissue and from each other. Clinical OSC and SCCC case files and the corresponding histopathological slides were collected and reviewed. Micro dissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor and control tissues were subjected to semi-high throughput microRNA profiling. MicroRNA expression distinguishes OSCs and SCCCs from corresponding control tissues. Selected differentially expressed miRNAs were validated using single RT-PCR assays. No prognostic miRNAs could be identified that reliably predict SCCC metastasis or OSC recurrence. A comparison between OSCs (n = 14) and SCCCs (n = 18) revealed 38 differentially expressed microRNAs (p < 0.05). Differentially expressed miRNAs were selected for validation in the discovery cohort and an independent validation cohort (OSCs, n = 11; SCCCs, n = 12). At least two miRNAs, miR-196b-5p (p ≤ 0.05) and miR-107 (p ≤ 0.001), displayed a statistically significant differential expression between OSCs and SCCCs with miR-196b-5p upregulated in SCCCs and miR-107 upregulated in OSCs. In the validation cohort, microRNA miR-493-3p also showed significant upregulation in SCCCs when compared to OSCs (p ≤ 0.05). ROC analyses indicated that the combined miR-196b-5p and miR-107 expression levels predicted OSCs with 90.0% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity. In conclusion, the combined testing of miR-196b-5p and miR-107, can be of additional use in routine diagnostics to discriminate OSCs from SCCCs.

The Effect of Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Medication on Metastatic Uveal Melanomas.

BACKGROUND: There has been speculation that IOP-lowering medication, which increases aqueous humor outflow, increases the risk of metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). This hypothesis has not been studied previously but is relevant for UM patients who use IOP-lowering medication. The aim of the current study is to assess the association between the use of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication and the risk of metastatic UM, and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, in which patients from the Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Study were included from 1986 onwards. Medical records were evaluated for use of IOP-lowering medication at baseline (i.e., before diagnosis). For each IOP-lowering medication, we divided patients into two groups for comparison (e.g., patients with alpha2-agonist use and patients without alpha2-agonist use). All patients underwent regular ophthalmic examinations and routine screening for metastasis. Survival analyses were initiated to compare groups in each IOP-lowering medication group. In addition, secondary analyses were performed to examine the association between IOP and the development of metastatic UM, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 707 patients were included of whom 13 patients used prostaglandin or pilocarpine at baseline. For alpha2-agonist, beta-blocker, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and oral IOP-lowering medication these were 4, 14, 11, and 12 patients, respectively. The risk of metastatic UM (choroid and ciliary body melanoma) among the prostaglandin/pilocarpine users was significantly higher than controls (HR [95% CI]: 4.840 [1.452-16.133]). Mortality did not differ significantly among the IOP-lowering medications groups, except for the prostaglandin or pilocarpine group (HR [95% CI]: 7.528 [1.836-30.867]). If we combined all IOP-lowering medication that increase aqueous humor outflow, the risk (HR [95% CI]) of metastatic UM and mortality was 6.344 (1.615-24.918) and 9.743 (2.475-38.353), respectively. There was an association between IOP and mortality, but not for the onset of metastatic UM. CONCLUSION: The use of topical prostaglandin or pilocarpine may increase the risk of metastatic UM and mortality compared to patients without prostaglandin or pilocarpine use. Therefore, use of IOP-lowering medication which increases aqueous humor outflow, should be avoided in patients with (presumed) UM.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma, late clinical results.

PURPOSE: To determine local control, late toxicity and metastatic free survival (MFS) of patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (fSRT) for uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1999 and 2007, 102 UM patients were included in a prospective study of a single institution (median follow-up (FU) 32 months; median tumor thickness 6 mm); five fractions of 10 Gy were given. Primary endpoints were local tumor control and late toxicity (including visual outcome and eye preservation). Secondary endpoint was MFS. RESULTS: Local tumor control was achieved in 96% of the patients. Fifteen enucleations were performed, 2-85 months after radiation. Four eyes were enucleated because of local tumor progression. Nine patients developed grade 3 or 4 neovascular glaucoma (NVG), 19 developed severe retinopathy, 13 developed opticoneuropathy grade 3 or 4, 10 developed cataract grade 3, and 10 patients suffered from keratitis sicca. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) decreased from a mean of 0.26 at diagnosis to 0.16, 3 months after radiation and it gradually declined to 0.03, 4 years after therapy. The 5-year actuarial MFS was 75% (95% CIs: 62-84%). CONCLUSIONS: fSRT is an effective treatment modality for uveal melanoma with a good local control. With that, fSRT is a serious eye sparing treatment modality. However, our FU is relatively short. Also, the number of secondary enucleations is substantial, mainly caused by NVG.

Not only hard contact lens wear but also soft contact lens wear may be associated with blepharoptosis.

OBJECTIVE: The authors attempt to establish an association between prolonged hard and soft contact lens wear and ptosis. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective consecutive series. PARTICIPANTS: All patients between 18 and 50 years of age who were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral ptosis between January 2002 and December 2005 (35 patients). METHODS: In a retrospective consecutive series, we included all patients between 18 and 50 years of age, with unilateral or bilateral ptosis between January 2002 and December 2005. Patients with congenital ptosis, ophthalmic surgery or disease, trauma, giant papillary conjunctivitis, unknown duration of contact lens wear, or muscular or neurologic disorders were excluded. We compared this study group to a Dutch reference population (the total underlying population from which the ptosis cases derive). RESULTS: The group included 35 patients: 20 (57%) (ages 18 to 50 years, average 37 years) had been wearing hard contact lenses for, on average, 17.6 years (range 6 to 27 years); 9 (26%) (ages 18 to 45 years, average 30 years) had been wearing soft contact lenses for, on average, 9 years (range 1.5 to 20 years); and 6 (17%) (ages 23 to 39 years, average 33 years) had no history of contact lens wear. The odds ratio for soft contact lenses was 14.7 (4.2 to 50.7; CI = 95) and for hard contact lenses 97.8 (22.5 to 424). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that not only hard contact lens wear but also soft contact lens wear may be associated with ptosis.

Effectiveness of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To study the effectiveness and acute side effects of fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (fSRT) for uveal melanoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1999 and 2003, 38 patients (21 male, 17 female) were included in a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial (mean follow-up of 25 months). A total dose of 50 Gy was given in 5 consecutive days. A blinking light and a camera (to monitor the position of the diseased eye) were fixed to a noninvasive relocatable stereotactic frame. Primary end points were local control, best corrected visual acuity, and toxicity at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. RESULTS: After 3 months (38 patients), the local control was 100%; after 12 months (32 patients) and 24 months (15 patients), no recurrences were seen. The best corrected visual acuity declined from a mean of 0.21 at diagnosis to 0.06 2 years after therapy. The acute side effects after 3 months were as follows: conjunctival symptoms (10), loss of lashes or hair (6), visual symptoms (5), fatigue (5), dry eye (1), cataract (1), and pain (4). One eye was enucleated at 2 months after fSRT. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results demonstrate that fSRT is an effective and safe treatment modality for uveal melanoma with an excellent local control and mild acute side effects. The follow-up should be prolonged to study both long-term local control and late toxicity.

In vivo and in vitro detection of dopamine d2 receptors in uveal melanomas.

Scintigraphy with radiolabeled benzamides was used in melanoma patients. Studies with a newer benzamide called 123I-epidepride, a high-affinity D2 receptor (D2R) antagonist, showed high sensitivity in D2R-positive pituitary adenomas. We evaluated the presence of D2R in patients with uveal melanomas in vivo with 123I-epidepride, and in vitro in melanomas, using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 125I-epidepride autoradiography. We studied the in vivo tumor-to-background (TB) ratios in six patients with posterior uveal melanoma (one previously enucleated). IHC was performed in 3 of 6 tumors after enucleation and in another 20 uveal melanomas, 7 metastatic lymph nodes from skin melanoma, and 2 normal specimens. 125I-epidepride autoradiography was performed in 10 uveal melanomas (3 of which were studied in vivo), 7 metastases, and 2 normal samples. Radioligand uptake was present in the affected eye of 5 patients with uveal melanoma (TB = 3.1-6.1) and absent in the operated one (TB = 1). Eight uveal tumors were positive at IHC (35%), 14 weakly positive (61%), and 1 negative (4%). Two metastases were positive (29%), 2 weakly positive (29%), and 3 negative (42%). Two uveal tumors were positive at autoradiography (20%), 7 had nonspecific binding (70%), and 1 was negative (10%). One metastasis was positive (14%), while 6 were negative (86%). 123I-epidepride scintigraphy in uveal melanomas seems promising for sensitivity and image quality. D2R was demonstrated in a significant proportion of the melanomas, although 123I-epidepride uptake might also be nonspecific and unrelated to D2R binding. Although further studies on larger series are needed, 123I-epidepride could represent a future tool to study the expression of D2R in other classes of neuroendocrine tumors.

Detection of genetic prognostic markers in uveal melanoma biopsies using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

PURPOSE: In uveal melanoma, specific chromosomal abnormalities are known to correlate with the risk of metastases; changes in chromosomes 3 and 8q correlate strongly with a decreased survival of the patient, whereas chromosome 6 abnormalities are associated with a better prognosis. Usually, karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis are used to detect these abnormalities in resected tumor tissues. However, the evaluation of these chromosomal changes is compromised in patients treated with eye-retaining treatment protocols because of the lack of tumor material. The purpose of this study was to validate the use of FISH for the analysis of genetic prognostic markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed 40 uveal melanoma fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) and the corresponding main tumor with FISH. RESULTS: All biopsies were found to contain tumor cells, and FISH analyses of the samples were successful in all cases. Statistical analysis showed very good agreement between the FISH results from the biopsies and those from the main tumor. In only 2 of 249 hybridizations did we find a small variation that could have led to a misclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the application of FISH to FNABs is a reliable method for assaying genetic prognostic parameters such as chromosome 3 loss and/or chromosome 8q gain. Implementation of this method in a diagnostic setting means that we are able to identify patients at risk of developing metastatic disease, not only in enucleated patients but also in cases treated with conservative treatment modalities such as radiotherapy.