Periconceptional Dietary Quality and Metabolic Syndrome at 3 Years Postpartum.

BACKGROUND: The period around pregnancy is a critical window in the primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease, but little is known about the role of dietary patterns in cardiometabolic health. Our objective was to determine the association between alignment of periconceptional diet with the 2020 to 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and the risk of metabolic syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-Be Heart Health Study, a pregnancy cohort study that followed pregnant participants to a median of 3 years postpartum (n=4423). Usual dietary intake in the 3 months around conception was estimated from a Food Frequency Questionnaire. Alignment with the Dietary Guidelines was measured using the Healthy Eating Index-2020, where higher scores represent greater alignment. Postpartum metabolic syndrome was defined using the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guideline. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome at 3 years postpartum was 20%. After adjusting for confounders, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was flat up to a periconceptional Healthy Eating Index-2020 total score of ≈60, and then declined steeply as scores increased. Compared with a Healthy Eating Index-2020 score of 60, having scores of 70, 80, and 90 were associated with 2, 4, and 7 fewer cases of metabolic syndrome per 100 individuals, respectively (prevalence differences: -0.02 [95% CI, -0.03, 0]; -0.04 [-0.08, -0.1]; -0.07 [-0.13, -0.02]). CONCLUSIONS: Dietary interventions around conception and systems-level changes to support high diet quality may be important for improving postpartum cardiometabolic health, and helping to reverse or slow the decline in women's cardiometabolic health.

Gestational weight gain below recommendations and adverse maternal and child health outcomes for pregnancies with overweight or obesity: a United States cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The current Institute of Medicine (IOM) pregnancy weight gain guidelines were developed using the best available evidence but were limited by substantial knowledge gaps. Some have raised concern that the guidelines for individuals affected by overweight or obesity are too high and contribute to short- and long-term complications for the mother and child. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between pregnancy weight gain below the lower limit of the current IOM recommendations and risk of 10 adverse maternal and child health outcomes among individuals with overweight and obesity. METHODS: We used data from a prospective cohort study of United States nulliparae with prepregnancy overweight (n = 955) or obesity (n = 897) followed from the first trimester to 2-7 y postpartum. We used multivariable Poisson regression to relate pregnancy weight gain z-scores with a severity-weighted composite outcome consisting of ≥1 of 10 adverse outcomes (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, unplanned cesarean delivery, maternal postpartum weight increase >10 kg, maternal postpartum metabolic syndrome, infant death, stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age birth, and childhood obesity). RESULTS: Pregnancy weight gain z-scores below, within, and above the IOM-recommended ranges occurred in 5%, 13%, and 80% of pregnancies with overweight and 17%, 13%, and 70% of pregnancies with obesity. There was a positive association between pregnancy weight gain z-scores and all adverse maternal outcomes, childhood obesity, and the composite outcome. Pregnancy weight gain z-scores below the lower limit of the recommended ranges (<6.8 kg for overweight, <5 kg for obesity) were not associated with the severity-weighted composite outcome. For example, compared with the lower limit, adjusted rate ratios (95% confidence interval) for z-scores of -2 standard deviations in pregnancies with overweight (equivalent to 3.6 kg at 40 wk) and obesity (-2.8 kg at 40 wk) were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91, 1.06) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.07). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support arguments to decrease the lower limit of recommended weight gain ranges in these prepregnancy body mass index groups.

Do current pregnancy weight gain guidelines balance risks of adverse maternal and child health in a United States cohort?

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine pregnancy weight gain guidelines were developed without evidence linking high weight gain to maternal cardiometabolic disease and child obesity. The upper limit of current recommendations may be too high for the health of the pregnant individual and child. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the range of pregnancy weight gain for pregnancies within a normal body mass index (BMI) range that balances the risks of high and low weight gain by simultaneously considering 10 different health conditions. METHODS: We used data from an United States prospective cohort study of nulliparae followed until 2 to 7 y postpartum (N = 2344 participants with a normal BMI). Pregnancy weight gain z-score was the main exposure. The outcome was a composite consisting of the occurrence of ≥1 of 10 adverse health conditions that were weighted for their seriousness. We used multivariable Poisson regression to relate weight gain z-scores with the weighted composite outcome. RESULTS: The lowest risk of the composite outcome was at a pregnancy weight gain z-score of -0.6 SD (standard deviation) (equivalent to 13.1 kg at 40 wk). The weight gain ranges associated with no more than 5%, 10%, and 20% increase in risks were -1.0 to -0.2 SD (11.2-15.3 kg), -1.4 to 0 SD (9.4-16.4 kg), and -2.0 to 0.4 SD (7.0-18.9 kg). When we used a lower threshold to define postpartum weight increase in the composite outcome (>5 kg compared with >10 kg), the ranges were 1.6 to -0.7 SD (8.9-12.6 kg), -2.2 to -0.3 SD (6.3-14.7 kg), and ≤0.2 SD (≤17.6 kg). Compared with the ranges of the current weight gain guidelines (-0.9 to -0.1 SD, 11.5-16 kg), the lower limits from our data tended to be lower while upper limits were similar or lower. CONCLUSIONS: If replicated, our results suggest that policy makers should revisit the recommended pregnancy weight gain range for individuals within a normal BMI range.

Periconceptional Dietary Patterns and Adverse Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The periconceptional period is a critical window for the origins of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, yet little is known about the dietary patterns that promote perinatal health. OBJECTIVE: We used machine learning methods to determine the effect of periconceptional dietary patterns on risk of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth, and a composite of these outcomes. METHODS: We used data from 8259 participants in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (8 US medical centers, 2010‒2013). Usual daily periconceptional intake of 82 food groups was estimated from a food frequency questionnaire. We used k-means clustering with a Euclidean distance metric to identify dietary patterns. We estimated the effect of dietary patterns on each perinatal outcome using targeted maximum likelihood estimation and an ensemble of machine learning algorithms, adjusting for confounders including health behaviors and psychological, neighborhood, and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: The 4 dietary patterns that emerged from our data were identified as "Sandwiches and snacks" (34% of the sample); "High fat, sugar, and sodium" (29%); "Beverages, refined grains, and mixed dishes" (21%); and "High fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and plant proteins" (16%). One-quarter of pregnancies had preeclampsia (8% incidence), gestational diabetes (5%), preterm birth (8%), or SGA birth (8%). Compared with the "High fat, sugar, and sodium" pattern, there were 3.3 to 4.3 fewer cases of the composite adverse outcome per 100 pregnancies among participants following the "Beverages, refined grains and mixed dishes" pattern (risk difference -0.043; 95% confidence interval -0.078, -0.009), "High fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant proteins" pattern (-0.041; 95% confidence interval -0.078, -0.004), and "Sandwiches and snacks" pattern (-0.033; 95% confidence interval -0.065, -0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight that there are a variety of periconceptional dietary patterns that are associated with perinatal health and reinforce the negative health implications of diets high in fat, sugars, and sodium.