Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 137: 44-53, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160231

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In Tuscany, Italy, New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (NDM-CRE) in hospitalized patients has increasingly been observed since 2018, leading in 2019 to the implementation of enhanced control measures successfully reducing transmission. We describe the NDM-CRE epidemiology during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tuscany. METHODS: Data on NDM-CRE patients hospitalized in five Tuscan hospitals were collected from January 2019 to December 2021. Weekly rates of NDM-CRE cases on hospital days in medical and critical-care wards were calculated. In March-December 2020, NDM-CRE rates were stratified by COVID-19 diagnosis. Multi-variate regression analysis was performed to assess outcomes' differences among two periods analysed and between COVID-19 populations. RESULTS: Since March 2020, an increase in NDM-CRE cases was observed, associated with COVID-19 admissions. COVID-19 patients differed significantly from non-COVID-19 ones by several variables, including patient features (age, Charlson index) and clinical history and outcomes (NDM-CRE infection/colonization, intensive care unit stay, length of stay, mortality). During the pandemic, we observed a higher rate of NDM-CRE cases per hospital day in both non-COVID-19 patients (273/100,000) and COVID-19 patients (370/100,00) when compared with pre-pandemic period cases (187/100,00). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a resurgence in NDM-CRE spread among hospitalized patients in Tuscany during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as a change in patients' case-mix. The observed increase in hospital transmission of NDM-CRE could be related to changes in infection prevention and control procedures, aimed mainly at COVID-19 management, leading to new challenges in hospital preparedness and crisis management planning.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gammaproteobacteria , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/epidemiology , beta-Lactamases , Hospitals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 25(11): 1432.e1-1432.e4, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate different methods for testing carbapenem susceptibility of Escherichia coli producing KPC-type carbapenemase. METHODS: Susceptibility to imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem was assayed using the reference broth microdilution method and several commercial methods (Vitek2, MicroScan, Etest, MIC Test Strip) starting from the same bacterial suspension. Susceptibility to imipenem and meropenem was also tested by Sensititre and disc diffusion (Bio-Rad). Results were interpreted according to EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA) and error rates were calculated as described by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guidelines and also considering the new EUCAST definitions. Genotypic diversity of isolates was evaluated with a RAPD profiling protocol. RESULTS: Of 54 KPC-positive E. coli isolates, 5.6%, 7.4% and 0% were susceptible standard dosing regimen (S), 55.6%, 72.2% and 0% susceptible increased exposure (I), and 38.9%, 20.4% and 100.0% resistant (R) to imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem, respectively, using the reference broth microdilution method. CA lower than 90% were observed with all systems for imipenem and meropenem using both the ISO and the modified EUCAST criteria. With ertapenem, CA >90% was observed with all methods except Vitek2. RAPD profiling revealed a remarkable genotypic diversity of the isolates, supporting that results were not biased by an oligoclonal nature of the collection. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial methods can be unreliable for testing susceptibility to carbapenems of KPC-producing E. coli. Susceptibility should be confirmed by reference broth microdilution.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/enzymology , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/classification , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Diagnostic Errors , Ertapenem/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/classification , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Genotype , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , Meropenem/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Molecular Typing , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL