Radioresistant Pulmonary Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Lesions From Nonlung Primaries: Impact of Histology and Dose-Fractionation on Local Control After Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: We investigated whether pulmonary metastases from historically considered radioresistant primaries would have inferior local control after radiation therapy than those from nonradioresistant nonlung primaries, and whether higher biologically effective dose assuming alpha/beta=10 (BED10) would be associated with superior local control. Methods and Materials: We identified patients treated with radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive pulmonary disease to 1 to 5 lung metastases from nonlung primaries in 2013 to 2020 at a single health care system. Radioresistant primary cancers included colorectal carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and sarcoma. Nonradioresistant primary cancers included breast, bladder, esophageal, pancreas, and head and neck carcinomas. The Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), new metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Among 114 patients, 73 had radioresistant primary cancers. The median total dose was 50 Gy (IQR, 50-54 Gy) and the median number of fractions was 5 (IQR, 3-5). Median follow-up time was 59.6 months. One of 41 (2.4%) patients with a nonradioresistant metastasis experienced local failure compared with 18 of 73 (24.7%) patients with radioresistant metastasis (log-rank P = .004). Among radioresistant metastases, 12 of 41 (29.2%) patients with colorectal carcinoma experienced local failure compared with 6 of 32 (18.8%) with other primaries (log-rank P = .018). BED10 ≥100 Gy was associated with decreased risk of local recurrence. On univariable analysis, BED10 ≥100 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.263; 95% CI, 0.105-0.656; P = .004) was associated with higher LRFS, and colorectal primary (HR, 3.060; 95% CI, 1.204-7.777; P = .019) was associated with lower LRFS, though these were not statistically significant on multivariable analysis. Among colorectal primary patients, BED10 ≥100 Gy was associated with higher LRFS (HR, 0.266; 95% CI, 0.072-0.985; P = .047) on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Local control after radiation therapy was encouraging for pulmonary metastases from most nonlung primaries, even for many of those classically considered to be radioresistant. Those from colorectal primaries may benefit from testing additional strategies, such as resection or systemic treatment concurrent with radiation.

Differential Effect of Consolidative Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Sex.

Purpose: The landmark randomized trial on chest irradiation in extensive disease small cell lung cancer (CREST) demonstrated that consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (cTRT) improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after initial chemotherapy (chemo) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, with potentially increased benefit in women compared with men. It is unknown whether similar findings would apply after chemoimmunotherapy became the standard first-line treatment. In this analysis, we report national practice patterns and survival outcomes of cTRT according to patient sex. Methods and Materials: We included patients from de-identified electronic health record-derived database diagnosed with stage IV small cell lung cancer (2014-2021) who completed 4 to 6 cycles of first-line systemic therapy (platinum-doublet chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy). We evaluated OS and PFS using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with receipt of cTRT as an independent variable and stratified by sex. As a sensitivity analysis, we weighted the models by the inverse probability of receiving cTRT. Results: A total of 1227 patients were included (850 chemotherapy, 377 chemoimmunotherapy). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients who did and did not receive cTRT. Among women, cTRT was associated with superior OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87) and PFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.82) compared with those not receiving cTRT. Conversely, no OS or PFS benefit with cTRT was observed in men (OS HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.80-1.31; PFS HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.85-1.47). Findings were similar in weighted analyses. Conclusions: The survival efficacy of cTRT may be moderated by sex, with female patients appearing more likely to benefit than male patients. These findings reflect sex-based survival trends with similar effect sizes to those observed in the CREST trial. Although the underpinnings of this association need to be elucidated, stratification by sex should be considered for randomized-controlled trials studying cTRT in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: The treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has been informed by more than 5 decades of clinical trials and other relevant literature. However, controversies remain regarding the application of various radiation and systemic therapies in commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Objective: To develop case-referenced consensus and evidence-based guidelines to inform clinical practice in unresectable LA-NSCLC. Evidence Review: The American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Thoracic Committee guideline is an evidence-based consensus document assessing various clinical scenarios associated with LA-NSCLC. A systematic review of the literature with evidence ratings was conducted to inform the appropriateness of treatment recommendations by the ARS AUC Thoracic Committee for the management of unresectable LA-NSCLC. Findings: Treatment appropriateness of a variety of LA-NSCLC scenarios was assessed by a consensus-based modified Delphi approach using a range of 3 points to 9 points to denote consensus agreement. Committee recommendations were vetted by the ARS AUC Executive Committee and a 2-week public comment period before official approval and adoption. Standard of care management of good prognosis LA-NSCLC consists of combined concurrent radical (60-70 Gy) platinum-based chemoradiation followed by consolidation durvalumab immunotherapy (for patients without progression). Planning and delivery of locally advanced lung cancer radiotherapy usually should be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A variety of palliative and radical fractionation schedules are available to treat patients with poor performance and/or pulmonary status. The salvage therapy for a local recurrence after successful primary management is complex and likely requires both multidisciplinary input and shared decision-making with the patient. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence-based guidance on the management of various unresectable LA-NSCLC scenarios is provided by the ARS AUC to optimize multidisciplinary patient care for this challenging patient population.

Patterns of Care for T1 Glottic Squamous Cell Carcinomas from 2004-2020.

OBJECTIVE(S): Describe recent national trends in overall treatment modalities for T1 glottic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and identify factors associated with treatment regimens. METHODS: National Cancer Database from 2004-2020 was queried for all patients with glottic cT1N0M0 SCC. Treatment patterns over time were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine the factors associated with treatment regimens. RESULTS: Of the 22,414 patients identified, most patients received RT only (57%), 21% received surgery only, and 22% received dual-modality treatment ("over-treatment"). Over the time period, there was a decreasing trend in rates of over-treatment for T1 glottic SCC (p < 0.001) and an increasing trend in surgery only (p < 0.001). Treatment in 2016-2018 (OR: 1.168 [1.004 to 1.359]), 2013-2015 (OR: 1.419 [1.221 to 1.648]), 2010-2012 (OR: 1.611 [1.388 to 1.871]), 2007-2009 (OR: 1.682 [1.450 to 1.951]), or 2004-2006 (OR: 1.795 [1.548 to 2.081]) versus 2019-2020 was associated with greater likelihood of over-treatment. T1b tumors were less likely to be over-treated (OR: 0.795 [0.707 to 0.894]) versus T1a tumors, and less likely to receive surgery first (OR: 0.536 [0.485 to 0.592]) versus T1a tumors. CONCLUSION: Over-treatment for T1 glottic SCC has been declining, with increasing rates of surgery only. Year of treatment was significantly associated with the receipt of dual-modality treatment. Finally, patients with T1b disease were more likely to receive RT as the first and only treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Trends in new and persistent opioid use in older adults with and without cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of ongoing efforts to decrease opioid use on patients with cancer remains undefined. Our objective was to determine trends in new and additional opioid use in patients with and without cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program-Medicare for opioid-naive patients with solid tumor malignancies diagnosed from 2012 through 2017 and a random sample of patients without cancer. We identified 238 470 eligible patients with cancer and further focused on 4 clinical strata: patients without cancer, patients with metastatic cancer, patients with nonmetastatic cancer treated with surgery alone ("surgery alone"), and patients with nonmetastatic cancer treated with surgery plus chemotherapy or radiation therapy ("surgery+"). We identified new, early additional, and long-term additional opioid use and calculated the change in predicted probability of these outcomes from 2012 to 2017. RESULTS: New opioid use was higher in patients with cancer (46.4%) than in those without (6.9%) (P < .001). From 2012 to 2017, the predicted probability of new opioid use was more stable in the cancer strata (relative declines: 0.1% surgery alone; 2.4% surgery+; 8.8% metastatic cancer), than in the noncancer stratum (20.0%) (P < .001 for each cancer to noncancer comparison). Early additional use declined among surgery patients (‒14.9% and ‒17.5% for surgery alone and surgery+, respectively) but was stable among patients with metastatic disease (‒2.8%, P = .50). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing declined over time at a slower rate in patients with cancer than in patients without cancer. Our study suggests important but tempered effects of the changing opioid climate on patients with cancer.

Overall survival in low-comorbidity patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer who chose stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing SBRT versus those undergoing surgery. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients without documented comorbidities who underwent surgical resection (lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection) or SBRT for clinical stage I NSCLC between 2012 and 2018. Peritreatment mortality and 5-year OS were compared among propensity score-matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 30,658 patients were identified, including 24,729 (80.7%) who underwent surgery and 5929 (19.3%) treated with SBRT. Between 2012 and 2018, the proportion of patients receiving SBRT increased from 15.9% to 26.0% (P < .001). The 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality were higher among patients undergoing surgical resection versus those receiving SBRT (1.7% vs 0.3%, P < .001; 2.8% vs 1.7%, P < .001). In propensity score-matched patients, OS favored SBRT for the first several months, but this was reversed before 1 year and significantly favored surgical management in the long term (5-year OS, 71.0% vs 41.8%; P < .001). The propensity score-matched analysis was repeated to include only SBRT patients who had documented refusal of a recommended surgery, which again demonstrated superior 5-year OS with surgical management (71.4% vs 55.9%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is being increasingly used to treat early-stage lung cancer in low-comorbidity patients. However, for patients who may be candidates for either treatment, the long-term OS favors surgical management.

Dose-Volume Predictors of Radiation Pneumonitis After Thoracic Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) is a common treatment for thoracic tumors, typically delivered as 60 Gy in 15 fractions. We aimed to identify dosimetric risk factors associated with radiation pneumonitis in patients receiving HFRT at 4 Gy per fraction, focusing on lung V20, mean lung dose (MLD), and lung V5 as potential predictors of grade ≥2 pneumonitis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients were treated with thoracic HFRT to 60 Gy in 15 fractions or 72 Gy in 18 fractions at a single health care system from 2013 to 2020. Tumors near critical structures (trachea, proximal tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, spinal cord, or heart) were considered central (within 2 cm), and those closer were classified as ultracentral (within 1 cm). The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 pneumonitis. Logistic regression analyses, adjusting for target size and dosimetric variables, were used to establish a dose threshold associated with <20% risk of grade ≥2 pneumonitis. RESULTS: During a median 24.3-month follow-up, 18 patients (16.8%) developed grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis, with no significant difference between the 2 dose regimens (17.3% vs 16.3%, P = .88). Four patients (3.7%) experienced grade ≥3 pneumonitis, including 2 grade 5 cases. Patients with grade ≥2 pneumonitis had significantly higher lung V20 (mean 23.4% vs 14.5%, P < .001), MLD (mean 13.0 Gy vs 9.5 Gy, P < .001), and lung V5 (mean 49.6% vs 40.6%, P = .01). Dose thresholds for a 20% risk of grade ≥2 pneumonitis were lung V20 <17.7%, MLD <10.6 Gy, and V5 <41.3%. Multivariable analysis revealed a significant association between lung V20 and grade ≥2 pneumonitis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: To minimize the risk of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis when delivering 4 Gy per fraction at either 60 Gy or 72 Gy, it is advisable to maintain lung V20<17.7%. MLD <10.6 Gy and V5<41.3% can also be considered as lower-priority constraints. However, additional validation is necessary before incorporating these constraints into clinical practice or trial planning guidelines.

A retrospective comparative cohort study: concurrent versus consolidative immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in EGFR- or ALK-negative unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very challenging because it is a heterogeneous group of diseases. This study was to investigative whether concurrent immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy was associated with improved outcomes compared to consolidative immunotherapy following chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, which may provide evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment of stage III NSCLC. Methods: A total of 78 epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EGFR/ALK) negative patients from the clinical database of the shanghai pulmonary hospital with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC and we evaluated them for baseline clinical factors, follow-up. Patients underwent concurrent immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy or consolidative immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy. Patients were classified based on initial site of progression (primary versus non-primary site). The study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and time to death or distant metastasis (TDDM). Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the factors affecting PFS and TDDM. Results: The median follow-up time for both groups was 26 months, and there was no significant difference in baseline clinical characteristics (P>0.05). The patients receiving concurrent immunotherapy (n=36) had a longer PFS than those receiving consolidative immunotherapy (n=42) (median 32.4 vs. 15.5 months; P<0.01). The TDDM was also longer in patients with concurrent immunotherapy than those with consolidative immunotherapy (median 57.3 vs. 31.0 months; P=0.01). Furthermore, in a subset of patients with initial site of progression at a non-primary-site, patients undergoing concurrent immunotherapy had longer PFS than those undergoing consolidative immunotherapy (median 22.7 vs. 11.9 months; P=0.03). Conclusions: Concurrent immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy may be associated with improved disease progression outcomes as compared to consolidative immunotherapy following chemoradiotherapy.

Real-World Data: Applications and Relevance to Cancer Clinical Trials.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for comparative-effectiveness research (CER). Since the 1980s, there has been a rise in the creation and utilization of large national cancer databases to provide readily accessible "real-world data" (RWD). This review article discusses the role of RCTs in oncology, and the role of RWD from the national cancer database in CER. RCTs remain the preferred study type for CER because they minimize confounding and bias. RCTs have challenges to conduct, including extensive time and resources, but these factors do not impact the internal validity of the result. Generalizability and external validity are potential limitations of RCTs. RWD is ideal for studying cancer epidemiology, patterns of care, disparities in care delivery, quality-of-care evaluation, and applicability of RCT data in specific populations excluded from RCTs. However, retrospective databases with RWD have limitations in CER due to unmeasured confounders and are often suboptimal in identifying causal treatment effects.

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy for operable locally-advanced esophageal cancer.

Background: For patients with operable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (LA-EC), we hypothesized that pre-operative induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (IC-CRT) would improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study including patients with LA-EC who received preoperative-intent IC-CRT vs. CRT between 2013-2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess for variables associated with survival. The impact of treatment group on pathologic response was assessed by chi-square. Results: Ninty-five patients were included for analysis (IC-CRT n=59; CRT n=36) and the median follow-up was 37.7 months (IQR: 16.8-56.1). There was no difference in median PFS or OS for IC-CRT or CRT, 22 months (95% CI: 12-59) vs. 32 months (95% CI: 10-57) (P=0.64) and 39 months (95% CI: 23-not reached) vs. 56.5 months (95% CI: 38-not reached) (P=0.36), respectively. Amongst the subset of patients with adenocarcinoma histology, there was no difference in median PFS or OS, nor was there when analyses were further restricted to those who received ≥3 cycles of induction 5-fluorouracil and platinum, or for those who underwent esophagectomy. Pathologic complete response occurred in 45% vs. 29% (P=0.24) and N-stage regression occurred in 72% vs. 58% (P=0.28) of patients in the IC-CRT and CRT cohorts, respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 44% of patients in each treatment cohort. Conclusions: For patients with LA-EC, preoperative-intent IC-CRT was not associated with improved PFS or OS when compared with CRT.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Radiation Therapy in the Multidisciplinary Management of Thymic Carcinoma.

Importance: Thymic carcinoma is rare, and its oncologic management is controversial due to a paucity of prospective data. For this reason, multidisciplinary consensus guidelines are crucial to guide oncologic management. Objective: To develop expert multidisciplinary consensus guidelines on the management of common presentations of thymic carcinoma. Evidence Review: Case variants spanning the spectrum of stage I to IV thymic carcinoma were developed by the 15-member multidisciplinary American Radium Society (ARS) Thoracic Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) expert panel to address management controversies. A comprehensive review of the English-language medical literature from 1980 to 2021 was performed to inform consensus guidelines. Variants and procedures were evaluated by the panel using modified Delphi methodology. Agreement/consensus was defined as less than or equal to 3 rating points from median. Consensus recommendations were then approved by the ARS Executive Committee and subject to public comment per established ARS procedures. Findings: The ARS Thoracic AUC panel identified 89 relevant references and obtained consensus for all procedures evaluated for thymic carcinoma. Minimally invasive thymectomy was rated as usually inappropriate (regardless of stage) due to the infiltrative nature of thymic carcinomas. There was consensus that conventionally fractionated radiation (1.8-2 Gy daily) to a dose of 45 to 60 Gy adjuvantly and 60 to 66 Gy in the definitive setting is appropriate and that elective nodal irradiation is inappropriate. For radiation technique, the panel recommended use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy or proton therapy (rather than 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) to reduce radiation exposure to the heart and lungs. Conclusions and Relevance: The ARS Thoracic AUC panel has developed multidisciplinary consensus guidelines for various presentations of thymic carcinoma, perhaps the most well referenced on the topic.

Utilization and Survival Impact of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal fractionation schedule in unresected stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) unsuitable for stereotactic body radiation therapy is unclear. Given the lack of comparative data regarding nonstereotactic body radiation therapy schemas, we compared overall survival (OS) with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and examined the OS impact of different HFRT doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 2159 patients from the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage I (cT1-2aN0M0) NSCLC between 2008 and 2016. Patients underwent CFRT (70≤BED10 [biologically effective dose] <100 Gy10 in ≥30 fractions), low-dose HFRT (LD-HFRT; 70≤BED10 [assuming α/ß=10] <100 Gy10 in 11 to 24 fractions), or high-dose HFRT (HD-HFRT; 100≤BED10 ≤120 Gy10 in 6 to 10 fractions). Patients who received surgery, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy were excluded. We compared CFRT versus all HFRT, and separately CFRT versus LD-HFRT and CFRT versus HD-HFRT. OS was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 63.2% of patients underwent CFRT, 23.5% LD-HFRT, and 13.3% HD-HFRT. OS was significantly longer with HFRT versus CFRT on univariable (28.2 mo [95% CI, 25.6-31.7] vs 26.4 mo [25.0-27.9]; log-rank=0.0025) but not multivariable analysis (MVA; hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; P=0.062). MVA yielded no significant difference in OS between CFRT and LD-HFRT (HR 0.96, P=0.53). OS was significantly longer with HD-HFRT versus CFRT on MVA (HR, 0.75; P=0.003). However, on sensitivity analysis using different multivariable modeling techniques, this did not retain statistical significance (HR, 0.83; P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: For stage I NSCLC, HFRT does not show a robust OS benefit compared with CFRT but may be preferred given the convenience and lower costs.

Outcomes Stratification of Head and Neck Cancer Using Pre- and Post-treatment DNA Methylation From Peripheral Blood.

PURPOSE: Established prognostic factors for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) mostly consist of clinical and tumor features assessed before treatment. We report a novel application of DNA methylation in peripheral blood before and after radiation therapy to further improve outcomes stratification. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Peripheral blood samples from patients with nonmetastatic HNSCC were obtained for methylation analysis 1 week before and 1 month after radiation therapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a Discovery Cohort or a Validation Cohort. In the Discovery Cohort, associations between genome-wide methylation change (posttreatment minus pretreatment) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as well as overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox regression. A methylation risk score (MRS) was then constructed from methylation levels at the top associated sites, filtered for residing within the regulatory regions of genes expressed in cells of hematopoietic lineage. The prognostic value of MRS was separately assessed in the Discovery and Validation Cohorts. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and September 2018, 115 patients participated in this study. Human papilloma virus negative status, oral cavity cancer, gastrostomy tube insertion, and higher neutrophil count before radiation therapy were associated with shorter RFS and OS (P < .05). Genes downstream of the methylation sites comprising MRS are HIF1A, SF1, LGALS9, and FUT5, involved in hypoxia response, blood cell maturation, and immune modulation. High MRS (in the top third) was significantly associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-35.5; P = .016) and OS (HR, 15.9; 95% CI, 1.6-153.6; P = .017) in the Discovery Cohort, independent of the aforementioned risk factors. These findings were replicated in the Validation Cohort, for which high MRS also independently predicted worse RFS (HR, 10.2; 95%, CI 2.4-43.4; P = .002) and OS (HR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.4; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: We successfully trained and validated a signature of DNA methylation in peripheral blood before and after radiation therapy that stratified outcomes among patients with HNSCC, implicating the potential for genomics-tailored surveillance and consolidation treatment.

Outcomes Following SBRT vs. IMRT and 3DCRT for Older Patients with Stage IIA Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer > 5 cm.

BACKGROUND: To describe outcomes and compare the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage IIA lymph node-negative (N0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors > 5 cm. METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare database (2005-2015) to identify patients > 65 years with stage IIA (AJCC TNM7) N0 NSCLC > 5 cm tumors who were treated with SBRT, IMRT, and 3DCRT. We used propensity score methods with inverse probability weighting to compare lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Of 584 patients, 88 (15%), 140 (24%), and 356 (61%) underwent SBRT, IMRT, and 3DCRT, respectively. The SBRT group was older (P = .004), had more comorbidities (P = .02), smaller tumors (P = .03), and more adenocarcinomas (P < .0001). We found a trend towards higher median unadjusted OS with SBRT compared to IMRT and 3DCRT (19 vs. 13 and 14 months, respectively, P = .37). In our propensity score-adjusted analyses, SBRT was significantly associated with better OS and LCSS compared to IMRT (HROS: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.89, HRLCSS: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.81) and 3DCRT (HROS: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93, HRLCSS: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93). SBRT-treated patients also had lower overall adjusted complication rates compared to IMRT (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and 3DCRT (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71). CONCLUSION: For patients with NSCLC tumors > 5 cm, SBRT trends towards fewer toxicities and improved survival compared to other forms of radiotherapy. Our findings support SBRT as an appropriate treatment strategy for older patients with larger inoperable NSCLC tumors.

Impact of radiotherapy delay following biopsy for patients with unresected glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Because of the aggressive nature of glioblastoma, patients with unresected disease are encouraged to begin radiotherapy within approximately 1 month after craniotomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between time interval from biopsy to radiotherapy with overall survival in patients with unresected glioblastoma. METHODS: Patients with unresected glioblastoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 who received adjuvant radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Demographic and clinical data were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. RESULTS: Among 3456 patients with unresected glioblastoma, initiation of radiotherapy within 3 weeks of biopsy was associated with a higher hazard of death compared with later initiation of radiotherapy. After excluding patients who received radiotherapy within 3 weeks of biopsy to minimize the effects of confounders associated with short time intervals from biopsy to radiotherapy, the median interval from biopsy to radiotherapy was 32 days (IQR 27-39 days). Overall, 1782 (66.82%) patients started radiotherapy within 5 weeks of biopsy, and 885 (33.18%) patients started radiotherapy beyond 5 weeks of biopsy. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.50; p = 0.374). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresected glioblastoma, a longer time interval from biopsy to radiotherapy does not appear to be associated with worse overall survival. However, external validation of these findings is necessary given that selection bias is a significant limitation of this study.

Factors Associated With In-Hospital Mortality in Mycosis Fungoides Patients: A Multivariable Analysis.

Background Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Although it often has an indolent course, it can progress to more aggressive CTCL forms. There is sparse data in current literature describing specific clinical factors associated with in-hospital mortality in mycosis fungoides patients. An understanding of patients at greatest risk for in-hospital mortality can aid in developing recommendations for prophylaxis and empirical management. Aim We aim to characterize factors associated with in-hospital mortality in MF patients. Materials and methods The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) was queried for MF cases from 2006 to 2015. Baseline demographic and hospital characteristics were stratified based on survival outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 57,665 patients with MF presenting to the ED between 2006 and 2015 were identified. Sézary syndrome, sepsis, and advanced age were associated with MF in-hospital mortality, while female sex was inversely associated. There was a downtrend in in-hospital mortality among MF patients presenting to the ED from 2006 to 2015. Conclusions Our study highlights factors crucial for risk-stratification for hospitalized MF patients.

Immunotherapy After Chemotherapy and Radiation for Clinical Stage III Lung Cancer.

Importance: The 2017 international PACIFIC trial established a role for immunotherapy after chemoradiation for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the US, patients with NSCLC commonly differ from clinical trial populations in terms of age, health, access to care, and treatment course, which may all factor into the efficacy of immunotherapy. Objective: To determine the outcomes of immunotherapy use in unresectable stage III NSCLC in the general US population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with clinical stage III NSCLC between 2015 and 2017 with follow-up through the end of 2018 who were treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Data were analyzed January 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality hazard in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and survival among a propensity-matched sample treated with chemotherapy and radiation, with and without immunotherapy. Results: A total of 23 811 patients with clinical stage III NSCLC with median (IQR) age 66 (59-72) years met inclusion criteria (10 454 [43.9%] women; 564 [2.4%] Asian, 2930 [12.3%] Black, 20 077 [84.3%] White patients), including 209 (16.1%) patients with multiple comorbidities and 1297 (5.4%) immunotherapy recipients. Immunotherapy after chemotherapy and radiation was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.82; P < .001). Among a propensity-matched sample, immunotherapy was associated with superior 3-year survival (52% [1297 patients at 0 months, 56 patients at 36 months] vs 44% [2594 patients at 0 months, 173 patients at 36 months]; P < .001). The treatment of 833 patients who received immunotherapy (64.2%) differed from the PACIFIC trial protocol, including 221 patients (17.0%) who received radiation doses outside of the protocol range and 731 patients (56.4%) who started immunotherapy more than 6 weeks after radiation was completed. The survival advantage of immunotherapy persisted when initiated up to 12 weeks after radiation was completed (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92). Among patients who received radiation outside the PACIFIC protocol range, the survival advantage of immunotherapy was not significant (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69-1.01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, immunotherapy after chemotherapy and radiation for stage III NSCLC was associated with a survival advantage in the general US population despite two-thirds of patients treated differently than the PACIFIC protocol. The findings suggest there may be flexibility in the timing of immunotherapy initiation after radiation; further study is warranted to clarify the clinical benefits of immunotherapy.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 1: a guide to decision-making.

Background: Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making. Methods: Based on a systematic review from 2000-2021, evidence regarding relevant outcomes was assembled, with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers. A framework was developed to present this information a format that enhances decision-making at the point of care for individual patients. Results: While patients often cross over several boundaries, the evidence fits into categories of healthy patients, compromised patients, and favorable tumors. In healthy patients with typical (i.e., solid spiculated) lung cancers, the impact on long-term outcomes is the major driver of treatment selection. This is only slightly ameliorated in older patients. In compromised patients increasing frailty accentuates short-term differences and diminishes long-term differences especially when considering non-surgical vs. surgical approaches; nuances of patient selection (technical treatment feasibility, anticipated risk of acute toxicity, delayed toxicity, and long-term outcomes) as well as patient values are increasingly influential. Favorable (less-aggressive) tumors generally have good long-term outcomes regardless of the treatment approach. Discussion: A framework is provided that organizes the evidence and identifies the major drivers of decision-making for an individual patient. This facilitates blending available evidence and clinical judgment in a flexible, nuanced manner that enhances individualized clinical care.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients.

Background: Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making. Methods: A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved. Results: In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence. Conclusions: A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.