Outcomes of Surgical and Endovascular Treatment for Cephalic Arch Stenosis in Proximal Arteriovenous Fistula.

Purpose: The cephalic arch is a significant site of stenosis in proximal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) that contributes to access dysfunction and thrombosis. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment (ST) and endovascular treatment (ET) for cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). Materials and Methods: A total of 62 patients with proximal AVF who underwent CAS revision using either ST or ET were enrolled between January 2018 and March 2023. In the ET group, only the initial ET following AVF formation was considered, to mitigate bias. In the ST group, central transposition of the native AVF (transposition group) or interposition of the prosthetic graft into the proximal basilic or axillary vein (interposition group) was performed. We evaluated primary and functional patency based on these groups and calculated the number of patency loss events after CAS treatment. Results: Of the 62 patients, 38 (61%) were male, with a mean age of 66.4 years. ST was performed in 26 (42%) patients, including transposition in 16 and interposition in 10, whereas ET was administered to 36 patients during the study period. Among the ST recipients, 42% had a history of ET for CAS. The incidence of AVF thrombosis was marginally higher in the ST group than in the ET group (39% vs. 19%, P=0.098). The primary patency rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 87%, 87%, and 66% in the transposition group; 45%, 23%, and 11% in the interposition group; and 66%, 49%, and 17% in the ET group, respectively. Notably, the primary patency of the transposition group was significantly higher than that of the interposition (P=0.001) and ET groups (P=0.016). The frequency of patency loss events per person-year after the initial revision was 0.40, 0.52, and 1.42 in the transposition, interposition, and ET groups, respectively. Conclusion: Transposition exhibited the most favorable primary patency rate and the lowest number of subsequent patency loss events during follow-up despite the higher rates of AVF thrombosis and previous ET at presentation. Consequently, transposition should be actively considered in eligible patients with CAS.

Absence of estrogen receptor is associated with worse oncologic outcome in patients who were received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, especially for HER2-positive or triple negative breast cancer which shows good response to chemotherapy. However, because a result of biomarkers is, occasionally, changed after NAC, the treatment strategy should be differently applied for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. We compared the results of biomarkers before and after NAC to evaluate the association with disease prognosis and oncologic results. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent NAC and the immunohistochemical (IHC) staining results were compared between before and after NAC. And the association between oncologic outcomes and biomarkers was analyzed. RESULTS: Negative status of estrogen receptor (ER) was associated with locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis both before and after NAC (p = 0.021, 0.019; p = 0.018, 0.036). And the negative status of progesterone receptor (PR) and triple negative status before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also associated with death and distant metastasis, respectively. However, the changes of biomarkers after NAC in breast cancer were not directly associated with any oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: The absence of ER in breast cancer before and after NAC would be a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, the absence of ER should be considered as important factor in determining the treatment strategy.