ED95 of phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this trial was to determine the 95% effective dose (ED95) of phenylephrine by intermittent i.v. bolus, to prevent spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery. METHODS: The study was conducted in a double-blinded fashion in 50 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The dose of phenylephrine was determined using up-down sequential allocation, modified by a variation of the Narayana rule. Systolic pressure and heart rate were assessed every minute until uterine incision. The first patient was assigned a 40-microg dose, and the dose to subsequent patients varied by 10-microg increments or decrements. An adequate response was defined as absence of hypotension (systolic pressure <80% of baseline) and nausea. The study solution was given immediately after spinal administration, without prior pressure measurement, and thereafter when the systolic pressure was 120% of baseline) was observed in 14 cases, immediately after intrathecal injection and prophylactic phenylephrine administration in all cases. CONCLUSION: The ED95 of phenylephrine, administered as intermittent boluses to prevent pre-delivery spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery, is at least 122 microg (lower limit of the confidence interval). The safety of this dose warrants further studies.

Determination of the ED95 for intrathecal plain bupivacaine combined with fentanyl in active labor.

BACKGROUND: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia is an effective technique for pain control in labor and is particularly useful in the active phase. Excessive doses of intrathecal bupivacaine may be associated with adverse effects. This study is designed to estimate the ED95 for intrathecal plain bupivacaine with fentanyl 15 microg in labor. METHODS: Forty healthy women in active labor (cervical dilatation > or = 5 cm and verbal numeric pain score > or = 6/10) were given CSE for labor analgesia with intrathecal plain bupivacaine and fentanyl 15 microg. The initial dose of bupivacaine was 1.75 mg. Doses were varied in a 0.25-mg testing interval according to a method of sequential allocation designed to cluster the dose around the ED95. Effectiveness was defined as a verbal numeric pain score < or = 1 within 10 min of intrathecal injection. RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate to the 1.75-mg dose (95% CI 84.6-100.0%) and an 85.0% response rate to 1.50 mg (95% CI 64.0-95.8%). The ED95 for intrathecal plain bupivacaine with fentanyl 15 microg in active labor was 1.66 mg (95% CI 1.50-482.5 mg). The incidence of fetal bradycardia was 7.5%. The incidence of pruritus was 55%. No patient experienced motor block. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first dose-finding study specifically designed to estimate the ED95 of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with a fixed amount of fentanyl for analgesia in active labor. The combination of bupivacaine 1.75 mg with fentanyl 15 microg rapidly and reliably alleviated pain in the active phase of labor.

Differentially androgen-modulated genes in ovarian epithelial cells from BRCA mutation carriers and control patients predict ovarian cancer survival and disease progression.

Epidemiological studies have implicated androgens in the etiology and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer. We previously reported that some androgen responses were dysregulated in malignant ovarian epithelial cells relative to control, non-malignant ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells. Moreover, dysregulated androgen responses were observed in OSE cells derived from patients with germline BRCA-1 or -2 mutations (OSEb), which account for the majority of familial ovarian cancer predisposition, and such altered responses may be involved in ovarian carcinogenesis or progression. In the present study, gene expression profiling using cDNA microarrays identified 17 genes differentially expressed in response to continuous androgen exposure in OSEb cells and ovarian cancer cells as compared to OSE cells derived from control patients. A subset of these differentially affected genes was selected and verified by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Six of the gene products mapped to the OPHID protein-protein interaction database, and five were networked within two interacting partners. Basic leucine zipper transcription factor 2 (BACH2) and acetylcholinesterase (ACHE), which were upregulated by androgen in OSEb cells relative to OSE cells, were further investigated using an ovarian cancer tissue microarray from a separate set of 149 clinical samples. Both cytoplasmic ACHE and BACH2 immunostaining were significantly increased in ovarian cancer relative to benign cases. High levels of cytoplasmic ACHE staining correlated with decreased survival, whereas nuclear BACH2 staining correlated with decreased time to disease recurrence. The finding that products of genes differentially responsive to androgen in OSEb cells may predict survival and disease progression supports a role for altered androgen effects in ovarian cancer. In addition to BACH2 and ACHE, this study highlights a set of potentially functionally related genes for further investigation in ovarian cancer.

The role of HER2/neu overexpression/amplification in the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma of the breast.

HER2/neu overexpression/amplification is seen more frequently in ductal carcinoma in situ, particularly high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (50-60%), than in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (25-30%). To date, however, the role of HER2/neu in the progression of in situ to invasive disease has not been clarified. Two hundred fifty-one breast tumors were retrieved from the pathology files at Mount Sinai Hospital. These included 91 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ, 136 cases of invasive ductal carcinomas with associated ductal carcinoma in situ, and 24 cases of pure invasive carcinomas. All cases were reviewed and stained with two monoclonal antibodies to HER2/neu (CB11 and TAB250). Immunohistochemical staining was recorded using a semiquantitative scoring system (1). Representative cases were also investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. HER2/neu protein overexpression (defined as immunohistochemical staining with score of >or=5) was seen in 34% of cases of pure ductal carcinoma in situ, 17% of invasive carcinomas with associated ductal carcinoma in situ, and 12.5% of pure invasive carcinomas (P =.01). Sixty percent of cases of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ showed HER2/neu protein overexpression, versus 29% of high-grade invasive carcinomas with associated ductal carcinoma in situ and 22% of high-grade pure invasive ductal carcinomas (P =.02). The concordance between the immunohistochemical staining in the in situ and invasive components of individual tumors was 90%. Thirty-three cases were also evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and showed concordance between the immunohistochemical results and the degree of gene amplification in 91% of cases, whereas 3 of 33 cases showed HER2/neu gene amplification (HER2/CEP17 = 2.3-3.7) by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the absence of positive immunohistochemical staining. One case showed HER2/neu gene amplification in the associated ductal carcinoma in situ (HER2/CEP17 ratio = 6.5), with no evidence of gene amplification in the invasive tumor (HER2/CEP17 ratio = 1.14). Multiple genetic events are required for the development of an invasive phenotype. The findings from this study suggest that the genetic event of HER2/neu gene amplification/protein overexpression may not play a key role in the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma and that other molecular alterations may be more important in the initiation of invasion in ductal carcinoma of the breast.