Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 244
Filter
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 21(9): e444-e451, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32888473

ABSTRACT

Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) generate measures of cancer incidence and survival that are essential for cancer surveillance, research, and cancer control strategies. In 2014, the Toronto Paediatric Cancer Stage Guidelines were developed to standardise how PBCRs collect data on the stage at diagnosis for childhood cancer cases. These guidelines have been implemented in multiple jurisdictions worldwide to facilitate international comparative studies of incidence and outcome. Robust stratification by risk also requires data on key non-stage prognosticators (NSPs). Key experts and stakeholders used a modified Delphi approach to establish principles guiding paediatric cancer NSP data collection. With the use of these principles, recommendations were made on which NSPs should be collected for the major malignancies in children. The 2014 Toronto Stage Guidelines were also reviewed and updated where necessary. Wide adoption of the resultant Paediatric NSP Guidelines and updated Toronto Stage Guidelines will enhance the harmonisation and use of childhood cancer data provided by PBCRs.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic/standards , Neoplasms/therapy , Pediatrics/trends , Prognosis , Child , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Registries
2.
Int J Cancer ; 144(8): 1941-1953, 2019 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30350310

ABSTRACT

Estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality from 36 cancers and for all cancers combined for the year 2018 are now available in the GLOBOCAN 2018 database, compiled and disseminated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This paper reviews the sources and methods used in compiling the cancer statistics in 185 countries. The validity of the national estimates depends upon the representativeness of the source information, and to take into account possible sources of bias, uncertainty intervals are now provided for the estimated sex- and site-specific all-ages number of new cancer cases and cancer deaths. We briefly describe the key results globally and by world region. There were an estimated 18.1 million (95% UI: 17.5-18.7 million) new cases of cancer (17 million excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million (95% UI: 9.3-9.8 million) deaths from cancer (9.5 million excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) worldwide in 2018.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Global Burden of Disease , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Survival Rate , Young Adult
3.
Int J Cancer ; 133(3): 721-9, 2013 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23364833

ABSTRACT

Incidence rates of different cancers have been calculated for the black population of Harare, Zimbabwe for a 20-year period (1991-2010) coinciding with continuing social and lifestyle changes, and the peak, and subsequent wane, of the HIV-AIDS epidemic. The overall risk of cancer increased during the period in both sexes, with rates of cervix and prostate cancers showing particularly dramatic increases (3.3% and 6.4% annually, respectively). By 2004, prostate cancer had become the most common cancer of men. The incidence of cancer of the esophagus, formerly the most common cancer of men, has remained relatively constant, whereas rates of breast and cervix cancers, the most common malignancies of women, have shown significant increases (4.9% and 3.3% annually, respectively). The incidence of Kaposi sarcoma increased to a maximum around 1998-2000 and then declined in all age groups, and in both sexes The incidence of squamous cell cancers of the conjunctiva is relatively high, with temporal trends similar to those of Kaposi sarcoma. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the fifth most common cancer of men and fourth of women, showed a steady increase in incidence throughout the period (6.7-6.9% annually), although rates in young adults (15-39) have decreased since 2001. Cancer control in Zimbabwe, as elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, involves meeting the challenge of emerging cancers associated with westernization of lifestyles (large bowel, breast and prostate), while the incidence of cancers associated with poverty and infection (liver, cervix and esophagus) shows little decline, and the residual burden of the AIDS-associated cancers remains significant.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Life Style , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk , Sarcoma, Kaposi/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Zimbabwe/epidemiology
7.
Br J Cancer ; 105 Suppl 2: S2-5, 2011 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22158314

ABSTRACT

The overall objective of the study is to estimate the percentage of cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) in the UK in 2010 that were the result of exposure to 14 major lifestyle, dietary and environmental risk factors: tobacco, alcohol, four elements of diet (consumption of meat, fruit and vegetables, fibre and salt), overweight, lack of physical exercise, occupation, infections, radiation (ionising and solar), use of hormones and reproductive history (breast feeding). The number of new cases attributable to suboptimal exposure levels in the past, relative to a theoretical optimum exposure distribution, is evaluated. For most of the exposures, the attributable fraction was calculated based on the distribution of exposure prevalence (around 2000), the difference from the theoretical optimum (by age group and sex) and the relative risk per unit difference. For tobacco smoking, the method developed by Peto et al (1992) was used, which relies on the ratio between observed incidence of lung cancer in smokers and that in non-smokers, to calibrate the risk. This article outlines the structure of the supplement - a section for each of the 14 exposures, followed by a Summary chapter, which considers the relative contributions of each factor to the total number of cancers diagnosed in the UK in 2010 that were, in theory, avoidable.


Subject(s)
Environmental Health , Life Style , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Diet/adverse effects , Environment , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , United Kingdom/epidemiology
20.
Br J Cancer ; 105 Suppl 2: S77-81, 2011 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22158327

ABSTRACT

This chapter summarises the results of the preceding sections, which estimate the fraction of cancers occurring in the UK in 2010 that can be attributed to sub-optimal, past exposures of 14 lifestyle and environmental risk factors. For each of 18 cancer types, we present the percentage of cases attributable to one or all of the risk factors considered (tobacco, alcohol, four elements of diet (consumption of meat, fruit and vegetables, fibre, and salt), overweight, lack of physical exercise, occupation, infections, radiation (ionising and solar), use of hormones, and reproductive history (breast feeding)).Exposure to less than optimum levels of the 14 factors was responsible for 42.7% of cancers in the UK in 2010 (45.3% in men, 40.1% in women)--a total of about 134,000 cases.Tobacco smoking is by far the most important risk factor for cancer in the UK, responsible for 60, 000 cases (19.4% of all new cancer cases) in 2010. The relative importance of other exposures differs by sex. In men, deficient intake of fruits and vegetables (6.1%), occupational exposures (4.9%) and alcohol consumption (4.6%) are next in importance, while in women, it is overweight and obesity (because of the effect on breast cancer)--responsible for 6.9% of cancers, followed by infectious agents (3.7%).Population-attributable fractions provide a valuable quantitative appraisal of the impact of different factors in cancer causation, and are thus helpful in prioritising cancer control strategies. However, quantifying the likely impact of preventive interventions requires rather complex scenario modelling, including specification of realistically achievable population distributions of risk factors, and the timescale of change, as well as the latent periods between exposure and outcome, and the rate of change following modification in exposure level.


Subject(s)
Environment , Environmental Health , Life Style , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Diet , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL