Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Comput Aided Mol Des ; 34(2): 99-119, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974851

ABSTRACT

The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) aims to identify best practice methods for computer aided drug design through blinded ligand pose prediction and affinity challenges. Herein, we report on the results of Grand Challenge 4 (GC4). GC4 focused on proteins beta secretase 1 and Cathepsin S, and was run in an analogous manner to prior challenges. In Stage 1, participant ability to predict the pose and affinity of BACE1 ligands were assessed. Following the completion of Stage 1, all BACE1 co-crystal structures were released, and Stage 2 tested affinity rankings with co-crystal structures. We provide an analysis of the results and discuss insights into determined best practice methods.


Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/antagonists & inhibitors , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/antagonists & inhibitors , Drug Design , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Small Molecule Libraries/pharmacology , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/metabolism , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Humans , Ligands , Machine Learning , Molecular Docking Simulation , Small Molecule Libraries/chemistry , Thermodynamics
2.
J Comput Aided Mol Des ; 33(1): 1-18, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30632055

ABSTRACT

The Drug Design Data Resource aims to test and advance the state of the art in protein-ligand modeling by holding community-wide blinded, prediction challenges. Here, we report on our third major round, Grand Challenge 3 (GC3). Held 2017-2018, GC3 centered on the protein Cathepsin S and the kinases VEGFR2, JAK2, p38-α, TIE2, and ABL1, and included both pose-prediction and affinity-ranking components. GC3 was structured much like the prior challenges GC2015 and GC2. First, Stage 1 tested pose prediction and affinity ranking methods; then all available crystal structures were released, and Stage 2 tested only affinity rankings, now in the context of the available structures. Unique to GC3 was the addition of a Stage 1b self-docking subchallenge, in which the protein coordinates from all of the cocrystal structures used in the cross-docking challenge were released, and participants were asked to predict the pose of CatS ligands using these newly released structures. We provide an overview of the outcomes and discuss insights into trends and best-practices.


Subject(s)
Cathepsins/chemistry , Molecular Docking Simulation/methods , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Protein Kinases/chemistry , Binding Sites , Computer-Aided Design , Crystallography, X-Ray , Databases, Protein , Drug Design , Ligands , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation , Thermodynamics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL