ABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: In oocytes of advanced maternal age (AMA) women, what are the mechanisms leading to aneuploidy and what is the association of aneuploidy with embryo development? SUMMARY ANSWER: Known chromosome segregation errors such as precocious separation of sister chromatids explained 90.4% of abnormal chromosome copy numbers in polar bodies (PBs), underlying impaired embryo development. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Meiotic chromosomal aneuploidies in oocytes correlate with AMA (>35 years) and can affect over half of oocytes in this age group. This underlies the rationale for PB biopsy as a form of early preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), as performed in the 'ESHRE STudy into the Evaluation of oocyte Euploidy by Microarray analysis' (ESTEEM) randomized controlled trial (RCT). So far, chromosome analysis of oocytes and PBs has shown that precocious separation of sister chromatids (PSSC), Meiosis II (MII) non-disjunction (ND), and reverse segregation (RS) are the main mechanisms leading to aneuploidy in oocytes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were sourced from the ESTEEM study, a multicentre RCT from seven European centres to assess the clinical utility of PGT-A on PBs using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in patients of AMA (36-40 years). This included data on the chromosome complement in PB pairs (PGT-A group), and on embryo morphology in a subset of embryos, up to Day 6 post-insemination, from both the intervention (PB biopsy and PGT-A) and control groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: ESTEEM recruited 396 AMA patients: 205 in the intervention group and 191 in the control group. Complete genetic data from 693 PB pairs were analysed. Additionally, the morphology from 1034 embryos generated from fertilized oocytes (two pronuclei) in the PB biopsy group and 1082 in the control group were used for statistical analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 461/693 PB pairs showed abnormal segregation in 1162/10 810 chromosomes. The main observed abnormal segregations were compatible with PSSC in Meiosis I (MI) (n = 568/1162; 48.9%), ND of chromatids in MII or RS (n = 417/1162; 35.9%), and less frequently ND in MI (n = 65/1162; 5.6%). For 112 chromosomes (112/1162; 9.6%), we observed a chromosome copy number in the first PB (PB1) and second PB (PB2) that is not explained by any of the known mechanisms causing aneuploidy in oocytes. We observed that embryos in the PGT-A arm of the RCT did not have a significantly different morphology between 2 and 6 days post-insemination compared to the control group, indicating that PB biopsy did not affect embryo quality. Following age-adjusted multilevel mixed-effect ordinal logistic regression models performed for each embryo evaluation day, aneuploidy was associated with a decrease in embryo quality on Day 3 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.90), Day 4 (aOR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.39), and Day 5 (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.58). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: RS cannot be distinguished from normal segregation or MII ND using aCGH. The observed segregations were based on the detected copy number of PB1 and PB2 only and were not confirmed by the analysis of embryos. The embryo morphology assessment was static and single observer. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our finding of frequent unexplained chromosome copy numbers in PBs indicates that our knowledge of the mechanisms causing aneuploidy in oocytes is incomplete. It challenges the dogma that aneuploidy in oocytes is exclusively caused by mis-segregation of chromosomes during MI and MII. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Data were mined from a study funded by ESHRE. Illumina provided microarrays and other consumables necessary for aCGH testing of PBs. None of the authors have competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Data were mined from the ESTEEM study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01532284).
Subject(s)
Preimplantation Diagnosis , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Maternal Age , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Aneuploidy , Oocytes , Embryonic Development/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: What are the cost per live birth and the incremental cost of preventing a miscarriage with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by polar body biopsy and array-based comprehensive genome hybridisation (aCGH) versus regular IVF/ICSI without PGT-A for infertility treatment in women 36-40 years of age? DESIGN: Decision tree model. POPULATION: A randomised clinical trial on PGT-A (ESTEEM study). METHODS: Two treatment strategies were compared: one cycle of IVF/ICSI with or without PGT-A. Costs and effects were analysed with this model for four different cost scenarios: high-, higher medium, lower medium and low-cost. Base case, sensitivity, threshold, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to examine the cost-effectiveness implications of PGT-A. RESULTS: PGT-A increased the cost per live birth by approximately 15% in the high-cost scenario to approximately 285% in the low-cost scenario. Threshold analysis revealed that PGT-A would need to be associated with an absolute increase in pregnancy rate by 6% to >39% or, alternatively, would need to be US$2,969 (high-cost scenario) to US$4,888 (low-cost scenario) cheaper. The incremental cost to prevent one miscarriage by PGT-A using the base case assumptions was calculated to be US$34,427 (high-cost scenario) to US$51,146 (low-cost scenario). A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cost-effectiveness for PGT-A from 1.9% (high-cost scenario) to 0.0% (low-cost scenario) of calculated samples. CONCLUSIONS: While avoiding unnecessary embryo transfers and miscarriages are important goals, patients and doctors need to be aware of the high-cost implications of applying PGT-A using aCGH on polar bodies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: PGT-A by polar body biopsy and comprehensive genome hybridisation increases cost per live birth and requires high financial spending per miscarriage averted.
Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/genetics , Aneuploidy , Genetic Testing/economics , Maternal Age , Preimplantation Diagnosis/economics , Abortion, Spontaneous/prevention & control , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Polar Bodies/transplantation , PregnancyABSTRACT
A retrospective cohort study was performed to examine whether, in artificial endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, progesterone (P) levels the day prior to embryo transfer of euploid embryos have an impact on pregnancy outcomes. In a private university clinic, 244 FETs between January 2016 and June 2017 were analyzed. Endometrial preparation was achieved with estradiol valerate and vaginal micronized progesterone. Serum P and estradiol levels the day prior to embryo transfer were measured. A multivariable analysis to assess the relationship between serum P level and pregnancy outcomes was performed, adjusted for confounding variables. Mean P value was 11.3 ± 5.1 ng/ml. Progesterone levels were split in quartiles: Q1: ≤ 8.06 ng/ml; Q2: 8.07-10.64 ng/ml; Q3: 10.65-13.13 ng/ml; Q4: > 13.13 ng/ml. Patients included in the lower P quartile had a significantly higher miscarriage rate and significantly lower live birth rate (LBR) compared to the higher ones. A low serum P level (≤ 10.64 ng/ml) one day before FET is associated with a lower pregnancy and LBR following FET of euploid embryos.
Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer/methods , Fertilization in Vitro , Pregnancy Outcome , Progesterone/blood , Adult , Birth Rate , Cryopreservation , Female , Humans , Live Birth , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the chromosomal constitution and the developmental potential of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) deriving embryos displaying a single pronucleus at the zygote stage. METHODS: Eighty-eight embryos from single pronucleus (1PN) two polar bodies (2PB) ICSI zygotes from 64 preimplantational genetic screening (PGS) cycles (October 2012-December 2014), were retrospectively analyzed. Zygotes were cultured in a time-lapse incubator. Embryo biopsy was performed on day 3 and genetic analysis approached by array comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: Chromosomal analysis revealed that 17% (15/88) of embryos derived from 1PN 2PB zygotes were diagnosed as euploid. After blastomere biopsy at day 3, the blastocyst rate at day 5 was 3.4% (3/88). Only 2.3% (2/88) euploid blastocysts were obtained. In two couples and after counseling and patient agreement, the transfer of a euploid blastocyst from a 1PN 2PB ICSI zygote was performed resulting in the birth of a healthy child. CONCLUSIONS: These results open the possibility to consider embryos coming from 1PN 2PB ICSI zygotes for transfer when no other embryos from 2PN 2PB ICSI zygotes are available and if a PGS diagnosis of euploidy is obtained. Confirmation of biparental inheritance is strongly recommended.
Subject(s)
Embryonic Development , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Time-Lapse Imaging , Zygote/growth & development , Zygote/ultrastructureABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To present a case describing the birth of a healthy female after the replacement of vitrified biopsied embryos after Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. METHOD: A descriptive case report of a single patient. RESULTS: Our patient carrier of an X-linked disease became pregnant and as a result a healthy girl was born. CONCLUSIONS: This report shows that blastocysts obtained from biopsied embryos can be successfully cryopreserved by a simple, secure and low-cost vitrification method using a Hemi-straw support.
Subject(s)
Blastocyst/cytology , Cryopreservation , Pregnancy Outcome , Adult , Biopsy , Female , Genetic Carrier Screening , Humans , Male , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/genetics , PregnancyABSTRACT
Indications and candidates for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) have increased in recent years. This study evaluates whether IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) results could be improved by selecting embryos through PGD-AS (aneuploidy screening) in couples in whom the male partner presents meiotic abnormalities. Two hundred and fifty-six embryos were biopsied and 183 were suitable for analysis (73.2%). Ninety-two embryos showed normal chromosomal analysis (50.3% of the analysed embryos and 57.5% of the diagnosed embryos). Pregnancy, abortion and implantation rates were compared with 66 IVF-ICSI cycles performed in 44 patients with meiotic abnormalities without PGD (control group). No statistically significant differences in the pregnancy rate (52 versus 43.9%), implantation rate (32.1 versus 23.5%) and miscarriage rate (15.4 versus 10.3%) were observed between the groups. Although the embryos obtained from men with meiotic abnormalities showed a high frequency of chromosome abnormalities, no improvements in pregnancy and implantation rates were obtained after PGD-AS in the series analysed.
Subject(s)
Meiosis , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Spermatozoa/abnormalities , Spermatozoa/cytology , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Chromosome Aberrations , Embryo Implantation , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Incidence , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Sperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicABSTRACT
It is essential to deposit embryos as gently as possible during IVF, avoiding manoeuvres that might trigger uterine contractions which could adversely affect the results of this treatment. The time during which the embryo transfer catheter remains in the cervical canal might be related to stimulation of contractions. This study investigates the influence that the time interval before withdrawal of the catheter after ultrasound (US)-guided embryo deposit might have on the pregnancy rate in patients under IVF cycles. A total of 100 women about to undergo transfer of at least two optimal embryos was studied. The women were prospectively randomized into two groups: (i) slow withdrawal of the catheter immediately after embryo deposit (n = 51); and (ii) a 30 s delay before catheter withdrawal (n = 49). The pregnancy rates for transfer in the two groups were 60.8 and 69.4% respectively, with no significant differences. There were no statistically significant differences in pregnancy rates between the two patient groups. The results indicate either that the waiting interval was insufficient to detect differences, or that the retention time before withdrawing the catheter is not a factor that influences pregnancy rate.