Rectal misoprostol versus oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in advanced labour were enrolled. The only exclusion criterion was a known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive rectal misoprostol 800 microg or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU with delivery of the anterior shoulder. The main outcome measure was change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and medication side effects. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar in each treatment group. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in hemoglobin (misoprostol 1.19 g/dL and oxytocin 1.16 g/dL; relative difference 2.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]-16.8% to 19.4%; P = 0.80). The only significant secondary outcome was shivering, which was more common in the misoprostol group (misoprostol 7.5% vs. oxytocin 0.9%; relative risk 8.0; 95% CI 1.86-34.36; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rectal misoprostol 800 microg is as effective as 10 IU intramuscular oxytocin in minimizing blood loss in the third stage of labour. Rectal misoprostol has a lower incidence of side effects than the equivalent oral dose. This confirms the utility of misoprostol as a safe and effective uterotonic for use in the rural and remote areas of developing nations where other pharmacologic agents may be less feasible.

Oral misoprostol versus oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of oral misoprostol 800 mug with intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU in routine management of the third stage of labour. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was performed in a rural district hospital in Ghana, West Africa, and enrolled women in labour with anticipated vaginal delivery and no known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive oral misoprostol 800 mug or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU. Blood samples were taken to determine hemoglobin concentration before delivery and at 12 hours post partum. Treatment was administered at delivery of the anterior shoulder. The primary outcome was the change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included other measures of blood loss and presumed medication side effects. RESULTS: In total, 450 women were enrolled in the study. Their baseline characteristics were similar. There was no significant difference between the groups in the change in hemoglobin concentration (misoprostol 1.07 g/dL and oxytocin 1.00 g/dL). The only significant secondary outcomes were shivering (80.7% with misoprostol vs. 3.6% with oxytocin) and pyrexia (11.4% with misoprostol, none with oxytocin). CONCLUSION: Routine use of oral misoprostol 800 microg appears to be as effective as 10 IU parenteral oxytocin in minimizing blood loss during the third stage of labour, as determined by change in hemoglobin concentration. Misoprostol appears to be a safe, inexpensive, and effective uterotonic for use in rural and remote areas, where intravenous oxytocin may be unavailable.