Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , Centenarians , Humans , Nonagenarians , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The implementation of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may enhance the efficiency of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, as RDTs are widely accessible and easy to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a diagnosis strategy based on a combination of antigen and immunoglobulin M (IgM) or immunoglobulin G (IgG) serological RDTs. Plasma and nasopharyngeal samples were collected between 14 March and 11 April 2020 at hospital admission from 45 patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed COVID-19 and 20 negative controls. SARS-CoV-2 antigen (Ag) was assessed in nasopharyngeal swabs using the Coris Respi-Strip. For IgM/IgG detection, SureScreen Diagnostics and Szybio Biotech RDTs were used in addition to laboratory assays (Abbott Alinity i SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Theradiag COVID-19 IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Using the Ag RDT, 13 out of 45 (29.0%) specimens tested positive, the sensitivity was 87.0% for cycle threshold (Ct ) values ≤25% and 0% for Ct values greater than 25. IgG detection was associated with high Ct values and the amount of time after the onset of symptoms. The profile of isolated IgM on RDTs was more frequently observed during the first and second week after the onset of symptoms. The combination of Ag and IgM/IgG RDTs enabled the detection of up to 84.0% of COVID-19 confirmed cases at hospital admission. Antigen and antibody-based RDTs showed suboptimal performances when used alone. However when used in combination, they are able to identify most COVID-19 patients admitted in an emergency department.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Serologic Tests/methodsABSTRACT
Diagnostic of acute hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is based on the detection of anti-HAV IgM without testing for the pathogen itself. We evaluated the usefulness of HAV RNA testing for confirmation of acute hepatitis A and to provide indications about the level of HAV replication in HIV-positive and HIV-negative subjects during an unprecedented outbreak of HAV observed in France in 2017. HAV RNA was detected in 38 out of 41 (92.6%) subjects with a clinical diagnosis of acute hepatitis A, whereas nine cases tested positive for anti-HAV IgM in whom the diagnosis of acute hepatitis A was not retained were found negative for HAV RNA. All subjects in the control group were also tested negative for HAV RNA. HAV viremia was correlated to ALT peak (r = .64; P < .0001). HIV-infected patients have similar HAV RNA levels but were less likely to have prolonged international normalized ratio of prothrombin time when compared to the HIV-uninfected group (P = .016), suggesting a less severe course of acute hepatitis. HAV RNA was detected in the serum of most of the patients with acute hepatitis A, indicating that the direct detection of HAV can be used to confirm hepatitis A in patients tested positive for anti-HAV IgM antibodies. Nucleic acid tests should serve more broadly during the diagnosis workup of acute hepatitis A to improve the predictive values of HAV in vitro diagnostic tests and to confirm acute hepatitis A in patients tested positive with IgM with moderate or low S/CO values.
