Cognitive "success" in the setting of performance validity test failure.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown unique variance contributions from performance invalidity, it is difficult to interpret the meaning of cognitive data in the setting of performance validity test (PVT) failure. The current study aimed to examine cognitive outcomes in this context. METHOD: Two hundred and twenty-two veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury referred for clinical evaluation completed cognitive and performance validity measures. Standardized scores were characterized as Within Normal Limits (≥16th normative percentile) and Below Normal Limits (<16th percentile). Cognitive outcomes are examined across four commonly used PVTs. Self-reported employment and student status were used as indicators of "productivity" to assess potential functional differences related to lower cognitive performance. RESULTS: Among participants who performed in the invalid range on Test of Memory Malingering trial 1, Word Memory Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Digit Span aged corrected scaled score, and the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition Forced Choice index, 16-88% earned broadly within normal limits scores across cognitive testing. Depending on which PVT measure was applied, the average number of cognitive performances below the 16th percentile ranged from 5 to 7 of 14 tasks. There were no differences in the total number of below normal limits performances on cognitive measures between "productive" and "non-productive" participants (T = 1.65, p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current study suggest that the range of within normal limits cognitive performance in the context of failed PVTs varies greatly. Importantly, our findings indicate that neurocognitive data may still provide important practical information regarding cognitive abilities, despite poor PVT outcomes. Further, given that rates of below normal limits cognitive performance did not differ among "productivity" groups, results have important implications for functional abilities and recommendations in a clinical setting.

Harmonizing PTSD severity scales across instruments and sites.

OBJECTIVE: The variety of instruments used to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) allows for flexibility, but also creates challenges for data synthesis. The objective of this work was to use a multisite mega analysis to derive quantitative recommendations for equating scores across measures of PTSD severity. METHOD: Empirical Bayes harmonization and linear models were used to describe and mitigate site and covariate effects. Quadratic models for converting scores across PTSD assessments were constructed using bootstrapping and tested on hold out data. RESULTS: We aggregated 17 data sources and compiled an n = 5,634 sample of individuals who were assessed for PTSD symptoms. We confirmed our hypothesis that harmonization and covariate adjustments would significantly improve inference of scores across instruments. Harmonization significantly reduced cross-dataset variance (28%, p < .001), and models for converting scores across instruments were well fit (median R² = 0.985) with an average root mean squared error of 1.46 on sum scores. CONCLUSIONS: These methods allow PTSD symptom severity to be placed on multiple scales and offers interesting empirical perspectives on the role of harmonization in the behavioral sciences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Varying failure criteria on performance validity tests influences interpretation of cognitive outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the effects of applying various performance validity tests (PVT) failure criteria on the relationship between cognitive outcomes and posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptomology. METHOD: One hundred and ninety-nine veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury referred for clinical evaluation completed cognitive tests, PVTs, and self-report measures of PTS symptoms and symptom exaggeration. Normative T scores of select cognitive tests were averaged into memory, attention/processing speed, and executive functioning composites. Separate one way analyses of variance assessed differences among high PTS (n = 140) versus low PTS (n = 59) groups and were repeated excluding participants based on varying combinations of PVT failure criteria. RESULTS: When no PVTs were considered, the high PTS group demonstrated worse performance across all three cognitive domains. Excluding those who failed two or more stand-alone, or two or more embedded validity measures resulted in group differences across all cognitive composites. When participants were excluded based on failure of any one embedded and any one stand-alone PVT measure combined, the high PTS group performed worse on the executive functioning and attention/processing speed composites. The remaining three proposed methods to control for performance validity resulted in null PTS-cognition relationships. Results remained largely consistent after controlling for symptom exaggeration. CONCLUSIONS: Methods of defining PVT failure can greatly influence differences in cognitive function between groups defined by PTS symptom levels. Findings highlight the importance of considering performance validity when interpreting cognitive data and warrant future investigation of PVT failure criteria in other conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A pilot study of olfactory function in veterans with a history of deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury.

Olfactory impairment in military populations is highly prevalent and often attributed to the long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and chronic psychiatric disorders. The main goal of this investigation was to examine olfactory function in a cohort of combat veterans using a quantitative smell test.Participants underwent a neurological examination, completed performance validity testing (PVT), provided deployment history, and their medical records were reviewed.Participants were 38 veterans with a deployment-related mTBI who passed the PVT and did not have ongoing substance misuse issues. Olfactory examination revealed normosmia in 20 participants and various degrees of deficit in 18. The groups did not differ in demographics, post-injury interval, or current clinical (non-psychiatric) conditions. Participants with hyposmia frequently reported being exposed to a higher number of blasts and being positioned closer to the nearest primary blast, and more often endorsed a period of loss of consciousness after the most serious mTBI. In addition, they more often reported tympanic membrane perforation, extracranial injuries, and histories of both blast and blunt force mTBI. Comorbid diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, chronic headaches, and pain were more common among them as well.Several blast exposure and injury-related characteristics increase the likelihood of long-term olfactory impartments, comorbid psychiatric conditions, and chronic pain among veterans with history of deployment-related mTBI. Notably, none of the participants with hyposmia had a clinical diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction or were receiving service-connected disability for loss of sense of smell at the time of their assessment.

Risk factors for decline in cognitive performance following deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury: A preliminary report.

Thorough identification of risk factors for delayed decline in cognitive performance following combat-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is important for guiding comprehensive post-deployment rehabilitation. In a sample of veterans who reported at least one deployment-related mTBI, preliminary results indicate that factors including a history of loss of consciousness over 1 min, current obesity and hypertension, and Black race were more prevalent in those with decreased scores on a measure of memory function. These factors should be considered by clinicians and researchers working with current and former military personnel.

Predictive utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-RF (MMPI-2-RF) in differentiating psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and epileptic seizures in male veterans.

OBJECTIVE: While psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and epileptic seizures (ES) often present similarly, they are etiologically distinct, and correct diagnosis is essential for ensuring appropriate treatment and improving outcomes. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-RF (MMPI-2-RF) may assist in differential diagnosis, but prior investigations have been limited by disproportionately female samples, inconsistent accounting for profile invalidity, and limited intra-scale variability from dichotomizing variables. The current investigation addressed these gaps by assessing diagnostic utility of the MMPI-2-RF in differentiating PNES and ES in a male sample of veterans while conservatively accounting for profile invalidity and using a statistical approach that allows for consideration of continuous independent variables to better appreciate intra-scale variance. METHOD: One hundred and forty-four veterans completed the MMPI-2-RF and were diagnosed with PNES (57.6%) or ES (42.4%) by a board-certified neurologist following continuous video-EEG monitoring. Participants with validity scores falling in the definitely or likely invalid ranges were excluded to ensure construct validity among clinical/substantive scales. Independent samples t-tests assessed differences in MMPI-2-RF variables by diagnostic groups. Hierarchical stepwise logistical regressions assessed predictive utility of MMPI-2-RF indices. A clinical calculator was derived from regression findings to help with diagnostic prediction. RESULTS: Males with PNES endorsed significantly higher scores on F-r, FBS-r, RBS, RC1, RC7, HPC, and NUC (medium to large effect sizes). The regression block that contained validity, restructured clinical (RC1), and substantive scales (GIC, SUI) had a hit rate of 75.69%, which was an improvement from the baseline model hit rate of 57.64%. Higher endorsement on RC1 and lower reporting on GIC significantly predicted PNES diagnosis for males. CONCLUSIONS: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-RF improved diagnostic accuracy of PNES versus ES among male veterans, and RC1 (somatic complaints) emerged as a significant predictor for males with PNES, in line with hypotheses. Several clinical/substantive scales assisted with differential diagnosis after careful accounting for profile validity. Future studies can validate findings among males outside of veteran samples.

Role of deployment-related mTBI and resilience in perceived participation limitations among Veterans.

Problems with social functioning are common following combat deployment, and these may be greater among individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The present investigation examined the impact of mild TBI (mTBI), deployment-related characteristics, and resilience on perceived participation limitations among combat Veterans. This was a cross-sectional study of 143 participants with a history of at least one deployment-related mTBI (TBI group) and 80 without a history of lifetime TBI (Comparison group). Self-report measures of participation, resilience, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and combat exposure were administered. In addition, each participant completed a structured interview to assess lifetime TBI history. The groups did not differ in basic demographics, but significant differences were found for perceived limitations in participation, the presence of PTSD symptoms, and intensity of combat exposure. A stepwise model indicated a significant effect of resilience on reported limitations in participation (adjusted R2 = 0.61). Individuals with higher resiliency reported a higher degree of social participation, and this effect was stronger in the TBI group. Deployment-related characteristics, including intensity of combat exposure, did not have a significant effect (adjusted R2 = 0.28) on social participation. The role of resilience should be recognized within post-deployment transition and rehabilitation programs.

Providing Care for Comorbid Mental Health Conditions in the Polytrauma System of Care.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize challenges and best practices relevant to providing care for mental health comorbidities in veterans and service members (V/SM) treated in the Polytrauma System of Care (PSC) and to review themes that emerged during a May 2017 meeting of rehabilitation professionals on this topic. Management of comorbid mental health conditions remains a critical issue within the PSC, given the high rate of these comorbidities and the impact of mental health conditions on treatment planning and outcomes. DESIGN: To identify the challenges of concomitantly treating TBI-related symptoms and mental health comorbidities in V/SM treated within the PSC, describe specialty programs within the Veterans Health Administration designed to treat these comorbid conditions, and report on the themes and recommendations identified by rehabilitation professionals at the 2017 meeting. CONCLUSION: To further develop mental health treatment within the PSC, the following recommendations were made: (1) continued support for family members as critical members of the rehabilitation team; (2) adding measures and mechanisms to monitor mental health within the PSC; and (3) exploration of modern technologies to enhance care of existing polytrauma clients and to better prepare to serve clients with all types of acquired brain injury.

Vocational Rehabilitation in the Veterans Health Administration Polytrauma System of Care: Current Practices, Unique Challenges, and Future Directions.

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE: Veterans and service members (V/SMs) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and comorbid conditions are treated in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma System of Care (PSC). These V/SMs comprise a unique population with distinct needs for restoring community reintegration, including participation in meaningful employment. Low employment rates after TBI vary and are influenced by many factors. Employment is a central aspect of the VHA priority of facilitating adjustment, and addressing vocational needs alongside healthcare is critical to community reintegration. The purpose of this article is to outline current practices of addressing vocational rehabilitation in the PSC, discuss the unique challenges in serving Veterans with polytrauma, and outline future directions to improve vocational services and outcomes. METHODS: Briefly review literature on V/SM with TBI and employment, describe the PSC and VHA vocational programs for V/SM with polytrauma, and synthesize proceedings on vocational rehabilitation from the 2017 VHA "Community Reintegration in the Polytrauma System of Care" meeting. CONCLUSIONS: To advance and expand vocational services the following guidelines were recommended: (1) designing flexible services based on individualized needs, (2) increasing access to vocational services through communication and collaboration, (3) promoting cross-disciplinary education and engagement in vocational care, and (4) systematically tracking employment outcomes.

Detection of symptom over-reporting on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory in OEF/OIF/OND veterans with history of mild TBI.

OBJECTIVE: As part of routine care at Veterans Affairs facilities, veterans with a service-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) are administered a self-report post-concussive symptom measure, the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI). Interpreting the NSI can be problematic given that over-reporting on self-report measures is often found in both civilian and military patient populations. This study investigates embedded scales on the NSI that identify possible and probable symptom exaggeration. METHOD: 183 veterans with a history of mild TBI were administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, 2nd edition, Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and the NSI. The participants were divided into symptom validity testing pass and fail groups based on their performance on the MMPI-2-RF symptom validity scales. Cut scores on the NSI Total and Validity-10 scores were then established and applied to two additional veteran populations. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity values were derived for all NSI Total and Validity-10 values. Optimal cut scores were determined based on specificity levels of ≥95%. The NSI Total cut score was ≥57 for possible and ≥67 for probable symptom exaggeration and the Validity-10 cut score was ≥22 for possible and ≥27 for probable symptom exaggeration, with sensitivity ranging from 27 to 43%. Applying these cut scores to a broader clinical and research sample resulted in lower rates of suspected exaggeration. CONCLUSIONS: Both the NSI Total and Validity-10 cut scores consistently identified potential symptom exaggeration across three mild TBI samples. Clinicians and researchers who use the NSI are encouraged to utilize either embedded validity measure in their practice.

Delivery of mental health treatment to combat veterans with psychiatric diagnoses and TBI histories.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and mental health (MH) disorders are prevalent in combat veterans returning from Afghanistan and/or Iraq (hereafter referred to as returning veterans). Accurate estimates of service utilization for veterans with and without TBI exposure (referred to as TBI history) are imperative in order to provide high quality healthcare to returning veterans. We examined associations between TBI history and MH service utilization in a subsample of returning veterans who were newly diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and/or anxiety in the 2010 fiscal year (N = 55,458). Data were extracted from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Patient Care Database. Veterans with MH diagnoses and TBI histories attended significantly more psychotherapy visits, (M = 8.32 visits, SD = 17.15) and were more likely to attend at least 8 psychotherapy visits, (15.7%) than veterans with MH diagnoses but no TBI history (M = 6.48 visits, SD = 12.12; 10.1% attended at least 8 sessions). PTSD and TBI history, but not depression or anxiety, were associated with a greater number of psychotherapy visits when controlling for demographic and clinical variables. PTSD, anxiety, depression, and TBI history were associated with number of psychotropic medication-management visits. TBI history was related to greater MH service utilization, independent of MH diagnoses. Future research should examine what MH services are being utilized and if these services are helping veterans recover from their disorders.

Choosing appropriate comparison group participants in studies of veterans: Characteristics of orthopedically injured and uninjured Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn veterans.

INTRODUCTION: Research addressing deployment-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) is fairly complex due to a high prevalence of comorbid conditions, multiple exposures, and the lack of acute medical records. Therefore, there is a need for a well-defined, matching comparison group. This study compared deployment-related characteristics, everyday functioning, and cognitive performance in recently deployed veterans who had not sustained any injuries with those who had orthopedic injuries during deployment, but who were without a history of TBI. METHOD: Participants included 45 individuals who had been deployed and who were without injuries and a group of 27 individuals who reported at least one orthopedic injury during deployment. The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4, Community Integration Questionnaire, Veterans RAND 36 Item Health Survey, Brief Pain Inventory, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C) were used to assess daily functioning. Cognitive performance was measured using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Test, Color-Word Interference Test, and Verbal Selective Reminding Test. The two groups were compared using t tests based on equal variances. The effect size was calculated. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences, with all variables having p-values >.1 and small to medium effect sizes. DISCUSSION: Orthopedic injuries sustained during deployment that did not require evacuation or hospitalization did not have any lasting effect on participants' health, cognition, and daily functioning relative to other deployed individuals with no history of injury. These results indicate the two groups are comparable and that their data could be potentially combined to create a single comparison group. Due to the small sample available for this study, the current results are considered preliminary, and further investigation is needed.

Relative Utility of Performance and Symptom Validity Tests.

This investigation adds to the burgeoning body of research concerned with discriminating performance and symptom validity tests (SVTs) through examination of their differential relationships with cognitive performance and symptom self-report measures. To the authors' current knowledge, prior studies have not assessed differences between participants who fail either a performance validity test (PVT) or an SVT but not both. As part of their neuropsychological evaluations at four Veterans Affairs medical centers across the United States, participants were administered a fixed, standardized battery that consisted of performance validity, symptom validity, cognitive performance, and symptom self-report measures. Compared with participants who failed a PVT and an SVT, participants who passed both and participants who only passed a PVT demonstrated better cognitive performance and self-reported fewer symptoms. Results support differential clinical utility of performance validity and SVTs when assessing cognitive performance and symptom self-report.

Factors related to satisfaction with life in veterans with mild traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Satisfaction with life (SWL) is an important measure of outcome in rehabilitation. Previous research suggests that those with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), even mild TBI, report lower levels of life satisfaction when compared with the noninjured population. Although is it possible that TBI has a direct effect on SWL, various medical and psychosocial factors commonly affecting those recovering from TBI likely contribute to SWL. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: The present study aimed to identify factors related to SWL in 95 veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) with a history of mild TBI. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated that headache impact, pain interference, sleep quality, posttraumatic stress symptom severity, and social support were all significantly related to SWL. However, when secondary analyses were conducted including posttraumatic stress symptom severity as a covariate before the entry of other predictors, only sleep quality and social support remained significantly associated with SWL. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: These results indicate the importance of properly identifying and treating symptoms of posttraumatic stress in veterans with a history of mTBI, as posttraumatic stress symptoms appear to be strongly related to SWL in those with a history of mild TBI. Optimizing sleep quality and social support may also be important in improving SWL.

Comparison of domain-specific cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy and stenting.

BACKGROUND: Observational data indicate that carotid artery stenting (CAS) is associated with higher incidence of subclinical cerebral microemboli than carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We hypothesized that CEA would be associated with superior performance on detailed domain-specific cognitive testing compared with CAS. METHODS: Patients with >80% asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were randomized to CEA or CAS with side of stenosis balanced across condition. A robust battery of tests was used to assess the cognitive domains of attention, memory, mood, visual-spatial skills, motor ability, processing speed, and executive functioning ≤10 days preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks and 6 months. Tests were administered using standardized conditions and were scored by individuals blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS: Baseline cognitive performance was similar between CAS (n = 29) and CEA (n = 31) groups (P > .05). Relative to baseline, verbal and visual memory and attention functions substantially improved in the CAS and CEA groups at 6 months (multiple cognitive tests achieved statistical significance). Compared with CEA, cognitive processing speed (Stroop Color test: 9.0 vs 7.3, P = .04; and Stroop Word test: 9.0 vs 7.4, P = .05) was superior in the CAS group at 6 weeks. Executive functioning (phonemic verbal fluency: 10.6 vs 8.4, P = .043) and motor function (Grooved Pegboard of nondominant extremity: 45.7 vs 38.9, P = .022) were also superior in the CAS group at 6 months. Tests of attention, memory, and visual-spatial skills were similar between CAS and CEA patients at 6 weeks and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid revascularization improves memory and attention within the first 6 postoperative months. Compared with CEA, CAS produces improvements in cognitive processing speed, executive functioning, and motor function.

Factors Associated with Word Memory Test Performance in Persons with Medically Documented Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the rate of poor performance validity in a large, multicenter, prospectively accrued cohort of community dwelling persons with medically documented traumatic brain injury (TBI), (2) to identify factors associated with Word Memory Test (WMT) performance in persons with TBI. METHOD: This was a prospective cohort, observational study of 491 persons with medically documented TBI. Participants were administered a battery of cognitive tests, questionnaires on emotional distress and post-concussive symptoms, and a performance validity test (WMT). Additional data were collected by interview and review of medical records. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen participants showed poor performance validity using the standard cutoff. Variable cluster analysis was conducted as a data reduction strategy. Findings revealed that the 10 cognitive tests and questionnaires could be summarized as 4 indices of emotional distress, speed of cognitive processing, verbal memory, and verbal fluency. Regression models revealed that verbal memory, emotional distress, age, and injury severity (time to follow commands) made unique contribution to prediction of poor performance validity. CONCLUSIONS: Poor performance validity was common in a research sample of persons with medically documented TBI who were not evaluated in conjunction with litigation, compensation claims, or current report of symptoms. Poor performance validity was associated with poor performance on cognitive tests, greater emotional distress, lower injury severity, and greater age. Many participants expected to have residual deficits based on initial injury severity showed poor performance validity.

A Factor Analytic Approach to the Validation of the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering as Measures of Effort and Not Memory.

Research has demonstrated the utility of performance validity tests (PVTs) as a method of determining adequate effort during a neuropsychological evaluation. Although some studies affirm that forced-choice PVTs measure effort rather than memory, doubts remain in the literature. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between effort and memory variables in a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) sample (n = 160) by separating memory and effort as distinct factors while statistically controlling for the shared covariance between the variables. A two-factor solution was extracted such that the five PVT variables loaded on Factor 1 and the four memory variables loaded on Factor 2. The pattern matrix, which controls for the covariance between variables, provided clear support of two highly distinct factors with minimal cross-loadings. Our findings support assertions that PVTs measure effort independent of memory in veterans with mild TBI.

The suppression of brain activation in post-deployment military personnel with posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Previous research using cognitive paradigms has found task-related activation that includes prefrontal brain structures and that is attenuated in association with posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). The present investigation used a cognitive control paradigm, the Arrows Task, to study subjects who had not sustained a traumatic brain injury during deployment and who had a wide range of scores on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL). During the Arrows Task there was no significant activation within the full sample of 15 subjects, but deactivation was found within areas that are likely to be involved in cognitive control, including the dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus and parietal cortex. Exploratory analyses were also conducted to compare subjects with relatively high PTSS (HIGH PTSS, n = 7) to those with lower severity or no symptoms (LOW PTSS, n = 8). LOW PTSS subjects exhibited activation in nonfrontal brain areas and their activation was greater relative to the HIGH PTSS subjects. In contrast, the HIGH PTSS group had extensive deactivation and there was a negative relationship between activation and PCL scores within subcortical structures, the cerebellum, and higher-order cortical association areas. For the HIGH PTSS group there was also a positive relationship between PCL scores and activation within basic sensory and motor areas, as well as structures thought to have a role in emotion and the regulation of internal bodily states. These findings are consistent with widespread neural dysfunction in subjects with greater PTSS, including changes similar to those reported to occur with acute stress and elevated noradrenergic activity.

Combat exposure, PTSD symptoms, and cognition following blast-related traumatic brain injury in OEF/OIF/OND service members and Veterans.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are frequently documented among the Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) veterans. This study will investigate both combat exposure and PTSD as factors that may influence objective cognitive outcomes following blast-related mild TBI (mTBI). Participants included 54 OEF/OIF/OND veterans who had been exposed to blast and reported symptoms consistent with mTBI and 43 combat-deployed control participants who had no history of blast exposure or TBI. Raw scores from the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Test, Color-Word Interference Test, and Verbal Selective Reminding Test were used to measure cognitive functioning. All participants demonstrated adequate effort on the Word Memory Test. Demographics, injury characteristics, overall intellectual functioning, and total scores from the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) and Combat Exposure Scale (CES) were used as the predictors for each cognitive measure. History of mTBI was significantly associated with higher PCL-C and CES scores. Multivariable linear regression, however, showed no significant differences in cognitive performance between groups. The absence of effect of mTBI, PTSD, and combat exposure on cognitive functioning noted in this study may be partially explained by the inclusion of only those participants who passed performance validity testing.

Neuropsychological and behavioral correlates of impulsiveness in veterans with and without mild traumatic brain injury.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified a relation between impulsiveness and substance use, as well as performance on certain tests of executive functioning. However, no prior research has investigated these relations in Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) veterans with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHOD: The present study utilized a sample of 127 veterans (55 controls, 72 mTBI). Relations among health behaviors, cognition, and domain scores (attentional, motor, and nonplanning impulsiveness) of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) were examined using regression analyses. RESULTS: Nonplanning impulsiveness was associated with higher Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score. Attentional and motor impulsiveness were not associated with performance on any measures of behavior or cognition. The relationship between nonplanning impulsiveness and alcohol misuse was not influenced by history of mTBI. CONCLUSIONS: These results partially support previous findings and indicate that an association between impulsiveness and problematic behaviors exists in OEF/OIF/OND veterans, regardless of TBI history.