A designated trauma social worker improves coordination of patient care by coordinating ancillary consults.

Trauma patients face unique challenges that require coordination by social workers knowledgeable in the intricacies of trauma patient psychosocial support which is often achieved by obtaining ancillary consultations. The impact of employing a designated trauma social worker (DTSW) in the utilization of these consults has not been described. A retrospective review was conducted of trauma patients admitted to an academic, urban Level 1 trauma center. The pre-intervention cohort (n = 272) corresponded to patients admitted before the presence of a DTSW (01/2013 to 06/2013), while the post-intervention cohort (n = 282) corresponded to patients admitted afterward (09/2015 to 01/2016). Data collection included demographics, injury profile, and types of interdisciplinary or therapy consultations. Post-intervention patients were found to be older and admitted with more injuries. Supportive care, physical therapy and occupational therapy consultations were more likely to be obtained in the post-intervention cohort. Hospital length of stay remained unchanged. This study suggests that the implementation of a DTSW significantly facilitates the utilization of interdisciplinary consultations. Length of stay remains unchanged, suggesting that a DTSW helps to coordinate care in a timely manner without increasing the hospital stay. DTSW implementation may be considered in trauma centers where one does not currently exist.

What Happens After a Stop the Bleed Class? The Contrast Between Theory and Practice.

OBJECTIVE: The Department of Homeland Security launched the Stop the Bleed initiative, a campaign intended to teach bystanders hemorrhage control strategies. Despite the program's popularity, little is known about actions taken by participants afterwards. We sought to determine how often participants acquired the equipment that is necessary in applying the skills taught. DESIGN: A standardized survey instrument was distributed to all American College of Surgeons Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) class participants from 05/2017 to 01/2018. The instrument queried about the likelihood of applying skills and obtaining materials. A web-based survey was administered one month later inquiring whether materials were obtained and barriers that would prohibit acquisition. SETTING: Academic, urban, Level I trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare and nonhealthcare personnel. RESULTS: There were 336 and 183 participants who completed the initial and subsequent web-based survey, respectively. Participants indicated a high likelihood of applying a tourniquet (95.5%), applying pressure (97.9%), and packing a wound (96.4%), if required. Additionally, 74.7% and 76.2% reported a high likelihood of obtaining a tourniquet and packing material, respectively. However, only 21.3% and 50.8% obtained a tourniquet and packing material, respectively, 1 month later. Cost, time, and accessibility of items during a time of need were cited to be common reasons for not obtaining these materials. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reporting a high likelihood of utilizing hemorrhage control skills upon completion of the B-Con class, few went on to acquire the materials needed to apply these skills among those who responded. These results may be impacted by loss of follow up and response bias. Developing strategies that allow for easy access to materials is imperative and may lead to both better implementation of the purposes of the program and improved dissemination of its principles within the community.

The risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage with direct acting oral anticoagulants after trauma: A two-center study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of a delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in trauma patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS: Patients on DOACs admitted to two Level I Trauma Centers between 2014 and 2017 were reviewed. Only patients with a negative admission CT brain were included. The primary outcome was a delayed ICH. RESULTS: Overall, 249 patients were included. The median age was 81 years with 82% undergoing a repeat CT. Three patients developed a delayed ICH (1.2%). One developed an ICH after receiving tissue plasminogen activator for a cerebrovascular accident after two negative CTs. Excluding this patient, the incidence dropped to 0.8%. None required neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSION: For patients at risk for a TBI who are on DOACs, repeat cross-sectional imaging of the brain when the initial imaging is negative is not necessary. A period of clinical observation may be warranted.

A negative computed tomography may be sufficient to safely discharge patients with abdominal seatbelt sign from the emergency department: A case series analysis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of an abdominal seatbelt sign (ASBS) following a motor vehicle collision (MVC) is associated with a high risk for occult intra-abdominal injury, prompting imaging studies and a prolonged period of clinical observation. The aim of this study was to determine how a negative computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen/pelvis (A/P) can serve in the safe disposition of these patients. Our hypothesis was that in the setting of a negative CT, the presence of occult intra-abdominal injuries requiring a delayed intervention is extremely unlikely. METHODS: The medical charts of patients admitted from January 2014 to December 2016 to a Level I trauma center following an MVC were reviewed for a documentation of an ASBS. Patients who did not have a CT A/P upon admission were excluded. The CT A/P of the remaining patients were then classified as negative if there were no findings of acute vascular, visceral or bony injury or positive if any of these findings was present. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT A/P for the presence of an intra-abdominal injury were calculated. RESULTS: Over the 3-year study period, 1,108 patients were admitted after an MVC. Of those, 196 (17.7%) had an ASBS upon presentation and 183 (93.4%) of 196 underwent a CT A/P. A total of 114 (62.3%) of 183 had a negative CT A/P. These patients remained hospitalized for a median of 2 (1-35) days with none (0.0%) requiring a delayed laparotomy. The sensitivity of CT A/P in identifying patients requiring an exploratory laparotomy was 100.0%, specificity was 67.9%, NPV was 100.0%, and PPV was 21.7%. The negative likelihood ratio was 0.00. CONCLUSION: For patients with an ASBS following an MVC, a negative CT A/P may be sufficient for safe discharge from the emergency department without any need for additional clinical observation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapuetic, level IV.

Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Feasibility and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Preventing secondary insult to the brain is imperative following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although TBI does not preclude nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injuries, development of hypotension in this setting may be detrimental and could therefore lead trauma surgeons to a lower threshold for operative intervention and a potentially higher risk of failure of NOM (FNOM). We hypothesized that the presence of a TBI in patients with blunt splenic injury would lead to a higher risk of FNOM. METHODS: Patients with blunt splenic injury were selected from the National Trauma Data Bank research datasets from 2007 to 2011. TBI was defined as AIS head ≥ 3 and FNOM as patients who underwent a spleen-related operation after 2 h from admission. TBI patients were compared to those without head injury. The primary outcome was FNOM. RESULTS: Of 47,713 patients identified, 41,436 (86.8%) underwent a trial of NOM. FNOM was identical (10.6 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.601) among patients with and without TBI. TBI patients had lower adjusted odds for FNOM (AOR 0.66, p < 0.001), even among those with a high-grade splenic injury (AOR 0.68, p < 0.001). No difference in adjusted mortality was noted when comparing TBI patients with and without FNOM (AOR 1.01, p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: NOM of blunt splenic trauma in TBI patients has higher adjusted odds for success. This could be related to interventions targeting prevention of secondary brain injury. Further studies are required to identify those specific practices that lead to a higher success rate of NOM of splenic trauma in TBI patients.

The risk factors of venous thromboembolism in massively transfused patients.

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are necessary for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with active bleeding. Thrombotic events have been associated with blood transfusion; however, the risk factors for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients receiving MTP are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted by reviewing the electronic medical records of all trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who received MTP from 2011 to 2016. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores, quantity of blood products transfused during MTP activation, incidence of VTE, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and ventilator days. The primary outcome was VTE. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients who had MTP activated, 15 (25.4%) developed a VTE during their hospital admission. Patients who developed VTE were compared with those who did not. Age (40 y versus 35 y, P = 0.59), sex (60% versus 73% male, P = 0.52), and mechanism of injury (47% versus 59% blunt, P = 0.40) were similar. Intensive care unit LOS, hospital LOS, and ventilator days were longer in the patients who were diagnosed with a VTE. Multivariable analysis revealed an increase in the odds for developing a VTE with increasing packed red blood cell transfusion (adjusted odds ratio = 2.61, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for VTE in trauma patients requiring massive transfusion is proportional to the number of packed red blood cells transfused. Liberal screening protocols and maintenance of a high index of suspicion for VTE in these high-risk patients is justified.

Helicopter Transport Use for Trauma Patients Is Decreasing Significantly Nationwide but Remains Overutilized.

Rapid transfer of trauma patients to a trauma center for definitive management is essential to increase survival. The utilization of helicopter transportation for this purpose remains heavily debated. The purpose of this study was to characterize the trends in helicopter transportations of trauma patients in the United States over the last decade. Subjects with a primary mode of either ground or helicopter transportation were selected from the National Trauma Data Bank datasets 2007 to 2015. Over this period, the proportion of patients transported by a helicopter decreased significantly in a linear fashion from 17 per cent in 2007 to 10.2 per cent in 2015 (P < 0.001). The overall mortality of this population was 7.6 per cent and remained unchanged over the study period (P = 0.545). Almost 3 of 10 subjects (29.4%) transported by a helicopter had an Injury Severity Score <9. The proportion of elderly (>65 years) patients requiring helicopter transportation increased by 69.1 per cent, whereas their associated mortality decreased by 21.5 per cent. The use of a helicopter for the transportation of trauma patients has significantly decreased over the last decade without any significant change in mortality, possibly indicating more effective utilization of available resources. Overtriage of patients with minor injuries remained relatively unchanged.

Decreased transport time to the surgical intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Extended stay in the emergency department (ED) is associated with worse outcomes in critically ill trauma patients. We conducted a human factors analysis to better understand impediments for patient flow when a surgical ICU (SICU bed is available in order to reduce ED LOS. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all trauma patients admitted to a protected SICU through the ED during 2011 and 2014. In 2010, a 24-hour protected SICU bed protocol was implemented to make a bed readily available. During 2013 human factors analysis helped to describe flow disruptions; related interventions were introduced to facilitate rapid transport from the ED to SICU. The interventions required the following prior to CT scanning: immediate ICU bed orders placed by the ED physician and ED to ICU personnel communication. Direct transport from the CT scanner to the ICU was mandated. Data including patient demographics, injury severity, ED LOS, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS was collected and compared between 2011 (PRE) and 2014 (POST). RESULTS: A total of 305 trauma patients admitted from the ED to the SICU were analyzed; 174 patients in 2011 (PRE) and 131 in 2014 (POST). Average age was 46 years and patients had a mean admission GCS and injury severity score (ISS) of 12.3 and 15.9, respectively. The cohorts were similar in age, mechanism of injury, initial vital signs, and injury severity. After implementing the human factors interventions, decreases were noted in the mean ED LOS (2.4 v. 3.0 hours, p=0.005) and ICU LOS (4.0 v. 4.8 days, p=0.023). No differences in hospital LOS or mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS: While an open SICU bed protocol may facilitate rapid transport of trauma patients from the ED to the ICU, additional human factors interventions emphasizing improved communication and coordination can further reduce time spent in the ED. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Economic/Decision.