ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of UK guidance regarding routine use of probiotics in preterm infants to prevent necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis and death. As practices can vary, we aimed to determine the current usage of probiotics within neonatal units in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: Using NeoTRIPS, a trainee-led neonatal research network, an online survey was disseminated to neonatal units of all service levels within England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales in 2022. Trainees were requested to complete one survey per unit regarding routine probiotic administration. RESULTS: 161 of 188 (86%) neonatal units responded to the survey. 70 of 161 (44%) respondents routinely give probiotics to preterm infants. 45 of 70 (64%) use the probiotic product Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM/Bifidobacterium bifidum Bb-06/B. infantis Bi-26 (Labinic™). 57 of 70 (81%) start probiotics in infants ≤32 weeks' gestation. 33 of 70 (47%) had microbiology departments that were aware of the use of probiotics and 64 of 70 (91%) had a guideline available. Commencing enteral feeds was a prerequisite to starting probiotics in 62 of 70 (89%) units. The majority would stop probiotics if enteral feeds were withheld (59 of 70; 84%) or if the infant was being treated for necrotising enterocolitis (69 of 70; 99%). 24 of 91 (26%) units that did not use probiotics at the time of the survey were planning to introduce them within the next 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: More than 40% of all UK neonatal units that responded are now routinely administering probiotics, with variability in the product used. With increased probiotic usage in recent years, there is a need to establish whether this translates to improved clinical outcomes.
Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing , Probiotics , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Infant, Premature , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Gestational Age , United KingdomABSTRACT
An 8-year-old girl of African descent presented to the hospital with a headache, lethargy, pallor and 'Coca-Cola'-coloured urine. She had been admitted 11 days before with Plasmodium falciparum malaria, which was successfully treated with 48 hours of parenteral artesunate. Investigations revealed signs of severe haemolytic anaemia, with a haemoglobin level of 52 g/L that reached a nadir of 10 g/L within 4 hours, in addition to haemoglobinuria, hyperbilirubinaemia and raised lactate dehydrogenase levels. She was diagnosed with post-artemisinin delayed haemolysis, which is usually self-limiting but has the potential to cause severe, life-threatening anaemia 7-21 days following malaria treatment with artesunate. There was excellent response to blood transfusion, and the child made a full recovery. This case highlights the importance of providing safety netting advice regarding signs and symptoms of anaemia to patients receiving artesunate, in addition to monitoring of haemoglobin levels in the weeks after treatment.