Dengue hepatitis: Incidence, spectrum and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While dengue infection is common in India, there is scarce information on dengue hepatitis. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, spectrum and outcome of dengue hepatitis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients, who had hepatitis among those with dengue infection admitted to two tertiary care hospitals in western India from January 2016 to March 2021. Diagnosis of dengue infection was made by serology. Dengue hepatitis was diagnosed and the severity of dengue was categorized by standard criteria. RESULTS: Of 1664 patients admitted with dengue fever during the study period, 199 patients had hepatitis (i.e. incidence of dengue hepatitis was 11.9%). Of the 199 dengue hepatitis patients (age: 29 [13 - 80] years, median [range], 67% males), 100 patients (50%) had severe dengue, 73 (36%) had severe dengue hepatitis, 32 (16%) had dengue shock syndrome and eight (4%) had acute liver failure. Forty-five patients (23%) had acute lung injury and 32 (16%) had acute kidney injury. The dengue hepatitis patients were treated with standard medical care, including vital organ support, as needed-166 (83%) patients survived, while 33 patients (17%) died (cause of death: multi-organ failure: 24 patients, septic shock: nine patients). The presence of shock independently predicted mortality (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 34). Among patients with dengue hepatitis, mortality rate was higher in those with severe dengue (23%), dengue shock syndrome (47%), severe dengue hepatitis (24%) and acute liver failure (38%). CONCLUSION: In this large series of hospitalized patients with dengue infection, the incidence of dengue hepatitis was 11.9%. Among 199 dengue hepatitis, 17% died; multi-organ failure was the commonest cause for death and death rate was higher in patients with more severe disease. The presence of shock at presentation independently predicted mortality.

Positive white nipple sign on esophageal varices: Not a just bystander; our experience.

Background and study aims The goal of this study was to assess whether a white nipple sign on esophageal varices is of no prognostic significance or mandates more attention. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 2601 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for variceal bleed from January 2008 to January 2020. Intraprocedural events like onset of active spurt while performing endoscopy, active spurt while attempting to band the varix with a nipple, need for rescue glue therapy required to control bleed in cases of failed endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), slipping of band and rebleed despite successful band application, need for emergency intubation, and pulmonary aspiration-related complications were noted. Results A total of 2601 patients underwent endoscopy for variceal bleeding. Of them, 631 had a positive white nipple sign. Of that subgroup, 137 (21.7 %) patients developed active spurt during endoscopy. In patients with the white nipple sign, 12.3 % required endotracheal intubation and 6.7 % developed aspiration pneumonia, which were significantly higher than in those without the sign. Rescue glue injection in esophageal varices was needed in 5.6 % as compared to 0.6 % in those without white nipple. Conclusions The white nipple sign is not only a predictor of recent bleed, but it carries statistically significant increased risk of intraoperative bleeding, need for endotracheal intubation, esophageal glue injections, and aspiration-related complications. Therefore, it is not just a bystander, but rather, a sign of increased danger and a need to be more vigilant with patient management.

Crush cytology: an expeditious diagnostic tool for gastrointestinal tract malignancy.

Background and study aims Crush cytology is a simple and rapid method used for diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. We have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of crush cytology for gastrointestinal tract lesions. Patients and methods This was a prospective, cross-sectional, single center study, conducted on the patients who had suspected malignant lesions between August 2018 and March 2020. The crush cytologic diagnoses were correlated with histology to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Results During the period of interest, a total of 451 patients (26.4 % esophagus & GE junction, 16.6 % stomach, 5.9 % ampulla & duodenum, and 50.9 % colorectal) had a suspected malignant lesion on endoscopic examination. Histology confirmed 92.9 % cases as malignant lesions and 7.1 % as nonmalignant. On crush cytology, 84.5 % were positive for malignancy, 8.9 % were negative for malignancy and 6.6 % were reported as suspicious for malignancy. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of crush cytology were 97.3 %, 90 %, 99.2 %, 72.5 % and 96.9 %, respectively. Conclusions Crush cytology is a highly sensitive, specific, rapid and cost effective technique to diagnose gastrointestinal malignancies in endoscopically suspected malignant lesions. However, it cannot entirely substitute histopathological examination for definite tumor typing, grading, confirming invasion and in cases in which cytology is suspicious. Crush cytology is an added asset to the histology to maximize diagnostic accuracy and accelerating decision making for the management of lesions.

Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why scuff when you can flush the muck - make it an easy row to hoe.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success rate and the option of necrosectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS guided drainage of patients with WON by using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with a solution containing hydrogen peroxide and adopting a step-up approach. METHODS: A prospective open label study was carried out at a single tertiary care center between January 2014 and January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included. Primary end points were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary end points were minor adverse events related to the procedures. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients and clinical success was achieved in 90.6 %. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1 %), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5 %), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage (PCD) in 5 (7.8 %), and 1 (1.6 %) patient required salvage surgery. The major adverse event was life threatening bleeding in 3 (4.7 %) patients. Minor adverse events were non-life threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1 %) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.7 %) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using a solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with a high technical and clinical success rate. Patients with solid debris > 40 % need aggressive management.

Gastrointestinal Histoplasmosis and CMV Co-Infection in an Immunocompetent Host.

A middle aged male with no known comorbidities presented with history of colicky abdominal pain, low grade fever and weight loss. Laboratory parameters were normal except low albumin. Imaging showed multiple areas of mural thickening with enhancement in jejunum & ileum. On Colonoscopy there was a thickened and deformed ileum with multiple ulcers. The biopsy showed co-infection of CMV and histoplasma, urine antigen for histoplasma was positive and CMV DNA detected in blood. He was successfully treated with combination of Valgancyclovir and Amphotericin-B followed by itraconazole.