ABSTRACT
A duodenal-cecal fistula is characterized as an unnatural connection between the duodenum and cecum. Here, we present the case of a 40-year-old male with unintentional weight loss and a history of foreign body ingestion a few years prior. Computerized tomography (CT) small bowel enterography showed a linear soft tissue tract extending from the inferior aspect of the distal duodenum to the cecum. Ultimately, a diagnosis of duodenal-cecal fistula was made following esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealing a fistula in the third part of the duodenum. A duodenal-cecal fistula secondary to foreign body ingestion is rare, with surgical intervention or endoscopic fibrin glue closure being potential treatment modalities if the fistula fails to close spontaneously. Duodenal-cecal fistulas are generally seen secondary to malignancies of the duodenum or colon, peptic ulcers, or inflammatory bowel disease. However, a duodenal-cecal fistula due to a foreign body is rare, thus highlighting the importance of keeping a broad differential, as appropriate in the clinical context.
ABSTRACT
Intestinal malrotation is primarily diagnosed in the neonatal period, when symptoms typically first appear. In contrast, occurrences in adults are quite uncommon. Adult cases are less frequently reported, often because the condition remains asymptomatic or presents with nonspecific symptoms that can delay diagnosis. Intestinal malrotation in adults can show a range of symptoms, from acute bowel obstruction to vague and chronic symptoms, often leading to a delay in the diagnosis compared to children. Patients with this condition present a distinctive challenge for surgeons regarding diagnosis and treatment, especially in acute situations. This study presents a rare case of a 16-year-old boy who came with chief complaints of acute abdominal pain and multiple episodes of bilious vomiting. The patient underwent an emergency laparoscopy converted to an open Ladd's procedure. During surgery, the duodenum, small intestine, cecum, and appendix were discovered to be abnormally positioned, and the transverse colon and mesentery were twisted along with the superior mesenteric artery and superior mesenteric vein, with the presence of classical Ladd's bands confirming preoperative CT findings of midgut volvulus. The patient tolerated the procedure well, with no intraoperative complications. Acute midgut volvulus is rare in adults and older children. Still, the differential diagnosis should be kept in mind in patients with pain in the abdomen and multiple episodes of bilious vomiting in cases with an uncertain diagnosis to plan proper management and avoid intraoperative surprises. Early detection, accurate imaging methods, and prompt intervention can mitigate complications that could increase morbidity and mortality.
ABSTRACT
Despite advancements in treatment strategies, the mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains high. Evidence suggests that aspirin (ASA) may have a protective effect on CRC incidence and metastasis through various mechanisms. The 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adult patients (age above 18 y) with the principal diagnosis of CRC. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on ASA use. The outcomes studied were in-hospital mortality and rates of total, gastrointestinal (GI), non-GI, and lymphoid metastasis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of ASA use on outcomes after adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Of the 814,270 patients, 88,620 (10.8%) used ASA, with the majority being aged above 65 years (78%), male (57%), white (77.6%), and had Medicare insurance (74.5%). There was a higher prevalence of Diabetes mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic pulmonary disease, Coronary artery disease, Chronic kidney disease, Chronic heart failure, Obesity, and Smoking among aspirin users than among non-ASA users. Patients who used ASA had a lower prevalence of total (47.3% vs. 32.5%, P<0.001), GI (22.2% vs. 32.4%, P<0.001), non-GI (9.9% vs. 15.3%, P<0.001), and lymphoid (9.3% vs. 10.9%, P<0.001) metastasis compared with those who did not use ASA. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with ASA use had lower odds of total (aOR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.78, P<0.001), GI (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.71-0.77, P<0.001), non-GI (aOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.77, P<0.1), and statistically insignificant odds of lymphoid (aOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90-1.00, P=0.098) metastasis. The use of ASA is associated with a decrease in the prevalence of metastasis among individuals diagnosed with CRC, but additional studies are required to elucidate the mechanism and duration of therapy needed to be effective.
ABSTRACT
Background: In today's era, cardiac catheterization procedures are becoming increasingly safe, but they are still fraught with complications. We aimed to study the outcomes of patients who underwent emergency surgical intervention for complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who required emergency surgical management following a complication in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in our institute from July 2017 to July 2022 was done. Result: A total of 57 patients out of a total of 52,326 patients (0.1%) were included. The average age of presentation was 10.4 years. Congenital heart disease (CHD) constituted the majority of the cases (28/57-49.1%), coronary artery disease (CAD) constituted 19.3% (11/57), and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) constituted 8.8% (5/57) of the cases. Apart from this, 22.80% patients (13/57) were grouped together in the miscellaneous group. In total, 76.9% (10/13) of these patients had pericardial effusion and they developed a right ventricular (RV) rent following an attempted pigtail drainage. Also, one patient each had a RV rent following an attempted permanent pacemaker implantation for heart block and an endocardial biopsy respectively. One patient had a left bronchial rupture following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aorta (DTA) aneurysm. Thirty-day mortality was 7% (4/57), and the mean time of shifting the patients from the catheterization laboratory to the operating room was 8.3 h. Conclusion: Cardiac catheterization procedures have become increasingly safe, but complications can still occur, for which the cardiac surgeon should be briefed in a Heart Team meeting before taking up such cases. Even though these complications form a small percentage, the cardiologist should exercise some caution in attempting cases which could have a relatively easier surgical correction.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Frailty is a clinically recognizable state of increased vulnerability due to age-related decline in reserve and function across multiple physiologic systems that compromises the ability to cope with acute stress. As frailty is being identified as an important risk factor in outcomes of gastrointestinal pathologies, we aimed to assess outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis within this cohort. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. ICD-10 codes were used to inquire for patients admitted with acute pancreatitis between September 2015 through 2017. ICD-10 codes corresponding to the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) were used to divide the study sample into 2 cohorts: low risk (< 5 points) and intermediate or high risk (> 5 points). To calculate the points, we fitted a logistic regression model that included membership of the frail group as the binary dependent variable (frail vs. non-frail) and the set of ICD-10 codes as binary predictor variables (1 = present, 0 = absent for each code). To simplify the calculation and interpretation, we multiplied regression coefficients by five to create a points system, so that a certain number of points are awarded for each ICD-10 code and added together to create the final frailty risk score. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to find adjusted mortality. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1,267,744 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis, 728,953 (57.5%) were identified as intermediate and high risk (> 5 points) (study cohort) and 538,781 (42.5%) as low risk (< 5 points). The mean age in the study cohort was 64.8 ± 12.6 and that in the low-risk group was 58.6 ± 9.5. Most of the patients in both groups were males and Caucasians; Medicare was the predominant insurance provider. A majority of the admissions in both groups were in an urban teaching hospital and were emergency. (Table 1). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality which was significantly higher in the study cohort as compared to the low-risk group (4.3% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.0001). The age-adjusted Odds ratio of mortality was 1.72(95% CI (Confidence Interval) 1.65-1.80, p < 0.05). When compared between the two groups; median length of stay (6 vs. 4); hospitalization cost ($14,412 vs. $10,193), disposition to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (17.1% vs. 8.6%) and need for home health care (HHC) was significantly higher in the study cohort. Complications like septicemia, septic shock, and acute kidney injury were also higher in the study group (Table 2). Table 1 Baseline demographics of the cohort Characteristics Acute pancreatitis with High HES Frailty score (> 5, intermediate + high) Acute pancreatitis with low HES Frailty score (< 5) P-value N = 1,267,744 N = 728,953 (57.5%) N = 538,781 (42.5%) Age Mean years (Mean ± SD) 64.8 ± 12.6 58.6 ± 9.5 < 0.001 Gender < 0.001 Male 59.1% 52.3% Female 40.9% 47.7% *Missing-475 Age groups < 0.001 18-44 3.7% 14.3% 45-64 48% 52.9% 65-84 32.2% 28.7% ≥ 85 16.1% 4.1% Race < 0.001 Caucasians 67.4% 61.9% African Americans 9.6% 16.8% Others 23% 21.3% *Missing-10 Insurance type < 0.001 Medicare 40.9% 36.3% Medicaid 17.2% 24.3% Private 31.8% 27.9% Other 9.9% 11.4% *Missing-75 Active smoking 32.7% 37.9% 0.005 Biliary Stone 36.2% 16.7% < 0.001 Admission Type < 0.001 Emergent 93.7% 94.3% Elective 6.3% 5.7% *Missing-2880 Hospital ownership/control < 0.001 Rural 7.8% 10% Urban nonteaching 26.3% 26.6% Urban teaching 65.9% 63.4% Table 2 Outcomes Outcomes Acute pancreatitis with High HES Frailty score (> 5, intermediate + high) Acute pancreatitis with low HES Frailty score (< 5) P-value In-hospital mortality *Missing-920 4.3% 2.5% < .0001 1.72(1.65-1.80) < .0001 Length of stay, days (Median,IQR) 6(3-8) 4(2-6) < .0001 Total hospitalization cost, $ (Median,IQR) 14,412(8843-20,216) 10,193(6840-13,842) < .0001 In-Hospital Complications ARDS 0.4% 0.3% 0.08 Ventilator dependence respiratory failure 0.23% 0.29% 0.25 Septicemia 15.2% 9.6% < .0001 Septic Shock 6.1% 2.9% < .0001 AKI 24.8% 14.9% < .0001 Disposition < .0001 Discharge to home 58.9% 74.9% Transfer other: includes Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), Intermediate Care Facility (ICF), and another type of facility 17.1% 8.6% Home health care 11.5% 8.1% Against medical advice (AMA) 1.6% 3.4% *Missing-920 CONCLUSION: Using frailty as a construct to identify those who are at greater risk for adverse outcomes, can help formulate interventions to target individualized reversible factors to improve outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis. Future large-scale prospective studies are warranted to understand the dynamic and longitudinal relationship between pancreatitis and frailty.
ABSTRACT
Introduction There is scarce data about the association of metabolic syndrome (MetS) or its components with the development of colonic diverticulosis (CD) in the elderly. We aim to determine the association of MetS and its components with CD in the elderly aged ≥75 years. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review at St. Luke's University Health Network to identify patients who underwent a colonoscopy between 2011 and 2020. We collected data on patient demographics, comorbidities, and colonoscopy findings. Statistical analyses were conducted to compute means and frequencies of patient characteristics and rates of CD, as well as to test for associations between potential risk factors and the presence of CD. Results A total of 1239 patients were included with a median age of 80 years, 57.6% females, 89.5% Caucasians, 72.9% with CD, and 66.7% having a left-sided disease. On bivariate analysis, the older age group (p=0.02), Caucasian ethnicity (p=0.01), and hypertension (p=0.04) were found to be significant risk factors for developing CD. Multivariate regression analysis showed older age group and hypertension (OR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.66-2.02, p=0.02) were major risk factors. A significant proportion of patients with left-sided disease had Caucasian ethnicity (p<0.001), while female gender, obesity, and iron deficiency anemia were also seen more frequently, although without statistical significance. Conclusion In the elderly (>75 years old), our study found hypertension to be associated with an increased risk of CD, while impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was protective. Most patients exhibited isolated left-sided diverticulosis, with pan-diverticulosis associated with higher proportions of adverse health indicators, including American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, IFG, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and hypothyroidism. Further research with larger sample sizes in similar age groups is needed to expand upon these findings.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Improvement in burn injury data collections and the quality of databanks has allowed meaningful study of the epidemiologic trends in burn care. The study assessed factors associated with disposition of burn injury patients from emergency department accounting for pre-hospital care and emergency care. METHODS: This prospective observational pilot study of the South Asia Burn Registry project was conducted at selected public sector burn centers in Bangladesh and Pakistan (September 2014 - January 2015). All age groups with an initial presentation to the burn centers were enrolled. Descriptive and regression analysis is presented. RESULTS: A total of 2749 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 21.7 ± 18.0 years, 55.3% were males, and about a quarter were children < 5 years. About 46.9% of the females were housewives. Scald burns were common among children (67.6%) while flame burns were common among adults (44.3%). About 75% of patients were brought in via non-ambulance mode of transport. More than 55% of patients were referrals from other facilities or clinics. The most common first aid given pre-hospital was the use of water or oil. About 25% were admitted for further care. The adjusted odds of being admitted compared to being sent home were highest for children < 5 yrs, those with higher total body surface area burnt, having arrived via ambulance, scald and electrical burn, having an associated injury and inhalational injury. CONCLUSION: The study provides insight into emergency burn care and associated factors that influenced outcomes for patients with burn injuries.