ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Viral infections are known to impact the pancreato-biliary system; however, there are limited data showing that the same is true of COVID-19. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can safely be performed in patients with COVID-19 infection, but outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infections and concomitant pancreatic and biliary disease requiring endoscopic intervention are unknown. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the severity of pancreaticobiliary diseases and post-ERCP outcomes in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Patients with pancreato-biliary disease that required inpatient ERCP from five centers in the United States and South America between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020 were included. A representative cohort of patients from each month were randomly selected from each site. Disease severity and post-ERCP outcomes were compared between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were included: 95 COVID positive and 80 COVID negative. Mean CTSI score for the patients who had pancreatitis was higher in COVID-positive cohort by 3.2 points (p < .00001). The COVID-positive group had more cases with severe disease (n = 41) versus the COVID-negative group (n = 2) (p < .00001). Mortality was higher in the COVID-19 positive group (19%) compared to COVID-negative group (7.5%) even though the COVID-19-negative group had higher incidence of malignancy (n = 17, 21% vs n = 7, 7.3%) (p = 0.0455). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with COVID infection have more severe pancreato-biliary disease and worse post-ERCP outcomes, including longer length of stay and higher mortality rate. These are important considerations when planning for endoscopic intervention. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: (NCT05051358).
Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Diseases , COVID-19 , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreatic Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Biliary Tract Diseases/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is the procedure of choice for patients who cannot undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The outcomes of patients undergoing surgery after EUS-BD for malignancy are unknown. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery after having undergone EUS-BD or ERCP from 6 tertiary care centers. Patient demographics, procedural data, and follow-up care were collected in a registry. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were included: EUS-BD n=58 (mean age 66, 45% male), ERCP n=87 (mean age 68, 53% male). The majority of patients had pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder malignancy. In the EUS-BD group, 29 patients had hepaticogastrostomy, 24 had choledochoduodenostomy, and 5 had rendezvous technique done. The most common surgery was Whipple in both groups (n=41 EUS-BD, n=56 ERCP) followed by partial hepatectomy (n=7 EUS-BD, n=14 ERCP) and cholecystectomy (n=2 EUS-BD, n=2 ERCP). Endoscopy clinical success was comparable in both groups (98% EUS-BD, 94% ERCP). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups: EUS-BD (n=10, 17%) and ERCP (n=23, 26%). Surgery technical success and clinical success were significantly higher in the EUS-BD group compared with the ERCP group (97% vs. 83%, 97% vs. 75%). Total Hospital stay from surgery to discharge was significantly higher in the ERCP group (19 d vs. 10 d, P =0.0082). DISCUSSION: Undergoing EUS-BD versus ERCP before hepatobiliary surgery is associated with fewer repeat endoscopic interventions, shorter duration between endoscopy and surgical intervention, higher rates of surgical clinical success, and shorter length of hospital stay after surgery.
Subject(s)
Cholestasis , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Cholestasis/etiology , Cholestasis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Endosonography/methods , Drainage/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Management of hepatic abscesses has traditionally been performed by image-guided percutaneous techniques. More recently, EUS drainage has been shown to be efficacious and safe. The aim of this study is to compare EUS-guided versus percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of hepatic abscesses. Methods: Patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage or PCD of hepatic abscesses from January 2018 through November 2021 from 4 international academic centers were included in a dedicated registry. Demographics, clinical data preprocedure and postprocedure, abscess characteristics, procedural data, adverse events, and postprocedure care were collected. Results: Seventy-four patients were included (mean age, 63.9 years; 45% male): EUS-guided (n = 30), PCD (n = 44). Preprocedure Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were 4.3 for the EUS group and 4.3 for the PCD group. The median abscess size was 8.45 × 6 cm (length × width) in the EUS group versus 7.3 × 5.5 cm in the PCD group. All of the abscesses in the EUS group were left-sided, whereas the PCD group contained both left- and right-sided abscesses (29 and 15, respectively). Technical success was 100% in both groups. Ten-millimeter-diameter stents were used in most cases in the EUS group, and 10F catheters were used in the PCD group. The duration to resolution of symptoms from the initial procedure was 10.9 days less in the EUS group compared with the PCD group (P < 0.00001). Hospital length of stay was shorter in the EUS group by 5.2 days (P = 0.000126). The EUS group had significantly fewer number of repeat sessions: mean of 2 versus 7.7 (P < 0.00001) and trended toward fewer number of procedure-related readmissions: 10% versus 34%. The PCD group had a significantly higher number of adverse events (n = 27 [61%]) when compared with the EUS group (n = 5 [17%]; P = 0.0001). Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage is an efficacious and safe intervention for the management of hepatic abscesses. EUS-guided drainage allows for quicker resolution of symptoms, shorter length of hospital stay, fewer adverse events, and fewer procedural sessions needed when compared with the PCD technique. However, EUS-guided drainage may not be feasible in right-sided lesions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intestinal strictures are a complication of the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)) that can lead to bowel obstruction and therapy failure. Intestinal strictures occurring after long-standing tissue damage and repair are more frequently reported in CD, but colonic strictures can occur in UC. However, there is a paucity of literature that comprehensively summarizes the available information regarding the incidence and etiology of colonic strictures in UC. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports on the incidence of colonic strictures in UC patients. METHODS: Four independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles describing the incidence of colonic strictures in UC published from inception to June 2021. Primary outcomes were (1) overall incidence of colonic strictures; (2) 10-year incidence of colonic strictures; and (3) incidence of colonic strictures containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between the pre-biologic era and post-biologic era. The meta-analysis was performed and the statistics were 2-tailed. Finally, probability of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and with Egger's test. RESULTS: Eleven studies reporting on a total of --- patients with colonic strictures were included in the analysis after comprehensive search. This yielded a pooled colonic stricture incidence rate of 5.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-7.8). The incidence rate of colonic strictures was lower in the post-biologic era compared to the pre-biologic era but the difference was not statistically significant (2.6% vs 6%; p = 0.14). The pooled 10-year colonic stricture rate was 3.2% (95% CI 1.5-6.8). The pooled 10-year incidence rate of colonic strictures was lower in the post-biologic era compared to the pre-biologic era but the difference was not statistically significant (1% vs 1.8%; p = 0.1). The pooled incidence of strictures with associated high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC) was 21.9% (95% CI 12.2-36.5). The incidence rate of HGD or CRC in colonic strictures was higher in the post-biologic era compared to the pre-biologic era but the difference was not statistically significant (23.6% vs 20.4%; p = 0.79). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of colonic strictures in UC showed that the overall pooled incidence and 10-year incidence of colonic strictures in UC are low. There was a trend towards lower incidences of UC strictures in the post-biologic era, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. While the overall incidence of colonic strictures, in UC is low, a high proportion of colonic strictures are associated with HGD or CRC, even in the biologic era. Therefore, this study provides further support for importance of stricture biopsy and surgical evaluation for colectomy in the UC patient with colonic stricture.
ABSTRACT
GOALS: We aimed to investigate the mortality and hospital utilization outcomes of hospitalized nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients with and without kidney failure in a nationwide cohort. BACKGROUND: NASH is a common medical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A paucity of data exists regarding the impact of kidney failure (defined as acute and chronic kidney failure) on outcomes of NASH hospitalizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2016 Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset of adult patients hospitalized for NASH, stratified for the presence of renal failure. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, predictors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay and mean total hospitalization charges. RESULTS: The overall sample included 7,135,090 patients. Among 6855 patients admitted for NASH, 598 or 8.7% had comorbid kidney failure. After multivariate regression analysis, NASH patients with renal failure had increased in-hospital mortality [odds ratio=28.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.99-91.73], length of stay (ß=3.02, 95% CI: 2.54-3.5), total hospital charges (ß=$37,045, 95% CI: $31,756.18-$42,335.62). Positive predictors of mortality in the renal failure group were Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=3.46, 95% CI: 1.04-11.51], variceal bleeding (aOR=3.02, 95% CI: 1.06-8.61), and hepatic encephalopathy (aOR=26.38, 95% CI: 1.29-540.56). Predictors of decreased mortality were Medicaid (aOR=0.047, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79) and private insurance (aOR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of renal failure in NASH hospitalizations is associated with markedly increased mortality, hospital costs, and length of stay. As a result, clinicians should be vigilant in treating kidney failure in this population.