Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 157: 103173, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33278677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) have shown contradictory results in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal junction/gastric cancer(GOJ/GC). AIM: to identify specific patient subgroups that would derive survival benefit from ICIs. METHODS: a subgroup meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials(RCTs) was carried out. RESULTS: four phase-III-RCTs were identified with data on the following variables: primary location(Gastric vs GOJ); age(≤ 65 vs >65); gender(male vs female); ECOG PS(0 vs 1); ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), histology(intestinal vs diffuse), PD-L1 expression(≥ 1% vs < 1%). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with survival benefit from ICIs (HR: 0.82, p 0.047), with a significant interaction between PD-L1 expression and ICI efficacy (interaction HR: 1.41, p 0.02). Numerically, the second most relevant interaction was ICI efficacy and gender, with ICI being more effective in males. CONCLUSION: The PD-L1 positive patient subgroup derives significant survival benefit from ICI in GOJ/GC, however other predictors are eagerly needed to further refine patient selection.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Stomach Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Esophagogastric Junction , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Male , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy
4.
Cancer Radiother ; 22(1): 9-16, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29217134

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyse feasibility, prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence after concurrent reirradiation and bevacizumab for recurrent high-grade gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, 35 patients (median 57-year-old; 21 men, 14 women) with WHO grade III (n=11) or grade IV (n=24) gliomas were included in this retrospective and consecutive single-centre study. All patients received bevacizumab (median number of treatments: 12) concomitant with reirradiation (median dose: 45Gy, median number of fractions: 18) for recurrence with median 22 months (range: 5.6-123.7 months) from first irradiation (median dose: 60Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 9.2 months from reirradiation. The median overall survival from reirradiation was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.9-16.1) and the progression-free survival from reirradiation was 6.7 months (95% CI: 2.9-10.5). The median overall survival from initial diagnosis was 44.6 months (95% CI: 32-57.1). No grade 3 toxicity or above was reported. Prognostic factors significantly correlated with better overall survival in univariate analysis were: age at least 55 (P=0.024), initial surgery (P=0.003), and 2Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) at least 50Gy at reirradiation (P=0.046). Twenty-two patients bevacizumab-naïve at time of reirradiation had a significantly increased overall survival from reirradiation compared to patients treated with reirradiation after bevacizumab failure (17.7 vs. 5.4 months, P<0.001) as well as overall survival from initial diagnosis (58.9 vs. 33.5 months, P=0.006). This outcome was similar in patients with initial glioblastomas (P=0.018) or anaplastic gliomas (P=0.021). There was no correlation between overall survival and gross tumour volume or planning target volume, frontal localization, or number of salvage therapies before reirradiation (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant reirradiation with bevacizumab in high-grade recurrent gliomas shows encouraging results in terms of survival and toxicities. Our data suggest that reirradiation should be favoured at initiation of bevacizumab, with EQD2 at least 50Gy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Glioma/mortality , Glioma/therapy , Re-Irradiation , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 17(4): 348-52, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the last 30 years, there has been a major shift in initial staging in prostate cancer (CaP) in Western countries, with the incidence of metastases at diagnosis decreasing from over 50% in the 1970s to currently less than 10%. Yet, CaP is still the second cause of cancer death in men. We used two monthly curated databases of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) to describe the natural history of patients dying of CaP in the modern era. METHODS: The outcome of 190 men with metastatic CRPC treated from 2008 to 2011 was studied. The characteristics of the patients who died from CaP (n = 113 patients, 61%) were analyzed. RESULTS: All 113 patients who died of CaP were assessable for the presence of metastases at diagnosis. Sixty-three patients (56%) had detectable metastases at diagnosis: 67%, 11% and 43% had bone, visceral and lymph node metastases, respectively. The median time to CRPC was 16 months and median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 years.Among the patients with localized CaP at diagnosis (n = 50, 44%), 46% had T stage ⩾ 3 and 38% had a Gleason score ⩾ 8. Overall, 64% of patients were classified as having a high-risk CaP. Only 26% who died from CaP had a Gleason score ⩽ 6. Median OS was 8.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: In the modern era, approximately half of the patients who die from CaP have metastases at diagnosis. The paradigm of progression from localized disease to metastasis and eventually death is only represented in the other half, although possible initial screening and staging errors ought to be taken into consideration. More efforts are needed to conduct trials in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic CaP.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Retrospective Studies
7.
Ann Oncol ; 24(7): 1807-1812, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23576708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Androgen receptor (AR) signalling remains critically important in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as confirmed by recent phase III trials, showing a survival advantage for abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide (MDV3100). The antitumour activity of abiraterone and prednisolone in patients pre-treated with enzalutamide is as yet unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the antitumour activity of abiraterone and prednisolone in patients with mCRPC who had progressed following treatment with docetaxel (Taxotere) and enzalutamide. Clinical data were retrospectively analysed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and RECIST responses, clinical benefit and survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 71 years (range 52-84); metastatic sites included bone disease in 37 patients (97%), lymph nodes in 15 patients (39%) and visceral disease in 10 patients (26%). Abiraterone was well tolerated. Three patients (8%) attained a PSA response, defined as ≥50% decline in PSA confirmed after ≥4 weeks, while seven patients (18%) had a ≥30% PSA decline. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months (95% CI 2.3-4.1). Of the 12 patients assessable radiologically, only 1 (8%) attained a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION: Abiraterone and prednisolone have modest antitumour activities in patients with mCRPC pretreated with docetaxel and enzalutamide.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Taxoids/pharmacology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Androstenes , Androstenols/administration & dosage , Benzamides , Bone Neoplasms/blood , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
8.
Clin Radiol ; 68(3): e136-42, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23287383

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate alternative possibilities for the intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins after bone resection utilizing more conventional hospital infrastructure technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A small pilot study was performed using digital mammograph imaging intraoperatively on 16 surgical specimens of bone tumours or malignancies with bone infiltration of the head and neck area, with the aim of evaluating the resection margins. RESULTS: In thirteen cases the intraoperative specimen images indicated clinically complete excision. In two cases incomplete resection or close proximity of margins was detected, which required additional resection. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that intraoperative specimen radiography can prove useful in evaluating completeness of excision. The significance of intraoperative assessment of surgical margin is of paramount importance when immediate reconstruction is performed. This proposed method is cheap, easy to perform and fast. Its cost-benefit ratio is superior than that of any other available technique. Intraoperative analysis of specimens with digital mammography imaging can potentially become a useful tool for immediate evaluation of osseous margins after resection.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies
9.
Ann Oncol ; 24(4): 1087-93, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23175622

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that interruption of imatinib mesylate (IM) in responding patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) results in rapid reprogression. The impact of interruption on residual tumour, quality of response and secondary resistance has not been fully investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the BRF14 study, 71 non-progressing patients were randomly assigned in the interruption arms after 1, 3 or 5 years. IM was resumed in the case of progressive disease (PD). Tumour status at randomisation, relapse and after IM rechallenge, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to secondary resistance were analysed. RESULTS: At data cut-off, 51 of 71 patients had restarted IM following documented PD. Eighteen patients (35%) progressed on known lesions only, while 33 patients (65%) had new lesions, with concomitant progression of known lesions in 17 patients. Only 8 (42%) of complete remission (CR) patients and 12 (52%) of partial response (PR) patients at randomisation achieved a new CR and PR. Patients progressing rapidly after interruption had a poorer prognosis. Tumour status at randomisation influenced time to progression after rechallenge. CONCLUSION: In advanced GIST patients interrupting IM, quality of response upon reintroduction did not reach the tumour status observed at randomisation. Rapid progression after imatinib interruption is associated with poor PFS after reintroduction.


Subject(s)
Benzamides/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Benzamides/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate , Male , Middle Aged , Piperazines/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Sarcoma/pathology , Treatment Outcome
10.
Ann Oncol ; 23(6): 1601-7, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22039081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the role of systemic therapy in patients with advanced well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS/DDLPS) are limited. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 208 patients with advanced WDLPS/DDLPS received chemotherapy in 11 participating institutions. Clinical and pathological data were collected by reviewing medical records. RESULTS: Median age was 63 years (range 32-84). Combination chemotherapy was delivered in 85 cases (41%) and single agent in 123 cases (59%), respectively. One hundred and seventy-one patients (82%) received an anthracycline-containing regimen. Using RECIST, objective response was observed in 21 patients (12%), all treated with anthracyclines. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-5.9]. On multivariate analysis, age and performance status (PS) were the sole factors significantly associated with poor PFS. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.2 months (95% CI 11.8 -18.7). On multivariate analysis, grade and PS were the sole factors significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy was associated with clinical benefit in 46% of patients with advanced WDLPS/DDLPS. OS remains poor, even though visceral metastatic disease is less frequent than in other sarcomas.


Subject(s)
Anthracyclines/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Liposarcoma/drug therapy , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liposarcoma/mortality , Liposarcoma/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/mortality , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
11.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 36(2): 180-5, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17223312

ABSTRACT

The lip is estimated to be the most frequent location for carcinoma of the oral cavity. It occurs more frequently in men, especially those with a history of exposure to sunlight. Despite the usually effective management, regional and occasionally distant metastases do occur, especially in advanced stages. In this retrospective analysis of patients with labial carcinoma presenting with distant bone metastases in 1995-2003, the extremely limited number of patients did not allow for multivariate data analysis. From a cohort of 415 patients presenting with lip lesions, 186 cases were diagnosed as carcinoma and managed accordingly. Four patients (2.14%) showed distant bone metastases, one with concurrent axillary node metastasis. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, case management and survival were evaluated. The distant metastasis patients were of clinical stages II-IV; initial management was wide local excision with reconstruction for all cases, with one undergoing concurrent neck dissection and one adjuvant radiotherapy. Time for distant bone metastasis was 9-21 months, subsequent survival 3-14 months and overall survival 13-35 months. Distant metastases from labial carcinoma are rare, not exceeding 2%. Metastasis to bone and axillary lymph nodes is exceptionally rare and can be attributed to either inadequate initial management or aggressive tumour behaviour.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma/secondary , Lip Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Mandibular Neoplasms/secondary , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL