Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 9(11): 23259671211050929, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34888389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Different indications and treatment options for combined injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) are not clearly defined. PURPOSE: To perform a modified Delphi process with the Committee for Ligament Injuries of the German Knee Society (DKG) in order to structure and optimize the process of treating a combined injury to the ACL and MCL. STUDY DESIGN: Consensus statement. METHODS: Scientific questions and answers were created based on a comprehensive literature review using the central registers for controlled studies of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane including the terms medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, MCL, ACL, and outcome used in various combinations. The obtained statements passed 3 cycles of a modified Delphi process during which each was readjusted and rated according to the available evidence (grades A-E) by the members of the DKG Ligament Injuries Committee and its registered guests. RESULTS: The majority of answers, including several questions with >1 graded answer, were evaluated as grade E (n = 16) or C (n = 10), indicating that a low level of scientific evidence was available for most of the answers. Only 5 answers were graded better than C: 3 answers with a grade of A and 2 answers with a grade of B. Only 1 answer was evaluated as grade D. An agreement of >80% (range, 83%-100%) among committee members was achieved for all statements. CONCLUSION: The results of this modified Delphi process offer a guideline for standardized patient care in cases of combined injuries to the ACL and MCL.

2.
Acta Orthop ; 83(4): 379-86, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22900914

ABSTRACT

The Dutch Orthopaedic Association has a long tradition of development of practical clinical guidelines. Here we present the recommendations from the multidisciplinary clinical guideline working group for anterior cruciate ligament injury. The following 8 clinical questions were formulated by a steering group of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association. What is the role of physical examination and additional diagnostic tools? Which patient-related outcome measures should be used? What are the relevant parameters that influence the indication for an ACL reconstruction? Which findings or complaints are predictive of a bad result of an ACL injury treatment? What is the optimal timing for surgery for an ACL injury? What is the outcome of different conservative treatment modalities? Which kind of graft gives the best result in an ACL reconstruction? What is the optimal postoperative treatment concerning rehabilitation, resumption of sports, and physiotherapy? These 8 questions were answered and recommendations were made, using the "Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation" instrument. This instrument seeks to improve the quality and effectiveness of clinical practical guidelines by establishing a shared framework to develop, report, and assess. The steering group has also developed 7 internal indicators to aid in measuring and enhancing the quality of the treatment of patients with an ACL injury, for use in a hospital or practice.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/standards , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Knee Injuries/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Interdisciplinary Communication , Knee Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Male , Netherlands , Orthopedics/standards , Quality Improvement , Radiography , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Arthroplasty ; 27(3): 494.e5-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22019319

ABSTRACT

Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures after a total knee arthroplasty are difficult surgical problems. We report a case of an 84-year-old woman with an osteoporotic fracture that was not deemed amenable to conventional treatment. In this case, a complete consolidation was achieved by using a proximal femur nail antirotation nail upside down and through the fracture for fixation.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Knee Prosthesis , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 3: 24, 2008 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18544170

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of radiographic osteoarthritis in the operated knee in comparison with the contralateral knee ten years after a bone-tendon bone patellar autograft ACL-reconstruction and to evaluate to which level patients regain activity ten years after reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with ACL instability were operated arthroscopically using the central third of the patellar tendon as a bone-tendon-bone autograft. At a minimum of 10 year follow up 28/44 patients matched the inclusion criteria and could be reached for follow-up. Evaluation included a patient satisfaction evaluation using a Visual Analog Scale, physical examination (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner score, Lysholm score, KT-1000 stabilometry) and a radiological evaluation (Kellgren and Fairbanks classification). RESULTS: The patients' satisfaction, at a mean of 10,3 year follow-up, measured with a VAS score (0-10) was high with a mean of 8.5 (range 4 to 10). The KT 1000 arthrometer laxity measurements revealed in 55% of the patients an A rating (1-2 mm), in 29% a B rating (3-5 mm) and in 16% a C rating (6-10 mm). According to the Tegner score 54% of the patients were able to perform at the same activity level as pre-operatively. The mean pre-operative Tegner score was 6.8 and the mean post-operative Tegner score was 6.0 at final follow up. The Lysholm score showed satisfactory results with a mean of 91 points (range 56 to 100). According to the Kellgren and Fairbank classifications, there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) in development of OA between the ACL injured and subsequently operated knee in comparison to the contralateral knee. CONCLUSION: The patellar BTB ACL reconstruction does not prevent the occurrence of radiological OA after 10 years but does help the patient to regain the pre-operative level of activity.

5.
J Knee Surg ; 21(1): 68-74, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18300676

ABSTRACT

This prospective cohort study compared opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of the Puddu plate and the Vitoss synthetic cancellous bone versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of the AO/ASIF L-plate, focusing on complications (nonunions, infections, loss of correction, reoperations) and patient satisfaction (visual linear analog scale). During a 10-month period, we performed high tibial osteotomy for 40 patients experiencing medial knee osteoarthritis and a varus deformity. The average follow-up was 11 months. The complication rate in patients treated with the opening wedge technique was significantly higher regarding tibial nonunion, loss of correction, and material failure. Patients in the closing wedge group were more satisfied with the postoperative result. This study found that the Puddu plate, despite 6 weeks of non-weight bearing facilitating the osseous consolidation with Vitoss cement, was not able to maintain the correction during the time required for bone healing.


Subject(s)
Osteotomy/adverse effects , Tibia/surgery , Adult , Aged , Bone Plates , Calcium Phosphates , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteotomy/instrumentation , Osteotomy/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Silicates
6.
J Knee Surg ; 20(4): 271-6, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17993066

ABSTRACT

Arthroscopic debridement has been used to treat patients with degenerative knee osteoarthritis, although there is sometimes conflicting evidence documenting its efficacy. This study evaluates the success of arthroscopic debridement in elderly patients with grade III and IV chondromalacia of the knee as measured by patient satisfaction and the need for additional surgery. From December 1998 to August 2001, a total of 102 consecutive cases of knee arthroscopy in 99 patients > 60 years were performed. Average follow-up was 34 months (range: 7-104 months). Patients were asked about their satisfaction using a visual analog scale, and the presence of meniscal lesions during arthroscopy and the treatment for these lesions were evaluated. Knees also were assessed for articular surface degeneration using Outerbridge's classification for chondromalacia. The need for and type of additional surgery was evaluated. During arthroscopy, meniscal lesions requiring a partial meniscectomy were found in 95 knees. Chondromalacia was found in 92 knees; 53 knees had grade I or II chondromalacia and 39 knees had grade III or IV chondromalacia. Additional surgery was performed in 17 knees. Mean patient satisfaction score was 73 (range: 50-100) in the 39 knees with grade III or IV chondromalacia after arthroscopic debridement was performed. These findings suggest arthroscopic debridement in elderly patients has a place in the treatment algorithm for grade III or IV chondromalacia of the knee.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Chondromalacia Patellae/surgery , Debridement/methods , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Chondromalacia Patellae/classification , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Patient Satisfaction , Reoperation , Research Design
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...