Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
3.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 70(1): 62-6, 2015 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26017660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Concerns remain regarding the cancer risk associated with perinatal antiretroviral (ARV) exposure among infants. No excessive cancer risk has been found in short-term studies. METHODS: Children born to HIV-infected women (HIV-exposed) in New Jersey from 1995 to 2008 were identified through the Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System and cross-referenced with data from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry to identify new cases of cancer among children who were perinatally exposed to ARV. Matching of individuals in the Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System to the New Jersey State Cancer Registry was conducted based on name, birth date, Social Security number, residential address, and sex using AutoMatch. Age- and sex-standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using New Jersey (1979-2005) and US (1999-2009) cancer rates. RESULTS: Among 3087 children (29,099 person-years; median follow-up: 9.8 years), 4 were diagnosed with cancer. Cancer incidence among HIV-exposed children who were not exposed to ARV prophylaxis (22.5 per 100,000 person-years) did not differ significantly from the incidence among children who were exposed to any perinatal ARV prophylaxis (14.3 per 100,000 person-years). Furthermore, the number of cases observed among individuals exposed to ARV did not differ significantly from cases expected based on state (SIR = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.25 to 3.54) and national (SIR = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.26 to 3.70) reference rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are reassuring that current use of ARV for perinatal HIV prophylaxis does not increase cancer risk. We found no evidence to alter the current federal guidelines of 2014 that recommend ARV prophylaxis of HIV-exposed infants.


Subject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Chemoprevention/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Anti-Retroviral Agents/adverse effects , Chemoprevention/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , New Jersey/epidemiology
4.
J Clin Virol ; 58 Suppl 1: e24-8, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23953941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A screening strategy combining rapid HIV-1/2 (HIV) antibody testing with pooled HIV-1 RNA testing increases identification of HIV infections, but may have other limitations that restrict its usefulness to all but the highest incidence populations. OBJECTIVE: By combining rapid antibody detection and pooled nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) testing, we sought to improve detection of early HIV-1 infections in an urban Newark, NJ hospital setting. STUDY DESIGN: Pooled NAAT HIV-1 RNA testing was offered to emergency department patients and outpatients being screened for HIV antibodies by fingerstick-rapid HIV testing. For those negative by rapid HIV and agreeing to NAAT testing, pooled plasma samples were prepared and sent to the University of Washington where real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification was performed. RESULTS: Of 13,226 individuals screened, 6381 had rapid antibody testing alone, and 6845 agreed to add NAAT HIV screening. Rapid testing identified 115 antibody positive individuals. Pooled NAAT increased HIV-1 case detection by 7.0% identifying 8 additional cases. Overall, acute HIV infection yield was 0.12%. While males represent only 48.1% of those tested by NAAT, all samples that screened positive for HIV-1 RNA were obtained from men. CONCLUSION: HIV-1 RNA testing of pooled, HIV antibody-negative specimens permits identification of recent infections. In Newark, pooled NAAT increased HIV-1 case detection and provided an opportunity to focus on treatment and prevention messages for those most at risk of transmitting infection. Although constrained by client willingness to participate in testing associated with a need to return to receive further results, use of pooled NAAT improved early infection sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Specimen Handling/methods , Algorithms , Female , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-1/immunology , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Male , New Jersey , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
5.
J Clin Virol ; 52 Suppl 1: S29-33, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22078147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Before 2009, New Jersey (NJ) publicly funded counseling and testing sites (CTS) tested for HIV using a single rapid test followed, when positive, by a Western Blot (WB) for confirmation. With this strategy, 74.8% of confirmed positive clients returned to receive test results. To improve the client notification rate at these centers, the New Jersey (NJ) Division of HIV, STD and TB Services (DHSTS) implemented a rapid testing algorithm (RTA) which utilizes a second, different, rapid test to verify a preliminary positive. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of the two testing algorithms. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. DATA SOURCES: New Jersey HIV Rapid Testing Support Program (NJHIV) records, DHSTS grant documents, counseling time estimates from an online survey of site supervisors. Costs included test kits and personnel costs from month of RTA implementation through 11/30 in 2008 and 2009. The incremental cost of the RTA was calculated per additional percent of positive clients who were notified and per day earlier notification. RESULTS: In 2008, 215 of 247 clients with a positive rapid HIV test were confirmed positive by WB. 90.9% of clients were notified a mean of 11.4 days after their initial test. 12 refused confirmatory WB. In 2009, 152 of 170 clients with one positive rapid test had a confirmatory second positive rapid test and were notified on the same day. The incremental cost of the RTA was $20.31 per additional positive person notified and $24.31 per day earlier notification or $3.23 per additional positive person and $3.87 per day earlier notification if the WB were eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: The RTA is a cost-effective strategy achieving 100% notification of newly HIV positive clients a mean of 11.4 days earlier compared to standard testing.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , HIV Infections/economics , Immunoenzyme Techniques/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Blotting, Western/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling/economics , Disease Notification/economics , HIV/immunology , HIV/pathogenicity , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Health Care Costs , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , New Jersey , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
6.
J Clin Virol ; 52 Suppl 1: S11-5, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21983254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Awaiting definitive diagnosis before scheduling healthcare visits complicates HIV screening and referral. Clients screened by rapid tests as initially reactive often fail to return to receive definitive test results, are not linked to care and enter care late or not at all. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate statewide, (1) the accuracy of a single-visit, two test HIV rapid testing algorithm (RTA) and (2) its effect on referral to care for positive clients. STUDY DESIGN: A two-test RTA was implemented at 24 sites in New Jersey beginning in December 2008. All clients with a reactive rapid HIV test were offered a second rapid HIV test, and RTA results were compared with Western blot (WB). Referral to care occurred based upon two sequential positive rapid tests. RESULTS: The RTA program has screened 51,413 individuals obtaining 426 reactive rapid test results; 394 (92.5%) were reactive by a second rapid test, 32 (7.5%) had a negative second rapid test. Twenty-eight individuals refused WB testing. Of 369 RTA-positive individuals who have WB results, 368 (99.5%) were confirmed positive. Of RTA-positive clients, 290 (73.6%), including 25 (6.6%) who refused Western blot, were immediately referred for care including one individual with a false-positive RTA. CONCLUSIONS: The RTA reduced false positive results by 6.2% and agreed with WB results 99.5% of the time. Improved referral to care compared to traditional rapid HIV screening occurs when immediate referral is based on RTA verification of a preliminary positive rapid test. WB confirmation is not essential for effective screening and contributes to difficulties linking individuals to care.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Blotting, Western , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/immunology , HIV-1/pathogenicity , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , New Jersey/epidemiology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Patient Care Management/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Preventive Health Services/methods , Referral and Consultation
9.
Sex Transm Dis ; 35(11): 905-9, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18685549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe heterosexual anal sex activity during a year and to identify factors associated with heterosexual anal sex and condom use during anal sex. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from a trial conducted in 3 public sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. Patients described sexual behaviors every 3-months for the year. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to include multiple observations for each subject. RESULTS: Two thousand three hundred fifty-seven heterosexual subjects reported on 6611 3-month intervals that included 9235 partnerships. About 18.3% of subjects had anal sex in a particular 3-month interval and 39.3% in the year. About 23.5% of subjects had anal sex in at least two 3-month intervals in the year. Anal sex was associated with having more sex acts, 2 or more sex partners, unprotected vaginal sex, and a main partner. For anal sex in the past 3 months, 27.3% of subjects consistently used condoms, and 63% of subjects never used condoms. Consistent condom use for anal sex was associated with having consistent condom use for vaginal sex, 2 or more partners, and anal sex with casual or new partner. CONCLUSION: STD clinic patients were commonly engaged in heterosexual anal sex, and most of them never used condoms during anal sex. Patients who had anal sex tended to also engage in other risk behaviors that put them at risk of STD/human immunodeficiency virus. Clinicians should ask about anal sex, appropriately examine and test patients who have had anal sex, and recommend condom use for both anal and vaginal sex.


Subject(s)
Heterosexuality , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Risk-Taking , Sexual Partners , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/transmission , Young Adult
10.
Sex Transm Dis ; 35(5): 484-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18360314

ABSTRACT

GOAL: Trichomonas vaginalis is the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection in the United States and may be associated with adverse birth outcomes and may also increase susceptibility to or transmissibility of human immunodeficiency virus. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the epidemiology of T. vaginalis in Sexually Transmitted Disease clinics and characterize the risk factors associated with prevalent and incident T. vaginalis within the same population. METHODS: We analyzed data from visits occurring during February 1999-December 2001 from 3 sexually transmitted disease clinics in Newark, NJ; Long Beach, CA; and Denver, CO. Data were analyzed from 1462 women aged 15 to 39 years who were tested by culture at their initial visit for T. vaginalis, and for 1269 women with at least 1 follow-up visit. Risk factors for prevalent infections at baseline and incident infections among treated or previously uninfected women were assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, 13.0% of the women had a prevalent infection; risk factors included the following: older age (> or =20 years), black race, having less than 12 years of education, and having a concurrent chlamydial infection. At follow-up, 4.6% of women had an incident infection; risk factors included the following: older age (35-39 years), black race, having a concurrent chlamydial infection, having had multiple sexual partners in the 3 months before incident infection, and having had T. vaginalis at the visit before their incident infection. CONCLUSIONS: T. vaginalis incidence is high in women. Risk factors for prevalent and incident infection are similar. T. vaginalis was associated with older age in women, unlike other sexually transmitted infections.


Subject(s)
Trichomonas Vaginitis/epidemiology , Trichomonas vaginalis , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Trichomonas Vaginitis/etiology , Trichomonas Vaginitis/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Women's Health
12.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 55(9): 1393-7, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17767680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To alert persons in the public and private healthcare professions to the increasing trends in higher proportions of persons aged 50 and older who are newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and who are living with HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). DESIGN: Data from the period 1992 through 2004 from the HIV/AIDS Reporting System (HARS) were analyzed. SETTING: New Jersey is the eleventh-most-populous state, with the highest density of persons per square mile. It also has the fifth-highest number of AIDS cases. PARTICIPANTS: All persons residing in New Jersey and reported to HARS with HIV infection or who are considered to have AIDS. MEASUREMENTS: Trends in persons aged 50 and older were compared with those in the population younger than 50 during 1992 through 2004 for the numbers of persons living with HIV/AIDS and the number of persons newly diagnosed with HIV infection. RESULTS: The proportion of all persons aged 50 and older living with HIV/AIDS in 2004 was significantly greater than the comparable proportion of persons in 1992. Proportionally, more persons were newly diagnosed with HIV who were aged 50 and older according to sex and for each of the three major race or ethnicity groups (white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, and Hispanic) than were persons younger than 50. Each of these increases was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: HIV/AIDS social marketing campaigns should include images and issues related to older persons in educational and prevention efforts. New methods that reach older populations should be considered. Physicians and other healthcare providers should be made aware of their role in prevention and education about HIV. Testing of older populations with risk factors should be encouraged.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , New Jersey/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Survival Rate/trends
13.
PLoS One ; 2(1): e185, 2007 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17268576

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In March 2004, the OraQuick rapid HIV antibody test became the first rapid HIV test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use on oral fluid specimens. Test results are available in 20 minutes, and the oral fluid test is non-invasive. From August 2004-June 2005, we investigated a sudden increase in false-positive results occurring in a performance study of OraQuick oral-fluid rapid HIV tests in Minnesota. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a field investigation, we reviewed performance study data on oral-fluid and whole-blood OraQuick rapid HIV test device lots and expiration dates and assessed test performance and interpretation with oral-fluid and whole-blood specimens by operators who reported false-positive results. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate client demographic and risk characteristics associated with false-positive results. Next, we conducted an incidence study of false-positive OraQuick rapid HIV tests in nine US cities and tested both oral-fluid and finger-stick whole-blood specimens from clients; reactive tests were confirmed with Western blot. Sixteen (4.1%) false-positive oral-fluid results occurred in the performance study from April 15, 2004 through August 31, 2004 with unexpired devices from six test lots among 388 HIV-uninfected clients (specificity, 95.9%; 95% CI: 93.4-97.6). Three test operators who had reported false-positive results performed and interpreted the test according to package-insert instructions. In multivariate analysis, only older age was significantly associated with false-positive results (adjusted odds ratio = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.2-25.7). In the incidence study, all valid oral-fluid and whole-blood results from 2,268 clients were concordant and no false-positive results occurred (100% specificity). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The field investigation did not identify a cause for the increase in false-positive oral-fluid results, and the incidence study detected no false-positive results. The findings suggest this was an isolated cluster; the test's overall performance was as specified by the manufacturer.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , False Positive Reactions , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , HIV-1/immunology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Adult , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Male , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/methods , Risk Factors
14.
Ann Intern Med ; 145(8): 564-72, 2006 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17043338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies show 11% to 15% of women treated for Chlamydia trachomatis are reinfected 3 to 4 months after treatment, suggesting the need for rescreening. There is little information on infections among men, infections with Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Trichomonas vaginalis, or long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of new sexually transmitted infections during the year after a visit to a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic and associated risk factors. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized, controlled trial (RESPECT-2). SETTING: 3 urban STD clinics. PATIENTS: Sexually active patients enrolled in an HIV prevention counseling trial. MEASUREMENTS: Patient characteristics at the initial visit; behaviors during follow-up; and new infections with C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, or T. vaginalis (women only) detected during 4 scheduled return visits and any other interim visits. RESULTS: 2419 persons had 8129 three-month follow-up intervals. Among 1236 women, 25.8% had 1 or more new infections (11.9% acquired C. trachomatis, 6.3% acquired N. gonorrhoeae, and 12.8% acquired T. vaginalis); among 1183 men, 14.7% had 1 or more new infections (9.4% acquired C. trachomatis, and 7.1% acquired N. gonorrhoeae). Black persons and those with sexually transmitted infections at baseline were at highest risk for recurrent infection (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5 and 2.4, respectively). For persons infected at baseline, the risk for infection was high at 3 and 6 months (16.3 per 100 three-month intervals) and remained high at 9 and 12 months (12.0 per 100 three-month intervals). Most (67.2%) infections were diagnosed during study-related visits, and 66.2% of these patients reported no symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Because patients were recruited from STD clinics, results may not be generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women who receive diagnoses of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, or T. vaginalis infections should return in 3 months for rescreening because they are at high risk for new asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections. Although single-dose therapy may adequately treat the infection, it often does not adequately treat the patient.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia trachomatis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gonorrhea/drug therapy , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/drug therapy , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Trichomonas Vaginitis/drug therapy , Trichomonas Vaginitis/epidemiology , Trichomonas Vaginitis/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
15.
Sex Transm Dis ; 32(2): 123-9, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15668620

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HIV counseling prevents sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), with most of the benefit accumulating in the first 6 months. STUDY: The authors conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of a 20-minute additional (booster) counseling session 6 months after HIV counseling compared with no additional counseling for prevention of STDs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, trichomoniasis). Participants were 15- to 39-year-old STD clinic patients in Denver, Long Beach, and Newark. RESULTS: Booster counseling was completed by 1120 (67.8%) of 1653 assigned to receive it. An incident STD during the 6 to 12 months after initial counseling (and within the 6 months after scheduled booster counseling) was detected in 141 of 1653 (8.5%) participants in the booster counseling group and 144 of 1644 (8.8%) in the no-booster group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.22). Three months after booster counseling, sexual risk behaviors were reported less frequently by the booster group than the no-booster group. CONCLUSIONS: Booster counseling 6 months after HIV testing and counseling reduced reported sexual risk behavior but did not prevent STDs.


Subject(s)
Counseling , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , California , Colorado , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , New Jersey , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
16.
Sex Transm Dis ; 32(2): 130-8, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15668621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two risk-reduction counseling sessions can prevent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs); however, return rates for test results are low. STUDY: A randomized, controlled trial compared rapid HIV testing and counseling in 1 visit with standard HIV testing and counseling in 2 visits. Main outcomes were STDs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, trichomoniasis, syphilis, HIV) within 12 months. Participants were 15- to 39-year-old STD clinic patients in Denver, Long Beach, and Newark. STD screening and questionnaires were administered every 3 months. RESULTS: Counseling was completed by 1632 of 1648 (99.0%) of the rapid-test group and 1144 of 1649 (69.4%) of the standard-test group. By 12 months, STD was acquired by 19.1% of the rapid group and 17.1% of the standard group (relative risk [RR], 1.11; confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.29). STD incidence was higher in the rapid-test group than in the standard-test group among men (RR, 1.34; CI, 1.06-1.70), men who had sex with men (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.92-3.76), and persons with no STDs at enrollment (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.48). Behavior was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling with either test had similar effects on STD incidence. For some persons, counseling with standard testing may be more effective than counseling with rapid testing.


Subject(s)
Counseling , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , California , Colorado , Female , Humans , Male , New Jersey , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
20.
N J Med ; 101(6): 17-20, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15232947

ABSTRACT

Mental health issues facing children and adolescents in New Jersey are an under-recognized health care issue. Insufficient data are available to fully define the scope of the problem. Current resources for early diagnosis and treatment do not meet the need. In an era in which the usual stress of adolescence is compounded by violence in schools and the threat of terrorism, more needs to be done to ensure the mental health of all of our children and adolescents.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Adolescent , Child , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Mental Health Services , New Jersey
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...