Optimizing combat readiness for military surgeons without trauma fellowship training: Engaging the "voluntary faculty" model.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate operative volume remains a critical component in mitigating surgical atrophy and maintaining clinical competency. The initiation of military-civilian surgical partnerships (MCPs) has been proposed for addressing knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) metrics to address concerns over operational readiness and the low acuity experienced by military surgeons. This study investigates the first partnership for Navy surgical staff at a nonacademic Military Treatment Facility (MTF) with a regional academic Army Military Treatment Facility (AMTF) and a civilian, nonacademic level II trauma center devised to improve operational readiness for attending surgeons. We hypothesize that a skill sustainment MCP will allow military surgeons to meet combat readiness standards as measured by the KSA metric. METHODS: A memorandum of understanding was initiated between the Navy Military Treatment Facility (NMTF), the AMTF, and the level II civilian trauma center (CTC). The single military surgeon in this study was classified as "voluntary faculty" at the CTC. Total case volume and acuity were recorded over an 11-month period. Knowledge, skills, and abilities metrics were calculated using the standard national provider identifier number and the novel case-log based method. RESULTS: A total of 156 cases were completed by a single surgeon over the study period, averaging 52 cases per institution. Significantly more KSAs were obtained at the CTC compared with NMTF (5,954 vs. 2,707; p < 0.001). Significantly more emergent cases were observed at the CTC compared with the MTFs (χ 2 = 7.1, n = 96, p < 0.05). At a single site, AMTF, a significant difference in the calculated KSA score, was observed between the national provider identifier and case-log methods (5,278 vs. 3,297; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The skill sustainment MCP between NMTF and CTC increased surgical readiness and exposed surgeons to increased operative acuity. The voluntary faculty model reduces direct litigation exposure and encourages clinical competency for military surgeons while remaining a deployable asset to the global military effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

The impact of the AirSeal® valve-less trocar system in robotic colorectal surgery: a single-surgeon retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Traditional trocar systems suffer from several innate flaws due to their silicone seal design. The AirSeal® is a valve-less trocar system that overcomes these flaws by utilizing a system of laminar flow and CO2 recirculation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the AirSeal® versus a traditional trocar system in operative time, EBL and post-operative complications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of this system in robotic colorectal surgery. METHODS: A single surgeon's database was reviewed and all LAR and right hemicolectomy robotic cases from 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 were included for analysis. Patient demographic information was evaluated and primary outcomes examined were operative time, EBL, post-operative complications and hospital LOS. RESULTS: Ninety four patients were identified in the LAR cohort and 56 patients were identified in the right hemicolectomy cohort. Mean operative time for LAR was 293 ± 91.6 min in 2014-2015 and 232 ± 74.6 min in 2017-2018 (p = 0.001); however, this significant difference was not seen between right hemicolectomies. Mean EBL for LAR was 209 ± 189 cc in 2014-2015 and 150 ± 173.9 cc in 2017-2018 (p = 0.05); again, this significant difference was not appreciated for right hemicolectomies. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of wound infections, pneumonia, post-operative pneumonia, DVT/PE, intra-abdominal/pelvic abscesses, or unplanned 30-day readmission rate between 2014-2015 and 2017-2018. Length of stay was reduced in both populations between 2014-2015 and 2017-2018; however, it neither reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing low anterior resections, the AirSeal® trocar system demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mean operative time and EBL compared to the traditional trocar system. There was also a trend towards decreased length of stay and post-operative complications with AirSeal® use in low anterior resections and right hemicolectomies. In patients undergoing distal colorectal procedures, the AirSeal® trocar system should be considered.

The robotic colorectal experience: an outcomes and learning curve analysis of 502 patients.

AIM: This study aimed to present our experience with robotic colorectal surgery since its establishment at our institution in 2009. By examining the outcomes of over 500 patients, our experience provides a basis for assessing the introduction of a robotic platform in a colorectal practice. Specific measures investigated include intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes for all operations using the robotic platform. In addition, for our most commonly performed operations we wished to analyse the learning curve to improve operative proficiency. This is the largest single-surgeon robotic database analysed to date. METHOD: A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery by a single surgeon at the George Washington University Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes were assessed. Additionally, an operating time learning curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria identified 502 patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery between October 2009 and December 2018. The most common indications for surgery were diverticulitis (22.9%), colon adenocarcinoma (22.1%) and rectal adenocarcinoma (19.5%). The most common operations were anterior/low anterior resection (33.9%), right hemicolectomy/ileocaecectomy (24.9%) and left hemicolectomy/sigmoidectomy (21.9%). The rate of conversion to open surgery was 4.8%. The most common postoperative complications were wound infection (5.0%), anastomotic leakage (4.0%) and abscess formation (2.8%). The operating time learning curve plateaued at 55-65 cases for anterior and low anterior resection and 35-45 cases for left hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy. A clear learning curve was not seen in right hemicolectomy. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted surgery can be performed in a diverse colorectal practice with low rates of conversion and postoperative complications. Plateau performance was achieved after 65 anterior/low anterior resections and 45 left and sigmoid colectomies.

The outcomes of two robotic platforms performing transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasia: a case series of 21 patients.

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer effecting adults. Surgical guidelines recommend transanal excision of early rectal neoplasia up to 8 cm from the anal verge. A retrospective review of two novel approaches for transanal robotic local excision with R0 resections of rectal cancers which was, on average, higher than 8 cm. Twenty-one cases of robotic assisted transanal surgery for early stage disease (T0-T1, N0) were reviewed. The first 10 cases performed with the da Vinci® Si robotic platform between 2013 and 2016, and the first 11 cases performed using the Flex® Medrobotics platform between August 2017 and August 2018. The average distance from the anal verge was 11.1 cm and 9.5 cm for the da Vinci® Si and Flex® Colorectal Drive, respectively. The average operative time was 167.6 min for the da Vinci® Si and 110.1 min for the Flex® Colorectal Drive; the average EBL was 37.5 cc and 9.1 cc for the da Vinci® Si and Flex® Colorectal Drive. In the da Vinci® series, four cases required intraoperative conversion. In the Flex® series, one case was aborted due to unfavorable robotic positioning. All margins were histologically negative when surgically complete with no recurrences to date. Transanal robotic surgery may provide a method to address rectal lesions farther from the anal verge than previously described. The Flex® Colorectal Drive platform may provide superior ability to navigate the nonlinear anatomy of the rectum and distal sigmoid colon.

Total hip arthroplasty as treatment for avascular necrosis secondary to slipped capital femoral epiphysis in a pre-teen.

BACKGROUND: While the treatment for avascular necrosis (AVN) secondary to slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) varies, it is rare that a pre-teenager will undergo a total hip arthroplasty (THA) in efforts to relieve pain and maintain function. METHODS: A-10-year old female sustained an unstable SCFE while playing on wet grass. Unfortunately, her femoral head demonstrated significant AVN after surgical hip dislocation. All treatment options were discussed with the patient and her family. The decision of the family was to have the patient undergo a THA. RESULTS: Approximately one year after her injury, a ceramic on ceramic THA was performed. Her post-operative Harris Hip Scores increased dramatically and she was able to walk without crutches for the first time since her injury. At one year post operatively, the patient was no longer taking narcotics, losing weight, and returned to her sporting activities. CONCLUSION: THA for SCFE in pre-teenagers is not a norm and should be considered on a case by case basis. This case report demonstrates a successful outcome and a review of options for the treatment of AVN secondary to SCFE.