How to prevent relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Disease relapse remains the first cause of mortality of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The risk of recurrence is elevated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, as well as when allo-HCT is performed in patients with refractory hematological malignancies or with persistent molecular or radiological (PET-CT scan) residual disease. For high risk AML and myelodysplasia (MDS), a post transplant maintenance strategy is possible, using hypomethylating agents or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) anti-FLT3 when the target is present. For Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), there is a consensus for the use of TKI anti BCR-ABL as post transplant maintenance.

Evaluation of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in younger adults with adverse karyotype AML.

To illustrate methodological issues, we compared donor vs no-donor to transplant vs no-transplant comparisons in a cohort of 107 patients aged 50 years with adverse karyotype AML in first CR. Adverse karyotypes were defined as -7, del(7q), -5, del(5q), t(9;22), 11q23, 3q26 or complex abnormalities. Mantel-Byar estimations and hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) as a time-dependent variable were used to compare transplant vs no-transplant cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS. In all, 52 patients had a sibling donor, but only 35 of them were transplanted in first CR, whereas 9 patients received HSCT from alternative stem cell sources. Donor-based analysis showed lower CIR in the donor group, not translating in prolonged RFS or OS. Conversely, transplant-based analysis showed that HSCT in the first CR improved the three CIR (multivariate hazard ratio (HR), 0.31; P<0.001), RFS (multivariate HR, 0.57; P=0.047) and OS (multivariate HR, 0.54; P=0.03) endpoints. At 5 years, OS was estimated at 33% in transplanted vs 18% in non-transplanted patients. The positive effect of HSCT was more pronounced in patients aged 35 years and/or in those transplanted in the more recent years. These results confirm that HSCT is likely the best curative option in younger patients with adverse karyotype AML.

Prognostic significance of DNA methyltransferase 3A mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the Acute Leukemia French Association.

Recently, DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) mutations have been identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the highest frequency being found within cytogenetically normal (CN) AML. In this study, diagnostic samples from 123 adults younger than 60 years with primary CN-AML homogeneously treated in the Acute Leukemia French Association-9801 and -9802 trials were screened for mutations in DNMT3A-conserved domains by direct sequencing. Patients were also assessed for the presence of FLT3 (fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-3), NPM1 (nucleophosmin), CEBPA, WT1 (Wilms tumor 1), IDH1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1) and IDH2 mutations. Thirty-eight mutations were detected in 36 patients (29%): 36 nucleotide substitutions, mostly affecting amino-acid residue R882 and two frameshift deletions. DNMT3A mutations were significantly associated with the French-American-British subtypes M4/M5 and the presence of NPM1 mutations. In the whole cohort, DNMT3A mutated patients had a shorter event-free survival (5-year EFS: 13% vs 32%, P = 0.02) and overall survival (5-year OS: 23% vs 45%, P = 0.02) compared with DNMT3A wild-type patients. In multivariate analysis including age, white blood cell count, NPM1/FLT3-internal tandem duplication/CEBPA risk group and DNMT3A mutational status, the presence of a DNMT3A mutation remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for EFS and OS, suggesting that testing for DNMT3A mutations could help further improve risk stratification in CN-AML.

Correlation between galactomannan antigen levels in serum and neutrophil counts in haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.

The detection of circulating galactomannan (GM) in serum samples is an important step in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA). The assay has been mainly explored in neutropenic patients, and is now used to monitor patients at high risk for IA. However, the performance of the assay varies greatly among studies. The objective of this study was to explore the impact of the neutrophil count on the GM serum index at the time of IA diagnosis. Ninety-nine episodes of proven or probable, microbiologically documented IA in 91 patients with haematological malignancies were studied retrospectively. Three groups were identified: groups 1-3, with <100 polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN)/mm(3) (n = 18), between 100 and 500 PMN/mm(3) (n = 21), or >500 PMN/mm(3) (n = 60), respectively. The mean GM index was significantly higher in group 1 than in the other groups (p <0.05). This finding did not change after stratifying the analysis with regard to the use of antibiotics likely to give false-positive GM results or with regard to treatment effective against fungi before the diagnosis of IA. This finding could be considered in the routine use of the GM antigenaemia test in non-neutropenic patients; a negative result or a low GM index should not eliminate the diagnosis of IA. This limitation calls for other microbiological tests, including analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, to establish a definitive diagnosis of IA.

Acute myeloid leukemia after infliximab: a case report.

Concern has arisen regarding a possible increase in the risk of malignant diseases such as lymphoproliferative disorders in a patient taking TNF-alpha antagonists for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. The evidence of a causal link remains unclear. We report a case of 60-year-old male patient who developed acute myeloid leukemia during infliximab therapy for ankylo-sing spondylitis.

[Early pneumonia after allogenic stem cell transplantation]. / Complications pulmonaires précoces des allogreffes de cellules souches hématopoïétiques.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia is one of the main causes of mortality following allogenic stem cell transplantation, especially in the first months after the transplant has been performed. STATE OF THE ART: Pneumonia is the most common infection occurring after transplant and the infection with the highest mortality. Following the classical, myeloablative approach to transplant, two thirds of the pneumonias that occur are of infectious origin. Their causes roughly follow the timing of the immune reconstitution, and may depend on the type of transplant, the match between donor and recipient, and, overall, the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease. Most bacterial pneumonias occur during the initial neutropenic phase. The 2nd and 3rd month post transplant are mainly complicated by viral pneumonia, especially respiratory virus and adenovirus pneumonia in deeply immunosuppressed patients. Preemptive and prophylactic strategies have considerably reduced the incidence of cytomegalovirus pneumonia. Pneumonia due to encapsulated bacteria, such as Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, usually considered to be late infections, may actually be observed from the second month post-transplant. PERSPECTIVES: The increasing use of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has modified the time course of the main adverse events following transplantation, including the timing of the infectious pneumonias. The pneumonias that are specifically related to allogenic transplant are idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, bronchiolitis obliterans, and bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia, which are all considered to be pulmonary manifestations of graft-versus-host disease, and treated as such. Prophylaxis for many of these infectious pneumonias (i.e., P jiroveci, S pneumoniae, toxoplasmosis) are well standardized. CONCLUSIONS: Much remains to be done to decrease the incidence of pneumonia in these patients and to understand their mechanisms.

[ABO incompatibility and non myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation]. / Incompatibilité ABO et greffe allogénique de cellules souches hématopoïétiques à l'ère des conditionnements non myéloablatifs.

ABO incompatibility is not a barrier for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but is associated with specific complications. Major ABO incompatibility is associated with delayed erythroid engraftment, increased transfusion requirement and cases of pure red cell aplasia. Minor ABO incompatibility may be responsible for acute haemolytic reactions in the first months following transplantation. The widely used non myeloablative conditioning regimens might modify the management of ABO incompatibility. They could favour pure red cell aplasia development in the setting of major ABO mismatch since they are associated with a prolonged persistence of host anti-donor isohemagglutinins after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the setting of minor ABO incompatibility, the use of peripheral blood stem cells and the nature of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimen may have an impact on the incidence of haemolytic reactions. In that review, the clinical and therapeutic aspects of ABO incompatibility are studied, especially regarding the impact of the conditioning regimen intensity.

Effect of priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) Group.

In a multicenter trial, 259 young adults (15-49 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were first randomized to receive a timed-sequential induction regimen given either alone (135 patients) or concomitantly with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (124 patients). Patients reaching complete remission (CR) were then randomized to compare a timed-sequential consolidation to a postremission chemotherapy including four cycles of high-dose cytarabine followed by maintenance courses. In the appropriate arm, GM-CSF was given concurrently with chemotherapy during all cycles of consolidation. CR rates were significantly better in the GM-CSF arm (88 vs 78%, P<0.04), but did not differ after salvage. Patients receiving GM-CSF had a higher 3-year event-free survival (EFS) estimate (42 vs 34%), but GM-CSF did not impact on overall survival. Patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics benefited more from GM-CSF therapy (P=0.05) in terms of EFS than patients with other cytogenetics. This was also confirmed when considering only patients following the second randomization, or subgroups defined by a prognostic index based on cytogenetics and the number of courses required for achieving CR. Priming of leukemic cells with hematopoietic growth factors is a means of enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy in younger adults with AML.

Impact of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens on the occurrence of pure red cell aplasia after ABO-incompatible allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the setting of major ABO-incompatible allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is linked to the persistence of host residual plasma cells secreting antidonor isohaemagglutinins (HA) after transplantation. There are conflicting results regarding the impact of the intensity of conditioning regimen on the occurrence of PRCA after major ABO-mismatched HSCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To address this question, we compared two cases occurring after nonmyeloablative (NMA) and myeloablative (MA) HSCT and reviewed previous cases reported in the NMA setting. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We observed a delayed disappearance of antidonor HAs in the NMA setting, associated to a more prolonged period of red blood cells transfusion dependence than in the MA setting. In our case as in several others, the disappearance of antidonor HAs and resolution of PRCA were observed after reinforcement of the graft-versus-host effect (i.e. immunosuppression removal or donor leukocytes infusion).

High efficacy and safety profile of fractionated doses of Mylotarg as induction therapy in patients with relapsed acute myeloblastic leukemia: a prospective study of the alfa group.

Pivotal phase II studies in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) patients in first relapse have used gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (Mylotarg) at a dose of 9 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 14. These studies showed a 26% response rate (13% complete remission (CR) and 13% CRp (complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery)) but with high degree of hematological and liver toxicities. Based on in vitro studies showing a re-expression of CD33 antigenic sites on the cell surface of blasts cells after exposure to GO, we hypothesized that fractionated doses of GO may be efficient and better tolerated. Fifty-seven patients with AML in first relapse received GO at a dose of 3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4 and 7 for one course. Fifteen patients (26%) achieved CR and four (7%) CRp. Remission rate correlated strongly with P-glycoprotein and MRP1 activities. The median relapse-free survival was 11 months, similar for CR or CRp patients. Median duration of neutropenia < 500/microl and thrombocytopenia < 50,000/microl were, respectively, 23 and 21 days. No grade 3 or 4 liver toxicity was observed. No veno-occlusive disease occurred after GO or after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation given after GO in seven patients. Mylotarg administered in fractionated doses demonstrated an excellent efficacy/safety profile.

New findings and key questions in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Invasive aspergillosis remains the primary cause of death from infection following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Most cases occur during the second or third month after transplantation, during graft-versus-host disease or immunosuppression. Strategies for management of these cases include the development of more effective antifungals for prophylaxis, the use of biological markers to improve the early diagnosis of aspergillosis, new approaches to transplantation to reduce the risk of infection, and the emerging area of targeted cellular therapy.

Do minitransplants have minicosts? A cost comparison between myeloablative and nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a widely used, cost-intensive procedure. Although pretransplant nonmyeloablative (NMA) or reduced-intensity conditioning regimens appear very promising, prospective studies comparing this approach with the conventional myeloablative (MA) approach in specific hematologic diseases are necessary, especially in patients in whom the conventional approach is not contraindicated. Cost may be an important factor in the decision-making process. We compared the costs of MA and NMA transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We estimated 1-year resource utilization in 12 consecutive MA patients (median age: 39 years) and in 11 consecutive NMA patients (median age: 58 years) who underwent HLA-identical sibling SCT for AML. Resources care expenses were valued using the average daily rate for personnel costs, supplies, and room costs. Other data were directly collected from the patients' charts. Despite a trend for lower costs in NMA patients during the first 6 months, costs during the 6-12-month period were significantly higher after NMA due to late complications and readmissions (P=0.03). Finally, mean 1-year costs were not different in MA and NMA patients (P=0.75). Prospective studies comparing conventional and NMA approaches in homogeneous populations should include economic items.

Autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation as post-remission therapy in refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after highly intensive chemotherapy.

Post-remission options were compared in a population of 262 relapsing and refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients achieving complete remission (CR) after the same re-induction according to etoposide - mitoxantrone - cytarabine (EMA) trials. The selection of post-remission therapy depended on trial recommendations, age, performance status, and availability of an HLA-identical sibling. One hundred and thirty patients received chemotherapy consolidation courses, 50 received autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), and 43 underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), while 39 did not receive any additional therapy. The preliminary analysis identified 3 favorable prognostic factors correlated with event-free survival (EFS): M3 subtype, previous CR duration > 1 year, and transplantation. Three year EFS was 68 vs. 23% with autologous SCT and allogeneic BMT in M3 patients and, respectively, 41 vs. 20% in non-M3 patients. Three year probabilities of treatment-related mortality were 11 and 47%, respectively. A statistical model was conceived with adjustment on prognostic factors and post-remission option. In the multivariate analysis, autologous SCT appeared significantly better than allogeneic BMT (P < 0.01) or chemotherapy (P = 0.001), while allogeneic BMT was not statistically different than chemotherapy. This indicates a high treatment-related toxicity with allogeneic BMT in patients re-induced by highly intensive chemotherapy, and therefore a tendency for a better outcome with autologous SCT as post-remission treatment in those patients.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in second rather than first complete remission in selected patients with good-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Through two consecutive trials, a policy that considered allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from a sibling donor in second rather than first complete remission (CR) in selected younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21)/inv(16) (core binding factor (CBF) group) or a normal karyotype (NN group) was followed by Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) centers. The outcome of 92 of these patients in first relapse (32 CBF, 60 NN) was reviewed with the aim of validating this strategy. The presence of an FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) was retrospectively assessed in 50 patients. A total of 61 patients (66%) reached a second CR. Donor availability was an independent prognostic factor for survival in the whole patient population as well as in the CBF subset, but not in NN patients, further supporting this strategy for CBF-AMLs. In NN patients, FLT3-ITD was the main bad-prognosis factor for second CR achievement and survival, leading to consider SCT earlier, at least in FLT3-ITD patients with a donor.

Calcineurin activity as a functional index of immunosuppression after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The authors have previously shown that mononuclear cells derived from patients with resistant chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) express high calcineurin (CN) activity, suggesting that in vitro assessment of CN activity may be a useful index to estimate the degree of immunosuppression afforded by cyclosporine A (CsA). The goal of this study was to assess CN activity during the first 2 months after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) and to correlate its evolution with the occurrence of acute GVHD. METHODS: Thirty-one allogeneic SCT recipients were enrolled during a 21-month period. All received GVHD prophylaxis with CsA (2 mg/kg/day) and methotrexate (on days 1, 3, and 6). CN activity was measured before transplant, and then once weekly, for at least 2 months. RESULTS: Eighteen patients developed acute grade II or higher GVHD at a median time of 22.5 days and were treated with steroids. CN activity was significantly increased in these 18 patients when compared with 13 patients who did not develop GVHD. Analysis involving the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that acute grade II or higher GVHD can be predicted with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 54% with the use of a cutoff value of 28 pmol RII/mg proteins/min of CN activity. CONCLUSIONS: CN activity appears to be a promising therapeutic test to predict acute GVHD after allogeneic SCT. This functional assessment of the in vivo efficacy of CsA opens new insights for CsA dose adjustment-in particular, the administration of its most efficient dose instead of its maximal tolerated dose, as is currently performed.