The hospital at home in the USA: current status and future prospects.

The annual cost of hospital care services in the US has risen to over $1 trillion despite relatively worse health outcomes compared to similar nations. These trends accentuate a growing need for innovative care delivery models that reduce costs and improve outcomes. HaH-a program that provides patients acute-level hospital care at home-has made significant progress over the past two decades. Technological advancements in remote patient monitoring, wearable sensors, health information technology infrastructure, and multimodal health data processing have contributed to its rise across hospitals. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic brought HaH into the mainstream, especially in the US, with reimbursement waivers that made the model financially acceptable for hospitals and payors. However, HaH continues to face serious challenges to gain widespread adoption. In this review, we evaluate the peer-reviewed evidence and discuss the promises, challenges, and what it would take to tap into the future potential of HaH.

Is spinal height gain associated with rod orientation and the use of cross-links in magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis?

Optimal orientation for magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of rod orientation with implant-related complications (IRCs) and spinal height gains. Using an international early-onset scoliosis (EOS) database, we retrospectively reviewed 57 patients treated with dual MCGRs from May 2013 to July 2015 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcomes of interest were IRCs and left/right rod length gains and thoracic (T1-T12) and spinal (T1-S1) heights. We compared patients with two rods lengthened in the cephalad ( standard; n  = 18) versus opposite ( offset; n  = 39) directions. Groups did not differ in age, sex, BMI, duration of follow-up, EOS cause, ambulatory status, primary curve magnitude, baseline thoracic height, or number of distractions/year. We compared patients whose constructs used ≥1 cross-link (CL group; n  = 22) versus no CLs (NCL group; n  = 35), analyzing thoracic height gains per distraction ( α  = 0.05). Offset and standard groups did not differ in left or right rod length gains overall or per year or in thoracic or spinal height gain. Per distraction, the CL and NCL groups did not differ significantly in left or right rod length or thoracic or spinal height gain. Complications did not differ significantly between rod orientation groups or between CL groups. MCGR orientation and presence of cross-links were not associated with differences in rod length gain, thoracic height, spinal height, or IRCs at 2-year follow-up. Surgeons should feel comfortable using either MCGR orientation. Level of evidence: 3, retrospective.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Rebound Study: A Prospective Cohort Study to Evaluate Viral and Symptom Rebound Differences in Participants Treated With Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir Versus Untreated Controls.

BACKGROUND: The uptake of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NPR) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been limited by concerns around the rebound phenomenon despite the scarcity of evidence around its epidemiology. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the epidemiology of rebound in NPR-treated and untreated participants with acute COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We designed a prospective, observational study in which participants who tested positive for COVID-19 and were clinically eligible for NPR were recruited to be evaluated for either viral or symptom clearance and rebound. Participants were assigned to the treatment or control group based on their decision to take NPR. Following initial diagnosis, both groups were provided 12 rapid antigen tests and asked to test on a regular schedule for 16 days and answer symptom surveys. Viral rebound based on test results and COVID-19 symptom rebound based on patient-reported symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: Viral rebound incidence was 14.2% in the NPR treatment group (n = 127) and 9.3% in the control group (n = 43). Symptom rebound incidence was higher in the treatment group (18.9%) compared to controls (7.0%). There were no notable differences in viral rebound by age, gender, preexisting conditions, or major symptom groups during the acute phase or at the 1-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report suggests that rebound after clearance of test positivity or symptom resolution is higher than previously reported. However, notably we observed a similar rate of rebound in both the NPR treatment and control groups. Large studies with diverse participants and extended follow-up are needed to better understand the rebound phenomena.

Treatment of Early-onset Scoliosis: Similar Outcomes Despite Different Etiologic Subtypes in Traditional Growing Rod Graduates.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether traditional growing rod (TGR) treatment outcomes vary by early-onset scoliosis (EOS) subtype. The goal of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes and complications of TGR treatment by EOS subtype. METHODS: We queried an international database of EOS patients from 20 centers to identify "graduates" who had (1) undergone primary TGR treatment from 1993 to 2014; (2) completed TGR treatment; and (3) had an uneventful clinical examination within 6 months after completion of TGR treatment with no anticipated further intervention. We included 202 patients in 4 etiologic subgroups: neuromuscular (n=65), syndromic (n=57), idiopathic (n=52), and congenital (n=28). Mean age at surgery was 7.1 years (range, 1.6 to 14.9 y); mean duration of follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18.6 y). The groups did not differ by mean age, body mass index, sex, number of lengthenings, or duration of follow-up. The following preoperative differences were significant: (1) greater mean major curve in the neuromuscular versus idiopathic subgroup; (2) shorter spinal height (T1-S1) in the congenital versus idiopathic subgroup; and (3) smaller proportion of ambulatory patients in the neuromuscular subgroup versus all other subgroups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences among subgroups in mean major curve correction or changes in thoracic height (T1-T12), spinal height, or global kyphosis at any point. Rates of deep surgical site infection, implant-related complications, and neurological complications were not different among subgroups. The medical complication rate was significantly lower in the idiopathic group compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Major curve correction and spinal and thoracic height increases did not differ significantly at any point by EOS subtype. Rates of deep surgical site infection, implant-related complications, and neurological complications did not differ by subtype. Except for the lower rate of medical complications in the idiopathic group, our findings suggest that, after TGR treatment, patients can expect similar outcomes regardless of their EOS subtype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.

Prevalence of junctional kyphosis in early-onset scoliosis: can it be corrected at final fusion?

PURPOSE: To investigate the risk and predictive factors of junctional issues after conversion from Traditional growing rod (TGR) to definitive spinal fusion in Early-onset scoliosis (EOS). METHODS: Retrospective review of a multicenter EOS database. TGR patients who received final fusion with at least two-year follow-up were included. Proximal (PJA) and Distal junctional angles (DJA) on pre-final fusion, post-final fusion (within one year of surgery), and at latest follow-up were measured on lateral upright spinal radiographs. Differences in values among designated time points and predictive factors of junctional issues were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: Forty-six of 251 patients (28 females, 18 males and mean age at final fusion: 12 ± 2 [9-17] years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up between first postoperative measurement and latest follow-up was 49 ± 22 (24-112) months. No statistical differences in PJA and DJA values were available at pre-fusion, first post-fusion, or latest follow-up (p = 0.827, p = 0.076). Fifty percent of patients had extension of TGR instrumentation at fusion, either proximal or distal. No factor including sex and etiology, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, major curve magnitude, PJA, and DJA at pre-fusion was found to be a predictive issue for extension of index TGR instrumentation, except the history of at least one implant-related complication during the period from index surgery to the definitive fusion. CONCLUSION: PJA and DJA remained stable when transitioning from TGR to final posterior spinal fusion. But 50% of patients had extension of construction at fusion, either proximal or distal.

The role of traditional growing rods in the era of magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and radiographic profile of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGR) during the magnetically-controlled growing rod (MCGR) era. METHODS: A US multicenter EOS database was reviewed to identify (1) patients who underwent TGR after MCGR surgery was introduced at their institution, (2) patients who underwent MCGR during the same time period. Of 19 centers, 8 met criteria with all EOS etiologies represented. Clinical notes were reviewed to determine the indication for TGR. Patient demographics and pre-operative radiographs were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 25 TGR and 127 MCGR patients were identified. The TGR patients were grouped by indication into the sagittal plane profile (n = 11), trunk height (n = 6), co-morbidities/need for MRI (n = 4), and other (ex: behavioral issues, remaining growth). Four patients had a combination of sagittal profile and short stature with sagittal profile listed as primary factor. The TGR short trunk group had a mean T1-S1 length of 192 mm vs 273 mm for the MCGR group (p = 0.0002). The TGR sagittal profile group, had a mean maximal kyphosis of 61° vs 55° for the MCGR group (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: TGR continues to have a role in the MCGR era. In this study, the most commonly reported indications for TGR were sagittal plane profile and trunk height. These results suggest that TGR is indicated in patients of short stature with stiff hyperkyphotic curves. As further experience is gained with MCGR, the indications for TGR will likely be refined.

Comparing health-related quality of life and burden of care between early-onset scoliosis patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods and traditional growing rods: a multicenter study.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To compare pre-operative and post-operative EOSQ-24 scores in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and traditional growing rod (TGR) patients. Since the introduction of MCGR, early-onset scoliosis patients have been afforded a reduction in the number of surgeries compared to the TGR technique. However, little is known about (health-related quality of life) and burden of care outcomes between these surgical techniques. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using a multicenter registry on patients with EOS undergoing MCGR or TGR between 2008 and 2017. The EOSQ-24 was administered at preoperative and postoperative 2-year assessments. The EOSQ-24 scores were compared between MCGR and TGR as well as preoperatively and postoperatively within each procedure. RESULTS: 110 patients were analyzed in this study (TGR, N = 32; MCGR, N = 78). There were no significant differences in preoperative age, gender, etiology, main coronal curve or maximum kyphosis between TGR and MCGR groups. Patients with TGR had averaged 3.9 surgical lengthenings and MCGR had averaged 7.7 non-invasive lengthenings by the 2-year follow-up. When changes in preoperative to postoperative scores were compared, MCGR had more improvements in pain, emotion, child satisfaction and parent satisfaction than TGR although there were no statistical significance. When analyzed separately, MCGR cohort had improvement in scores for all four domains and four sub-domains; while, TGR cohort only had improvement in financial burden domain and pulmonary function sub-domain. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistical significance, the improvement in pain, emotion and satisfaction scores was larger in MCGR than TGR. Since these areas can be influenced more by mental well-being than other sub-domains, the results may prove our hypothesis that compared to TGR, MCGR with reduced number of surgeries have better psychosocial effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

An initial effort to define an early onset scoliosis "graduate"-The Pediatric Spine Study Group experience.

PURPOSE: Increasingly, patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) are completing a growth friendly surgical program followed by observation, removal of implants or a definitive spinal fusion. These patients are colloquially referred to as "graduates". A standardized definition of a graduate is needed for research and comparing the outcomes, family counseling, and a better understanding of the population. METHODS: A 15-question electronic survey was completed by 39 experienced pediatric spine surgeons to identify factors salient to the definition of a graduate of EOS surgical programs. A Delphi/Nominal group technique session with nine questions was then performed face-to-face with 21 members of the Pediatric Spine Study Group to discuss and refine the definition. A follow-up electronic survey was then distributed to these same 21 members to gain consensus on the final definition. RESULTS: From the initial survey, it was identified that a graduate did not require definitive spinal fusion after a growing program. From the Delphi session, it was determined that skeletal maturity was the most important factor in defining a graduate. A strictly defined minimum length of follow-up was not felt to be a prerequisite for qualification of graduation. After the final electronic version was distributed, > 80% of respondents agreed upon the final definition, thereby achieving consensus. CONCLUSION: The Pediatric Spine Study Group recommends adoption of the following definition: a "graduate" is a patient who has undergone any surgical program to treat early onset scoliosis, and has reached skeletal maturity and does not have a planned surgical intervention for EOS in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Risk Factors for Reoperation Following Final Fusion After the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis with Traditional Growing Rods.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a high rate of reoperation after final fusion following the treatment of early-onset scoliosis with use of traditional growing rods, the risk factors for reoperation are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to identify risk factors associated with the need for reoperation after final fusion for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. METHODS: A multicenter database for patients with early-onset scoliosis was retrospectively analyzed. Patients managed with traditional growing rods and final fusion were identified (n = 248). The inclusion criteria were ≥1 lengthening procedure with traditional growing rods and ≥2 years of follow-up after final fusion or revision surgery within 2 years after final fusion (167 patients; 67%). Patients requiring reoperation following final fusion were compared with patients who did not require reoperation. The data that were analyzed included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, spinal deformity characteristics, radiographic measurements, perioperative details, and complications during all stages of treatment. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up from the initial visit to the latest visit was 10.7 ± 4.1 years, and the mean duration of follow-up after final fusion was 4.9 ± 3.1 years. Thirty-two (19%) of the 167 patients required reoperation following final fusion. Curve progression requiring revision surgery during lengthening with traditional growing rods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 21.137 per event; p = 0.028), the number of levels spanned with traditional growing rods (aOR, 1.378 per level; p = 0.007), and the duration of treatment with traditional growing rods (aOR, 1.220 per year; p = 0.035) were independently associated with revision surgery after final fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Independent risk factors for curve progression requiring reoperation during lengthening with traditional growing rods that require operative intervention include increasing number of levels spanned with traditional growing rods and longer duration of treatment with traditional growing rods. These findings may help with patient counseling and potentially guide surgeon decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

MRI utilization and rates of abnormal pretreatment MRI findings in early-onset scoliosis: review of a global cohort.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review OBJECTIVES: To report the frequency of pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization and rates and types of intra-spinal abnormalities identified on MRI in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). MRI can help identify spinal cord abnormalities in patients with EOS. METHODS: We reviewed data from patients enrolled from 1993-2018 in an international EOS registry. Patients with incomplete/unverifiable data and those with spinal deformities secondary to infection or tumor were excluded, leaving 1343 patients for analysis. Demographic characteristics, pretreatment major curve magnitude, treatment type, and MRI findings were analyzed. Patients were categorized by EOS type (congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular, syndromic), pretreatment MRI utilization, and presence of intra-spinal abnormality on MRI. Univariate testing and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify demographic, radiographic, and clinical predictors of MRI utilization and abnormal MRI findings. RESULTS: MRI was used in 836 patients (62%). Pretreatment MRI utilization rates ranged from 42% in neuromuscular EOS to 74% in congenital EOS. Prevalence of abnormal MRI findings was 24% overall, ranging from 13% in patients with idiopathic EOS to 39% in neuromuscular EOS. Compared with white/Caucasian patients, Asian/Asian-American patients had higher odds of MRI utilization and abnormal MRI findings. Treatment type, pretreatment major curve magnitude, age at MRI, and age at treatment were not associated with abnormal MRI findings. Overall, 249 abnormalities were identified in 197 patients. The most common findings were syrinx and tethered cord. Syrinx with Chiari malformation was the most frequent combination of abnormal findings. CONCLUSION: In the two-thirds of patients who underwent MRI before EOS treatment, findings were abnormal in 24%. EOS type and race/ethnicity were associated with both MRI utilization and abnormal findings. The most frequent abnormalities were syrinx and tethered cord, and the type of abnormalities appeared to differ by EOS type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III.

Idiopathic Early-onset Scoliosis: Growing Rods Versus Vertically Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Ribs at 5-year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Distraction-based techniques allow spinal growth until skeletal maturity while preventing curve progression. METHODS: Two multicenter early-onset scoliosis databases were used to identify patients with idiopathic spine abnormalities treated with traditional growing rods (TGR) or vertically expandable titanium ribs (VEPTR). Patients underwent at least 4 lengthenings and had at least 5-year follow-up. Significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: In total, 50 patients treated with TGR and 22 treated with VEPTR were included. Mean (±SD) age at surgery was 5.5 (±2.0) years for the TGR group versus 4.3 (±1.9) years for the VEPTR group (P=0.044); other demographic parameters were similar. VEPTR patients had more procedures (mean 15±4.2) than TGR patients (mean 10±4.0) (P=0.001). Unilateral constructs were present in 18% (4 of 22) of VEPTR and 16% (8 of 50) of TGR patients. Bilateral constructs spanned a mean 2.1 additional surgical levels and exposed patients to 1.6 fewer procedures than unilateral constructs. Curve correction was similar between bilateral and unilateral constructs. TGR patients experienced greater curve correction (50%) than VEPTR patients (27%) (P<0.001) and achieved a greater percentage of thoracic height gain (24%) than VEPTR patients (12%) (P=0.024). At latest follow-up, TGR patients had better maintenance of curve correction, less kyphosis, and 15% greater absolute gain in thoracic height versus VEPTR patients. TGR patients had a lower rate of wound complications (14%) than VEPTR patients (41%) (P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with idiopathic early-onset scoliosis, TGRs produced greater initial curve correction, greater thoracic height gains, less kyphosis, and lower incidence of wound complications compared with VEPTR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Best Practice Guidelines for Surgical Site Infection Prevention With Surgical Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is unfortunately a commonly encountered complication in the surgical treatment of children with Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS). There is documented variation in the treatment of this patient population. Previous work building consensus for the approach to high risk patients (eg, neuromuscular etiology) has been promising. The goal of the current study is to apply similar principles to develop consensus-based guidelines for the treatment of patients with EOS. METHODS: A focus group from 2 multicenter pediatric spine deformity study groups developed a list of statements to be distributed to a larger group of EOS experts. Using the Delphi process, participants were presented with a systematic review of the literature as well as a review of current practices in growth friendly surgery. The first round was conducted using an electronic survey. Results of this survey were then discussed face-to-face and the statements were further refined. A final round was conducted using the Audience Response System, allowing participants to vote for each statement (strongly agree or agree). Agreement >80% or disagreement <20% was considered consensus. RESULTS: A total of 29 of 57 statements reached consensus. Negative statements (statements of disagreement) were excluded, so the final consensus guidelines included 22 statements. The number of statements from the previously published Best Practice Guidelines (BPG) approved for insertion and lengthening growth friendly procedures were 12 of 14 and 11 of 14, respectively. The high risk BPG therefore does not cover all of the issues specific to the EOS population, and explains why 22 statements reached consensus in the current guideline. Upon completion of the surveys, 100% of the participants agreed to support its publication. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Delphi process several "best practices" were developed for growth friendly surgical treatment of EOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Growth-Friendly Spine Surgery in Escobar Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to characterize the spinal deformity of patients with Escobar syndrome, describe results of growth-friendly treatments, and compare these results with those of an idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (EOS) cohort to determine whether the axial stiffness in Escobar syndrome limited correction. METHODS: We used 2 multicenter databases to review the records of 8 patients with EOS associated with Escobar syndrome who had at least 2-year follow-up after initiation of growth-friendly treatment from 1990 to 2016. An idiopathic EOS cohort of 16 patients matched for age at surgery (±1 y), postoperative follow-up (±1 y), and initial curve magnitude (±10 degrees) was identified. A randomized 1:2 matching algorithm was applied (α=0.05). RESULTS: In the Escobar group, spinal deformity involved 7 to 13 vertebrae and ranged from no vertebral anomalies in 3 patients to multiple segmentation defects in 6 patients. Mean age at first surgery was 5 years (range, 1.4 to 7.8 y) with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 4.0 to 10 y). Mean major curve improved from 76 degrees at initial presentation, to 43 degrees at first instrumentation, to 37 degrees at final follow-up (both P<0.001). Mean pelvic obliquity improved from 16 degrees (range, 5 to 31 degrees) preoperatively to 4 degrees (range, 0 to 8 degrees) at final follow-up (P=0.005). There were no differences in the mean percentage of major curve correction between the idiopathic EOS and Escobar groups at the immediate postoperative visit (P=0.743) or final follow-up (P=0.511). There were no differences between the cohorts in T1-S1 height at initial presentation (P=0.129) or in growth per month (P=0.211). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple congenital fusions and spinal curve deformity are common in Escobar syndrome. Despite large areas of congenital fusion, growth-friendly constructs facilitate spinal growth and improve curve correction. These results are comparable to those in idiopathic EOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-case-control study.

Surgical and Health-related Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Growing Rod "Graduates" With Severe versus Moderate Early-onset Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare surgical and quality-of-life outcomes at the end of growing rod treatment in patients with severe versus moderate early-onset scoliosis (EOS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Knowledge of the outcomes of severe EOS after growth-friendly treatment is limited because this condition is uncommon. METHODS: We identified 40 children with severe EOS (major curve ≥90°) treated with growing rods before age 10 with minimum 2-year follow-up after last lengthening or final fusion. From the same registry, we matched 40 patients with moderate EOS (major curve < 90°). Twenty-seven patients in the severe group and 12 in the moderate group underwent final fusion (P < 0.001). RESULTS: Mean preoperative curves were 102° (range, 90°-139°) in the severe group and 63° (range, 33°-88°) in the moderate group (P < 0.001). At final follow-up, mean curves were 56° (range, 10°-91°) and 36° (range, 12°-89°), respectively (P < 0.001). Fourteen (35%) children in the severe group and 32 (80%) in the moderate group had scoliosis of < 45° at final follow-up [risk ratio (RR), 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.20-0.57]. At final follow-up, 30 (75%) children in the severe group and 35 (88%) in the moderate group had achieved T1-T12 length of ≥18 cm (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.09). Thirty-five children in the severe group and 26 in the moderate group had at least one complication (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73). Mean 24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire scores were similar between groups at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Delaying surgery until the major curve has progressed beyond 90° is associated with larger residual deformity and more complications than treating at a lesser curve magnitude. Quality-of-life outcomes were similar between those with severe and moderate EOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Early Onset Scoliosis: Is there an Improvement in Quality of Life With Conversion From Traditional Growing Rods to Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods?

BACKGROUND: Modern treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) includes implantation of traditional growing rods (TGR) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) for posterior-based distraction if nonoperative treatment plans failed. The recent MCGR innovation has largely been expected to improve patient and family burden by avoiding frequent return to the operating room. At least one study has shown no HRQoL difference between TGR and MCGR, but none have specifically investigated a cohort of conversion patients whose families have experienced both. METHODS: An EOS database was queried for all patients treated with TGR, MCGR, and those converted from TGR to MCGR who had at least 1 pretreatment and 1 posttreatment HRQoL assessment (EOSQ-24). Data on demographics, diagnoses, and major curve size, as well as EOSQ-24 domain scores were studied. RESULTS: There were 156 TGR, 114 MCGR, and 32 conversion patients, with an average of 2.0 years between first and final EOSQ-24 surveys. There was no significant difference in outcome in any EOSQ-24 domain between the converts and the other 2 treatment groups. There was a significant post-op improvement in MCGR versus TGR in transfers and energy level (P=0.01; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although patient families and their surgeons may subjectively report improved HRQoL after conversion from TGR lengthenings to in-office MCGR lengthenings, these improvements were seen in transfer and fatigue domains, not burden or satisfaction. Although the EOSQ-24 is a well-validated EOS metric, it may not be sensitive enough to overcome the QoL floor-effect associated with the diagnosis itself, or perhaps the improvement in QoL must be assessed over a longer interval to assess meaningful change. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Quantifying Anesthesia Exposure in Growing Rod Treatment for Early Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Growing rod (GR) treatment for early-onset scoliosis requires repeated anesthesia exposure (AE). At a minimum, GR treatment requires AE for diagnostic imaging, index GR surgery, periodic lengthenings, and final fusion. Adjunct procedures and complication-related procedures also increase AE. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify AE in GR treatment and to establish preoperative expectations. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of 16 patients who completed GR treatment and underwent final fusion. Duration of all AE related to GR treatment for "standard" care procedures (ie, advanced imaging, index surgery, lengthenings, final fusion) and "associated" care procedures (ie, revisions, adjunctive surgical procedures, wound-related complications) were reviewed. Etiologies were classified per the classification of early-onset scoliosis. Mean total anesthesia time (TAT) was tallied and analyzed for standard care and associated care procedures. RESULTS: There were 5 syndromic, 8 neuromuscular, and 3 idiopathic patients. The mean age at the first AE event related to GR treatment was 7.4 years (range, 3.8 to 11 y). Mean age at the index GR surgery and final fusion was 8.1 years (range, 3.9 to 14.4 y) and 12.8 years (range, 9.7 to 19 y), respectively. The percentage of TAT for each procedural category was 7% for advanced imaging, 14% for index GR, 14% for lengthenings, 21% for final fusion, 27% for revisions, 9% for adjunct surgery, and 9% for wound complications. Standard care procedures accounted for 55% of TAT, whereas associated care procedures accounted for 45%. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified expected duration of AE in GR treatment. Revisions and final fusion contributed most to TAT. Given the recent controversy of repeated AE in young children, efficiency measures should be implemented to reduce AE and avoid duplication without compromising the goals of surgical treatment. Associated care procedures accounted for 45% of the total AE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Rod fracture and lengthening intervals in traditional growing rods: is there a relationship?

PURPOSE: Is there any relationship between lengthening intervals and rod fracture in traditional growing rod (TGR) surgery? METHODS: A multicenter EOS database was queried for patients who had: (1) dual growing rods for EOS; (2) minimum 2-year follow-up; (3) a minimum of 2 lengthenings; and (4) revision surgery due to rod fracture. Of 138 patients who met the criteria: 56 patients experienced at least one-rod fracture (RF group) and 82 patients had no rod fractures (NRF group). In addition to each patient's lengthening intervals, demographics, construct details, and radiographic parameters were compared. RESULTS: RF and NRF patients had a mean pre-op age of 5.7 years (range 1.3-10.7) and 7.3 years (range 1.6-12.8), respectively (p < 0.001). There was no significant association between etiologies and rod fracture or between BMI and rod fracture (p = 0.979). There was no significant difference between lengthening intervals between the RF and NRF groups (p > 0.05). RF and NRF patients had statistically similar mean pre-op major curve size and max kyphosis (p = 0.279; p = 0.619, respectively). Stainless steel rods fractured more frequently compared with Titanium rods (SS 49.2 % vs. Ti 38 %; p = 0.004). Rod fracture occurred more in rods smaller than 4 mm (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Lengthening intervals were not statistically different in RF and NRF groups and there was no association between lengthening interval and rod fracture in TGR cases. It was shown that patients who had rod fracture were younger and were more likely to have SS rods with smaller than 4 mm diameter.

Age at Initiation and Deformity Magnitude Influence Complication Rates of Surgical Treatment With Traditional Growing Rods in Early-Onset Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Multi-center retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative variables associated with postoperative complications in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGR); and to develop a model to predict the incidence of postoperative complications based on preoperative variables. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: TGRs are commonly used to treat progressive EOS. Prior research has demonstrated a high rate of postoperative complications using this technique; however, few studies have identified preoperative factors that contribute to such complications. METHODS: A total of 110 patients who initiated TGR treatment before 10 years of age and completed final treatment were identified from a multi-center database. Overall treatment effect was calculated for major curve size, thoracic kyphosis, thoracic height, and total spine height. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified preoperative predictors of complications. An algorithm was developed and validated to calculate the probability of complications based on preoperative data. RESULTS: All patients completed TGR treatment (average follow-up 8.1 years). The overall treatment effect was a significant decrease in major curve magnitude, increase in thoracic height, increase in spine height, and no significant change in thoracic kyphosis. There were 263 total complications in 87 patients (79%) resulting in 84 unplanned surgeries. The most common complications were implant-related (49%), surgical site infection (23%), medical (19%), alignment (6%), and neurologic (3%). The significant independent preoperative predictors of complications were age at implantation and preoperative thoracic kyphosis. Multivariable regression showed that age less than 7.6 years, thoracic kyphosis greater than 38 degrees, or major curve magnitude greater than 84 degrees significantly increased the probability of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier age at implantation, greater thoracic kyphosis, and larger major curves increased the probability of complications following TGR instrumentation. These findings provide a valuable tool for predicting complications that may aid in surgical planning and shared decision making with patients and their families. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Longitudinal Pilot Analysis of Radiation Exposure During the Course of Growing Rod Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the amount of ionizing radiation (IR) exposure in growing rod (GR) surgery for early-onset scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is substantial evidence of the health hazards attributed to IR exposure. However, no studies have estimated the amount of IR exposure in GR surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive single-center series of GR patients were retrospectively reviewed. Of 28 total patients, 24 had a minimum 2-year follow-up and complete records available for analysis. All spine-related IR imaging studies excluding intraoperative fluoroscopy were tabulated and IR estimated based on historical controls in millisieverts (mSv). RESULTS: Initial x-ray evaluation for scoliosis was performed at a mean age of 4.0 years (range = birth to 9.7). Mean radiographic period was 8.5 years (range = 2.2 to 19.4). There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between patient age at time of initial IR and total mean IR (p < .05). Total IR was 3.4 times greater than that of estimated background radiation (2.4 mSv per year). Mean IR before index surgery and during the first postoperative year were 22.41 mSv and 10.78 mSv, respectively. Annual IR after the first postoperative year averaged 7.02 mSv (range = 2.25 to 13.45). Patients who underwent at least one revision surgery experienced significantly higher IR than nonrevision patients (79.95 vs. 46.58 mSv; p < .05). Overall, 89% of total IR was attributed to x-rays and 11% from computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the general public, GR patients had 3.4 times more IR than the estimated background radiation for the same duration of time. Younger patients and those requiring revision surgery had significantly higher IR doses. This study underscores the importance of recognizing the amount of IR used in the management of GR patients and its potential long-term risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Final Fusion After Growing-Rod Treatment for Early Onset Scoliosis: Is It Really Final?

BACKGROUND: Final fusion is thought to be the end point for patients with early onset scoliosis following treatment with the use of growing rods. But is it? The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and cause of any reoperation after final fusion. METHODS: A multicenter database of patients with early onset scoliosis was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients treated with growing rods with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after final fusion. All reoperations were recorded. Reoperation was defined as a return to the operating room for any complication related to the final fusion surgery or etiology of the spinal deformity. RESULTS: One hundred (84%) of 119 patients met the inclusion criteria: for 38 of the patients, the etiology of scoliosis was neuromuscular; for 31, syndromic; for 22, idiopathic; and for 9, congenital. The mean age at final fusion was 12.2 years (range, 8.5 to 18.7 years). The mean follow-up after final fusion was 4.3 years (range, 2 to 11.2 years). Twenty (20%) of the patients had 30 complications requiring reoperation (57 procedures). There was a mean of 1.5 complications per patient after final fusion. Eight patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, 8 with syndromic, 4 with idiopathic, and no patient with congenital scoliosis required reoperation. Nine (9%) of the patients experienced infection (33 reoperation procedures); 6 (6%) had instrumentation failure (8 procedures); 5 (5%) had painful or prominent instrumentation (6 procedures); 3 (3%) each had coronal deformity (3 procedures), pseudarthrosis (3 procedures), or sagittal deformity (3 procedures); and 1 (1%) had progressive crankshaft chest wall deformity requiring a thoracoplasty (1 procedure). CONCLUSIONS: A higher-than-anticipated percentage of patients treated with growing rods required unplanned reoperation following final fusion. Long-term follow-up after final fusion is necessary to determine true final results. Patients and parents need to be counseled regarding the possibility of further surgery after final fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.