The impact of drug administration sequence and pharmacokinetic interaction in a phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of two administration sequences of docetaxel and gemcitabine in cancer patients, and to describe the pharmacokinetics of both drugs. Patients were treated in a 4-weekly schedule at two dose levels: gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, and docetaxel 85 or 100 mg/m2 on day 15 (levels I and II). The protocol was amended to a 3-weekly schedule, testing gemcitabine 800 or 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, with docetaxel 85 mg/m2 on day 8 given initially (dose levels IIIa and IV). At the recommended dose, an extra cohort of patients initially received gemcitabine (dose level IIIb). Eleven patients were treated with the 4-week schedule; 29% of cycles were delayed predominantly because of hematological toxicity. Four patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), predominantly hematological. In the 3-week schedule, 14 patients were treated. At level IV, three of four patients developed DLTs, defining the MTD. With the reverse sequence, three patients received a total of 10 cycles. Overall, nine partial remissions were observed. We conclude the recommended dose for phase II studies is gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, combined with docetaxel 85 mg/m2 on day 8, on a 3-weekly schedule. Gemcitabine distribution is significantly altered upon docetaxel administration.

EORTC phase II study of daily oral linomide in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with good prognostic factors.

Following a previous EORTC GU-Group study, in which linomide showed some activity in poor prognosis patients, this study was initiated to determine the effect of linomide in more favourable patients. 35 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with good prognostic factors, i.e. good performance status, prior nephrectomy, no prior systemic therapy, and no liver, bone or brain metastases, were treated with linomide, a quinoline derivative with immunomodulating properties, at a dose of 10 mg daily, after an initial dose escalation during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In 29 evaluable patients, no responses were observed (95% confidence interval 0-10%). Best overall response was no change in 9 patients, for a median duration of 4 months. Linomide in this schedule was poorly tolerated, with 17% (6 patients) of patients being withdrawn and 23% (8 patients) having dose reductions due to adverse events, mostly influenza-like symptoms of myalgia, arthralgia and fatigue. Several cases of pericarditis and neuropathy were observed. In spite of selection of favourable prognosis patients and an optimal daily dosing schedule, linomide was not an effective treatment in renal cell carcinoma. In view of toxicity and lack of efficacy, there is no rationale in further testing the drug in this disease.

Marker tumour responses to the sequential combination of intravesical therapy with mitomycin-C and BCG-RIVM in multiple superficial bladder tumours. Report from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment on Cancer-Genitourinary Group (EORTC 30897).

OBJECTIVES: To study the ablative activity of intravesical mitomycin C followed by intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) on a papillary marker tumour and to determine the incidence of side effects. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with multiple pTa or pT1 bladder tumours were treated with 4 instillations of mitomycin C at weekly intervals followed by 6 instillations at weekly intervals of BCG-RIVM. All visible tumours were resected before starting intravesical instillations except one marker tumour. Response was determined 2 weeks after the last instillation. RESULTS: The incidence of adverse effects was similar to previously reported toxicity of either mitomycin C or BCG alone. Complete response, histologically proven, was observed in 16 of 35 patients and in 3 patients without histological confirmation. One patient showed progression. CONCLUSION: The sequential combination of mitomycin C and BCG is an efficacious treatment. The measurement of response to a marker tumour is a safe and efficient method to test new drugs or combinations of drugs.