Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Whether ticagrelor in chronic coronary syndrome patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can prevent cardiovascular events is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate outcomes of complex PCI and the efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in stable patients randomized in the ALPHEUS (Assessment of Loading with the P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor or clopidogrel to Halt ischemic Events in patients Undergoing elective coronary Stenting) trial. METHODS: All PCI procedures were blindly reviewed and classified as complex if they had at least 1 of the following criteria: stent length >60 mm, 2-stent bifurcation, left main, bypass graft, chronic total occlusion, use of atherectomy or guiding catheter extensions, multiwire technique, multiple stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of type 4a or b myocardial infarction (MI) and major myocardial injury during the 48 hours after PCI. We compared the event rates according to the presence or not of complex PCI criteria and evaluated the interaction with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. RESULTS: Among the 1,866 patients randomized, 910 PCI (48.3%) were classified as complex PCI. The primary endpoint was more frequent in complex PCI (45.6% vs 26.6%; P < 0.001) driven by higher rates of type 4 MI and angiographic complications (12.2% vs 4.8 %; P < 0.001 and 19.3% vs 8.6%; P < 0.05, respectively). The composite of death, MI, and stroke at 48 hours (12.7% vs 5.1 %; P < 0.05) and at 30 days (13.4% vs 5.3%; P < 0.05) was more frequent in complex PCI. No interaction was found between PCI complexity and the randomized treatment for the primary endpoint (Pinteraction = 0.47) nor the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic coronary syndrome, patients undergoing a complex PCI have higher rates of periprocedural and cardiovascular events that are not reduced by ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel.

Safety and Efficacy of a Hybrid Approach Combining a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon With a New Generation Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With De Novo True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The use of drug-coated balloon in the management of true bifurcation lesions appears to be an attractive option to reduce the rate of stent thrombosis and restenosis particularly at the level of the side branch ostium. We aim to assess the safety and the efficacy of a hybrid approach combining a drug-eluting stent in the main branch and a drug-coated balloon to treat the side branch ostium in patients with de novo true bifurcation. METHODS: From September 2020 to March 2022, 45 patients with a de novo true bifurcation lesion Medina (1.1.1) or Medina (0.1.1) were enrolled. All patients underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with the hybrid approach. Clinical assessment with functional stress imaging test was scheduled at 6 months. In case of documented ischemia, coronary angiography was performed. The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure at 6 months including cardiac death, target vessel MI or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were technical success, defined by performing the percutaneous coronary intervention without an additional drug-eluting stent at the level of the side branch ostium, and clinical success, defined by a technical success associated with the absence of severe complications during in-hospital phase. RESULTS: The immediate results show a technical success of the procedure in the majority of cases (88.9 %) with a low rate of bailout side branch stenting (11.1 %). The clinical success was obtained in 86.7 % and only one patient experienced a severe in-hospital complication. A side branch ostial lesion length > 10 mm was the only independent predictor of clinical failure of the procedure (OR 12.49, 95 % CI 1.17-133.6; p = 0.037). At 6 months, the TLF was low and occurred in 1 patient (2.2 %). No cardiac death was observed. No TVMI was observed. Importantly, at 6 months, no side branch thrombosis was observed. CONCLUSION: The use of a hybrid approach combining a drug-eluting stent in the main branch and a drug-coated balloon in the side branch to treat true bifurcation lesions appears to be safe and efficient with few immediate complications and with satisfactory results at mid-term follow up.

ßeta blocker interruption after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomized ABYSS trial.

BACKGROUND: The long-term use of ß-blocker after myocardial infarction (MI) when global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved has not been studied in the era of modern myocardial reperfusion and secondary prevention therapies. It is unknown whether ß-blockers are useful in stable post-MI patients without reduced LVEF and without heart failure. METHODS: The Assessment of ß-blocker interruption 1 Year after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction on Safety and Symptomatic cardiac events requiring hospitalization (ABYSS) Trial enrolled in 49 centers in France, 3,700 patients with a prior (>6 months) history of MI and a LVEF >40%, chronically treated with a ß-blocker and without any major cardiovascular event (MACE) in the past 6 months. These patients were randomized to interruption or continuation of their ß-blocker therapy. The primary objective is to demonstrate the noninferiority of interruption vs continuation of the ß-blocker therapy on the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, MI, hospitalization for any cardiovascular reason at the end of follow-up (accrual follow-up) with a one-year minimum follow-up for the last randomized patient. Secondary objectives will focus on patient reported outcomes with the evaluation of the quality of life before and after randomization with the EQ5D-5L questionnaire. Enrolment has been completed. CONCLUSION: The ABYSS trial evaluates the cardiovascular safety of ß-blocker interruption in stabilized post-MI patients without heart failure nor reduced LVEF. ABYSS trial is a reappraisal of ß-blockers life-long therapy in stable post-MI patients without reduced LVEF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03498066 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Aortic valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement for root aneurysm: the CAVIAAR multicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite growing evidence that aortic valve repair improves long-term patient outcomes and quality of life, aortic valves are mostly replaced. We evaluate the effect of aortic valve repair versus replacement in patients with dystrophic aortic root aneurysm up to 4 years. METHODS: The multicentric CAVIAAR (Conservation Aortique Valvulaire dans les Insuffisances Aortiques et les Anévrismes de la Racine aortique) prospective cohort study enrolled 261 patients: 130 underwent standardized aortic valve repair (REPAIR) consisting of remodelling root repair with expansible aortic ring annuloplasty, and 131 received mechanical composite valve and graft replacement (REPLACE). Primary outcome was a composite criterion of mortality, reoperation, thromboembolic or major bleeding events, endocarditis or operating site infections, pacemaker implantation and heart failure, analysed with propensity score-weighted Cox model analysis. Secondary outcomes included major adverse valve-related events and components of primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.1 years, and valve was bicuspid in 115 patients (44.7%). Up to 4 years, REPAIR did not significantly differ from REPLACE in terms of primary outcome [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.66 (0.39; 1.12)] but showed significantly less valve-related deaths (HR 0.09 [0.02; 0.34]) and major bleeding events (HR 0.37 [0.16; 0.85]) without an increased risk of valve-related reoperation (HR 2.10 [0.64; 6.96]). When accounting for the occurrence of multiple events in a single patient, the REPAIR group had half the occurrence of major adverse valve-related events (HR 0.51 [0.31; 0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary outcome did not significantly differ between the REPAIR and REPLACE groups, the trend is in favour of REPAIR by a significant reduction of valve-related deaths and major bleeding events. Long-term follow-up beyond 4 years is needed to confirm these findings.

Early and late ventricular arrhythmias complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias can be life-threatening complications of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). AIMS: To describe the incidence, predictors and in-hospital impact of early ventricular arrhythmia (EVA, occurring

Sudden Cardiac Death Following Thrombolysis in a Young Woman with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a well-known cause of acute coronary syndrome. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most common presentation of SCAD, which can be complicated by sudden cardiac death (SCD). Conservative management is the cornerstone of treatment except in case of ongoing ischemia or large myocardial compromise. CASE REPORT A 34-year-old woman presented with an anterior STEMI, diagnosed by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) team, which performed fibrinolysis. SCD resulting from ventricular fibrillation occurred soon after thrombolysis was started. Her pulsed was palpable following defibrillation, and she was immediately intubated. A coronary angiogram (CA) showed total occlusion with dye staining contrast of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Echocardiogram showed a severe drop in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 20%). She was treated with dobutamine and intra-aortic balloon pump implantation because of her poor hemodynamic status. Rescue angioplasty was performed with a drug-eluting stent implanted from the left main stem toward the proximal LAD. However, she developed hemorrhagic shock due to active liver bleeding that was surgically treated. At 3 months, she was asymptomatic, her LVEF had improved (45%), and elective CA showed quite normal coronary arteries. Optical coherence tomography showed residual hematoma as "lunar crescent" and stent under-expansion. The latter was fixed by post-dilatations. CONCLUSIONS Our case adds to the evidence that thrombolysis leads to poor outcomes in patients with SCAD, as reported in numerous reports. OCT was used to confirm, a posteriori, the diagnosis of SCAD. Rescue angioplasty was necessary in our patient due to poor hemodynamic status following unsuccessful fibrinolysis.

On- Versus Off-Hours Presentation and Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess the association between admission time with patient's care, procedure characteristics, and clinical outcomes within a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network of patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The effect of admission time on STEMI patient's outcomes remains controversial when primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy. METHODS: Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 2,167 consecutive STEMI patients admitted in a tertiary PCI-capable center were collected. On-hours were defined as admission from Monday through Friday between 8 am and 6 pm and off-hours as admission during night shift, weekend, and nonworking holidays. In-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality were assessed as well as key time delays. RESULTS: A total of 1,048 patients (48.3%) were admitted during on-hours, and 1,119 patients (51.7%) during off-hours. Characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups, including rates of cardiac arrest (7.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.55) and cardiogenic shock (12.3% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.16). Median symptom-to-first medical contact time and median first medical contact-to-sheath insertion time did not differ according to on- versus off-hours admission (120 min vs. 126 min; p = 0.25 and 90 min vs. 93 min; p = 0.58, respectively), as well as the rate of radial access for catheterization (85.6% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.27). There was no association between on- versus off-hours groups and in-hospital (8.1% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.49) or 1-year mortality (11.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.89), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary organized STEMI network, patients admitted in a high-volume tertiary primary PCI center during on-hours or off-hours had similar management and 1-year outcomes.

Long-Term Evolution of Premature Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: The long-term evolution of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the evolution of coronary atherosclerosis in young patients and identify the risk factors of poor outcomes. METHODS: Participants age ≤45 years with acute or stable obstructive CAD were prospectively enrolled and followed. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), refractory angina requiring coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Eight hundred-eighty patients with premature CAD were included. They were age 40.1 ± 5.7 years, mainly men, smokers, with a family history of CAD or hypercholesterolemia. At baseline presentation, 91.2% underwent coronary revascularization, predominantly for acute MI (78.8%). Over a follow-up of 20 years, one-third (n = 264) of patients presented with a total of 399 ischemic events, and 36% had at least a second recurrent event. MI was the most frequent first recurrent event (n = 131 of 264), mostly related to new coronary lesions (17.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.01; hazard ratio [HR]:1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.93 for new vs. initial culprit lesion). All-cause death (n = 55; 6.3%) occurred at 8.4 years (median time). Ethnic origin (sub-Saharan African vs. Caucasian, adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR]: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.13 to 3.35; p = 0.02), inflammatory disease (adjHR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.36; p = 0.03), and persistent smoking (adjHR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.63 to 3.28; p < 0.01) were the strongest correlates of a first recurrent event. When considering all recurrent events, the same factors and Asian ethnicity predicted poor outcome, but persistent smoking had the greatest impact on prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Premature CAD is an aggressive disease despite the currently recommended prevention measures, with high rates of recurrent events and mortality. Ethnicity and concomitant inflammatory disease are associated with poor prognoses, along with insufficient control of risk factors.

Intravenous Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Elderly Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the Randomized ATOLL Trial.

Elderly (≥75 years old) patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have higher ischemic and bleeding risk compared with those <75 years old. We investigated the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) enoxaparin versus IV unfractionated heparin (UFH) in elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. A prespecified analysis of the Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Angioplasty and Intravenous Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin to Lower Ischemic and Bleeding Events at Short- and Long-term Follow-up (ATOLL) study was performed examining the 30-day outcomes in the elderly patients. Of the 165 elderly patients in the ATOLL study, 85 patients received IV enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg and 80 patients received IV UFH. Intravenous enoxaparin did not reduce the primary end point, the main secondary efficacy end point, major bleeding, major or minor bleeding, and all-cause mortality compared with IV UFH. The rate of minor bleeding (5.9% vs 22.8%, P adjusted = .01) was significantly lower with IV enoxaparin compared with IV UFH. Intravenous enoxaparin appears to be a safe alternative to IV UFH in primary PCI of the elderly patients with STEMI.

Point-of-care genetic profiling and/or platelet function testing in acute coronary syndrome.

Our aim was to demonstrate that the sequential use of the Verigene® rapid CYP2C19 test for genetic profiling and the VerifyNowTM bedside test for platelet function measurement in ACS patients may optimise P2Y12 inhibition. "Rapid" (CYP2C19*1/*1 or CYP2C19*17 carriers, n=211) and "slow" metabolisers (CYP2C19*2 carriers, n=58) were first put on clopidogrel and prasugrel for ≥ 2 weeks, respectively. Patients with low platelet reactivity (PRU<30) on prasugrel or high platelet reactivity (>208 PRU) on clopidogrel were then switched to clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively. Our objectives were (i) to demonstrate that the proportion of "rapid" metabolisers on 75 mg of clopidogrel within 30-208 (PRU) of P2Y12 inhibition is non-inferior to "slow" metabolisers on prasugrel 10 mg and (ii) to evaluate the same end-point after switching drugs. The proportion of "rapid" and "slow" metabolisers within 30-208 PRU of P2Y12 inhibition was 71% and 56.9%, respectively, an absolute difference of +14.1% (95% CI, -0.05% to 28.28%) with a non-inferiority margin greater than the predefined margin of -10%. Among patients out of target, all but one "slow" metabolisers displayed low-on prasugrel platelet reactivity while the majority of "rapid" metabolisers (68%) displayed high-on clopidogrel platelet reactivity. After switching, the proportion of patients within 30-208 PRU of P2Y12 inhibition was 83.6% and 79.3% in "rapid" and "slow" metabolisers, respectively (+4.3%, 95% CI -7.3% to 15.9%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates a loose relationship between genotype and platelet function phenotype approaches but that they are complementary to select prasugrel or clopidogrel MD in stented ACS patients.

Incidence, diagnostic methods, and evolution of left ventricular thrombus in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and low left ventricular ejection fraction: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the incidence and evolution of left ventricular (LV) thrombi in a high-risk population of patients with LV systolic dysfunction after anterior myocardial infarction (ant-MI). We also compared the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-delayed enhancement (CMR-DE) in detecting LV thrombi. METHODS: We prospectively included 100 consecutive patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <45% at the first TTE performed <7 days after ant-MI. A second evaluation with TTE and CMR-DE (by blinded examiners) was performed at 30 days. A third TTE and assessment of clinical status were performed between 6 and 12 months after ant-MI. RESULTS: Patients (males 71%; mean age 59.1 ± 12.1 years; mean LVEF 33.5% ± 6.0%) were included at a median of 5.5 days (interquartile range 25th-75th percentile 4.25-6.0 days) after ant-MI. Thrombi were detected among 26 (26%) patients at a median of 12.0 days after ant-MI (7 patients at 1-7 days after MI; 15 at 8-30 days; and 4 after day 30). Sensitivity and specificity for LV thrombi detection were 94.7% and 98.5%, respectively, for TTE as compared with CMR-DE. Most thrombi (n = 24; 92.3%) disappeared after triple antithrombotic therapy (vitamin K antagonist in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular thrombus is a frequent complication after ant-MI with systolic dysfunction. When a search for thrombus is prespecified, the accuracy of TTE is high as compared with CMR-DE. The best antithrombotic strategy is not known.

Impact of renal failure on all-cause mortality and other outcomes in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal failure (RF) have been systematically excluded from clinical trials; consequently their outcomes have not been well studied in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: To compare cardiovascular outcomes after contemporary PCI in patients with versus without RF, according to clinical presentation (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], acute coronary syndrome [ACS] or stable coronary artery disease [sCAD]). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with stent were prospectively included from 2007 to 2012. RF was defined as creatinine clearance<60mL/min. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and target lesion revascularization [TLR]), TLR and Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year. RESULTS: Among 5337 patients, 23% had PCI for STEMI, 34% for ACS and 43% for sCAD, while 27% had RF. RF patients had a higher unadjusted death rate than those with preserved renal function (nRF) in all PCI indication groups (STEMI, 41% vs. 7.5%; ACS, 19% vs. 6%; sCAD, 10% vs. 3%; P<0.0001 for all). The rate of MACCE was also higher in RF patients whatever the PCI indication (STEMI, 45% vs. 15%; ACS, 23% vs. 14%; sCAD, 14% vs. 9%; P<0.05 for all). Rates of TLR (5.5-7.4%) and ST (<2.5%) were similar (P>0.05 for both). sCAD-RF and STEMI-nRF patients had similar rates of mortality (P=0.209) and MACCE (P=0.658). RF was independently associated with mortality, with a doubled relative risk in STEMI versus ACS and sCAD groups (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 3.627-7.821 vs. 2.1, 1.465-3.140 and 2.3, 1.507-3.469, respectively; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: RF is a stronger independent predictor of death after PCI in STEMI than in ACS or sCAD patients. sCAD-RF and STEMI-nRF patients had similar prognoses.

Platelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that ticagrelor 90mg twice daily provides stronger platelet inhibition than prasugrel 10mg once daily in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily and prasugrel 10mg once daily on platelet reactivity in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), using: the VerifyNow(®) P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) assay, expressed in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU); measurement of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI; %); and light transmission aggregometry (LTA), expressed as residual platelet aggregation (RPA; %). METHODS: Platelet reactivity was evaluated prospectively using the three assays 30 days after primary PCI in 118 patients with STEMI on a maintenance dose of prasugrel 10mg once daily (n=60) or ticagrelor 90mg twice daily (n=58). RESULTS: On-treatment platelet reactivity, assessed by the VN-P2Y12 assay, was lower for ticagrelor compared with prasugrel (20.91 ± 4.59 PRU vs. 43.50±6.98 PRU; P=0.008) but was not significantly different when using the more specific VASP-PRI assay (13.05 ± 1.61% vs. 17.44 ± 1.97%; P=0.09) or RPA assessed by LTA (10.49 ± 1.44% vs. 7.20 ± 1.27%; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in platelet reactivity between ticagrelor and prasugrel varies according to the platelet function test in patients with STEMI. The differences observed may be related more to the tests than to the drugs used.

TIA Caused by Contrast Echocardiography in Patient with Platypnea-Orthodeoxia.

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (POS) is a rare clinical disorder characterized by dyspnea caused by the upright position and relieved at recumbent position. Few cases of POS and stroke were reported in literature, and the association between stroke and POS with evidence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is rare. Stroke may occur in patients with cardiac shunt who undergo contrast echocardiography. We present a patient with POS who experienced transitory ischemic attack (TIA) most likely caused by injection of agitated saline microbubbles during screen for PFO. No case report of TIA/stroke during contrast echocardiography in patients with POS has previously been published.

Sex-related differences after contemporary primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Whether outcomes differ for women and men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains controversial. AIM: To compare 1-year outcomes after primary PCI in women and men with STEMI, matched for age and diabetes. METHODS: Consecutive women with STEMI of<24 hours' duration referred (August 2007 to January 2011) for primary PCI were compared with men matched for age and diabetes. Rates of all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (death/myocardial infarction/stroke) were assessed at 1 year. RESULTS: Among 775 consecutive patients, 182 (23.5%) women were compared with 182 matched men. Mean age was 69±15 years, 18% had diabetes. Patient characteristics were similar, except for lower creatinine clearance (73±41 vs 82±38 µmol/L; P=0.041), more cardiogenic shock (14.8% vs 6.6%; P=0.017) and less radial PCI (81.3% vs 90.1%; P=0.024) in women. Rates of 1-year death (22.7% vs 18.1%), TVR (8.3% vs 6.0%) and MACCE (24.3% vs 20.9%) were not statistically different in women (P>0.05 for all). After exclusion of patients with shock (10.7%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (6.6%), death rates were even more similar (11.3% vs 11.8%; P=0.10). Female sex was not independently associated with death (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.87; P=0.97). CONCLUSION: In our consecutive unselected patient population, women had similar 1-year outcomes to men matched for age and diabetes, after contemporary primary PCI for STEMI, despite having a higher risk profile at baseline.

Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial.

CONTEXT: International guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but the optimal timing of intervention is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether immediate intervention on admission can result in a reduction of myocardial infarction compared with a delayed intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Angioplasty to Blunt the Rise of Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized for an Immediate or Delayed Intervention (ABOARD) study, a randomized clinical trial that assigned, from August 2006 through September 2008 at 13 centers in France, 352 patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 3 or more to receive intervention either immediately or on the next working day (between 8 and 60 hours after enrollment). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the peak troponin value during hospitalization; the key secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Time from randomization to sheath insertion was 70 minutes with immediate intervention vs 21 hours with delayed intervention. The primary end point did not differ between the 2 strategies (median [interquartile range] troponin I value, 2.1 [0.3-7.1] ng/mL vs 1.7 [0.3-7.2] ng/mL in the immediate and delayed intervention groups, respectively; P = .70). The key secondary end point was observed in 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.6%-18.8%) of the group assigned to receive immediate intervention and 10.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.7%-14.6%) of the group assigned to receive delayed intervention (P = .31). The other end points, as well as major bleeding, did not differ between the 2 strategies. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, a strategy of immediate intervention compared with a strategy of intervention deferred to the next working day (mean, 21 hours) did not result in a difference in myocardial infarction as defined by peak troponin level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442949.

Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin have become the mainstay oral antiplatelet regimen to prevent recurrent ischaemic events after acute coronary syndromes or stent placement. The frequent genetic functional variant 681 G>A (*2) of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is an important contributor to the wide variability between individuals of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. We assessed whether the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism affected long-term prognosis of patients who were chronically treated with clopidogrel. METHODS: Between April 1, 1996, and April 1, 2008, 259 young patients (aged <45 years) who survived a first myocardial infarction and were exposed to clopidogrel treatment for at least a month, were enrolled in a multicentre registry and underwent CYP2C19*2 determination. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent coronary revascularisation occurring during exposure to clopidogrel. Follow-up was every 6 months. The key secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis proven by angiography. FINDINGS: Median clopidogrel exposure time was 1.07 years (IQR 0.28-3.0). Baseline characteristics were balanced between carriers (heterozygous *1/*2, n=64; homozygous *2/*2, n=9) and non-carriers (n=186) of CYP2C19*2 variant. The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in carriers than in non-carriers (15 vs 11 events; hazard ratio [HR] 3.69 [95% CI 1.69-8.05], p=0.0005), as did stent thrombosis (eight vs four events; HR 6.02 [1.81-20.04], p=0.0009). The detrimental effect of the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant persisted from 6 months after clopidogrel initiation up to the end of follow-up (HR 3.00 [1.27-7.10], p=0.009). After multivariable analysis, the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant was the only independent predictor of cardiovascular events (HR 4.04 [1.81-9.02], p=0.0006). INTERPRETATION: The CYP2C19*2 genetic variant is a major determinant of prognosis in young patients who are receiving clopidogrel treatment after myocardial infarction.

Feasibility of outpatient coronary angiography with "ad hoc" angioplasty.

To assess the feasibility and safety of coronary angiography combined, where necessary, with ad hoc angioplasty in an outpatient setting; a prospective, single-center study. The first 172 patients (154 men, 59 +/- 11 years) considered at low risk for complications were enrolled for outpatient-coronary angiography with or without angioplasty via a radial approach. The inclusion criteria were clinical, not based on angiography. After angiography/angioplasty, creatinine and troponin were assayed (outside the hospital) within 24h and patients were telephoned and asked about their clinical condition. Angioplasty was performed in 69 (40%) patients and 130 patients (75.6%) were discharged on the same day. In the angioplasty group, a history of coronary dilatation was more common in patients discharged on the same day (p = 0.05), whereas bifurcation lesions were more frequent in subjects who were kept in hospital (p < 0.0001). No serious complications occurred during the study. Of the 42/172 prolonged hospitalizations, eight were due to minor procedural complications, five due to failure of the radial route and three for indications for bypass surgery; the others were kept in for reasons unrelated to a complication (e.g., the examination was performed late in the day, a particularly complex procedure, etc.). Four (3%) of the 24-hour telephone calls led to a visit, but not hospital admission. Overall, performing angiography and "ad hoc" angioplasty in the course of a single outpatient visit makes it possible to foreshorten the hospital stay and increase patient throughput with a given hospital capacity and, this, without increasing clinical risk. Exactly how these patients are selected remains to be defined and may certainly be improved compared to this initial experiment. An outpatient-coronary angiography and ad hoc angioplasty strategy is a viable option with a low risk for patients selected on the basis of simple clinical criteria. It combines the advantages of increased convenience for the patient and lower costs.

[Anti-thrombotic therapy of acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation]. / Traitement antithrombotique des syndromes coronariens aigus sans sus-décalage de ST.

Unstable angina is the most frequent acute coronary syndrome. Risk stratification to predict coronary morbidity and mortality and the risk of major hemorrhage is the key element of the medical approach. Combined antithrombotic therapy (including aspirin, clopidogrel, low-molecular-weight heparin and, possibly, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists) has led to a substantial reduction in major coronary events; tolerance is good because the treatment is brief and aggressive. Combined antithrombotic therapy also increases the benefit of early invasive strategies including coronary angiogram with stent-based percutaneous coronary angioplasty.