Developing a model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia: A Delphi study.

AIM: To develop a nurse-led model of analgesia to manage post-operative pain in the surgical neonate. DESIGN: A four-round e-Delphi study was conducted from March to December 2022. METHODS: An e-Delphi method was used seeking a consensus of 70% or greater. Fifty-one experts were invited to join the panel. Members consisted of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals who work in areas associated with neonatal care. In round 1, 49 statements relative to neonatal pain assessment and management were distributed to the panel. Panel members were asked to rate their level of agreeance on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Ratings equal to or greater than 4 represented agreement, 3 indicated uncertainty and 2 or less disagreement with the proposed statement. An opportunity for free-text responses after each statement was provided. This iterative process continued for three rounds. In the fourth and final round, the completed model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia was presented along with a further opportunity to provide feedback on the final version. RESULTS: Four rounds of statements and voting were required to reach consensus on a model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia. The model consists of criteria for use, over-arching guidelines and three separate pathways based on an individual baby's pain assessment scores, need for pain relieving interventions and time-lapsed post-surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia, applicable to the Australasian context, was developed in collaboration with a group of neonatal experts. IMPACT: This study provides a multi-modal family-integrated model to manage neonatal post-operative pain. By providing nurses with increased autonomy to assess and manage acute pain, this model has the potential to not only provide a more responsive and individualized approach to alleviate discomfort, but highlights the integral role of parent partnerships in the neonatal intensive care. REPORTING METHOD: This study was reported in line with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDE) guidance on Delphi studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was utilized for this study.

Consent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students: A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: While consent is an integral part of respectful maternity care, how this is obtained during labour and birth presents conflicting understandings between midwives' and women's experiences. Midwifery students are well placed to observe interactions between women and midwives during the consent process. AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore the observations and experiences of final year midwifery students of how midwives obtain consent during labour and birth. METHODS: An online survey was distributed via universities and social media to final year midwifery students across Australia. Likert scale questions based on the principles of informed consent (indications, outcomes, risks, alternatives, and voluntariness) were posed for intrapartum care in general and for specific clinical procedures. Students could also record verbal descriptions of their observations via the survey app. Recorded responses were analysed thematically. FINDINGS: 225 students responded with 195 completed surveys; 20 students provided audio recorded data. Student's observations suggested that the consent process varied considerably depending on the clinical procedure. Discussions of risks and alternatives during labour were frequently omitted. DISCUSSION: The student's accounts suggest that in many instances during labour and birth the principles of informed consent are not being applied consistently. Presenting interventions as routine care subverted choice for women in favour of the midwives' preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Consent during labour and birth is invalidated by a lack of disclosure of risks and alternatives. Health and education institutions should include information in guidelines, theoretical and practice training on minimum consent standards for specific procedures inclusive of risks and alternatives.

The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Many women use pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain management (NPPM) during childbirth, however, evidence shows the usage rates of pharmacological pain management are increasing. The shift towards a biomedical approach to birth care opposes the enduring midwifery philosophy of trusting the woman and her body. Identifying midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards perceived and actual barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option will provide insight into the factors that affect this. METHODS: This review of the literature sought to understand midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Peer-reviewed journals were searched for primary research that met the inclusion criteria and explored midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Included studies were evaluated for quality according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. RESULTS: Thirteen qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria and four main themes of barriers to midwives offering NPPM emerged: health system-related, health facility-related, health practitioner-related, and health consumer-related barriers. CONCLUSIONS: The review of the literature highlighted there are barriers that prevent or delay the initial utilization of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in labor by midwives. These findings can be used as a platform to inform further research into this topic.

Nursing and midwifery students' perspectives of using digital systems on placement: A qualitative study.

AIM: To explore undergraduate nursing and midwifery student perspectives of using digital patient systems on clinical placements. DESIGN: This was an interpretative qualitative design study. METHODS: Undergraduate nursing and midwifery students in a large Australian metropolitan university were invited to participate in two focus groups from April to June 2019. Twenty (20) students participated and data on their perspective of using digital systems on placement were collected. Thematic analysis using NVivo 12 software was undertaken. FINDINGS: Students identified benefits and challenges when moving between paper records and digital systems. Whilst paper reporting was more efficient for some processes, the students recognised the advantages of digital technology, such as enabling greater confidentiality and consolidation of patient data in one place. However, they also reported difficulty with student access and the size of the portal digital workstation at the bedside. Generally, the lack of preparation and access was considered frustrating and mitigated some of the benefits described when using digital systems. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing and midwifery students prefer to be prepared for both paper and digital record keeping. Whilst students identify the benefits of digital platforms, not having direct access mitigates the benefits of these systems. Students identified the use of simulation and interactive modules prior to commencement of clinical practice to enable them to feel more confident with using the systems in patient care. IMPACT: Health care students require direct access to digital health platforms whilst on clinical placement to facilitate their learning. Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are in a unique position to work with health care providers to better prepare health care professionals, including nurses and midwives, to work with digital health care systems. Further research is needed to develop the educational preparation for nurses, midwives, and other health care professionals to work with digital systems in practice.

Safety and effectiveness of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia in neonates: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the safety and effectiveness of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia on neonatal patient outcomes. More specifically, the objective was to determine the effect of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia on neonatal pain scores, analgesic use, and incidence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, as well as any opioid-associated adverse events. INTRODUCTION: Despite recent innovations in neonatology leading to significant improvements in short- and long-term outcomes for newborns requiring intensive care, optimal management of pain and distress remains a challenge for the multidisciplinary treatment team. The inability of neonates to communicate pain easily, inconsistent practice among health professionals, insufficient analgesic prescriptions, and delays in medical reviews all impact effective pain management. Exploring the effect of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia may identify a modality that negates these concerns and improves the pharmacological management of pain in newborns. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review considered experimental and observational studies evaluating the safety and effectiveness of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia that included babies born at 23 weeks' gestation to four weeks post-term. The interventions considered for inclusion were any type of analgesia delivered by an infusion pump that allowed bolus dosing or a continuous analgesic infusion with bolus dosing as required. Studies using algorithms and protocols to guide timing and dosage were eligible for inclusion. Comparators included the standard management of pain for neonates in the newborn intensive care unit. A modification to the a priori protocol was made to include all neonates nursed outside of a neonatal intensive care unit to ensure all studies that examined the use of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia in the neonatal population were included in the review. METHODS: An extensive search of six major databases was conducted (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science). Studies published from 1997 to 2020 in English were considered for inclusion in this review. Databases searched for unpublished studies included MedNar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this review: two randomized controlled trials, six quasi-experimental studies, one case-control study, and five case series. There was considerable heterogeneity in the interventions and study outcome measures within the studies, resulting in an inability to statistically pool results. The small sample sizes and inability to distinguish data specific to neonates in six of the studies resulted in low quality of evidence for the safety and effectiveness of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia in neonates. However, studies reporting neonatal data demonstrated low pain scores and a trend in reduced opioid consumption when parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia was used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia in the neonatal population has shown some effect in reducing the amount of opioid analgesia required without compromising pain relief or increasing the risk of adverse events. Due to the paucity of evidence available, certainty of the results is compromised; therefore, larger trials exploring the use of parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia in neonates and the development of nurse-led models for analgesia delivery are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018114382.

A literature review to determine midwifery students' perceived essential qualities of preceptors to increase confidence and competence in the clinical environment.

BACKGROUND: Midwifery students' experiences with preceptors in the clinical environment plays an integral role in developing the confidence and competence of students. As up to 50% of the midwifery program is taught in the clinical environment, an analysis of the preceptorship role in the context of midwifery student confidence and competence may be important to inform future practice and policy. AIM: To discover, whilst on clinical placement, what is required by preceptors to suitably equip midwifery students to develop confidence and competence in the clinical environment. METHODS: A search of the literature was undertaken using health and midwifery related electronic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Intermid, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Grey literature, and reference lists from studies were also part of the thorough search process. FINDINGS: After critical reading of the 15 included studies, there were a number of themes identified as the preceptor qualities that contributed to student confidence and competence. Those themes include 'belongingness', 'hands on experience/skill development', 'students' development of professional identity' and 'preceptor characteristics that impact student learning'. DISCUSSION: Student confidence and competence can be dependent on the preceptor who supports them. There are preceptors who enable students to flourish in their confidence and competence, and there also appears to be preceptors who do not possess these qualities, which requires further enquiry. CONCLUSION: As the evidence appears to find that trained preceptors are optimal for student confidence and competence, further enquiry is warranted to inform policy and practice around the concept of preceptorship training for midwives.

Health care students experience of using digital technology in patient care: A scoping review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how undergraduate health care students use digital technology to deliver patient care during their clinical placements. DESIGN: A scoping review of primary research was conducted using the extended PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A subject specialist librarian assisted in searching for the academic literature in four electronic databases: CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and ERIC. REVIEW METHODS: Four reviewers, working in pairs, independently reviewed a total of 332 potentially relevant articles according to set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, all included papers underwent an independent quality review by two reviewers. RESULTS: Seven studies involving medical or nursing/midwifery students were included in the review. Three studies evaluated the use of mobile learning devices in patient care with four studies evaluating the use of digital systems in practice. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, which used differing digital systems and instruments, the researchers decided the most suitable method of analysis was a narrative review. The results are explained using four key themes: student learning needs when using technology in practice; access to technology in placements; perceptions of using technology in placements; and impact of technology on patient care. CONCLUSION: The use of digital systems in clinical settings creates challenges and benefits to student learning in delivering patient care. When students are prepared and facilitated to use digital systems, a sense of confidence and belonging to the team is fostered. Lack of availability and access to these systems, however, may impede students' ability to be involved in all aspects of patient care. Limitations of the current review included the relatively low quality of the educational research being conducted in this field of research. Further quality research is needed to explore how students in the health care professions are supported in digital environments and how higher education institutions are adapting their curricula to meet the digital learning needs of health care students.

Using simulation to teach undergraduate nursing and midwifery students research design.

Whilst it is widely accepted that the ability to critique, interpret and integrate research is an integral part of the evidence-based practice of nursing and midwifery, teaching such skills to undergraduate students is equally recognised as challenging. From a student's perspective the theoretical aspects, concepts and language of research design may seem far removed from the imperative of developing skills and gaining clinical experience. Simulation has been widely demonstrated as an effective pedagogical approach to engage students in learning and developing practical skills. The 'hands-on' approach provides a cognitive link between theory and practice that is immediately relevant to the student. Simulation training has also been used in other areas of healthcare such as communication and ethics. However, the use of simulation to demonstrate the theoretical and practical aspects of research design to midwifery and nursing students has not been explored. This paper describes a novel approach to teaching undergraduate students fundamental concepts of randomised controlled trial design through their participation in a simulated research trial. Students experienced aspects such as consent, randomisation, intervention, data collection, analysis and interpretation. Post workshop evaluations suggest that students found the approach engaging, increased their knowledge and understanding of research and evidenced-based practice.

A review of interventions to prevent Type 2 Diabetes after Gestational Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy is a risk factor for the development of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) within 15 years, and prevention programmes have been problematic. QUESTION: The aim of the study is to identify effective strategies and programmes to decrease the risk of T2DM in women who experience GDM, the barriers to participation, and the opportunities for midwives to assist women in prevention. METHODS: English language, peer reviewed and professional literature published between 1998 and 2013 were searched. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken, included studies were then appraised for quality and finally findings of the studies were thematically analysed. FINDINGS: This review identified that there are interventions that are effective, however most lifestyle changes are difficult to translate into everyday life. As the incidence of GDM is expected to rise, midwives' role in promoting long-term health behaviours requires further review. CONCLUSIONS: Women need to overcome barriers and be supported in making the behavioural changes necessary to prevent T2DM following GDM. Midwives as the primary carers for women in pregnancy and childbirth are ideally positioned to educate women and engage them in lifestyle and behaviour programmes that prevent the onset of Type 2 Diabetes.

An interpretive review of women's experiences of gestational diabetes mellitus: proposing a framework to enhance midwifery assessment.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects almost 5% of pregnancies in Australia, and within 15 years, 25% of affected women will go on to develop Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The adoption of preventive health behaviours may be influenced by women's experiences of GDM. QUESTION: This review sought to understand women's beliefs, values, perceptions and experiences following diagnosis of GDM. METHODS: Peer reviewed and professional journals were searched for primary research, published between January 1991 and December 2011 that explored the beliefs, values, perceptions and experiences of peripartum or postpartum women with a diagnosis or history of GDM. FINDINGS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and the majority of these studies were qualitative (n=15). Each study was reviewed and synthesis revealed three emergent themes and core concepts related to each theme: Responses (initial reaction to GDM diagnosis, negative thoughts following diagnosis, struggle to manage GDM, feelings of 'loss of control', changes to identity and adapting to change), Focus of Concern (concern for baby's health, mother's concern for her own health, perceived seriousness of GDM, perceived fear of T2DM) and Influencing Factors (cultural roles and beliefs, social stigmas, social support, professional support, adequate and appropriate information, social roles and barriers to self-care). CONCLUSION: The experiences of women with GDM are unique and personal however this review highlights common experiences evident in the existing research. The proposed framework may be used by midwives in clinical assessment and care of women diagnosed with GDM.

Pilot study of an individualised early postpartum intervention to increase physical activity in women with previous gestational diabetes.

Optimal strategies to prevent progression towards overt diabetes in women with recent gestational diabetes remain ill defined. We report a pilot study of a convenient, home based exercise program with telephone support, suited to the early post-partum period. Twenty eight women with recent gestational diabetes were enrolled at six weeks post-partum into a 12 week randomised controlled trial of Usual Care (n = 13) versus Supported Care (individualised exercise program with regular telephone support; n = 15). Baseline characteristics (Mean ± SD) were: Age 33 ± 4 years; Weight 80 ± 20 kg and Body Mass Index (BMI) 30.0 ± 9.7 kg/m(2). The primary outcome, planned physical activity {Median (Range)}, increased by 60 (0-540) mins/week in the SC group versus 0 (0-580) mins/week in the UC group (P = 0.234). Walking was the predominant physical activity. Body weight, BMI, waist circumference, % body fat, fasting glucose and insulin did not change significantly over time in either group. This intervention designed to increase physical activity in post-partum women with previous gestational diabetes proved feasible. However, no measurable improvement in metabolic or biometric parameters was observed over a three month period.

Antenatal screening and predicting hypertension in pregnancy for midwives.

BACKGROUND: The cause of hypertension in pregnancy remains unknown and results in increased risk of complications for mother and baby. Symptoms of developing pre-eclampsia, such as an elevated blood pressure, can be vague and singular. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate research investigating antenatal screening practices for hypertension which fall within the midwives scope of practice. METHOD: Inclusion criteria for this literature review were English language, peer reviewed primary research journal articles, published in the previous 20 years where the population under study was pregnant with reported outcomes of prevention, screening or prediction of hypertension in pregnancy. A large number of papers (n=201) were identified and these were screened and subsequently excluded if they addressed diagnostic testing, screening and interpretation that depended solely on a medical practitioner. RESULTS: There was no single predictive factor found, however the relevant papers included in this review (n=33) found evidence of modifiable, non-modifiable and clinical assessment factors for inclusion in a midwifery screening model. CONCLUSIONS: Further research should be focused on the factors observed by midwives during history taking and the antenatal course in the second and third trimesters and whether or not these can be synthesised in to a hypertension-specific diagnostic tool for use in midwifery practice.