Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Eur J Midwifery ; 6: 37, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35794877

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many women use pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain management (NPPM) during childbirth, however, evidence shows the usage rates of pharmacological pain management are increasing. The shift towards a biomedical approach to birth care opposes the enduring midwifery philosophy of trusting the woman and her body. Identifying midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards perceived and actual barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option will provide insight into the factors that affect this. METHODS: This review of the literature sought to understand midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Peer-reviewed journals were searched for primary research that met the inclusion criteria and explored midwives' beliefs and attitudes towards the barriers to offering NPPM as an initial option for laboring women. Included studies were evaluated for quality according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. RESULTS: Thirteen qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria and four main themes of barriers to midwives offering NPPM emerged: health system-related, health facility-related, health practitioner-related, and health consumer-related barriers. CONCLUSIONS: The review of the literature highlighted there are barriers that prevent or delay the initial utilization of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in labor by midwives. These findings can be used as a platform to inform further research into this topic.

2.
Women Birth ; 35(3): e211-e220, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34226153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Midwifery students' experiences with preceptors in the clinical environment plays an integral role in developing the confidence and competence of students. As up to 50% of the midwifery program is taught in the clinical environment, an analysis of the preceptorship role in the context of midwifery student confidence and competence may be important to inform future practice and policy. AIM: To discover, whilst on clinical placement, what is required by preceptors to suitably equip midwifery students to develop confidence and competence in the clinical environment. METHODS: A search of the literature was undertaken using health and midwifery related electronic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Intermid, SCOPUS and Web of Science. Grey literature, and reference lists from studies were also part of the thorough search process. FINDINGS: After critical reading of the 15 included studies, there were a number of themes identified as the preceptor qualities that contributed to student confidence and competence. Those themes include 'belongingness', 'hands on experience/skill development', 'students' development of professional identity' and 'preceptor characteristics that impact student learning'. DISCUSSION: Student confidence and competence can be dependent on the preceptor who supports them. There are preceptors who enable students to flourish in their confidence and competence, and there also appears to be preceptors who do not possess these qualities, which requires further enquiry. CONCLUSION: As the evidence appears to find that trained preceptors are optimal for student confidence and competence, further enquiry is warranted to inform policy and practice around the concept of preceptorship training for midwives.


Subject(s)
Midwifery , Students, Nursing , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Midwifery/education , Preceptorship , Pregnancy
3.
Women Birth ; 27(4): e7-e15, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25262356

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy is a risk factor for the development of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) within 15 years, and prevention programmes have been problematic. QUESTION: The aim of the study is to identify effective strategies and programmes to decrease the risk of T2DM in women who experience GDM, the barriers to participation, and the opportunities for midwives to assist women in prevention. METHODS: English language, peer reviewed and professional literature published between 1998 and 2013 were searched. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken, included studies were then appraised for quality and finally findings of the studies were thematically analysed. FINDINGS: This review identified that there are interventions that are effective, however most lifestyle changes are difficult to translate into everyday life. As the incidence of GDM is expected to rise, midwives' role in promoting long-term health behaviours requires further review. CONCLUSIONS: Women need to overcome barriers and be supported in making the behavioural changes necessary to prevent T2DM following GDM. Midwives as the primary carers for women in pregnancy and childbirth are ideally positioned to educate women and engage them in lifestyle and behaviour programmes that prevent the onset of Type 2 Diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Diabetes, Gestational/physiopathology , Life Style , Midwifery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
4.
Women Birth ; 26(2): e69-76, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23333029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects almost 5% of pregnancies in Australia, and within 15 years, 25% of affected women will go on to develop Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The adoption of preventive health behaviours may be influenced by women's experiences of GDM. QUESTION: This review sought to understand women's beliefs, values, perceptions and experiences following diagnosis of GDM. METHODS: Peer reviewed and professional journals were searched for primary research, published between January 1991 and December 2011 that explored the beliefs, values, perceptions and experiences of peripartum or postpartum women with a diagnosis or history of GDM. FINDINGS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and the majority of these studies were qualitative (n=15). Each study was reviewed and synthesis revealed three emergent themes and core concepts related to each theme: Responses (initial reaction to GDM diagnosis, negative thoughts following diagnosis, struggle to manage GDM, feelings of 'loss of control', changes to identity and adapting to change), Focus of Concern (concern for baby's health, mother's concern for her own health, perceived seriousness of GDM, perceived fear of T2DM) and Influencing Factors (cultural roles and beliefs, social stigmas, social support, professional support, adequate and appropriate information, social roles and barriers to self-care). CONCLUSION: The experiences of women with GDM are unique and personal however this review highlights common experiences evident in the existing research. The proposed framework may be used by midwives in clinical assessment and care of women diagnosed with GDM.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mothers/psychology , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Midwifery/methods , Perception , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , Quality of Life , Social Support
5.
Women Birth ; 23(3): 81-93, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19805014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The cause of hypertension in pregnancy remains unknown and results in increased risk of complications for mother and baby. Symptoms of developing pre-eclampsia, such as an elevated blood pressure, can be vague and singular. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate research investigating antenatal screening practices for hypertension which fall within the midwives scope of practice. METHOD: Inclusion criteria for this literature review were English language, peer reviewed primary research journal articles, published in the previous 20 years where the population under study was pregnant with reported outcomes of prevention, screening or prediction of hypertension in pregnancy. A large number of papers (n=201) were identified and these were screened and subsequently excluded if they addressed diagnostic testing, screening and interpretation that depended solely on a medical practitioner. RESULTS: There was no single predictive factor found, however the relevant papers included in this review (n=33) found evidence of modifiable, non-modifiable and clinical assessment factors for inclusion in a midwifery screening model. CONCLUSIONS: Further research should be focused on the factors observed by midwives during history taking and the antenatal course in the second and third trimesters and whether or not these can be synthesised in to a hypertension-specific diagnostic tool for use in midwifery practice.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Midwifery , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...