ABSTRACT
Progressive retinal atrophies (PRA) are a heterogeneous group of inherited eye diseases common to both dogs and man. Over 100 individual canine breeds display some sort of retinal degeneration, making the dog an extremely valuable resource both for finding the genetic determinants of inherited blindness and for developing naturally occurring animal models that mimic human disease. Progressive retinal atrophies within the English mastiff displayed an ambiguous mode of inheritance. By conducting outcross matings between affected English mastiffs and normal animals from other breeds, the mode of inheritance was confirmed as dominant. This directed candidate gene analysis and led to identification of two synonymous mutations and one nonsynonymous mutation within the canine rhodopsin gene. The nonsynonymous mutation (T4R) is the cause of PRA in the English mastiff, and a test was developed to investigate its presence in 17 additional breeds. Testing of PRA-affected animals from 16 breeds revealed that none carry the T4R mutation, indicating a different cause of PRA. Analysis of two affected bull mastiffs revealed one heterozygote (+/T4R) and one homozygous normal individual (+/+). These findings suggest that the genetic origin of PRA is often breed specific and underline the value of outcross mating to circumvent problems that act to mask the mode of inheritance.
Subject(s)
Crosses, Genetic , Dogs/genetics , Eye Diseases, Hereditary/genetics , Genes, Dominant , Sensory Rhodopsins/genetics , Animals , Dogs/metabolism , Eye Diseases, Hereditary/metabolism , Female , Male , Models, Genetic , Pedigree , Sensory Rhodopsins/metabolismABSTRACT
The relationship between the neurosensory photoreceptors and the adjacent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) controls not only normal retinal function, but also the pathogenesis of hereditary retinal degenerations. The molecular bases for both primary photoreceptor and RPE diseases that cause blindness have been identified. Gene therapy has been used successfully to slow degeneration in rodent models of primary photoreceptor diseases, but efficacy of gene therapy directed at photoreceptors and RPE in a large-animal model of human disease has not been reported. Here we study one of the most clinically severe retinal degenerations, Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). LCA causes near total blindness in infancy and can result from mutations in RPE65 (LCA, type II; MIM 180069 and 204100). A naturally occurring animal model, the RPE65-/- dog, suffers from early and severe visual impairment similar to that seen in human LCA. We used a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) carrying wild-type RPE65 (AAV-RPE65) to test the efficacy of gene therapy in this model. Our results indicate that visual function was restored in this large animal model of childhood blindness.
Subject(s)
Blindness/therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Dog Diseases/genetics , Eye Proteins/genetics , Genetic Therapy/methods , Optic Atrophies, Hereditary/therapy , Proteins/genetics , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Carrier Proteins , Dependovirus/genetics , Dogs , cis-trans-IsomerasesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: D-cis-diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, has been reported to enhance photoreceptor survival in the rd mouse, a model of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) resulting from mutation of the PDE6B gene. We tested the hypothesis that diltiazem treatment would similarly rescue the canine rcd1 model of RP, which is also caused by a null mutation in the PDE6B gene. METHODS: D-cis-diltiazem was delivered orally twice daily to rcd1 affected dogs beginning at 4 weeks of age; untreated age-matched rcd1 dogs served as controls. At 14 weeks, electroretinograms (ERG) were performed on all animals; 14 dogs were euthanized at this age, and 2 dogs at 25 weeks of age. Eyes were enucleated, fixed, and processed for routine histological examination. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in ERG or histopathologic parameters between diltiazem-treated and untreated rcd1 dogs. Neither rcd1 group showed a rod b-wave; ERGs evoked by single white flashes (dark- or light-adapted) and flicker were also identical between groups. Similarly, treated and untreated animals did not differ in the degree of preservation of the photoreceptor layer, confirmed in cell counts within the outer nuclear layer. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of rcd1 affected dogs with D-cis-diltiazem did not modify the photoreceptor disease when results were assessed using either ERG or histopathologic criteria. The positive photoreceptor-rescue effect of calcium channel blockers reported in the rd mouse was thus not generalizable to another species with retinal degeneration due to mutation in the PDE6B gene. Caution needs to be exerted in extrapolation to the comparable human forms of RP.