Radiological outcomes following open versus percutaneous fixation versus arthroscopically assisted percutaneous fixation of calcaneal fractures: a ten-year retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Calcaneal fractures are often major injuries associated with considerable morbidity. The optimal surgical management of displaced calcaneal fractures remains contentious with open, percutaneous and arthroscopically assisted percutaneous approaches all offering potential benefits for patients. The aim of this study was to assess which of these three separate surgical approaches to the management of displaced calcaneal fractures provides the best radiographic deformity correction. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of all calcaneal fractures undergoing operative fixation at a single major trauma centre in the UK. The primary outcome was pre- and post-operative assessment of the deformity correction using radiographic parameters (angle of Gissane and Bohler's angle). Secondary outcomes included fracture configuration, complications and re-operation rate. RESULTS: Between 01/01/2009 and 31/12/2019, 152 calcaneal fractures in 134 patients underwent operative management via either an open or percutaneous approach. One-way ANOVA testing of the pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters demonstrated that an open approach offered superior post-operative correction of Bohler's angle when compared to percutaneous alone (p < 0.05); however, there was no difference in post-operative angle of Gissane (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up for complication and re-operation data was 3.5 years (range 0.1-12.4). Overall complication rate following all surgical fixation was 7.2% with a further 32.2% requiring further long-term surgical intervention for subtalar arthritis or removal of metalwork. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopically assisted percutaneous fixation does not offer superior radiographic deformity correction compared to percutaneous technique alone. Open fixation yielded improved correction of Bohler's angle when compared to percutaneous alone; however, there was no difference in post-operative angle of Gissane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patient handover in orthopaedics, improving safety using Information Technology.

Good inpatient handover ensures patient safety and continuity of care. An adjunct to this is the patient list which is routinely managed by junior doctors. These lists are routinely created and managed within Microsoft Excel or Word. Following the merger of two orthopaedic departments into a single service in a new hospital, it was felt that a number of safety issues within the handover process needed to be addressed. This quality improvement project addressed these issues through the creation and implementation of a new patient database which spanned the department, allowing trouble free, safe, and comprehensive handover. Feedback demonstrated an improved user experience, greater reliability, continuity within the lists and a subsequent improvement in patient safety.