Improving Outcomes in Tendon Repair: A Critical Look at the Evidence for Flexor Tendon Repair and Rehabilitation.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Appreciate the variation and evolution of flexor tendon management 2. Know how to assess the patient who presents with a flexor tendon laceration. 3. Understand the biology of repairing flexor tendon lacerations. 4. Appreciate the technical challenges in flexor tendon repair relating to different zones. 5. Understand the rationale of postoperative hand therapy. 6. Have an overview of the types of secondary tendon surgery. BACKGROUND: Flexor tendon injury constitutes a considerable trauma workload for hand surgeons, and a vast amount of research is dedicated toward improving outcomes in tendon repair. This Continuing Medical Education article aims to provide an up-to-date evidence-based outline of flexor tendon surgery in the hand. METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature on flexor tendon repairs to include a balanced overview of the experimental and clinical research. For each section, the best levels of evidence were assessed in the context of past research to provide a comprehensive opinion on best management. RESULTS: The review highlights current trends in flexor tendon surgery, clinical assessment, anesthetic technique, surgical approach, repair technique, and rehabilitation. Carefully selected illustrations, figures, tables, and video have been used to supplement the findings of the review. CONCLUSIONS: Early active mobilization remains the only long-term proven strategy to improve outcomes. Incorporating intraoperative mobilization using "wide-awake" surgery could emerge to further improve tendon outcomes. Good surgical approach, meticulous surgery, up-to-date physiotherapy regimens, and patient education remain the cornerstone of obtaining best outcomes.

Impact of Long Flexor Versus Intrinsic Dominance in the Generation of Arc of Finger Flexion.

Background: Finger flexion is a composite movement involving both long flexors and intrinsic hand muscles. Previous studies have characterized this but have not investigated differences within the normal population. Were discrete finger motion patterns identified, this could guide rehabilitation programs following flexor tendon surgery. Methods: Twelve volunteers repeatedly flexed and extended at a comfortable speed, resting their hand on a horizontal surface. Video was recorded perpendicular to the little finger flexion plane, and the little finger tip position was identified frame by frame to create a composite curve. Its highest point was noted, and the horizontal distance was measured from this point to the palmar digital crease (ΔXH). Results: In addition, 2 investigators independently reviewed frame-by-frame images and allocated subjects into groups based on the motion pattern. ΔXH demonstrated 2 clusters within our study population, and there was a statistically significant (P < .036) difference between groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that qualitative and quantitative differences exist in flexion curves between individuals.

Improving results of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: The global time and effort attributed to improving outcomes in the management of flexor tendon injury are large, but the degree of advancement made over the past 50 years is relatively small. This review examines the current perceived wisdom in this field and aims to explore the limitations to the authors' understanding of the tendon healing process, examining how this may be a factor that has contributed to the authors' modest progress in the field. METHODS: The authors critically evaluate the sum of laboratory and clinical literature on the topic of zone II flexor tendon management that has guided their practice and provide evidence to support their methods. RESULTS: The review highlights some of the key developments over the years and assesses their influence on changing current practice. It also highlights recent innovations, which have the potential to influence flexor tendon outcomes by altering the surgical approach, techniques, and rehabilitation regimens. Future innovations in the field will also be discussed to examine their potential in expanding the development in the management of flexor tendon injury. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of flexor tendon biology will allow progress in developing new therapies for flexor tendon injuries; however, there are as yet few real breakthroughs that will dramatically change current practice.

Rehabilitation of flexor and extensor tendon injuries in the hand: current updates.

In recent years, a significant amount of research in the field of tendon injury in the hand has contributed to advances in both surgical and rehabilitation techniques. The introduction of early motion has improved tendon healing, reduced complications, and enhanced final outcomes. There is overwhelming evidence to show that carefully devised rehabilitation programs are critical to achieving favourable outcomes. Whatever the type, or level, of flexor or extensor injury, the ultimate goal of both the surgeon and therapist is to protect the repair, modify peritendinous adhesions, promote optimal tendon excursion and preserve joint motion. Early tendon motion regimens are initiated at surgery or within 5 days post repair. Intra-operative information from the surgeon to the therapist is vital to the choice of splint protected position to reduce repair rupture/gap forces, and to commencement of active, or splint controlled, motion for tendon excursion. Decisions should align with the phases of healing, the clinician's observations, frequent range of motion measurements and patient input. Clinical concepts pertinent to early motion rehabilitation decisions are presented by zone of injury for both flexor and extensor tendons during the early phases of healing.

Musculotendinous anomalies in musician and nonmusician hands.

Musculoskeletal abnormalities of musicians' hands and upper extremities are well-recognized and potentially career-threatening problems. Of the many types of potentiality problematic musculoskeletal disorders that could be assessed, this study focused on joint instability and musculotendinous anomalies. For this study, the hands of 92 music students were compared with the hands of 64 nonmusician control subjects. Flexor anomalies were observed much more frequently than extensor musculotendinous anomalies; clinical evidence of the Linburg-Comstock anomaly was noted for 60 to 70 percent of subjects in both groups. Further analysis of the Linburg-Comstock anomaly demonstrated that the sites of pain among test-positive subjects were variable, test positivity was more frequent in the left hand and among string players, and test positivity tended to decrease from the radial side to the ulnar side of the hand. There were only two definite extensor musculotendinous anomalies (1.3 percent), and both involved a subluxating extensor mechanism affecting the little fingers. Forty-three percent of all subjects exhibited a degree of instability affecting the joints of their hands.