Effects of a new early municipality-based versus a geriatric team-based transitional care intervention on readmission and mortality among frail older patients - a randomised controlled trial.

Purpose Previous studies reported reduced risk of readmission, mortality and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) among geriatric patients receiving an early (<24h), hospital-based geriatric team intervention after discharge. The objective of this study was to compare a novel, early municipality-based, nurse-led and general practitioner (GP)-supported transitional care intervention (TCI) to an established hospital-based TCI among frail, older, geriatric patients. Material and methods A randomised controlled trial was conducted within a single geriatric department and the adjacent municipality. Inclusion criteria: acutely admitted, frail patients 75+ years old. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to the two TCIs. Primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. Secondary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and LOS. Stratified analysis according to type of dwelling was made. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and number needed to treat (NNT) were reported. Results 3,103 patients (median age (IQR): 85 (80-90); 57% female) were included. Readmission rates were 22% in the municipality-based intervention (n=332/1,545), and 18% in the hospital-based intervention (n=276/1,558); OR was 1.27, 95% CI (1.06-1.52), p=0.008 and NNT=27. OR for cohabiting patients was 1.47, 95% CI (1.02-2.08); p=0.035. No significant difference was observed in mortality (22% vs. 21%; OR=1.05, 95% CI (0.89-1.25), p=0.577) or LOS (median (IQR): 6 (2-8) vs. 6 (2-8) days, p=0.1787). Conclusions The new municipality-based, nurse-led and GP-supported intervention was inferior to the hospital-based geriatric team intervention in preventing 30-day readmission among frail, geriatric patients. There was no significant difference between the two interventions in regard to 90-day mortality or LOS.

Avoidable readmissions seem to be reduced by early follow-up visits for geriatric patients discharged from hospital.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to look specifically at patients readmitted in our previously published study. We wanted to assess the percentage of avoidable readmissions among patients receiving an early geriatric follow-up visit compared to a control group receiving usual care. METHOD: The original population was geriatric patients primarily admitted to hospital with one of nine medical diagnoses and included in a quasi randomized controlled trial. They received either an early geriatric follow-up visit or usual care after hospital discharge. Only patients with an unplanned readmission were included in this subgroup analysis. Medical records of the readmitted patients were assessed by two reviewers. Each readmission was classified as either avoidable or unavoidable. An avoidable readmission was defined as being clinically related to index admissions. RESULTS: Between June 2014 and November 2015, 2076 patients were included in the original study. Of these, 216 patients were readmitted. Almost half of avoidable readmissions happened during the first week after hospital discharge. Thirty-four (41%) of 83 readmissions in the intervention group were assessed as avoidable compared to 72 (54%) of 133 readmissions in the control group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: An early follow-up visit after hospital discharge seems to reduce avoidable readmissions among geriatric patients.

Early geriatric follow-up visits to nursing home residents reduce the number of readmissions: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Nursing home residents have a high risk of being readmitted after hospitalisation. The objective of this study is to test whether an early geriatric follow-up visit can reduce readmissions among nursing home residents without increasing mortality. The main components of the intervention will also be quantified. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A quasi-randomised controlled design. A population of nursing-home residents aged 75 years or older admitted to hospital with one of nine medical diagnoses. All patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment before discharge. The intervention comprised a visit by a nurse and a doctor from a geriatric team the first weekday after discharge. Control group patients were offered a follow-up visit by their general practitioner 7-14 days after discharge. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-eight patients were included in the study between June 1st 2014 and December 15th 2016. In the intervention group, 13% were readmitted within 30 days after discharge, compared to 19% in the control group (p = 0.04). Adjusted hazard ratio = 0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.95). The median length of hospital stay was 1 day for both groups. Neither 30 nor 90-day mortality were affected by the intervention. The most commonly registered intervention element was direct person-to-person contact between hospital and nursing home staff or relatives, followed by changes in medication and blood tests. CONCLUSION: Early geriatric follow-up visits to recently discharged nursing home residents are a safe and effective way of reducing readmissions. Communication, changes in medication, and blood tests were the most frequently performed elements.