Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 81(7): 616-623, July 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1505750

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potent risk factor for stroke. The presence of competing etiologies can modify disease outcomes and demand different treatment strategies. Objective The primary purpose of the study was to examine the differences in outcomes for patients with AF admitted with a recurrent stroke, stratified according to the presumed etiology of the stroke. Methods We analyzed AF patients admitted for a recurrent ischemic stroke in an academic comprehensive stroke center. Recurrent strokes were categorized as "Cardioembolic", meaning AF without any competing mechanism, versus "Undetermined" etiology due to competing mechanisms. We used logistic regression to test the association between recurrent stroke etiology and favorable outcome (discharge home), after accounting for important covariates. Results We included 230 patients, with a mean age 76.9 (SD ± 11.3), 52.2% male, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7 (IQR 2-16). Patients with cardioembolic stroke (65.2%) had higher median NIHSS 8.5 (3-18) versus 3 (1-8) and were more likely to be treated with reperfusion therapies. The favorable outcome was reached by 64 patients (27.8%), and in-hospital mortality was 15.2% overall. After adjustment, there was no difference in outcome between patients with cardioembolic versus undetermined stroke etiology (odds ratio for discharge home: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.65-3.15). Conclusions In this single-center sample of AF patients with history of stroke, there was no difference in discharge outcomes between those with cardioembolic and those with undetermined stroke etiology. This question warrants examination in larger samples to better understand the importance of the stroke mechanism and secondary prophylaxis.


Resumo Antecedentes Fibrilação atrial (FA) é um fator de risco importante para AVC. A presença de mecanismos concorrentes para o AVC pode modificar o desfecho e demandar estratégias de tratamento diferentes. Objetivo O objetivo primário do estudo foi examinar diferenças no desfecho de pacientes com FA admitidos por um AVC recorrente, sendo estratificados de acordo com a etiologia presumida do AVC. Métodos Nós analisamos pacientes com FA admitidos por conta de AVC recorrente em um centro acadêmico terciário de AVC. Os casos de AVC recorrentes foram classificados como "Cardioembólicos", sendo FA sem outros mecanismos alternativos, versus aqueles de etiologia "Indeterminada" por conta de mecanismos concorrentes. Foi usada regressão logística para testar a associação entre a etiologia do AVC recorrente e desfecho favorável (alta direto para casa) após controle para covariáveis importantes. Resultados Nós incluímos 230 pacientes, com uma idade média 76,9 anos (DP ± 11.3), 52.2% homens, com um escore mediano do National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) de 7 (IIQ 2-16). Pacientes com AVC cardioembólicos (65,2%) tiveram um escore de NIHSS mediano mais alto 8,5 (3-18) versus 3 (1-8), e com maior chance de tratamento com terapias de reperfusão. O desfecho favorável ocorreu em 64 pacientes (27,8%) e a mortalidade institucional foi de 15,2% no total. Após ajustes, não encontramos diferença no desfecho entre pacientes com AVC cardioembólico versus AVC de etiologia indeterminada (odds ratio para alta para casa: 1,41; 95% IC: 0,65-3,15). Conclusões Nessa amostra de pacientes com FA e história de AVC recorrente de centro único, não houve diferença no desfecho de alta entre aqueles com AVC cardioembólico e aqueles com etiologia indeterminada. Essa questão deve ser examinada em amostras maiores para melhor compreender a importância do mecanismo do AVC e a profilaxia secundária.

2.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 81(7): 616-623, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potent risk factor for stroke. The presence of competing etiologies can modify disease outcomes and demand different treatment strategies. OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of the study was to examine the differences in outcomes for patients with AF admitted with a recurrent stroke, stratified according to the presumed etiology of the stroke. METHODS: We analyzed AF patients admitted for a recurrent ischemic stroke in an academic comprehensive stroke center. Recurrent strokes were categorized as "Cardioembolic", meaning AF without any competing mechanism, versus "Undetermined" etiology due to competing mechanisms. We used logistic regression to test the association between recurrent stroke etiology and favorable outcome (discharge home), after accounting for important covariates. RESULTS: We included 230 patients, with a mean age 76.9 (SD ± 11.3), 52.2% male, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7 (IQR 2-16). Patients with cardioembolic stroke (65.2%) had higher median NIHSS 8.5 (3-18) versus 3 (1-8) and were more likely to be treated with reperfusion therapies. The favorable outcome was reached by 64 patients (27.8%), and in-hospital mortality was 15.2% overall. After adjustment, there was no difference in outcome between patients with cardioembolic versus undetermined stroke etiology (odds ratio for discharge home: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.65-3.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center sample of AF patients with history of stroke, there was no difference in discharge outcomes between those with cardioembolic and those with undetermined stroke etiology. This question warrants examination in larger samples to better understand the importance of the stroke mechanism and secondary prophylaxis.


ANTECEDENTES: Fibrilação atrial (FA) é um fator de risco importante para AVC. A presença de mecanismos concorrentes para o AVC pode modificar o desfecho e demandar estratégias de tratamento diferentes. OBJETIVOS: O objetivo primário do estudo foi examinar diferenças no desfecho de pacientes com FA admitidos por um AVC recorrente, sendo estratificados de acordo com a etiologia presumida do AVC. MéTODOS: Nós analisamos pacientes com FA admitidos por conta de AVC recorrente em um centro acadêmico terciário de AVC. Os casos de AVC recorrentes foram classificados como "Cardioembólicos", sendo FA sem outros mecanismos alternativos, versus aqueles de etiologia "Indeterminada" por conta de mecanismos concorrentes. Foi usada regressão logística para testar a associação entre a etiologia do AVC recorrente e desfecho favorável (alta direto para casa) após controle para covariáveis importantes. RESULTADOS: Nós incluímos 230 pacientes, com uma idade média 76,9 anos (DP ± 11.3), 52.2% homens, com um escore mediano do National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) de 7 (IIQ 2­16). Pacientes com AVC cardioembólicos (65,2%) tiveram um escore de NIHSS mediano mais alto 8,5 (3­18) versus 3 (1­8), e com maior chance de tratamento com terapias de reperfusão. O desfecho favorável ocorreu em 64 pacientes (27,8%) e a mortalidade institucional foi de 15,2% no total. Após ajustes, não encontramos diferença no desfecho entre pacientes com AVC cardioembólico versus AVC de etiologia indeterminada (odds ratio para alta para casa: 1,41; 95% IC: 0,65­3,15). CONCLUSõES: Nessa amostra de pacientes com FA e história de AVC recorrente de centro único, não houve diferença no desfecho de alta entre aqueles com AVC cardioembólico e aqueles com etiologia indeterminada. Essa questão deve ser examinada em amostras maiores para melhor compreender a importância do mecanismo do AVC e a profilaxia secundária.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Stroke/complications , Risk Factors , Logistic Models
3.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 79(1): 30-37, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33656109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is common among adults and associated with socioeconomic deprivation, polypharmacy, poor quality of life, functional impairment, and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To identify the frequency of multimorbidity among older adults inpatients with neurological disorders (NDs), stratify clusters of chronic comorbidities associated with NDs in degrees, and verify whether multimorbidity was associated with demographic data, readmission, long length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital mortality in this population. METHODS: We enrolled patients aged ≥60 years successively admitted to a tertiary medical center with NDs between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010. RESULTS: Overall, 1,154 NDs and 2,679 comorbidities were identified among 798 inpatients aged ≥60 years (mean: 75.76±9.12). Women comprised 435 (54.51%) of patients. Multimorbidity was detected in 92.61% (739) of patients, with a mean of 3.88±1.67 (median: 4.0), ranging from 2 to 10 chronic diseases. Patients with epilepsy, dementia, and movement disorders had the highest degrees of clusters of chronic morbidities (>50% of them with ≥5 chronic disorders), followed by those with cerebrovascular and neuromuscular disorders. Multimorbidity was associated with long LOS (p<0.001) and readmission (p=0.039), but not with hospital mortality (p=0.999). CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity was preponderant among older adults inpatients with NDs, and NDs had a high degree of associated chronic comorbidities. Multimorbidity, but not isolated NDs, was associated with readmission and long LOS. These results support ward-based, neurohospitalist-directed, interdisciplinary care for older adults inpatients with NDs to face multimorbidity.


Subject(s)
Multimorbidity , Nervous System Diseases , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Quality of Life
4.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 79(1): 30-37, Jan. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1153133

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Multimorbidity is common among adults and associated with socioeconomic deprivation, polypharmacy, poor quality of life, functional impairment, and mortality. Objectives: To identify the frequency of multimorbidity among older adults inpatients with neurological disorders (NDs), stratify clusters of chronic comorbidities associated with NDs in degrees, and verify whether multimorbidity was associated with demographic data, readmission, long length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital mortality in this population. Methods: We enrolled patients aged ≥60 years successively admitted to a tertiary medical center with NDs between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010. Results: Overall, 1,154 NDs and 2,679 comorbidities were identified among 798 inpatients aged ≥60 years (mean: 75.76±9.12). Women comprised 435 (54.51%) of patients. Multimorbidity was detected in 92.61% (739) of patients, with a mean of 3.88±1.67 (median: 4.0), ranging from 2 to 10 chronic diseases. Patients with epilepsy, dementia, and movement disorders had the highest degrees of clusters of chronic morbidities (>50% of them with ≥5 chronic disorders), followed by those with cerebrovascular and neuromuscular disorders. Multimorbidity was associated with long LOS (p<0.001) and readmission (p=0.039), but not with hospital mortality (p=0.999). Conclusions: Multimorbidity was preponderant among older adults inpatients with NDs, and NDs had a high degree of associated chronic comorbidities. Multimorbidity, but not isolated NDs, was associated with readmission and long LOS. These results support ward-based, neurohospitalist-directed, interdisciplinary care for older adults inpatients with NDs to face multimorbidity.


RESUMO Introdução: A multimorbidade é comum entre idosos e está associada a privação socioeconômica, polifarmácia, má qualidade de vida, déficit funcional e mortalidade. Objetivos: Identificar a frequência da multimorbidade entre pacientes idosos hospitalizados com doenças neurológicas (DN), estratificar combinações de comorbidades crônicas associadas às DN em graus e verificar se a multimorbidade foi associada a dados demográficos, readmissão, longo tempo de internação (TDI) e mortalidade hospitalar nessa população. Métodos: Foram incluídos pacientes com ≥60 anos sucessivamente admitidos com DN em um centro médico terciário entre 1º de janeiro de 2009 e 31 de dezembro de 2010. Resultados: Um total de 1.154 DN e 2.679 comorbidades foram identificados entre 798 pacientes com idade ≥60 anos (média: 75,76±9,12). Mulheres representaram 435 (54,51%) dos pacientes. A multimorbidade foi detectada em 92,61% (739) dos pacientes (média de 3,88±1,67; mediana de 4), variando de 2 a 10 doenças crônicas. Pacientes com epilepsia, demência e distúrbios do movimento apresentaram os maiores graus de morbidades crônicas (>50% deles com ≥5 doenças crônicas), seguidos por doenças cerebrovasculares e neuromusculares. A multimorbidade foi associada com longo TDI (p<0,001) e readmissão (p=0,039), mas não com mortalidade hospitalar (p=0,999). Conclusões: A multimorbidade foi preponderante entre os pacientes idosos internados com DN, as quais tiveram altos graus de comorbidades crônicas. A multimorbidade, mas não as DN isoladas, foi associada a readmissões e longo TDI. Esses resultados respaldam uma assistência interdisciplinar para idosos hospitalizados com DN em enfermarias lideradas por neurologistas hospitalistas para enfrentar a multimorbidade.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Multimorbidity , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Chronic Disease , Inpatients , Length of Stay
5.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 78(11): 687-694, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33263637

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Population ageing is a global phenomenon, and life expectancy in Brazil is growing fast. Epilepsy is the third most important chronic neurological disorder, and its incidence is higher among elderly patients than in any other segment of the population. The prevalence of epilepsy is greater among inpatients than in the general population and it is related to long length of hospital stay (LOS), which is associated with hospital mortality and higher healthcare costs. Despite these facts, reports of elderly inpatients admitted with seizures and associated outcomes are scarce. To identify predictors of long LOS among elderly inpatients admitted with seizures. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled elders admitted with epileptic seizures or who experienced seizures throughout hospitalization between November 2015 and August 2019. We analysed demographic data, neurological disorders, clinical comorbidities, and seizure features to identify risk factors. RESULTS: The median LOS was 11 days, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 5-21 days. The frequency of long LOS (defined as a period of hospitalization ≥12 days) was 47%. Multivariate analysis showed there was an exponential increase in long LOS if a patient showed any of the following conditions: intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR=4.562), urinary tract infection (OR=3.402), movement disorder (OR=5.656), early seizure recurrence (OR=2.090), and sepsis (OR=4.014). CONCLUSION: Long LOS was common among elderly patients admitted with seizures, and most predictors of long LOS found in this cohort might be avoidable; these findings should be confirmed with further research.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Seizures , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Prospective Studies , Seizures/epidemiology
6.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 78(11): 687-694, Nov. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142364

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Population ageing is a global phenomenon, and life expectancy in Brazil is growing fast. Epilepsy is the third most important chronic neurological disorder, and its incidence is higher among elderly patients than in any other segment of the population. The prevalence of epilepsy is greater among inpatients than in the general population and it is related to long length of hospital stay (LOS), which is associated with hospital mortality and higher healthcare costs. Despite these facts, reports of elderly inpatients admitted with seizures and associated outcomes are scarce. Objective: To identify predictors of long LOS among elderly inpatients admitted with seizures. Methods: We prospectively enrolled elders admitted with epileptic seizures or who experienced seizures throughout hospitalization between November 2015 and August 2019. We analysed demographic data, neurological disorders, clinical comorbidities, and seizure features to identify risk factors. Results: The median LOS was 11 days, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 5-21 days. The frequency of long LOS (defined as a period of hospitalization ≥12 days) was 47%. Multivariate analysis showed there was an exponential increase in long LOS if a patient showed any of the following conditions: intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR=4.562), urinary tract infection (OR=3.402), movement disorder (OR=5.656), early seizure recurrence (OR=2.090), and sepsis (OR=4.014). Conclusion: Long LOS was common among elderly patients admitted with seizures, and most predictors of long LOS found in this cohort might be avoidable; these findings should be confirmed with further research.


RESUMO O envelhecimento populacional é um fenômeno global e o crescimento da expectativa de vida no Brasil tem sido rápido. A epilepsia é a terceira doença neurológica crônica mais importante e sua incidência em idosos é maior do que em qualquer outro segmento populacional. A prevalência de epilepsia é maior entre pacientes internados e está relacionada a longo tempo de internação (TDI), o qual está associado a custos elevados e mortalidade hospitalar. Apesar disso, são escassos os relatos de desfechos de pacientes idosos internados com crises epilépticas e resultados associados. Objetivo: Identificar fatores de risco de longo TDI em idosos admitidos com crises epilépticas. Métodos: Recrutamos prospectivamente pacientes idosos admitidos com crises epilépticas ou que tiveram crises durante a internação hospitalar entre novembro de 2015 e agosto de 2019. Analisamos dados demográficos, distúrbios neurológicos, comorbidades clínicas e tipos de crise epiléptica para identificar fatores de risco. Resultados: A mediana do TDI foi 11 dias, com intervalo interquartil (IIQ) de 5-21 dias. A frequência de longo TDI (definido como TDI≥12 dias) foi 47%. A análise multivariada mostrou que houve um aumento exponencial de TDI quando o paciente apresentou algumas dessas condições: admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) (OR=4,562), infecção urinária (OR=3,402), transtorno do movimento (OR=4,562), recorrência precoce de crise epiléptica (OR=2,090) e sepse (OR=4,014). Conclusão: Longo TDI é um desfecho desfavorável importante e foi comum entre idosos admitidos com crises epilépticas. Muitos dos preditores de longo TDI encontrados nessa coorte podem ser evitados, o que deve ser confirmado com pesquisas futuras.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Seizures/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Brazil/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...