Systematic Comparison of Uremic Toxin Removal Using Different Hemodialysis Modes: A Single-Center Crossover Prospective Observational Study.

Many hypotheses could explain the mortality decrease observed using hemodiafiltration, such as reduction of intradialytic hypotension and more efficient toxin removal. We led a systematic analysis of representative uremic toxin removal with hemodialysis (HD), online postdilution hemodiafiltration (postHDF) and online predilution hemodiafiltration (preHDF), in a single-center crossover and prospective observational study. The primary outcome was the reduction ratio of uremic toxins of the three categories defined by the Eutox group. Twenty-six patients were treated by those three techniques of extra renal epuration. Mean Kt/Vurea was not different between the treatment methods. Mean reduction ratio of beta2microglobulin was significantly higher for both HDF treatments than for HD (p < 0.001). Myoglobin, kappa, and lambda free light chain reduction ratio was significantly different between the modes: 37.75 ± 11.95%, 45.31 ± 11% and 61.22 ± 10.56%/57.21 ± 12.5%, 63.53 ± 7.93%, and 68.40 ± 11.79%/29.12 ± 8.44%, 34.73 ± 9.01%, and 45.55 ± 12.31% HD, preHDF, and postHDF, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean protein-bound solutes reduction ratio was not different between the different treatments except for PCS with a higher reduction ratio during HDF treatments. Mean albumin loss was always less than 2 g. HDF improved removal of middle molecules but had no effect on indoles concentration without any difference between synthetic dialysis membranes.

Presence of specific SARS-COV2 antibodies in hemodialysis patients and their caregivers after the first wave of COVID-19.

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at risk for severe COVID-19 and cannot comply with social distancing. SARS-COV2 seroprevalence in French patients and caregivers after the first wave of COVID-19 is unknown. SeroCOVIDial is a prospective study conducted between June and December 2020. SARS-COV2 seroprevalence was evaluated by a rapid serological test (BIOSYNEX) in HD patients and caregivers, and the presence or not of anti-SARS-COV2 neutralizing or non-neutralizing antibodies in patients was also determined by ELISA and seroneutralization. In June 2020, 451 HD patients and 238 caregivers were included. Overall SARS-COV2 seroprevalence was 8.4% (patients) and 6.7% (caregivers), and was 87.1% (patients) and 90.0% (caregivers) in participants with a previously documented SARS-COV2 infection. Overall seroprevalence reached 13.8% (patients) and 12.6% (caregivers) following the second epidemic wave. During the follow-up, 38 (8.4%) patients died (9 of COVID-19). Among the 44 (10.6%) patients who became infected, only two were seropositive at M0. The levels of anti-SARS-COV2 antibodies decreased over time in patients and caregivers. The BIOSYNEX test showed 82.9% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity. Prevalence of anti-SARS-COV2 antibodies was low in HD patients and caregivers after the first epidemic wave but rose after the second wave. A rapid serological test showed good performances and could be useful for future monitoring of anti-SARS-COV2 antibodies.

Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio correlates with the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate and predicts the risk of death in patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue associated with increased cardiovascular, infectious and all-cause mortality. The neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a predictive marker of the risk of death and cardiovascular events. Uremic toxins, notably indoxyl sulfate (IS), are involved in immune deficiency and cardiovascular complications associated with CKD. The aim of this study was to assess whether the NLR was related to uremic toxins and could predict clinical outcome in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 183 patients on chronic HD. The main objective was to study the correlation between the NLR and uremic toxin serum levels. The secondary objective was to test if the NLR can predict the incidence of mortality, cardiovascular events and infectious events. RESULTS: Patients were separated into two groups according to the NLR median value (3.49). The NLR at inclusion was correlated with the NLR at the 6-month (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and 12-month (r = 0.62, P < 0.0001) follow-up. Among uremic toxins, IS levels were higher in the group with high NLR (104 µmol/L versus 81 µmol/L; P = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, the NLR remained correlated with IS (P = 0.03). The incidence of death, cardiovascular events and severe infectious events was higher in the group with high NLR [respectively, 38% versus 18% (P = 0.004), 45% versus 26% (P = 0.01) and 33% versus 21% (P = 0.02)] than in the low NLR group. Multivariate analysis showed an independent association of the NLR with mortality (P = 0.02) and cardiovascular events (P = 0.03) but not with severe infectious events. CONCLUSIONS: In HD patients, the NLR predicted mortality and cardiovascular events but not severe infections and correlated positively with the level of the uremic toxin IS. The NLR could be an interesting marker for monitoring the risk of clinical events in CKD patients.

Acute kidney injury in patients treated with anti-programmed death receptor-1 for advanced melanoma: a real-life study in a single-centre cohort.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoints inhibitors have transformed the prognosis of advanced melanoma but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We evaluated the incidence, risk factors and causes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in a monocentric real-life cohort of patients treated with anti-programmed death receptor-1 (anti-PD1) antibodies for advanced melanoma. METHODS: Retrospective collection of medical charts and comprehensive analysis of lab results from patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma between 2014 and 2018 was carried out. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, and causes were determined by chart review. Overall survival, survival without AKI and impact of AKI on survival were analysed. Risk factors for death and for AKI were identified. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. Forty-one (17%) had at least one episode of AKI. Independent risk factors for AKI were treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cumulated doses of anti-PD1. The main cause of AKI was prerenal, and only eight patients (3.3%) developed acute interstitial nephritis; 8% of patients developed CKD. The median overall survival was 13.4 months and was not affected by AKI. In multivariate analysis, the overall mortality was lower in overweight and obese patients and higher in patients treated with proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) or corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is common in patients treated with anti-PD1 for advanced melanoma but is mostly prerenal and favoured by the use of RAASi; renal irAE is rare. PPI and corticosteroids were associated with poor survival in this population, while overweight/obesity was protective.

Risk factors for severity of COVID-19 in chronic dialysis patients from a multicentre French cohort.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease, related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Few data are available in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients at 11 dialysis centres in two distinct districts of France to examine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in this population, and to determine risk factors of disease severity (defined as a composite outcome including intensive care unit admission or death) and mortality. RESULTS: Among the 2336 patients enrolled, 5.5% had confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Of the 122 patients with a follow-up superior to 28 days, 37% reached the composite outcome and 28% died. Multivariate analysis showed that oxygen therapy on diagnosis and a decrease in lymphocyte count were independent risk factors associated with disease severity and with mortality. Chronic use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (18% of patients) was associated with a protective effect on mortality. Treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine (AZT/HCQ) (46% of patients) were not associated with the composite outcome and with death in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is a severe disease with poor prognosis in patients with ESRD. Usual treatment with ARBs seems to be protective of critical evolution and mortality. There is no evidence of clinical benefit with the combination of AZT/HCQ.

Mean Platelet Volume Predicts Vascular Access Events in Hemodialysis Patients.

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) is the vascular access (VA) of 78% of hemodialysis patients (HD) in France. VA dysfunction corresponding to either stenosis requiring angioplasty or acute thrombosis is responsible for 30% of hospitalizations. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a biological marker of cardiovascular events. We studied MPV in a cohort of HD patients as a predictive marker of VA dysfunction. We conducted a prospective monocentric cohort study that included patients with AVF or AVG on chronic HD (n = 153). The primary outcome was the incidence of VA dysfunction regarding MPV value. The median MPV was 10.8 fL (7.8-13.5), and four groups were designed according to MPV quartiles. Fifty-four patients experienced the first event of VA dysfunction. The incidence of VA dysfunction was higher in patients with the highest MPV: 59% (23 events), 34% (14 events), 27% (11 events), and 18% (6 events), respectively, for the fourth, third, second, and first quartiles (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association between MPV and VA dysfunction-OR 1.52 (1.13-2.07), p < 0.001. VA dysfunction is predicted by MPV level. Patients with the highest MPV have the highest risk of VA events.

Hemodialysis vascular graft as a focus of persistent Q fever.

Vascular access infection is a frequent complication in hemodialysis patients. We report the second case worldwide of a prosthetic hemodialysis vascular graft infection by Coxiella burnetii, with intense hypermetabolism on PET-CT, Q fever serology consistent with persistent infection, and positive C. burnetii DNA in the blood and removed vascular graft.

Serum microRNAs are altered in various stages of chronic kidney disease: a preliminary study.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfw060.].

Indole 3-acetic acid, indoxyl sulfate and paracresyl-sulfate do not influence anemia parameters in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The main reason for anemia in renal failure patients is the insufficient erythropoietin production by the kidneys. Beside erythropoietin deficiency, in vitro studies have incriminated uremic toxins in the pathophysiology of anemia but clinical data are sparse. In order to assess if indole 3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), and paracresyl sulfate (PCS) -three protein bound uremic toxins- are clinically implicated in end-stage renal disease anemia we studied the correlation between IAA, IS and PCS plasmatic concentrations with hemoglobin and Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA) use in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Between June and July 2014, we conducted an observational cross sectional study in two hemodialysis center. Three statistical approaches were conducted. First, we compared patients treated with ESA and those not treated. Second, we performed linear regression models between IAA, IS, and PCS plasma concentrations and hemoglobin, the ESA dose over hemoglobin ratio (ESA/Hemoglobin) or the ESA resistance index (ERI). Third, we used a polytomous logistic regression model to compare groups of patients with no/low/high ESA dose and low/high hemoglobin statuses. RESULTS: Overall, 240 patients were included in the study. Mean age ± SD was 67.6 ± 16.0 years, 55.4% were men and 42.5% had diabetes mellitus. When compared with ESA treated patients, patients with no ESA had higher hemoglobin (mean 11.4 ± 1.1 versus 10.6 ± 1.2 g/dL; p <0.001), higher transferrin saturation (TSAT, 31.1 ± 16.3% versus 23.1 ± 11.5%; p < 0.001), less frequently an IV iron prescription (52.1 versus 65.7%, p = 0.04) and were more frequently treated with hemodiafiltration (53.5 versus 36.7%). In univariate analysis, IAA, IS or PCS plasma concentrations did not differ between the two groups. In the linear model, IAA plasma concentration was not associated with hemoglobin, but was negatively associated with ESA/Hb (p = 0.02; R = 0.18) and with the ERI (p = 0.03; R = 0.17). IS was associated with none of the three anemia parameters. PCS was positively associated with hemoglobin (p = 0.03; R = 0.14), but negatively with ESA/Hb (p = 0.03; R = 0.17) and the ERI (p = 0.02; R = 0.19). In multivariate analysis, the association of IAA concentration with ESA/Hb or ERI was not statistically significant, neither was the association of PCS with ESA/Hb or ERI. Identically, in the subgroup of 76 patients with no inflammation (CRP <5 mg/L) and no iron deficiency (TSAT >20%) linear regression between IAA, IS or PCS and any anemia parameter did not reach significance. In the third model, univariate analysis showed no intergroup significant differences for IAA and IS. Regarding PCS, the Low Hb/High ESA group had lower concentrations. However, when we compared PCS with the other significant characteristics of the five groups to the Low Hb/high ESA (our reference group), the polytomous logistic regression model didn't show any significant difference for PCS. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, using three different statistical models, we were unable to show any correlation between IAA, IS and PCS plasmatic concentrations and any anemia parameter in hemodialysis patients. Indolic uremic toxins and PCS have no or a very low effect on anemia parameters.

Serum microRNAs are altered in various stages of chronic kidney disease: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are innovative and informative blood-based biomarkers involved in numerous pathophysiological processes. In this study and based on our previous experimental data, we investigated miR-126, miR-143, miR-145, miR-155 and miR-223 as potential circulating biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary objective of this study was to assess the levels of miRNA expression at various stages of CKD. METHODS: RNA was extracted from serum, and RT-qPCR was performed for the five miRNAs and cel-miR-39 (internal control). RESULTS: Serum levels of miR-143, -145 and -223 were elevated in patients with CKD compared with healthy controls. They were further increased in chronic haemodialysis patients, but were below control levels in renal transplant recipients. In contrast, circulating levels of miR-126 and miR-155 levels, which were also elevated in CKD patients, were lower in the haemodialysis group and even lower in the transplant group. Four of the five miRNA species were correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate, and three were correlated with circulating uraemic toxins. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests that specific miRNAs could be biomarkers for complications of CKD, justifying further studies to link changes of miRNA levels with outcomes in CKD patients.