Metallosis in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

¼ Metallosis is a rare but significant complication that can occur after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a variety of reasons but most commonly in patients with metal-on-metal implants.¼ It is characterized by the visible staining, necrosis, and fibrosis of the periprosthetic soft tissues, along with the variable presence of aseptic cysts and solid soft tissue masses called pseudotumors secondary to the corrosion and deposition of metal debris.¼ Metallosis can present with a spectrum of complications ranging from pain and inflammation to more severe symptoms such as osteolysis, soft tissue damage, and pseudotumor formation.¼ Workup of metallosis includes a clinical evaluation of the patient's symptoms, imaging studies, serum metal-ion levels, and intraoperative visualization of the staining of tissues. Inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein along with intraoperative frozen slice analysis may be useful in certain cases to rule out concurrent periprosthetic joint infection.¼ Management depends on the severity and extent of the condition; however, revision THA is often required to prevent rapid progression of bone loss and tissue necrosis.

Higher Complication Rate in COVID-19 Recovered Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data reviewing complication risks associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) after recovering from COVID-19. This study evaluated complications within 90 days of TJA in patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis at varying intervals prior to surgery versus a non-COVID-19 cohort. METHODS: A large national database was used to identify patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the six months prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty. The incidence of complications within 90 days of surgery was recorded and compared to a COVID-19 negative control group matched 1:3 for age range in 5-year intervals, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex. There were 7,780 patients included in the study; 5,840 (75.1%) never diagnosed with COVID-19, 1,390 (17.9%) who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 0 to 3 months prior to surgery, and 550 (7.1%) who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 3 to 6 months prior to surgery. RESULTS: When compared to their COVID negative controls, patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 0 to 3 months prior to surgery had significantly higher rates of readmission (14.0 versus 11.1%, P = .001), pneumonia (2.2 versus 0.7%, P < .001), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .001), kidney failure (2.4 versus 1.4%, P = .006), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (1.4 versus 0.7%, P = .01). Patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 3 to 6 months prior to surgery had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (2.0 versus 0.7%, P = .002) and DVT (3.6 versus 1.9%, P = .005) when compared to their COVID negative controls. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 within three months prior to TJA have an increased risk of 90-day postoperative complications. Risk for pneumonia and DVT remains elevated even when surgery was performed as far as 3 to 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis.

Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis improves range of motion.

PURPOSE: Arthrofibrosis after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant contributor to patient dissatisfaction. While treatment algorithms involve early physical therapy and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), some patients ultimately require revision TKA. It is unclear whether revision TKA can consistently improve these patient's range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate ROM when revision TKA was performed for arthrofibrosis. METHODS: A retrospective study of 42 TKA's diagnosed with arthrofibrosis from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. The primary outcome was ROM (flexion, extension, and total arc of motion) before and after revision TKA, and secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes information system (PROMIS) scores. Categorical data were compared using chi-squared analysis, and paired samples t tests were performed to compare ROM at three different times: pre-primary TKA, pre-revision TKA, and post-revision TKA. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess for effect modification on total ROM. RESULTS: The patient's pre-revision mean flexion was 85.6 degrees, and mean extension was 10.1 degrees. At the time of the revision, the mean age of the cohort was 64.7 years, the average body mass index (BMI) was 29.8, and 62% were female. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, revision TKA significantly improved terminal flexion by 18.4 degrees (p < 0.001), terminal extension by 6.8 degrees (p = 0.007), and total arc of motion by 25.2 degrees (p < 0.001). The final ROM after revision TKA was not significantly different from the patient's pre-primary TKA ROM (p = 0.759). PROMIS physical function, depression, and pain interference scores were 39 (SD = 7.72), 49 (SD = 8.39), and 62 (SD = 7.25), respectively. CONCLUSION: Revision TKA for arthrofibrosis significantly improved ROM at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years with over 25 degrees of improvement in the total arc of motion, resulting in final ROM similar to pre-primary TKA ROM. PROMIS physical function and pain scores showed moderate dysfunction, while depression scores were within normal limits. While physical therapy and MUA remain the gold standard for the early treatment of stiffness after TKA, revision TKA can improve ROM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Determining and Achieving Target Limb Length and Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Intraoperative Digital Radiography.

BACKGROUND: Achieving appropriate limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is challenging. Target limb length and offset may not always mean equal radiographic measurements bilaterally. The goal of this study is to introduce a method for determining as well as achieving target limb length and offset using digital radiographic measurements. METHODS: One hundred and two consecutive patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis undergoing primary THA in the lateral decubitus position were included. Limb length and offset were measured on anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Offset was defined as the length of a line parallel to the inter-teardrop line, extending from the edge of the ischium, at about the lower border of the ipsilateral obturator foramen, to the edge of the femoral cortex, usually at, or just below, the neck resection level. Target limb length was determined for each patient based on patient perception and severity of disease. Target offset equaled the contralateral limb. Using intraoperative digital radiography, adjustments were made until targets were achieved and the hip was stable. Patients were followed for an average of 4.2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Limb length was within 5 mm of target measurements in 100% of patients and offset was within 5 mm of targets in 97.1%. Target measurements differed by >5 mm from the contralateral side in 2.0% of limb length and 2.9% of offset measurements. There were no significant differences between intraoperative and postoperative limb length (P = .261) or offset (P = .747) measurements. At final follow-up, there were no dislocations or reoperations and average Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement was 95.78. CONCLUSION: Target limb length and offset goals can be determined for most patients undergoing THA. Targets are not always equal to the contralateral side. Intraoperative digital radiography can allow surgeons to accurately achieve target limb length and offset to within 5 mm in a homogenous cohort of patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis with excellent clinical outcomes.

Digital Radiography in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique and Radiographic Results.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining the ideal acetabular cup position in total hip arthroplasty remains a challenge. Advancements in digital radiography and image analysis software allow the assessment of the cup position during the surgical procedure. This study describes a validated technique for evaluating cup position during total hip arthroplasty using digital radiography. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative supine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were made. Intraoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were made with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Radiographic beam angle adjustments and operative table adjustments were made to approximate rotation and tilt of the preoperative radiograph. The target for cup position was 30° to 50° abduction and 15° to 35° anteversion. Intraoperative radiographic measurements were calculated and final cup position was determined after strict impingement and range-of-motion testing. Postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were made. Two independent observers remeasured all abduction and anteversion angles. RESULTS: Of the cups, 97.8% were placed within 30° to 50° of abduction, with a mean angle (and standard deviation) of 39.5° ± 4.6°. The 2.2% of cups placed outside the target zone were placed so purposefully on the basis of intraoperative range-of-motion testing and patient factors, and 97.6% of cups were placed between 15° and 35° of anteversion, with a mean angle of 26.6° ± 4.7°. Twenty-eight percent of cups were repositioned on the basis of intraoperative measurements. Subluxation during range-of-motion testing occurred in 3% of hips despite acceptable measurements, necessitating cup repositioning. There was 1 early anterior dislocation. CONCLUSIONS: Placing the acetabular component within a target range is a critical component to minimizing dislocation and polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Using digital radiography, we positioned the acetabular component in our desired target zone in 97.8% of cases and outside the target zone, purposefully, in 2.2% of cases. When used in conjunction with strict impingement testing, digital radiography allows for predictable cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports.

Because of the extensile nature and familiarity of the standard posterior-lateral approach to the hip, a family of "micro-posterior" approaches has been developed. This family includes the Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (PATH) approach, the Supercapsular (SuperCap) approach and a newer hybrid approach, the Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) approach. Such approaches should ideally provide a continuum for the surgeon: from a "micro" (external rotator sparing) posterior approach, to a "mini" (external rotator sacrificing) posterior approach, to a standard posterior approach. This could keep a surgeon within his comfort zone during the learning curve of the procedure, while leaving options for complicated reconstructions for the more practiced micro-posterior surgeons. This paper details one author's experiences utilizing this combined approach, as well as permutations of this entire micro-posterior family of approaches as applied to more complex hip reconstructions.

Clinical fracture of cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners.

Highly cross-linked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is increasingly used as a bearing material in total hip replacements. Cross-linking of UHMWPE has been shown to increase wear resistance but decrease its fracture resistance. We analyzed the clinical fracture failure of four cross-linked UHMWPE total hip replacement components of four different designs via microscopic observation of the fracture surfaces, and found that in all cases fractures initiated at stress concentrations in an unsupported region of the component (termed the elevated rim). Finite element analyses (FEA) of each individual implant design were then conducted. Results from this analysis demonstrated that the predicted magnitude and orientation of maximum principal stress due to mechanical loading of the elevated rim was sufficient to propagate initiated fatigue cracks in each case. FEA also predicted that cracks may arrest after some amount of growth due to a steep stress gradient near the initiation site. Further, while anatomical positioning of the implant and material properties affect the risk of fracture, we examined whether these failures are strongly related to the notched elevated rim design feature that is common to the four failed cases presented here. We believe that cross-linked UHMWPE remains an excellent bearing material for total hip replacements but that designs employing this material should mitigate stress concentrations or other design features that increase the risk of fracture.

Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants.

Contemporary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee designs have provided pain relief and improved knee function but have failed to reproduce the kinematics and stability of the normal nonarthritic knee. The Medial Pivot total knee design features a near constant radius of curvature of the femoral component. The tibial surface is highly congruent and asymmetric, permitting a medial pivot motion during knee flexion. The purpose of the current study was to analyze and compare the gait kinematics of the Sigma posterior cruciate-retaining total knee implant, the Advance Traditional posterior cruciate-retaining total knee implant, and the Advance Medial Pivot knee implant using fluoroscopic analysis. In vivo kinematics were determined for 15 clinically successful total knee arthroplasties. Five knee implants were evaluated from each group. The authors analyzed the kinematics of knee motion during the stance phase of gait for each patient. On average, subjects with the Medial Pivot knee implant had a medial pivot motion. Both posterior cruciateretaining designs had a paradoxical roll forward of the tibia on femur during knee flexion and had greater excursion of both condyles during knee flexion than the medial pivot design. Nine of 10 of the posterior cruciate-retaining designs had condylar lift-off averaging 1.7 mm whereas only one Medial Pivot knee implant had condylar lift-off measuring 1.1 mm.