ABSTRACT
Panoramic radiography is the standard imaging method for preoperative assessment before lower third molar removal. However, oral surgeons have been using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as an additional tool to assess detailed preoperative data, as it provides cross-sectional images. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the use of CBCT and the additional information provided modifies the preoperative assessment of lower third molar removal when compared to panoramic radiography and consequently results in a different surgical approach. A search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus electronic databases was performed on 30 June 2018, which retrieved 196 records without duplicates. The grey literature was also searched to include any other paper that might meet the eligibility criteria, which resulted in an additional five records. Among these papers, five met all of the eligibility criteria. These five studies included a total of 289 individuals and a total sample of 311 teeth. The findings showed that three-dimensional imaging does not change the surgical approach when compared to panoramic radiography; however it is considered a useful imaging method to understand the relationship between the lower third molars and the mandibular canal.
Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Tooth, Impacted , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Radiography, PanoramicABSTRACT
The presence of lower lip pits in individuals with Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) may cause discomfort due to saliva secretion. Furthermore, one of the main complaints in relation to lip pits is poor aesthetics, which often affects quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the best technique for the surgical removal of lower lip pits in terms of aesthetic and functional characteristics. A search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus databases was performed on December 27, 2016, which retrieved 88 records without duplicates. Among these papers, three ultimately met all eligibility criteria. The three studies included a total of 61 individuals, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 10 years and sample collection from 10 to 24 years. The findings demonstrated that the outcome of surgical removal of lower lip pits was better with the use of vertical wedge excision, inverted-T lip reduction, Mutaf-Goldstein technique and modified simple excision than with simple excision. Simple excision may result in postoperative complications, such as mucocele and pit recurrence.
